chessgames.com
 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum
playground player
Member since Oct-01-06 · Last seen Apr-15-14
NJ--no rating. Favorites, Morphy, Marshall, Anderssen. Played a lot as a teen, then let it go for 40 years. Trying to reconstitute myself as a chess player.

Meanwhile, let this forum serve as a refuge from wild-eyed loony leftism. Here there will be no admiration for Hugo Chavez, Castro, or any of the other tin-pot dictators admired by chess players from the safety of freedom-loving Western democracies. Here will be found a premise that most of the nations of the world today are governed by Godless fools. Ours, too, unfortunately.

I was also going to say some uncomplimentary things about Queen Pawn games, the Sicilian and the French Defenses, Semi-Slav games, and a few other chess matters. But as those are purely questions of personal taste, I have chosen to leave them alone.

Since setting up this forum, I have also had several novels published: "Bell Mountain," "The Cellar Beneath the Cellar," and "The Thunder King." For more information about them (and me), visit my website, http://leeduigon.com/

Update, much delayed: my fourth book, "The Last Banquet," came out last year, and my fifth, "The Fugitive Prince," I expect to be published sometime this Spring. For book covers and free sample chapters, visit my blog.

Update again: "The Fugitive Prince" is out now and the next project is "The Palace." Editing is well advanced, but we're still waiting for a cover.

Chessgames.com Full Member

   playground player has kibitzed 4037 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Apr-15-14 playground player chessforum (replies)
 
playground player: <hms123> Well, that settles it! You is a wiz. BTW, I once interviewed Rip Torn in my office, many years ago, when he was making a movie in the town of Keyport, NJ (and I was editor of the local paper). He was polite and reasonably patient. But after he left, the ...
 
   Apr-10-14 hms123 chessforum (replies)
 
playground player: <hms123> A special heads-up to you, my friend: I've begun work on <The Temple>, a new book (No. 8) in my Bell Mountain series. I don't know how to tell you how happy that makes me. I'm very curious about my sales figures for the first quarter of this year, ...
 
   Apr-10-14 jessicafischerqueen chessforum (replies)
 
playground player: <jessicafischerqueen> Dear Jess, I want to give you a special heads-up: I have just started writing my next book, <The Temple>, Book No. 8 in my Bell Mountain series. It's good to be back in Obann! <Mrs. PGP> pointed out yesterday that <The Palace>
 
   Apr-09-14 Book vs Ingerslev, 1929 (replies)
 
playground player: Shades of Adolph Anderssen...
 
   Apr-09-14 optimal play chessforum (replies)
 
playground player: <optimal play> Boy, I thought I painted with a broad brush, but you're way ahead of me in that department. I went to bed last night preparing to admit, this morning, that I shot from the hip again, responding to your parable. I'd been thinking about it, on and off, ...
 
   Mar-23-14 Phony Benoni chessforum (replies)
 
playground player: <Jim Bartle> Marichal and Spahn it is. Most wins in the 70s is a lot tougher because so many pitchers are bunched up near the top. I plumped for Catfish Hunter, but no dice. The top guy in wins for the 1970s was Jim "Jockey Shorts" Palmer. Circa 1977, there was ...
 
   Mar-23-14 Winkel vs Alkmaar, 1856 (replies)
 
playground player: Are these cities in a fantasy story by Lord Dunsany or Fritz Leiber?
 
   Mar-18-14 Ulhumbrus chessforum (replies)
 
playground player: <Ulhumbrus> Dunsany also wrote probably the best chess story ever, <The Three Sailors Gambit>.
 
   Mar-15-14 NN vs A Schwarz, 1873 (replies)
 
playground player: <offramp> "What did Della wear, boy? She wore a brand new jersey!" Thank you, Perry Como.
 
   Mar-09-14 J Gallagher vs Conquest, 1988 (replies)
 
playground player: King's Gambit Accepted--the saloon's batwing doors fly open with a crash, and in comes Lee Van Cleef with fire in his eyes....
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 153 OF 312 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-11-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier: http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings...
Apr-11-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: I have learned a useful lesson from this year's Republican primary elections.

From now on I'm not going to resign any chess game in which defeat is inevitable. Instead, I'll simply announce that I am suspending my campaign!

Apr-11-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <...a useful lesson from this year's Republican primary elections.

From now on I'm not going to resign any chess game in which defeat is inevitable. Instead, I'll simply announce that I am suspending my campaign!>

lol - Yeah, what's with that?

I suppose it means "I'm going to wait and see if my opponent makes a scandalous blunder, and if so I'll jump back in".

But then it doesn't work as well in chess since your opponent can't move (or blunder) when it's your turn to move. :-)

Apr-11-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <NASA Global Warming Stance Blasted By 49 Astronauts, Scientists Who Once Worked At Agency>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/...

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier: http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings...
Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: <Esteemed Colleagues> This week's column, "Political Debate in a Caliban Culture," is about civility (a subject about which some believe I know very little):

http://www.newswithviews.com/Duigon...

I expect the Shakespeare reference will prove irresistibly attractive to <hms123>

<YouRang> Whoever loses the general election can now say, "I'm suspending my presidential campaign for four years."

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: <OhioChessFan> It seems NASA has lost interest in actually going into outer space. Maybe they've lost the knack for it, too.
Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jim Bartle: I believe it costs money to go to space.

As the astronaut said in "The Right Stuff" (movie, not book): "No bucks, no Buck Rogers."

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: Just for balance: <Attacks on climate science by former NASA staff shouldn't be taken seriously>

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environme...

Apr-12-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Pgp> what happens in Vancouver stays in Vancouver. I might have misremembered the exact name on the signs- I saw them in the neighborhood north of Burrard street downtown, across the street from the Hospital there.
Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier: http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings...
Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier: http://www.digitaljournal.com/artic...
Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: <frogbert> In my home town, two miles across at its widest point, we will hold an election next Wednesday for school board members and approval of the annual school budget. School board elections are always held on unusual days (all the other elections are on Tuesdays in November), so as to depress the voter turnout. The members of any local school board in New Jersey have no autonomy and no authority--I don't know why they bother.

Our proposed budget--for a small town with only four public schools in it--is $30 million and change! Seven and a quarter million bucks per school!

The purpose of these extravagant costs is to enrich teachers' union members and school administrators.

This is why my home state is lurching toward bankruptcy.

<YouRang> "Science denialism?" I'm supposed to take that seriously?

<Esteemed Colleagues> Anyone interested in playing the Albin Countergambit in the Thematic Challenge?

Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <playground player><"Science denialism?" I'm supposed to take that seriously?>

Well, why not?

The referenced article opens with an example:

<A vivid example is the President of South Africa, Thabo Mbeki, who argued against the scientific consensus that HIV caused AIDS. This led to policies preventing thousands of HIV positive mothers in South Africa from receiving anti-retrovirals. It's estimated these policies led to the loss of more than 330,000 lives (Chigwedere 2008). Clearly the consequences of denying science can be dire, even fatal. >

http://www.skepticalscience.com/5-c...

What parts of this article (if any) would you disagree with?

Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: News flash from New Jersey (this'll cheer you up): Newark Mayor Corey Booker was released from the hospital today after being treated for minor injuries suffered when he was wakened early this morning by the house next door to his being on fire. The mayor rushed into the burning building and carried out a woman who would have died if he'd waited for the firemen.

"I'm no hero," Booker said. (We beg to differ!) The primary emotion he felt during the action, he said, was intense fear.

Hats off to Mayor Corey Booker!

<YouRang> I'm feeling mellow for a change, so I don't want to revisit Global Warming at this time.

Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  hms123: <pgp>

I know all about the <Caliban>. They created a tempest in an Afghanistan teapot, right?

I didn't get where I am today by not looking things up on youtube. Here's what I found: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EWN9...

Apr-13-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <I'm feeling mellow for a change...>

Enjoy it while it lasts! :-)

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier: http://www.usccb.org/bible/readings...
Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  playground player: <YouRang> Let me be candid. I'm really not qualified to read this scientist's report and say, "It's a load of hooey," or that scientist's report and say, "This one's right!" We are talking about specialized knowledge which I do not possess. So I think I need to re-state my opposition to the Man-Made Global Warming camp on general principles.

1. No one must <ever> be allowed to wield the kind of raw coercive power that the Warmists are demanding.

2. Anyone who desires that kind of power must <never> be allowed to get it.

3. Because political power is so corrupting, it must always be diffused as much as possible. The worst possible arrangement would be the kind of "global governance" that these people advocate--to be wielded by themselves! The bigger and more powerful the government, the more intensely corrupt it will be. Surely you, as a Pre-Millenial, can't contemplate with pleasure any proposed global governance. Your eschatology ought to tell you who'll be running that show!

4. Anyone who has been caught lying and cheating as often as some of the Warmists have been caught cannot be trusted. (And don't say the same applies to Anti-Warmists, because the Anti-Warmists are not the ones seeking vast new powers over their fellow citizens.)

5. Anyone who demands the power to jail his critics, as James Hansen does, must not be given power.

6. Anyone who proposes to suspend the democratic process, and to proceed with no regard to due process of law--as Prof. Norgaard does in her letter to that person in the White House--is not to be trusted with any kind of political power. If the history of the 20th century teaches us anything at all, it should teach us that.

7. Let me illustrate my last point with a real-life parable.

A certain individual became prominent for broadcasting dire warnings of the ravages of Y2K, the end of civilization as we know it. Acting on his advice, many people sold all their property and headed for the hills.

And when nothing happened, some of these people said, "Well, see--Mr. X, with all his good advice, stopped Y2K!"

The Warmists are telling us, "Give us leviathan-like powers over all the people, and we will save you from destruction!" And there is absolutely no way to refute them; because if they become dictators, and the disasters they predict don't happen, they'll simply say, "Our methods worked! We saved the planet!"

Meanwhile, the imagined state of emergency will never be called off, and the tyrants will never give up their powers. Regrettably, the "War on Terror" shows signs of following this pattern. (But WOT is different from the MMGW "crisis" in that it originated from a real event: Sept. 11, 2001.)

These general principles of mine are the result of a lifetime of studying history and observing current events. The scientific questions are beside the point.

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <playground player: <YouRang> Let me be candid. I'm really not qualified to read this scientist's report and say, "It's a load of hooey," or that scientist's report and say, "This one's right!" We are talking about specialized knowledge which I do not possess.>

I appreciate this admission (although I never doubted it). I am not qualified either.

But lacking the qualifications to judge the science, how is it that you (and MMGW skeptics at large) are so confident that MMGW is a hoax and a fraud -- as you have stated many times?

<1. No one must <ever> be allowed to wield the kind of raw coercive power that the Warmists are demanding.

2. Anyone who desires that kind of power must <never> be allowed to get it.>

Okay, first of all these concerns about abuse of power, while valid, have nothing to do with the legitimacy of the science itself.

Secondly, this is a unprecedented condition: There is an honest belief among the majority of climate scientists that the earth's climate is being adversely affected by human activity during the past century. They also believe that we are at a critical stage such that if we fail to act soon, the effects will be irreversible.

So, assuming for a moment that their beliefs are justifiable, what *should* they do? It seems that calling for governments and corporations to adopt policies to change course is a rather obvious step, and this is what they are doing. If you forbid that, what other options would you recommend?

<3. Because political power is so corrupting, it must always be diffused as much as possible. The worst possible arrangement would be the kind of "global governance" that these people advocate--to be wielded by themselves! The bigger and more powerful the government, the more intensely corrupt it will be. Surely you, as a Pre-Millenial, can't contemplate with pleasure any proposed global governance. Your eschatology ought to tell you who'll be running that show!>

My eschatology tells me that there will be that there will be a form of global governance in the end times -- and this will be the case no matter what we do. If the predicted catastrophic consequences of global warming are realized, then governments will step in anyway to deal with food rationing, disease control, and conflict. Perhaps this explains the war, famine and pestilence that we see prophesied in Revelation 6:3-8.

And if MMGW-denial is connected with Christianity, it might explain some of the hatred of Christians foretold in the end times.

(continued next post)

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: Continued from above:

<4. Anyone who has been caught lying and cheating as often as some of the Warmists have been caught cannot be trusted. (And don't say the same applies to Anti-Warmists, because the Anti-Warmists are not the ones seeking vast new powers over their fellow citizens.)>

I don't see your logic here. If someone on either side of the debate is caught lying and cheating, then they are not trustworthy -- regardless of whether you are seeking power or not. So yes, I will point out that there has been lying and cheating on the anti-warmest side also.

<5. Anyone who demands the power to jail his critics, as James Hansen does, must not be given power.>

I think you're overstating. He didn't "demand power to jail his critics". His proposed that CEOs of companies that contribute to global warming despite knowing the consequences. His quote: <"CEOs of fossil energy companies know what they are doing and are aware of long-term consequences of continued business as usual. In my opinion, these CEOs should be tried for high crimes against humanity and nature."<>>

<6. Anyone who proposes to suspend the democratic process, and to proceed with no regard to due process of law--as Prof. Norgaard does in her letter to that person in the White House--is not to be trusted with any kind of political power. If the history of the 20th century teaches us anything at all, it should teach us that.>

Again, she is calling for urgent worldwide action based on her belief that MMGW and its consequences are real. Even if she is wrong about MMGW, her intentions can be good. That's much more than I can say about those on the skeptic side who told blatant and hateful lies about her views.

<7. Let me illustrate my last point with a real-life parable. A certain individual became prominent for broadcasting dire warnings of the ravages of Y2K>

As a software developer myself, I know that (1) Programmers around the world DID make huge efforts to avoid most of dire consequences of Y2K. (2) There was also huge amount of hype and misinformation associated with Y2K -- largely by opportunists.

<The Warmists are telling us, "Give us leviathan-like powers over all the people, and we will save you from destruction!" And there is absolutely no way to refute them; because if they become dictators, and the disasters they predict don't happen, they'll simply say, "Our methods worked! We saved the planet!">

Again, that's one (exaggerated IMO) scenario that assumes evil intentions by climate scientists. Another scenario is that the terrible consequences do occur, and all those who promoted skepticism will look like some of the most colossal and irresponsible fools in the history of the world.

<Meanwhile, the imagined state of emergency will never be called off>

You seem confident that the state of emergency is "imagined", even though you admit that you aren't qualified to judge the science.

<These general principles of mine are the result of a lifetime of studying history and observing current events. The scientific questions are beside the point.>

Possibly you've never observed an event like this before, and I think the scientific questions are paramount, and climate scientists are the best experts we have.

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <YouRang: Secondly, this is a unprecedented condition: There is an honest belief among the majority of climate scientists that the earth's climate is being adversely affected by human activity during the past century. They also believe that we are at a critical stage such that if we fail to act soon, the effects will be irreversible.

So, assuming for a moment that their beliefs are justifiable, what *should* they do? It seems that calling for governments and corporations to adopt policies to change course is a rather obvious step, and this is what they are doing. If you forbid that, what other options would you recommend?>

Let's change a few words and see if you agree with yourself:

Secondly, this is a unprecedented condition: There is an honest belief among the majority of <practicing Christians> that the earth's <human condition> is being adversely affected by <immoral> human activity during the past century. They also believe that we are at a critical stage such that if we fail to act soon, the effects will be irreversible.

So, assuming for a moment that their beliefs are justifiable, what *should* they do? It seems that calling for governments and corporations to adopt policies to change course is a rather obvious step, and this is what they are doing. If you forbid that, what other options would you recommend?

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  cormier: <<<<we know theat in many areas abuses are made by polutors and> ... will we get better leaders & better ministers and such having the common good at heart> .... lets pray for that guys> ..... tks G>
Apr-14-12  frogbert: <Our proposed budget--for a small town with only four public schools in it--is $30 million and change! Seven and a quarter million bucks per school!

The purpose of these extravagant costs is to enrich teachers' union members and school administrators.>

pgp, have you seen the budgets? are they available anywhere? do you mind referring me to them or forwarding the figures?

can i rightly assume that teachers in public schools belong to the upper class of the us society, based on their "extravagant" pay checks? does the state provide partial funding for private schools too?

Apr-14-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  YouRang: <OhioChessFan><Let's change a few words and see if you agree with yourself...>

lol - By what stretch of the imagination do validate the idea that YOU can change words in something I had said, and think it somehow serves as a test of ME agreeing with myself?

Why don't you just state your point?

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 312)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 153 OF 312 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Bobby Fischer Tribute Shirt
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific user and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies