chessgames.com
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum
SwitchingQuylthulg
Member since Apr-16-07
Everybody who checks this because he finds I've just said something absolutely foolish should note that I'm not any kind of superb chess master and, if I'm putting forth my opinion about this move or that game, it's entirely possible that what I've said is indeed absolutely foolish. Chess is not quite my type of braingame and I'm too lazy a person to work on it anyway. I still like the game though :)

On good days I can play chess like a master (that is, outplay FMs in blitz games only to lose on time three moves before mating them...) On a bad day I play chess like a sub-1500... In a minor-piece endgame with my enemy having a knight, I can play like a 255... Occasionally I make stupid blunders just because I'm so fatigued, so don't play me early in the morning, late in the evening or on Thursdays.

I very much enjoy it here at chessgames.com and it's possible I'll actually <buy> a premium membership one day. (More probably I won't, though - much better to get memberships through Chessgames.com Holiday Present Hunt, ChessBookie Game and other methods that don't require money :p) The one thing I dislike here are people who call theirselves "logical", "sensible" or "intellectual", yet never base what they say or think on logic or facts and call the people who do "stupid trolls". Thank CG.com for the ignore list feature. Also I dislike self-righteous people who find they can judge and criticize others but explode at the slightest criticism directed at theirselves. No human is perfect and they should just admit it (I'm an exception, of course.) Note that I very often post sarcastic, ironic or parodying remarks; the number of people who take those literally (and end up getting a message the exact opposite of what I meant) is very worrying so it's fair I put a warning here in my profile. It's also worth noting that many of such people eventually end up on my ignore list for Very Stoopid Behavior... perhaps not spotting sarcasm when it's dancing in front of one with a horned helmet on is in some cases a sign of low intelligence? (Not, of course, in all cases. Some intelligent luminaries regularly fall to it. Sometimes it appears to be a cultural thing. It being so early in the morning they're already drowsy appears to be another contributing factor.)

Some favourite players: Christian Bauer, Normunds Miezis, Edvins Kengis, Tony Miles, Branko Filipovic, Jon Speelman, and Pavel Blatny. What's the one thing these players have in common? 1...b6!! To quote Gyula Breyer: 'After 1 e4 White's game is in its last throes.' 1 e4 is perfectly playable on patzer level, though, because amateurs don't know the refutation. They play moves like 1...e6, allowing White a big space advantage, and 1...e5, weakening their pawn structure. More critical tests are 1...Nf6 and 1...c5, which should allow Black to equalise with accurate play. But why head for mere equalization when your opponent has just weakened his pawns?!?! 1...b6! exploits the weakening move and should give Black a comfortable advantage. One common line goes 1.e4 b6 2.d4 Bb7 3.Bd3 e6 4.c4 f5 5.exf5 Bxg2 6.Qh5+ g6 7.fxg6 Bg7 8.gxh7+ Kf8 and Black stands better! (I'll be posting exhaustive analysis of this line soon... hang on, no I won't, it's no good revealing <all> of one's opening secrets.)

Are you a player desperately in search for a system against 1.e4? Don't worry, friend, help is here. Finally, an easy and solid Black repertoire is available for everybody - the ultimate Owen Defense collection is complete and finished! Game Collection: Owen Defense

>> Click here to see SwitchingQuylthulg's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 13,131 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   SwitchingQuylthulg has kibitzed 2966 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Nov-20-09 SwitchingQuylthulg chessforum
 
SwitchingQuylthulg: <Good Knight vs. Bad Bishop> [DIAGRAM] A most excellent example of the value of placing one's pawns on light squares when the opponent has a dark-squared bishop. One of White's pawns is still on a dark square, and consequently the bishop is threatening to storm out
 
   Nov-18-09 World Blitz Championship (2009) (replies)
 
SwitchingQuylthulg: Predictions of a peaceful draw in Leko-Carlsen were correct.
 
   Nov-15-09 Chessgames Bookie chessforum (replies)
 
SwitchingQuylthulg: <dakgootje> ChessBookie probably hasn't even decided yet when this leg ends and the next starts, but it should pretty much coincide with the end of this year and the beginning of the next.
 
   Nov-14-09 YouRang chessforum (replies)
 
SwitchingQuylthulg: Round 9: Ivanchuk - Kramnik 0-1 Anand - Aronian 0-1 Svidler - Gelfand 1-0 Ponomariov - Morozevich 1-0 Leko - Carlsen 1-0
 
   Nov-12-09 Aronian vs Kramnik, 2009 (replies)
 
SwitchingQuylthulg: You've skipped one, guys. As I've said before, we need a new kibitzing trick to avoid such confusion. Something like CG.com automatically replacing say "###" with "<twentieth!!>" or whatever the appropriate ordinal number is, so we don't have to figure it out ...
 
   Nov-12-09 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
SwitchingQuylthulg: < G Pohla and G Pokhla might be the same person> The former is certainly the correct spelling of his surname. The guy only plays in Estonia, ergo he's an Estonian, and "Pohla" is a reasonably common surname in Estonia while I don't think "kh" even exists in the ...
 
   Nov-11-09 Kramnik vs Ponomariov, 2009 (replies)
 
SwitchingQuylthulg: <chessgames.com> Are you aware that you've created a new player file ( R Ponomariov ) by accident?
 
   Nov-08-09 David Moody (replies)
 
SwitchingQuylthulg: Have a look at brankat chessforum ;-)
 
   Nov-06-09 A Benson (replies)
 
SwitchingQuylthulg: Happy birthday <malthrope>!
 
   Nov-05-09 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
SwitchingQuylthulg: <WRITERS REQUEST> This game has the white queen capturing 11 pieces: M Lyell vs J Friedland, 2001 and is recognized by Tim Krabbé (who is an expert in this sort of thing, and incidentally also a writer) as a record. If that doesn't fit (because it goes on too long,
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

1...b6: The One True Opening

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 40 OF 40 ·  Later Kibitzing >
Aug-25-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: Memo to self: don't play 1 0 right after a crazyhouse game. You can't afford to waste time looking for good places to drop a piece.
Aug-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: <SwitchingQuylthulg> It's very interesting how your user name originated.
Aug-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: Forcing people to spell it serves as a very cheap IQ test.
Aug-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  eternaloptimist: Yes, haha...provided that they don't know about copy & paste.
Sep-20-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: A rare occasion today of (for all practical purposes) a former game of the day being used as puzzle of the day:

Imbaud vs Strumilo, 1922

M Ahn vs T Ruck, 2007

Sep-28-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  A Karpov Fan: Many thanks for your advice and detailed answer to my question in <Jess>'s place.

Looks like I have some work to do :-)

Oct-04-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: <Natalia Pogonina: There were some attempts to recalculate ratings, but they are speculative. Rating is a measure of how a person does against the competition. Thus comparing 2785 in 1972 to 2785 in 2009 doesn't make too much sense - the player pools are different.>

Compare me, yesterday.

<SwitchingQuylthulg: Ratings only ever measure a player's results in and relative to the current pool. Rating differences - which the whole system is based on - do a decent albeit (inevitably, due to limited sample sizes, different opponents and random chance) far from perfect job measuring domination in a pool. Absolute rating numbers on the other hand aren't even meant to measure anything at all. Trying to compare ratings from different pools is the best kind of experiment there is - everybody can draw whatever conclusion suits their views best.>

Looks like just because you're a strong player it doesn't necessarily follow you have no understanding of the rating system.

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Hello Mr. Owls-

Sorry to bother you, but something screwy is up with my FICS account?

I noticed today that my autoflag is not working, and yet in my profile it says it is turned on.

Then I looked at my recent history, and it says that my last two opponents were jessicafischerqueen.

Does this mean my computer is broken?

Hey the next time I am signed in, and you are around, would you consider looking at my profile to see what is wrong?

Thanks very much-

Jess

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Mr. Owls

Ok I just checked again, and now my profile games history is back to normal.

But I swear to God that previously it had listed me as playing agaisnt myself.

Also, in my last game today- the gentelman resigned, but after he resigned, I was looking at my profile- you know, with the dead game board still on the screen.

AND A ROOK MOVED BY ITSELF.

I almost jumped out of my skin!!!

I checked, and my opponent had already logged out.

Plus it WAS MY ROOK THAT HAD MOVED.

How is this possible?

Are there possibly some bugs or gremlins in the FICS program?

Also, as a long suffering watcher of my abortive attempt to become a 10/0 player, you may be pleased to notice that I did finally manage to crest the 1200 mark.

I'm at a towering 1190 at the moment or something like that.

"I've come a long way from my apprecticeship in the lower 1000 range"

Good grief.

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: Weird.

Are you sure you weren't looking at the recent game history of somebody else? If you were looking at the history of examickb or Nilcraft for example you would of course see two jessicafischerqueens as the most recent opponents. And of course this would go away when you carefully rechecked.

However, this wouldn't account for the autoflag or the ghost rook.

The autoflag - were the problems specifically with the auto part? That is, when you tried to flag the guy manually that worked? Otherwise, I'd suspect heavy lag, either with your own connection or (more probably) your opponent's.

Anyway, which game(s) did you encounter this problem in? In none of the recent history games did your opponent run out of time. You specified "today" so I presume it would have been a recent history game all the same. Conclusion: nobody ever ran out of time, and somebody's connection was lagging heavily. In reality, the guy resigned with some time still left, and the news took some time to get to you.

Alien rook syndrome - I note that you do not, in the final position of your latest game, in fact have a rook. You just testing me? Or have you played more games since?

If you have, was it a good move the rook made? As in, did it look like God was trying to nudge you towards some deep and beautiful plan in the position, or was it just an essentially random move?

It's quite possible to take moves back in the type of situation you describe. If you did this by accident... (And if it was your latest game, you must have taken moves back to even have a rook to make a move with.)

Congrats for your triumphal entry to the lands of slightly less low blitz ratings! I'll make a 1-minute player of you yet.

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: One more thing: go have your stored games against savis and arabisjors adjudicated as an abort and a win for you respectively. (You should probably simply resign the one against AuntyRuth.)
Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Thanks Mr. Owls-

Perhaps this can help.

all of the weird things happened in a game that I was ultimately able to adjourn.

So whatever game I adjourned today is the game in question when all the funny stuff happened.

Does my record show an adjourned game from today?

In that mystery game, it can't have been lag- his "lag meter" showed just .02-

And also, the clock ran up to a minute after.

I also pressed the autoflag command button and nothing happened in that game.

I don't remember any Aunty Ruth, but she sounds fishy to me.

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: I can see one game you adjourned today.

HEreigns - jessicafischerque, FICS 10 0, 2009

1. e4 d5 2. e5 e6 3. f4 f6 4. Nf3 c5 5. Game courtesyadjourned by Black.

"Courtesyadjourn", as far as I know, is only possible when an opponent has connection problems. So I was right about that one at least. There was nothing wrong with your autoflag; it was just that your opponent hadn't run out of time, but was lagging very, <very> heavily.

I can't see any possible rook moves in the final position...

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: THAT'S THE GAME

You are a genius.

Ok- so if I had just waited long enough, I would have been awarded the win, correct?

I don't know what to tell you about the Rook phantom. Actually that might have been in another game that I won.

So if I had hit "undo move" or something in that game, this would account for the ghost?

Thanks again for your great support Mr. Owls.

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Oh no-

Ok I think I'm finally understanding.

If I had waited long enough, his next move would have come in- then I would have played a move- and then if he was still ultra-lagging I'd have to wait several minutes for his next move, etc. etc.

So he was having a horrifying connection problem, and was likely relieved that I adjourned, right?

I think I have this right now.

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: No, still no recollection of <Aunty Ruth>.

That doesn't sound like me- as my playing record will attest - I've played what- 500,000 10/0 games now?

And I've not done that on any other occasion.

I'm not certain but it's possible I was actually disconnected- though given your description of the game, that sounds fishy as well.

Possibly this was a moment of pique on my part.

How can I call up the game and resign it?

Do I do that from the console?

Hey is it possible for me to give you <administrator privileges> on my FICS account?

Obviously I need a technical manager since I'm too stupid or lazy to actually learn how to use the site.

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Hey what happened to your last post?

It's gone!

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Ah ok you were consolidating an edit.

Ok then!

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: It's quite possible your opponent's next move would never have come in. But yes, the scenario you describe was probably spot on. I can't get inside another person's head, so I can't be sure he was relieved you adjourned (or indeed how long it took him to learn you did). But <you> should be relieved you adjourned.

Just type "resign AuntyRuth" in the main console. For the other games, go to http://www.freechess.org/Adjudicate/

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: LOL and now you are doing it again.

Feel free to erase all of my posts here obviously

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Thanks Mr. Owls-

I shall follow your orders precisely.

Oct-05-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: Oh for the love of

OK I just resigned successfully against Aunty Mame as per your method.

And I've just discovered I can't remember my password.

It's a wonder my rating isn't 800 when you think about it.

I have it written down on something, but whether that something is still in my apartment is anyone's guess.

Hang on- my password should be in the original email I got from FICS right?

heh-

Maybe I'm not quite so stupid as I'd like to believe...

Ok thanks again for your extraordinary patience with me. I think you would make a good parent, or teacher.

Oct-26-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: RIP Cordner Nelson.
Oct-28-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: <When you've found a good move, look for a better one!>


click for larger view

I was White here in a rare opening experiment (Sicilian) and was of course totally winning anyway. I'm still happy I put enough energy in to find the most effective (and most beautiful!) insta-killer in this position...

<25.Bc5!>

...protecting the bishop at b5 while threatening mate in 2 with 26.Qh8+. Black resigned.

Nov-20-09
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: <Good Knight vs. Bad Bishop>


click for larger view

A most excellent example of the value of placing one's pawns on light squares when the opponent has a dark-squared bishop. One of White's pawns is still on a dark square, and consequently the bishop is threatening to storm out of his prison with a bang: 39...e4+! and 40...Bxh2.

White thus brings this plan to an immediate end, completing his light-square bind with 39.e4! (if such an obvious move deserves an exclamation mark)...


click for larger view

...and Black is completely lost.

Jump directly to page #    (enter number from 1 to 40)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 40 OF 40 ·  Later Kibitzing >

Donate to Worldwide Chess Learning
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific user and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2009, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies