Mar-30-06 J C Fernandez vs I Krasik, 2005
| |
SADDAM: i PLANED TO PLAY 14..NXE5  AND SIMPLY FORGOT.
24/25.... NE3 WINS IMMIDIETLY, THE REST NEEDS NO COMMENT
|
|
| | Mar-30-06 I Krasik vs E Wilson, 2005 
| |
|
SADDAM: 34 B4?!(TRYING TO WIN PERHAPS) BXA LEADS TO SIMPLE =
35 BA1? lAST TIME TO BAIL OUT WITH BXC A1-Q BXA1 qXA1+ KH2 QXE5+ G3 AND MOST LIKELY DRAW. mY EXCUSE IS... i WAS IN TIME PRESSURE.
|
|
| | Jan-31-06 I Schneider vs J Friedel, 2005
| |
|
SADDAM: VEry nice joshua!!!!!! starting move 23~~~~~!@@@@@!!! what a tactic!!
|
|
| | Dec-02-05 FIDE World Cup (2005)
| |
|
SADDAM: this system sucks, to deptermine the winners using blitz,look how many mistakes, blunderes were made, its disgusting to watch. Of ocurse i realize it is a pleasure for many ammateurs to see Gms play like patzers because they dont have any time and because the format puts so much ...
|
|
| | Dec-01-05 Mamedyarov vs N Ibraev, 2005
| |
|
SADDAM: last move should say mate , not check, chessgames.com correct it pleas, nice finish, i have a feeling he hardly broke a sweat during this game
|
|
| | Oct-07-05 Sutovsky vs I Sokolov, 2005
| |
|
SADDAM: brocoli nice one! sokolov his knowledge
|
|
| | Jul-11-05 USA vs Russia Distance Match (2005)
| |
|
SADDAM: mr eric shiller , do u want to test all immigrant and americans alike weather they believe in the ideals you refer to.
|
|
| | Jun-24-05 P H Nielsen vs Carlsen, 2004
| |
|
SADDAM: anyone know the link for analysis at chess cafe???
|
|
| | Jun-24-05 Carlsen vs P H Nielsen, 2004
| |
|
SADDAM: Hey Guys, anyone seen the analysis of this line on chesscafe, please post the link here, i saw it there but lost track. thanks
|
|
| | Jun-13-05 Nakamura vs T Hillarp Persson, 2005
| |
|
SADDAM: Naka VS. Radga:
Nakamura is unpredictable.... Very good at swindling people, often plays with computer precision but also makes many positional errors and his opening is a weakness. Ratings are close but radga has played at the very top and naka has not! But in rapid or blitz match ...
|
|
| | | indicates a reply to the comment. | |
