chessgames.com
 
Chessgames.com User Profile
Vischer
Member since Mar-07-04
My favorite players are Vishy and Fischer. I haven't been playing chess seriously for long, just since November 2003, but I take lessons from Larry Kaufman and really enjoy the game. And I am also Vischer on ICC.
>> Click here to see Vischer's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   Vischer has kibitzed 337 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Apr-16-05 Taylor vs Dreyer, 1934 (replies)
 
Vischer: Ah I guess it doesn't matter because 6.Ng5 just wins immediately
 
   Dec-11-04 D Barua vs Gulko, 1993 (replies)
 
Vischer: hehe I was going to sac the wrong COLORED piece; didn't even notice it was black to play and win.
 
   Nov-25-04 Russian Championships 2004 (2004) (replies)
 
Vischer: in all the names endingin -eev like Bareev, Dreev, Timofeev, is it pronounced "eve" or is it pronounced "EH-ev"?
 
   Nov-21-04 Savchenko vs S Smagin, 1992 (replies)
 
Vischer: <chessgames.com> <this particular puzzle was taken from a collection of tactics specially chosen to confound computers> That sounds interesting; I don't know exactly how one makes a puzzle specially to confound computers but it might be fun to see the puzzles, and also ...
 
   Oct-22-04 Gulko vs Volovich, 1968 (replies)
 
Vischer: Interesting line is 25...Kf8 26.Ng5 Qc6 ...
 
   Sep-28-04 Kramnik vs Leko, 2004 (replies)
 
Vischer: GO LEKO!
 
   Sep-25-04 Leko vs Kramnik, 2004 (replies)
 
Vischer: I think 36.Rc1 would have led to a different result. I was sure Leko could At LEAST draw this! BOO 0-1!
 
   Sep-17-04 Ganguly vs Harikrishna, 2004
 
Vischer: 5...Bd6 isn't a horrible move, it is the stoneware defense and is similar to 4...Bd6 in the four knights or 4...Bd6 in the larsen. Black continues with 0-0, Re8, and Bf8 getting the good setup of K
 
   Aug-28-04 Anand vs Kramnik, 2004 (replies)
 
Vischer: <If you are playing against an opponent who opens 1.e4, the best winning chances seem to be in the sicilian defense. While white has a "ready made attack" as <NM Larry Kauffman> describes in his magnificent book "The chess advantage in black and white," he suggests that ...
 
   Aug-13-04 C Crouch vs S Kindermann, 1978
 
Vischer: Why doesn't 5.Be2 just outright refute the latvian gambit?
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2009, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies