chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum
Tiggler
Member since May-04-12 · Last seen Jul-03-15
I am only a butterfly dreaming of being Chuang Zhu, dreaming of being Tiggler.

Favorite WCs all time: Kasporov, Alekine, Botvinnik, Lasker, Capablanca. Best of the rest: Nimzovitch, Rubinstein, Korchnoi, Keres. Bring back the 24 game WC matches and 12+ game candidates matches so that we can have heroic champs and challengers again. Kasparov, Alekhine, Botvinnik, Lasker, Capablanca, Steinitz, Nimzovitch, Tal, Morphy, Anand, Karpov, Fischer, Rubinstein, Keres ....

Apart from actual chess, the two topics that keep me coming back to this site are the mysteries of the Elo and related ratings schemes, and the the even more strange oddities of chess search engines.

With respect to ratings, I don't mean the routine operation of the calculations, but the scale which these operations create, sui gerenis. What is the mathematical basis, and is it reduceable to a Haar measure? Is there any reality hiding behing the statistical artifact? Are there undiscovered truths about the distribution of ratings points, and do they regress to the mean?

Engines are a big mystery to us. Not so big a mystery to us as we to them, however. <DcGentle> has a zealous purpose to create an engine that understands positional chess. If he succeeds, he will also create an engine that might be mistaken for a human, and whose moves will be explicable. My interest is more prosaic: to understand the engines in their own terms. Why do they not seem to perform correct searches at the depth they advertise. Would a better search result in more "chessic truth"? They are designed to win at short(ish) time controls, and compromise their searches to do it. But CC players need the really best moves, not some practical compromise. They don't build engines for that, so how can we trick the engines that we do have into finding the best moves, and not just winning because their blunders are not awful?

These questions lack answers, so if you have the answers, please be so kind as to post them in my chessforum.

Since I first wrote my profile I have revised my all-time favorites hall-of-fame. As before, Fischer is struggling to keep a place in the top ten. The main change, of course, is to include Carlsen, who has now not only won the world title, but also defended it. I now rank him ~even with Anand, whom he has beaten twice, though Anand remains his strongest challenger (written 4/28/2015) after a very enduring career with two defenses of the uncontested title.

Here is my current list:

1. Garry Kasparov
2. Mikhael Botvinnik
3. Alexander Alekhine
4. Raoul Capablanca
5. Emmanuel Lasker
6. Anatoly Karpov
7. Wilhelm Steinitz
8/9. Vishwanath Anand/Magnus Carlsen
10-13. Robert Fischer/ Mikhail Tal/ Paul Keres/ Vasily Smyslov 14. Tigran Petrosian
15-18. Aron Nimzovitsch/ Akiba Rubinstein/ Viktor Korchnoi/ Boris Spassky 19/20. Vladimir Kramnik/ Max Euwe

The above list includes all the recognized World Champions, plus the four best who never achieved that honor. Notably absent are Morphy and Philidor, who are the claimants most difficult to classify. If I were to include Morphy, I think he might bump Fischer et al. from the top ten, and Fischer from the no 1 spot among US players.

Comments on the above are welcome, of course.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Tiggler has kibitzed 4860 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jul-02-15 B Bok vs M Bluvshtein, 2011
 
Tiggler: <davidseven: Tiggler, have you ever used the Tiger Chess Engine?> Nope. I just use free version of Houdini.
 
   Jun-30-15 D M Adams vs M Lyell, 2007 (replies)
 
Tiggler: <MindCtrol9> <Nobody should have not had any problem to see the solution in no time at all.> Parsing that sentence is a Sunday problem.
 
   Jun-28-15 M Krasenkow vs Nakamura, 2007 (replies)
 
Tiggler: <JimfromProvidence> Houdini confirms that 23.Bd4 is white's best try to extend the game. It's futile, but it avoids the immediate checkmate.
 
   Jun-24-15 A Giri vs Topalov, 2015 (replies)
 
Tiggler: <offramp: If +10-Giri does end up winning then it'll go down as one of his best wins. He'll have beaten the leader of the tournament, who is clearly on top form. I'd love to see a Giri-Caruana match.> Brilliancy prizes have gone out of style, but this game would get my vote. ...
 
   Jun-23-15 Louis F Stumpers (replies)
 
Tiggler: <ughaibu: Any theories as to why "asparagus" is uncountable?> No, but I prefer it to broccoli. I can manage one broccolo, just about.
 
   Jun-23-15 Topalov vs Caruana, 2015 (replies)
 
Tiggler: <MindCtrol9: Topalov will resign soon.> More likely draw by repetition after a few more moves.
 
   Jun-22-15 Carlsen vs Nakamura, 2015 (replies)
 
Tiggler: Carlsen is playing sitzkreig. All Naka has to do is make sure to keep enough time to visit the bathroom. Maybe he'll play something psychological, like ordering a pizza.
 
   Jun-22-15 Norway Chess (2015) (replies)
 
Tiggler: <Conrad93: And Nakamura loses to Carlsen again. He just can't get a lucky break, can he?> Maybe Carlsen will flag, just to be fair. The position is drawn.
 
   Jun-22-15 W Leimeister vs K Berggren, 2011 (replies)
 
Tiggler: <Tiggler: ... Never saw a triple solution like this before.> And I still have not. Two of my "mate" positions are illusions. But here is a consolation: after black's move 16, white can announce mate in 6, and there are two ways to do it.
 
   Jun-22-15 Smyslov vs Hort, 1973
 
Tiggler: <abuzic: 27.Nf6+ Kh8 28.Nxh7 Kxh7 29.Bxe5 Rxe5 30.Qh3+ <this is stronger the other options> Kg8 31.Rxf7> This was my solution also. It wins by force, even though it is second best to 27. Bxe5 etc.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Never kid a kidder

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Dec-30-14  Nickster: To see the actual data go to:

http://data.hugnetlab.com/

Select 'View' for 'Dog Bone Test'. Check 'Update With New Data' to get periodic live updates.

They are now doing calibration tests. This is without the 'fuel'. This is needed for a baseline. The loaded test will be done later.

This is going to take a while. Very slow moving but for someone playing Corr. chess I guess maybe not so slow.

Dec-30-14  Nickster: The test is over. Results are negative. No excess heat. You come to your own conclusions.

In the coming days/months the MFMP team will try different fuel combinations.

Dec-31-14  yskid: Happy New Year to all!
Thank you Tiggler for letting us use your site for LENR posting. Thank you Nickster to bringing E-Cat to our attention.
Jan-01-15  ketchuplover: peaceful 2015 to ye
Jan-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: Happy New Year to all, and thanks to those who left their greetings here, especially that rare bird, the ketchu plover.
Mar-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <Nickster> I just moved my copy of the pdf file "lugano report" to the recycle bin. I guess it is safe to assume this topic belongs there.
Mar-31-15  Nickster: <Tiggler> I have not been posting much because I am waiting for a 'credible' replication to happen. So far nothing. Zilch. But things have been happening in the world of LENR (Low Energy Nuclear Reactions).

For all the news/gossip E-cat World has grown enormously in the last few months.

http://www.e-catworld.com/

This is the place for the latest news.

The controversial 'lugano report', even with all it's flaws, has had a strong impact in the world of LENR. There has been a 'resurgence' of sorts. While in the past cold fusion was practically a taboo subject, it has now been given a second chance.

Even though it's still considered 'pseudoscience' some scientists are at least willing to look at it. Many countries have publicly started LENR research programs. Countries like Sweden, India, Japan etc. Where all this will lead to I'm not sure.

Mar-31-15  Nickster: There are some big players coming into the scene.

Airbus, a multi-billion dollar company, has recently submitted a patent application for LENR. Surprisingly similar to the Rossi patent application.

http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/2...

'Airbus Representatives to Attend LENR-Cities Event on April 10 in Milan — Another ‘Very Big Group’ interested in LENR Research'

I guess we will have to wait until April 10 to find out who this ‘Very Big Group’ is.

Mar-31-15  Nickster: There are some who are claiming success at replication.

Italian company Prometeon:

http://www.e-catworld.com/2015/03/0...

More importantly is the work of Russian physicist named Alexander G. Parkhomov. His first report from Dec.25 (translated into english) can be found here:

http://www.e-catworld.com/wp-conten...

A second replication lasting 3 days was claimed last week. The report (translated into english) can be found here:

https://docs.google.com/document/d/...

Dr.Parkhomov is retired and is willing to share his findings.

Mar-31-15  Nickster: As I mentioned in a previous post MFMP (Martin Fleischmann Memorial Project) attemted a Parkhomov replication. The attempts were broadcast live:

https://www.facebook.com/MartinFlei...

First attempt: No Excess heat found. Apparently the hydrogen had leaked out before reaching the desired temperature.

Second Attempt: Fixed leak. After reaching a certain temperature the reactor ... exploded !!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dDf...

Hmm. Bob Greenyer, one of the MFMP scientists, decided to fly down to Moscow and meet with Dr.Alexander Parkhomov. Pictures were taken of his setup. More importantly exact FUEL SAMPLES were taken. Once back from his trip samples of the fuel were shipped to labs around the world (I think four or five). Attempts at replication are now being attempted.

Is Parkhomov another quack or did he release the cat out of the bag? I guess we'll know the results in the coming weeks.

Mar-31-15  Nickster: Meanwhile Singor Rossi has been doing exactly what he said he would be doing. He has built a 1 MW plant and it's being tested now. Some pictures were released:

http://andrea-rossi.com/1mw-plant/

A quick google search states that 1 MW can power 1000 homes. A couple of points:

- Plant producing heat not electricity.

- Plant is portable. Consists of two containers.

- One containing plant and one is the control room.

- It has been in operation the last few months.

- Initially had some issues but now running smoothly.

- The trial period will end around the end on the year.

- Results of the one year trial (Positive or Negative) will be posted.

- If results Negative the customer will NOT pay.

Mar-31-15  Nickster: That's it for now. Everything is moving slowly ... ever so slowly. Anyway I continue to follow this story. Hey it's not costing me anything ...
Mar-31-15  yskid: <Mar-31-15 Nickster: That's it for now. Everything is moving slowly ... ever so slowly. Anyway I continue to follow this story. Hey it's not costing me anything ...>I agree, cost nothing to follow. I periodically check only Vortex. Last I saw that Rossi's patent application was rejected. This Airbus news is worth to take a note of IMHO, although nothing will mean much until some hard facts are supplied (and proven) about where the energy comes from (like what Kubre requested).
Mar-31-15  Nickster: <yskid> Yes the Airbus news is intriguing. Airbus is a VERY big company:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airbus

It would seem that Airbus has been interested in LENR for quite some time now. A few months ago on Jan. 10/11 a LENR-Cities conference was held at Magdelene College at Oxford University, UK. Airbus Group Innovations Vice-President and Chief Scientist Jean-François Geneste gave a presentation. Jean-François Geneste seems to be some kind of genius and has an impressive bio:

http://translate.google.com/transla...

One of the attendees, Mika Helsingius, Senior Scientist at the Finnish Defense Research Agency wrote this on LinkedIn:

"It was interesting event and there was a wide range of different people there. After the presentations it came even more clear, that using "nanoscale" instead of "nuclear" in LENR is justified as there might lie a whole world of different phenomena and not just anomalous heat effects. I had many interesting discussions, and one is always learning something new. LENR seems to be gaining momentum, even though it is not so visible in public.

"The talk by Airbus was very good, it made it more clear why they wanted to be in. It seems that many companies are interested, but LENR is still a delicate topic. I got the impression, that the energy sector seems to be more active than they say openly."

https://www.linkedin.com/groups/LEN...

A few months later Airbus Files a Patent for LENR ‘Power-Generating Device‘.

LENR-Cities will be hosting another conference in Milano this 10th of April. Airbus Group Chief Scientist, Jean-Francois Geneste will be attending. It should be interesting ...

Apr-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <Nickster> Thanks for the updates. I'm still a believer in "buy the rumor, sell the news." The rumor is getting a bit long in the tooth now, so I'm not buying.
Apr-09-15  yskid: <Mar-31-15 Nickster: <yskid> Yes the Airbus news is intriguing. Airbus is a VERY big company:

.....

Jean-François Geneste seems to be some kind of genius and has an impressive bio:

http://translate.google.com/transla...

One of the attendees, Mika Helsingius, Senior Scientist at the Finnish Defense Research Agency wrote this on LinkedIn:

"It was interesting event and there was a wide range of different people there. After the presentations it came even more clear, that using "nanoscale" instead of "nuclear" in LENR is justified as there might lie a whole world of different phenomena and not just anomalous heat effects. I had many interesting discussions, and one is always learning something new. LENR seems to be gaining momentum, even though it is not so visible in public

.....>In his book, A Different Universe (2005), Prof. Robert B. Laughlin ( http://large.stanford.edu/ ), more specifically in chapter 9, The Nuclear Family, especially P. 111, although more or less throughout whole book, writes about indications of "certain uncertainties" in connection with matter and how "things might work". Observing from the sides, IMO, it is important to keep an open mind and realize that "science is NOT settled", not even in basics.

Apr-16-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: I recently installed Turingkibitzer on my systems. It responds to posts addressed to any of my usernames, generates new comments at fora that my usernames might frequent, creates new threads on topics of interest and generally maintains the active presence of all persona associated with me.

In order to maintain control I merely have to make a few posts a week that the system uses for learning.

So far it has gone undetected, which is the criterion implied by the name of the product.

Apr-25-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <<Tiggler> <AylerKupp> How come you want to make this personal?

<Have you read the FIDE Laws of Chess? If you haven't I suggest that you do so.>

If you want to post insults again do it on my forum>

Sorry for the belated response (I don't look at my forum very often). That was not meant to be either personal or an insult. If it appeared that way to you (and I now see how it could) I apologize, that was not my intent. There were many posts from many people on this seemingly emotional subject that indicated to me that they apparently had not read the FIDE Laws of Chess, and I suggested to most of them that they do so, just to educate themselves.

I took your comment that "My guess is that it was because of Rich's previous threat. He painted himself into that corner." in error as indication that you were not familiar with the FIDE Laws of Chess (and hence were guessing) which indicate (section 12.8) that a player who repeatedly refuses to comply with the Laws of Chess be penalized by the loss of the game. So I didn't think that Rich has painted himself into a corner, he was just doing his job (section 13.1) and strictly following the FIDE Laws of Chess. And that just to make sure that So was aware of the consequences, he told So what they would be if there was another laws violation.

Again, sorry that this happened, I didn't mean it the way it came across.

Apr-29-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <I took your comment that "My guess is that it was because of Rich's previous threat. He painted himself into that corner." in error as indication that you were not familiar with the FIDE Laws of Chess>

No, I don't think the FIDE Laws are perfect, but they are not bad enough to justify this particular travesty. If the FIDE Laws were to blame, then it would be more depressing, but we all know that officious arbiters and unsporting players are part of the game.

If I had been arbiter I would have confiscated So's notes, added 5 minutes to Akobian's clock, and told the latter to sit his fat ass down and play chess. How would that decision not have been in accordance with FIDE Laws? (omit the "his fat ass" part from the official record - I did not really say that).

Apr-30-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <Tiggler> I kind of agree with you, except that I think that the arbiter should have done that on So’s <second> violation instead of giving So another warning. The concept of progressive discipline is well established, and it might have made So wake up and take notice, or at least ask for a clarification of the rules. Giving him two warnings might have made So thought that the threat of a forfeit on a third violation was not a serious one. It might have avoided what happened next.

It was an unfortunate incident and I don’t think that there was any malice on So’s part. Still, I think that So was the guiltier (or, perhaps, the more “remiss” of the two), particularly since apparently several of So’s friends and teammates had mentioned to him in the past that he was doing was against the Laws of Chess. I don’t know about you but if I think that what I’m doing is fine but several people whose opinion I trust tell me otherwise, I would wonder a little bit and double check to make sure that what I was doing was not in error. And I certainly would have asked the arbiter for a clarification of the rules after being told that I was violating them a second time. Besides, it is the player’s responsibility to be aware of the FIDE Laws of Chess and ask for clarification in any areas that he/she is unsure about, not the arbiter or any member of the tournament committee to explain them to the players.

One think that I am not sure about is Akobian’s knowledge of So’s previous violations. Most everyone seems to think that he was aware of them because of his position in the appeals committee in this tournament and therefore he was looking for a free win. But I am not sure about that. Unless the arbiter had stopped So’s clock during each game and publicly admonished him about his violations, So’s previous violations would not have been public. And as an arbiter I would not have done that; I would have taken So aside during one of the times that he left the table or, at worst, stopped the clock, pulled him aside, and admonished him privately. And the subject would not have been brought up before the appeals committee and Akobian would not have known either about So’s 2 previous violations or that the arbiter had told So that he would forfeit his game on his 3rd violation.

Of course, I wasn’t the arbiter and I wasn’t there, so I don’t know what really happened. Hopefully this incident is all behind us and So can concentrate on playing chess and resolving his family situation.

May-01-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <Hopefully this incident is all behind us>

Since no one can point to a similar incident in living memory, one can be pretty sure it will not be forgotten. One hopes the St. Louis Chess Club has learned something.

May-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: I guess that we will just have to agree to disagree. I fail to see what the St. Louis Chess Club might have learned from this incident other than, by following the FIDE Laws of Chess when a player that violates them is supported by a lot of his fans, that they should expect a lot of vitriol and not be surprised by it. Vitriol which, IMO, is entirely uncalled for. Oh well, live and learn.
May-02-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <AylerKupp> I had in mind that they will not be able to appoint Rich as Chief Arbiter next year, and that they must not put playing participants on the appeals panel. Nor should persons on the appeals panel be giving video interviews about matters that they will have to rule on.

You may think that is unfair to Rich, but I say that does not matter: the tournament should not be about him, and he will only be a distraction if appointed again.

May-04-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: I guess we still disagree. I see no reason why the St. Louis Chess Club would not be able to appoint Rich as Chief Arbiter next year since the only thing that he was "guilty" of was doing the job that he was required to do. As far as putting playing participants on the appeals panel I believe that this is common practice, but I am not sure. I think that it is a good idea to have a player on the appeals panel since that way there is a better chance of the players' viewpoint to be represented. And putting a playing player on the appeals committee seems more cost effective than bringing in a non-playing player, paying him/her transportation, lodging, meals, etc.

I do not recall any mention of Akobian being on the appeals panel as influencing his decision to inform Rich that So's note writing/usage was distracting him. And, unless the warnings to So were made in public , he would not have been aware that previous warnings had been issued nor of Rich informing So that he would be forfeited after a third violation. If the warnings were made in private (which is what I would have done in order to avoid embarassing the offending player and distracting the other players), there is no way that Akobian would have known about them unless either So or Rich told him. And I would doubt that either of them would have. And even if Akobian was a member of the appeals board he would not have found out about anything until an appeal was made.

The tournament was not about Rich, it was about the players. It was So that violated the FIDE Laws of Chess, not Rich, and it was So that brought attention to the incident. The tournament will be remembered because So repeatedly violated the FIDE Laws of Chess and was therefore forfeited, not because of the actions that Rich took.

As far as Rich being a distraction, I wouldn't know; I am not a player. Only the players would know whether his presence would be a distraction. And So seems to have accepted the situation and seems to be OK with the penalties that were issued. If So seems OK with it, I don't see why it should be a distraction to other players but, again, what I think is not relevant.

May-08-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  Tiggler: <I see no reason why the St. Louis Chess Club would not be able to appoint Rich as Chief Arbiter next year>

Of course they could: it just would not be very smart. Just as Rich's choice was not, though of course he could.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 15)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·  Later Kibitzing>

from the Chessgames Store
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. Don't post personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific user and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2015, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies