chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum
chesstoplay
Member since Feb-13-06 · Last seen Oct-01-14
********** ----- Fritz and Rybka Chess Analysis Engines Forum ----- **********

Hi and welcome.

My name is Peter. I am a USCF Life Member.

I have been a USCF Delegate, TD and Certified Chess Coach.

I am in my mid 50s and love chess.

My love of chess is far greater than my ability OTB.

I've been back to the game for 5 years after a 30 year gap.

My wife and I are patrons of chess in our area.

Please help us create more chess for everyone.
________________________________________________-
_

********** ----- Fritz and Rybka Chess Analysis Engines Forum ----- **********

< Begun 10/15/ 2007 > Please add great tips and ideas.

Key shortcuts:

http://www.chessbase.com/support/su...

MARCH 10, 2002 by Steve Lopez

OPTIMIZING A CHESS ENGINE'S STRENGTH
________________________________________________-
__

http://www.chessbase.com/support/su...

FEBRUARY 24, 2002 by unknown

SETTING HASH TABLES
________________________________________________-
__

http://www.k4it.de/index.php?topic=...

Nalimov Endgame table bases
________________________________________________-
__

Free chess engines can be found in the following:

http://www.rybkachess.com/index.php...

http://www.chessok.com/ = a Rybka web site per ahmadov

http://www.superchessengine.com/

https://netfiles.uiuc.edu/acozzie2/...

http://www.superchessengine.com/tog...

http://www.playwitharena.com/

http://www.chesslab.com/PositionSea...

http://www.superchessengine.com/fru...

>> Click here to see chesstoplay's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   chesstoplay has kibitzed 2742 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Sep-29-14 The World vs Naiditsch, 2014 (replies)
 
...
 
   Jul-25-14 RandomVisitor chessforum (replies)
 
...
 
   Jul-08-14 hms123 chessforum (replies)
 
chesstoplay: <team kids can win> I love what you wrote: < my goal with <team kids can win> was simply to focus on the team games as a dedicated, anonymous member...that is also a way of continuing as an ambassador for chess! > TY! < H > , I agree. Also, I saw your ...
 
   Jun-14-14 DcGentle chessforum (replies)
 
...
 
   Jun-14-14 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
chesstoplay: TY < perfidious > for the idea. I double checked and it is Pattberg. I am now thinking that Pattberg is the company and they were based in NY. But Pattberg does not bring up anything for me on the internet, so I'm stuck.
 
   Feb-16-14 Y Shulman vs D Marciano, 1997 (replies)
 
chesstoplay: About < 19 ... Rf8 > I talked to Yury tonight about this game and move. I showed him that his game was the puzzle of the day. He was pleased by * some happy news *. He referred to the puzzle as < Removing the Guard > Black's LSB and < Clearing the Square > e4.
 
   Feb-06-14 S Williams vs The World, 2013 (replies)
 
chesstoplay: Hi < Tiggler >, Yes, I agree, you didn't! I just loved your line... < Let's play an OTB celebrity who is a bunny at cc. > It made me smile and laugh! I believe chess should bring us many levels of enjoyment. So I used the word < bunny > just for fun. My ...
 
   Jan-27-14 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
chesstoplay: Hi, FYI... I posted this last night on the GM SKW main thread. Not much response yet. If you have something in the hopper, you have our continued offer of financial support. < Hi guys, TY for your TY! I truly care about the continued success of chessgames.com. ...
 
   Jan-19-14 Simon Kim Williams (replies)
 
chesstoplay: < GingerGM >, Thank you for playing a friendly exhibition game with our World Team here at chessgames.com! We all enjoyed your interesting moves from 1. b3 !! It is clear that you are an ambassador of chess. TY again!
 
   Nov-18-13 chesstoplay chessforum (replies)
 
chesstoplay: < DcGentle >, You did a great deal of excellent work. With my players through the years, I have had similar struggles. I learned that their individual styles were not always malleable. Some players, for example, were Knight players no matter what the call of the board was ...
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 27 OF 27 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Sep-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: My condolences , <chesstoplay>.
Sep-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <chesstoplay> I'm so sorry to hear about the loss of your father. I recall what my parents taught and how they carried themselves and simply what they sounded like; this has been much benefit to me

*****

Sep-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  hms123: <Peter>

I am very sorry to hear of your loss. I, too, know how hard it can be.

Sep-28-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Robin Gitte: To Peter: Sorry to hear the bad news. My condolences to you and yours. Robin.
Oct-15-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  hms123: <Peter>

This is my 12,000th post. I put it here as a tribute to all you have done for the site in general, as well as for the opportunities you have provided to me in particular.

Thank you.

Oct-19-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Hello <chesstoplay> I enjoyed your post (over at the main page of Williams vs WT) touching on playing GM's and running a retail chess store.
Oct-20-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Robin Gitte: <chesstoplay> Your comment on my forum appreciated. Bravo.
Oct-20-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  DcGentle: <chesstoplay> I have to agree to <morfishine>, you are a real chess enthusiast and the game needs people like you in order to get more support in all its dimensions. It's not only sport, it's an art form like you said, and it even gives reason for scientific research.

Some kibitzers on this side deride certain GMs, I would never do this.

"Gens Una Sumus". This should not be the Fide motto only, all chess players have something in common: The love for the game.

Ģ

Nov-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: Hi there! I just noticed this in your bio <<My love of chess is far greater than my ability OTB.

I've been back to the game for 5 years after a 30 year gap.>> and thought it's pretty similar to my story. 20yr gap and 3yr back. Just wandered if you have a rating still, because you also said you're a USCF Life *member* and I thought you must mean life master? Do you have a rating floor? The reason I ask is we have people here who call themselves life masters like it's a title as opposed to just being a member of a federation.

Nov-17-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  MarkFinan: <<MarkFinan: Hi Peter. Nice to see you stop by here too, and thanks for sharing that story. I'm starting to think that everyone are Beatles fans now, lol. And 2000-2200 is really good, you must have stayed in chess in some capacity to maintain that kinda level of play, unlike me, I had a straight 20-23ish (bad memory! Not a good thing for a chess player lol ) year's of not playing, and have only been really getting into it all again these past couple of year. Well having friends who are grandmasters must be a great help if you're ever stuck with anything chess related.

I hope you're enjoying the WCC, I really want Carlsen to do it (which I'm sure he will now). I think he could overtake Kasparov as the G.O.A.T by his mid thirties, but in this day and age it's easy for a young man to be distracted by other things! As I know well.

Take care, and pop in whenever you feel. 😃

✌>>

Im just reposting this here Peter, in case you thought I'm ignoring your post at my forum.

Nov-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  DcGentle: <chesstoplay>: Hi! Well, I just read your posting on the WT pages, and because I have decided, not to start a big fight about this move <18... d3> there, I'll comment here about it. It's a critical move, and several ways have been discovered how White might be able to produce a blockade after this move.

Superficially seen, after this move pawn d3 may look like a bone in the throat, as you say, but the truth is, it spoils Black's pawn structure, which otherwise would be suited to lock down the kingside and start a method of restricting White, repeating patterns of the last game.

<imag> has conceded that <3... d3> offers chances for White to draw by producing a blockade.

This could be avoided, would we take the white queen on the spot.

I don't know, what to do. A draw can still be avoided, but after <18... d3> I am skeptical.

Nov-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  chesstoplay: < DcGentle >, You did a great deal of excellent work.

With my players through the years, I have had similar struggles. I learned that their individual styles were not always malleable. Some players, for example, were Knight players no matter what the call of the board was for piece play to come. Others, the same, but they were for their Bishops.

Is your move good? Yes.

Is it one of a few good moves? Yes.

As long as the <World Team > enjoys the experience of this GM's kindness in playing us in this exhibition, it is all good.

Our undefeated record, at least, is certainly not in jeopardy!

Keep working as hard as you have been!

The team needs all key contributors!!

:)

Nov-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  hms123: <DcGentle> Your work and effort are greatly appreciated.
Nov-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  DcGentle: Thank you for your support!

Sometimes it's a sad story, you know, I already mentioned this on the WT main pages, that people just cannot let go of a certain move, because the engine evals are the best. Only engines don't know anything about blockades. A group of teammates have figured the blockade positions after <18... d3> weeks ago, but then other came along "rediscovered" the move (due to good engine evals) and now it's in the lead of the voting.

It's a weakness of the team, that bad news about certain moves don't spread (members don't easily admit that they were not successful there) and so other options will not be regarded.

You know, it's not about <my> move, it's about the possibility to win the game or not. Theoretically <18... d3> offers some chances, I don't deny it, but in this special case Williams will have recognized the inherent blockade options, I am quite sure, he even took an extension for this.

Nov-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  DcGentle: By the way, here is a line that I already posted twice on the WT forum, but the feedback was meager:

[Event "Analysis World Team Game 2013"]
[Site "MyTown"]
[Date "2013.09.17"]
[Round "?"]
[White "White"]
[Black "Black"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ECO "A01"]

1. b3 e5 2. Bb2 Nc6 3. e3 Nf6 4. Bb5 Bd6 5. g4 a6 6. Bf1 h6 7. h3 Be7 8. Bg2 d5 9. Nc3 Be6 10. Nge2 d4 11. Ne4 Nxe4 12. Bxe4 Bd5 13. Ng3 Bxe4 14. Nxe4 Qd7 15. Qf3 Nb4 16. O-O-O Nxa2+ 17. Kb1 Nb4 18. Qf5 Qxf5 19. gxf5 O-O-O 20. Rdg1 Rh7 21. Rg2 Nc6 22. Rhg1 Bf8 23. h4 f6 24. d3 h5 25. Ng3 dxe3 26. fxe3 b6 27. Bc3 Kb7 28. Bd2 Rd7 {<Black start to untangle the queenside.>} 29. Ne4 a5 30. Nc3 Ne7 {<White wants to avoid <e4>... but...>} 31. Rf1 Ng8 {<... now <32. e4> is rather forced, because the knight threatened to go to h6. After this move the knight could be taken by White's bishop.>} 32. e4 Bc5 33. Nd1 Ne7 34. Be3 Bb4 35. Kb2 Nc8 {<The knight is heading to e8. Interestingly the eval drops, because the engine has no clue what's going on. Objectively the knight doesn't improve its position, but it helps getting Black's rook out of the corner.>} 36. Bg1 Be7 37. Ne3 Nd6 38. Nd5 Bd8 39. Nc3 Ne8 40. Be3 Be7 41. Rd1 Bb4 42. Na4 Rh8 43. Bg1 Rf8 44. Be3 Rff7 {<Finished! It took some moves to get the rook there, but now White is doomed. He is in a state of mild Zugzwang, it doesn't really matter what he moves, Black cannot be stopped breaking through on the queenside.>} 45. Bg1 Kc6 46. Ra1 Rd8 47. Be3 b5 48. Nc3 Bxc3+ 49. Kxc3 b4+ 50. Kd2 Kb5 51. Ke2 c5 52. Kf3 Ra7 53. Bf2 Kc6 {<clearing square b5 for the knight.>} 54. Be3 Nd6 55. Rg6 Nb5 56. Kg3 Rdd7 57. Kf3 Na3 58. Rg2 a4 59. bxa4 Rxa4 60. Rag1 c4 61. Ra1 cxd3 62. cxd3 Rxd3 63. Rc1+ Rc3 64. Rxc3+ bxc3 65. Rxg7 Nc2 66. Bh6 Nd4+ 67. Kf2 Ra2+ 68. Ke3 c2 {<White has to give a piece for pawn c2 and can resign. No endgame to play.>} 0-1

I know that not all moves are forced here, but essentially White has no chance, he cannot do anything.

On the other hand, after <18... d3> we must be lucky not to be confronted with a draw.

Nov-18-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  hms123: <DcGentle>

This forum is not hidden.

Nov-19-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  DcGentle: <hms123>: Thanks for the hint, but what I posted is old news anyways, because the move used in this line won't be played.

So no damage done, I guess.

Nov-19-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  hms123: <Peter>

I think you haven't checked the box that says <hide from chessforum activity>. It is last on the list.

Nov-19-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  hms123: <Peter> Much better.
Dec-02-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  DcGentle: Hi <chesstoplay>

This is it, what the team missed:

<The Power Of Pawn Chains>

DcGentle chessforum

Maybe I should post it on the WT pages, but it's too late anyways. But I had to write it down.

Jan-07-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  DcGentle: A belated <Happy New Year>, <chesstoplay> !

Something struck me today, which could be important for my planned chess engine, and I had to write an article: DcGentle chessforum

What do you think about it? Positional play is not easy, but Carlsen demonstrates that it's possible. And we had other masters before Carlsen, of course, Karpov, for example. But was either of them so brilliant?

Capablamca was good, and also Lasker. The latter was a mixture of positional player and tactical genius.

Even Kasparov was more of a tactical player, I guess.

What do you think?

Jan-11-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  DcGentle: <chesstoplay>: You are the soul of this site! Many thanks! :-)
Jun-14-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  DcGentle: <chesstoplay>: Well I saw you visibly pleased about the return of <RandomVisitor>, and I know why. His engines have been a great help to the team in the past, at least in the understanding of most members. But my view is, that the team has ripened in recent years, and perhaps you know that I am working on a new engine with a new paradigm. Is this necessary, you may ask. Yes, it is.

Look at this study (DcGentle chessforum), and you'll see that current engines don't "understand" positional play really. In the meanwhile I know why: Here (DcGentle chessforum) you can read, why current engines are materialistic and only want to win by material gain. This is not only a poor style, but can even miss winning chances. Against GM Naiditsch we'll have to improve <RV>'s engines' suggestions, I am quite sure. We were lucky last time, that our previous opponent didn't use his engines in the way we did, if he did use an engine at all. This time it will be different, most likely. The team has shown that it can do it, but not if everybody works alone.

My new engine shall play positinally, and not try to gain material come hell or high water. Positional play is often much more effective. I cannot claim it will play like Carlsen, but it will most likely often select different moves than the current chess software.

So currently I don't know, how much time I'll have to help with the soon to start analysis, I have to find a compromise, I cannot delay the work for the new engine for ever. Some things are still unclear with the algorithm, and especially here I have to make progress.

Anyways, I will watch the game and maybe contribute, if there are problems.

Greetings,
<DC>

Jun-14-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  DcGentle: <chesstoplay> Hi again, I found two ebay links that might interest you regarding your Pattberg chess board:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-Com...

and

http://www.ebay.com/itm/Vintage-STA...

Unfortunately these items are not available anymore, but it may pay off to watch ebay, whether there are new offers.

All the best,
<DC>

Jul-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  hms123: <Peter>

How are things these days? I hope you and yours are doing well.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 27)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 27 OF 27 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Hardinge Simpole Publishing
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific user and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies