Apr-16-05 Taylor vs K Dreyer, 1934 
| |
|
Vischer: Ah I guess it doesn't matter because 6.Ng5 just wins immediately
|
|
| | Dec-11-04 D Barua vs Gulko, 1993 
| |
|
Vischer: hehe I was going to sac the wrong COLORED piece; didn't even notice it was black to play and win.
|
|
| | Nov-25-04 Russian Championships 2004 (2004) 
| |
|
Vischer: in all the names endingin -eev like Bareev, Dreev, Timofeev, is it pronounced "eve" or is it pronounced "EH-ev"?
|
|
| | Nov-21-04 S Savchenko vs S Smagin, 1992 
| |
|
Vischer: <chessgames.com> <this particular puzzle was taken from a collection of tactics specially chosen to confound computers> That sounds interesting; I don't know exactly how one makes a puzzle specially to confound computers but it might be fun to see the puzzles, and also ...
|
|
| | Oct-22-04 Gulko vs Volovich, 1968 
| |
Vischer: Interesting line is 25... f8 26. g5 c6 ...
|
|
| | Sep-28-04 Kramnik vs Leko, 2004  Sep-25-04 Leko vs Kramnik, 2004 
| |
|
Vischer: I think 36.Rc1 would have led to a different result. I was sure Leko could At LEAST draw this! BOO 0-1!
|
|
| | Sep-17-04 Ganguly vs Harikrishna, 2004
| |
Vischer: 5...Bd6 isn't a horrible move, it is the stoneware defense and is similar to 4...Bd6 in the four knights or 4...Bd6 in the larsen. Black continues with 0-0, Re8, and Bf8 getting the good setup of
|
|
| | Aug-28-04 Anand vs Kramnik, 2004 
| |
|
Vischer: <If you are playing against an opponent who opens 1.e4, the best winning chances seem to be in the sicilian defense. While white has a "ready made attack" as <NM Larry Kauffman> describes in his magnificent book "The chess advantage in black and white," he suggests that ...
|
|
| | Aug-13-04 C Crouch vs S Kindermann, 1978
| |
|
Vischer: Why doesn't 5.Be2 just outright refute the latvian gambit?
|
|
| | indicates a reply to the comment. | |