Nov-16-09 Tal Memorial (2009) 
| |
|
arnaud1959: <Sounds familiar, wasn't it one of Kramnik's former seconds who said that this is exactly how Kramnik prepares? Takes a computer line and prepends his own positional evaluation.> Does anyone believe that there are some super GM's (or even GM's)who trust 100% the computer ...
|
|
| | Nov-13-09 Morozevich vs Svidler, 2009
| |
|
arnaud1959: Or in the following position:
[DIAGRAM]
Black plays Qh7+ and his flag falls. The position is drawn the same way as it would be mate without Bb1 according to the rules.
|
|
| | Nov-13-09 Kramnik vs Leko, 2009
| |
|
arnaud1959: <Sastre> Yes, I thought it was obvious. Now they were just willing to draw and they simply chose a continuation that both knew. At this level they don't need to talk to each other before the game. They can decide to draw on the board.
|
|
| | Nov-11-09 Max Lange vs NN, 1855
| |
|
arnaud1959: the same pun could have been used for Kick Langeweg
|
|
| | Nov-09-09 Korchnoi vs Suetin, 1953
| |
|
arnaud1959: 24.Ng7 Nbd3+ followed by Kxg7 leads apparently to nothing for white.
|
|
| | Nov-06-09 Ponomariov vs Aronian, 2009
| |
|
arnaud1959: <Marmot PFL> You're right. I was thinking about 7.Nf3 variation like in Kramnik vs Anand, 2009
|
|
| | Nov-05-09 R Byrne vs Fischer, 1963
| |
|
arnaud1959: The Bishop cannot be on g7 in Slav. I agree though that this is a pure Grunfeld.
|
|
| | Nov-05-09 Aronian vs Svidler, 2009
| |
|
arnaud1959: One week ago those two played the same grunfeld against each other. They seem to be happy with it.
|
|
| | Oct-31-09 17th European Team Championship (2009)
| |
|
arnaud1959: <hand banana: carlsen's excuse was that kasparov hates kramnik and had to make sure he prepares magnus to beat kramnik at all costs.> 1)Is this an answer to another post?
2)Did Carlsen really say that?
3)Did Kasparov really say that?
4)Is there already a match ...
|
|
| | Oct-28-09 Shirov vs I Papaioannou, 2009
| |
arnaud1959: 41. e3 is simply amazing. Other moves don't work. 41.h7  xc4 or 41. c8+
|
|
| | |
