stunningmove: <AylerKupp> Thank you for your explanation of white's choice of 44.Bc4 over 44.Qh3. I found your team's extensive analysis on or about Feb. 17. Yes that must have been disappointing to go from a +0.91 to 0.00 from d-26 to d-27. It looks like every rabbit hole was checked.
stunningmove: <bluewave> I agree with <OCF>, it is extemely doubtful we will see analysis of this game. Time is an issue and pride is a second. Now if he had beaten us, analysis might be done. We have much more in depth analysis than a GM could ever do. He has already stated that
stunningmove: After 14...Qd5 15.Qf3! White's potential discovered attack on the Black Q (Nf6+) precludes a black Nb4 from being as effective as when 14...Qd7 is played. This practically forces 15.0-0-0 which allows a white 0-0-0 in reply and a drawish game
indicates a reply to the comment.
You are not logged
in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.