|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 40 OF 40 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
Aug-25-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: Memo to self: don't play 1 0 right after a crazyhouse game. You can't afford to waste time looking for good places to drop a piece. |
 |
Aug-26-09
 |
| eternaloptimist: <SwitchingQuylthulg> It's very interesting how your user name originated. |
 |
Aug-26-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: Forcing people to spell it serves as a very cheap IQ test. |
 |
Aug-26-09
 |
| eternaloptimist: Yes, haha...provided that they don't know about copy & paste. |
 |
Sep-20-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: A rare occasion today of (for all practical purposes) a former game of the day being used as puzzle of the day: Imbaud vs Strumilo, 1922
M Ahn vs T Ruck, 2007 |
 |
Sep-28-09
 |
| A Karpov Fan: Many thanks for your advice and detailed answer to my question in <Jess>'s place. Looks like I have some work to do :-) |
 |
Oct-04-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: <Natalia Pogonina: There were some attempts to recalculate ratings, but they are speculative. Rating is a measure of how a person does against the competition. Thus comparing 2785 in 1972 to 2785 in 2009 doesn't make too much sense - the player pools are different.> Compare me, yesterday.
<SwitchingQuylthulg: Ratings only ever measure a player's results in and relative to the current pool. Rating differences - which the whole system is based on - do a decent albeit (inevitably, due to limited sample sizes, different opponents and random chance) far from perfect job measuring domination in a pool. Absolute rating numbers on the other hand aren't even meant to measure anything at all. Trying to compare ratings from different pools is the best kind of experiment there is - everybody can draw whatever conclusion suits their views best.> Looks like just because you're a strong player it doesn't necessarily follow you have no understanding of the rating system. |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: Hello Mr. Owls-
Sorry to bother you, but something screwy is up with my FICS account? I noticed today that my autoflag is not working, and yet in my profile it says it is turned on. Then I looked at my recent history, and it says that my last two opponents were jessicafischerqueen. Does this mean my computer is broken?
Hey the next time I am signed in, and you are around, would you consider looking at my profile to see what is wrong? Thanks very much-
Jess |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: Mr. Owls
Ok I just checked again, and now my profile games history is back to normal. But I swear to God that previously it had listed me as playing agaisnt myself. Also, in my last game today- the gentelman resigned, but after he resigned, I was looking at my profile- you know, with the dead game board still on the screen. AND A ROOK MOVED BY ITSELF.
I almost jumped out of my skin!!!
I checked, and my opponent had already logged out.
Plus it WAS MY ROOK THAT HAD MOVED.
How is this possible?
Are there possibly some bugs or gremlins in the FICS program? Also, as a long suffering watcher of my abortive attempt to become a 10/0 player, you may be pleased to notice that I did finally manage to crest the 1200 mark. I'm at a towering 1190 at the moment or something like that. "I've come a long way from my apprecticeship in the lower 1000 range" Good grief. |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: Weird.
Are you sure you weren't looking at the recent game history of somebody else? If you were looking at the history of examickb or Nilcraft for example you would of course see two jessicafischerqueens as the most recent opponents. And of course this would go away when you carefully rechecked. However, this wouldn't account for the autoflag or the ghost rook. The autoflag - were the problems specifically with the auto part? That is, when you tried to flag the guy manually that worked? Otherwise, I'd suspect heavy lag, either with your own connection or (more probably) your opponent's. Anyway, which game(s) did you encounter this problem in? In none of the recent history games did your opponent run out of time. You specified "today" so I presume it would have been a recent history game all the same. Conclusion: nobody ever ran out of time, and somebody's connection was lagging heavily. In reality, the guy resigned with some time still left, and the news took some time to get to you. Alien rook syndrome - I note that you do not, in the final position of your latest game, in fact have a rook. You just testing me? Or have you played more games since? If you have, was it a good move the rook made? As in, did it look like God was trying to nudge you towards some deep and beautiful plan in the position, or was it just an essentially random move? It's quite possible to take moves back in the type of situation you describe. If you did this by accident... (And if it was your latest game, you must have taken moves back to even have a rook to make a move with.) Congrats for your triumphal entry to the lands of slightly less low blitz ratings! I'll make a 1-minute player of you yet. |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: One more thing: go have your stored games against savis and arabisjors adjudicated as an abort and a win for you respectively. (You should probably simply resign the one against AuntyRuth.) |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: Thanks Mr. Owls-
Perhaps this can help.
all of the weird things happened in a game that I was ultimately able to adjourn. So whatever game I adjourned today is the game in question when all the funny stuff happened. Does my record show an adjourned game from today?
In that mystery game, it can't have been lag- his "lag meter" showed just .02- And also, the clock ran up to a minute after.
I also pressed the autoflag command button and nothing happened in that game. I don't remember any Aunty Ruth, but she sounds fishy to me. |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: I can see one game you adjourned today.
HEreigns - jessicafischerque, FICS 10 0, 2009
1. e4 d5 2. e5 e6 3. f4 f6 4. Nf3 c5 5. Game courtesyadjourned by Black. "Courtesyadjourn", as far as I know, is only possible when an opponent has connection problems. So I was right about that one at least. There was nothing wrong with your autoflag; it was just that your opponent hadn't run out of time, but was lagging very, <very> heavily. I can't see any possible rook moves in the final position... |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: THAT'S THE GAME
You are a genius.
Ok- so if I had just waited long enough, I would have been awarded the win, correct? I don't know what to tell you about the Rook phantom. Actually that might have been in another game that I won. So if I had hit "undo move" or something in that game, this would account for the ghost? Thanks again for your great support Mr. Owls. |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: Oh no-
Ok I think I'm finally understanding.
If I had waited long enough, his next move would have come in- then I would have played a move- and then if he was still ultra-lagging I'd have to wait several minutes for his next move, etc. etc. So he was having a horrifying connection problem, and was likely relieved that I adjourned, right? I think I have this right now. |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: No, still no recollection of <Aunty Ruth>. That doesn't sound like me- as my playing record will attest - I've played what- 500,000 10/0 games now? And I've not done that on any other occasion.
I'm not certain but it's possible I was actually disconnected- though given your description of the game, that sounds fishy as well. Possibly this was a moment of pique on my part.
How can I call up the game and resign it?
Do I do that from the console?
Hey is it possible for me to give you <administrator privileges> on my FICS account? Obviously I need a technical manager since I'm too stupid or lazy to actually learn how to use the site. |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: Hey what happened to your last post?
It's gone! |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: Ah ok you were consolidating an edit.
Ok then! |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: It's quite possible your opponent's next move would never have come in. But yes, the scenario you describe was probably spot on. I can't get inside another person's head, so I can't be sure he was relieved you adjourned (or indeed how long it took him to learn you did). But <you> should be relieved you adjourned. Just type "resign AuntyRuth" in the main console. For the other games, go to http://www.freechess.org/Adjudicate/ |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: LOL and now you are doing it again.
Feel free to erase all of my posts here obviously |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: Thanks Mr. Owls-
I shall follow your orders precisely. |
 |
Oct-05-09
 |
| jessicafischerqueen: Oh for the love of
OK I just resigned successfully against Aunty Mame as per your method. And I've just discovered I can't remember my password. It's a wonder my rating isn't 800 when you think about it. I have it written down on something, but whether that something is still in my apartment is anyone's guess. Hang on- my password should be in the original email I got from FICS right? heh-
Maybe I'm not quite so stupid as I'd like to believe... Ok thanks again for your extraordinary patience with me. I think you would make a good parent, or teacher. |
 |
Oct-26-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: RIP Cordner Nelson. |
 |
Oct-28-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: <When you've found a good move, look for a better one!> click for larger view
I was White here in a rare opening experiment (Sicilian) and was of course totally winning anyway. I'm still happy I put enough energy in to find the most effective (and most beautiful!) insta-killer in this position... <25.Bc5!>
...protecting the bishop at b5 while threatening mate in 2 with 26.Qh8+. Black resigned. |
 |
Nov-20-09
 |
| SwitchingQuylthulg: <Good Knight vs. Bad Bishop>
 click for larger viewA most excellent example of the value of placing one's pawns on light squares when the opponent has a dark-squared bishop. One of White's pawns is still on a dark square, and consequently the bishop is threatening to storm out of his prison with a bang: 39...e4+! and 40...Bxh2. White thus brings this plan to an immediate end, completing his light-square bind with 39.e4! (if such an obvious move deserves an exclamation mark)...  click for larger view...and Black is completely lost. |
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 40 OF 40 ·
Later Kibitzing > |