Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing User Profile

Member since Jan-12-09
Bobby Fischer was the best, and the worst, of players. His lasting impact on the chess world is truly immeasurable. Let's enjoy chess! It's not necessary to act like a jackass -- be a good sport and become buddies with other chess players (like Boris Spassky did). You win some, you lose some, you draw some -- your rating does not matter because it will change like the weather if you're active. Allow yourself to enjoy playing, roll w/the punches (respect your opponents -- they know what they're doing too) and don't let the outcome dictate your mood all week.

Beginners must study the pulverizing games of Paul Morphy first. Don't disregard Giachino Greco either. How great could Pillsbury have been? Perhaps the gentleman Carl Schlechter is one of the most underrated old masters. Maybe Wilhelm Steinitz is underrated by history, for many great masters followed shortly after his teachings. It's amazing how well Lasker was able to play into old age. How unfortunate that Capablanca did not get a rematch with Alekhine, and that Alekhine could not stay sober. The most grueling, high-level, evenly-matched world championship battle was Kasparov-Karpov. The great Korchnoi could not touch Kasparov. Did computers taint Kasparov's legacy, or was it Kramnik's Berlin Defense?

I am grateful for the written contributions of Bill Wall and Raymond Keene, among so many others. Horowitz, Lasker, Fine, Minev and C.J.S. Purdy are some of my favorite writers of the past. I prefer Tarrasch over Nimzowitsch; both have their place. Richard Reti (or Max Euwe) is a must read. Lev Albert, Dan Heisman, Gary Lane, Neil McDonald, Cyrus Lakdawala, Tim Taylor, Sam Collins, Jon Watson and John Nunn are some of my favorite contemporary writers. There are many excellent chess writers not mentioned here.

Do not be duped by the special. So many students are publishing their school term papers w/a fancy title, calling it a chess book (that does not live up to the title) and putting it up for sale! This definitely falls under the category of "never judge a book by it's cover!" So much of this stuff is not worthy of being called a book -- it's just slick marketing. Always look at the qualifications/expertise of the author, editor and publisher before making a purchase. I must also say that I'm suspicious of those companies that require a book to be exactly 144 pages in length. It makes me wonder what nuggets of knowledge were left out. Yet, a 144 page book properly written and edited from a reputable chess publishing company is 10X better than the special.

>> Click here to see fredthebear's game collections. Full Member

   fredthebear has kibitzed 1636 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jun-20-18 P Swallow vs R De Coverly, 1988
fredthebear: 25.Rc4 would be uncomfortable for Black.
   Jun-19-18 Kasparov vs Kamsky, 1991 (replies)
fredthebear: Endings with bishops of opposite color are notoriously drawish, so these two GMs called it even.
   Jun-19-18 Ehlvest vs Beliavsky, 1991 (replies)
fredthebear: In the final position, Black is threatening mate on the move, but the Black king is in check and must respond immediately. White has a forced mate by continuously giving check: If 41...f6 42.Qxf6+ Kg8 43.Rd8#. If 41...Kf8/Kg8 42.Qd8+ Kg7 43.Qf6+ Kf8/Kg8 43.Rd8#.
   Jun-19-18 F J Ochoa De Echaguen vs Zsuzsa Polgar, 1992 (replies)
fredthebear: The White king is restricted (by his own doing) to the first rank, the Black king is not. The White kingside pawns will fall.
   Jun-19-18 Judit Polgar vs Piket, 1996
fredthebear: After 50...gxRf4 we have reached a king and pawn ending. White has a 3-2 pawn advantage, but doubled pawns are a real problem in the endgame. The big key here is that the White king cannot come around the middle and leave Black's passed h-pawn to promote. So 51.Kh3 is met by ...
   Jun-18-18 D H Campora vs Anand, 1988
fredthebear: 33...Qg3! certainly was a surprise. It simplifies matters with Black being much more active than White.
   Jun-17-18 C Super vs Mach III, 1989
fredthebear: 19.Kb1?! to avoid the knight+ fork, but it sure looks ugly.
   Jun-17-18 O Bernstein vs Alekhine, 1933
fredthebear: If 17.BxBe7 NxBe7 retreats the en prise Nd5.
   Jun-16-18 Tal vs A Zakharov, 1991 (replies)
fredthebear: 16.Bxe7 offers a decoy sacrifice. If 16...KxBe7 then 17.Nd5+ is a discovered attack on the loose Black queen. She'd capture the knight 17...QxNd5 and then get taken by the White e-pawn 18.exQd5. Queen's are worth three minor pieces, not two. Thus, the Black king declined to ...
   Jun-16-18 Short vs Akopian, 1997
fredthebear: 31...Ne8 looked like a blunder initially. 32.RxNe8 does win a piece, but it allows the Black g3-pawn to race to promotion. The White rook must decline the Black knight in order to guard White's back rank.
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC