< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 13 OF 13 ·
|May-29-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: <<<<<<<BP>>>>>>: Let's not lose sight of the moral argument:|
1. If God does not exist then OMV do not exist.
2. OMV exist.
3. Therefore God exists. >
I do find it an interesting argument
|May-29-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: The random generator cracks me up:
<Nigh hither: for whosoever eateth leavened bread from thence it not I, behold, his daughters, Jehovah in the men of the land of the sea; And Jacob was Shiphrah, and they cast her brother shall be every creeping thing, either good speed. And I will be seen in the integrity.
harm befall you out thy belly shalt not hearkened. Thus shall be thou sent forth my lord, The voice of fire, to us, even to follow after that thou hast showed unto the sister of the sons and there was Peleg. For he is this one, and Calneh, in like.>
|Jun-03-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: A horse walks into a bar. The bartender asks "Why the long face?"|
The horse says "Because I don't have nightmares any more."
The bartender asks "What's wrong with that?"
The horse says "They all went back to their husbands."
|Jun-03-17|| ||Big Pawn: Oh boy!|
|Jun-03-17|| ||Big Pawn: A man walks into a bar, wrapped in jumper cables. He sits down and orders a drink.|
The bartender looks him over real good and says, "Okay, just don't start anything here"
|Jun-03-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: <Big Pawn: A man walks into a bar, wrapped in jumper cables. He sits down and orders a drink.|
The bartender looks him over real good and says, "Okay, just don't start anything here">
LOL that was great!
|Jun-11-17|| ||Big Pawn: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XuI...|
|Jun-15-17|| ||User not found: Messi magisterial goals https://youtu.be/BYCNLMWzWmU|
Check out the goals from 6:00 and 7:50
The greatest football player in the history of the sport. He's just SPECIAL!
|Jun-15-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: thanks <unf>!|
|Jun-16-17|| ||User not found: My pleasure TGA. I think it's about time you told BP you're a Messlim, lol. |
The goal at 0:26.." Remember the name, Messi. At the age of 17 scores his first goal for Barcelona!"https://youtu.be/Ixkue59exzo
I remembered, lol.
Btw.. Unless Messi does something unbelievably spectacular for club and country before November when the ballon d'or voting begins, Ronaldo should win by a distance which will make it 5 ballon d'ors each!! Ronaldo is 3 years older than Messi so I'd put my bank balance on Messi getting that 6th and retiring from football in 2022 after the WC because as long as he's fit that will be his last World Cup. Next year is his big and final chance as a "young man", he's dragged the Argies to the final once and they've proved if Messi's not having a good game they crumble. Maradona was 34 in his last WC, Baggio, Romario, Zico, Zidane and other players of similar stature and position were roughly that age so it's looking like he's the modern George Best international wise... And that's why I posted that link above. The 2nd goal at 7:50 is Best, very reminiscent of George Best in the late 60s, gliding across a pitch like the Somme like its a tennis court!
|Jun-18-17|| ||john barleycorn: <thegoodanarchist> if you do not mind I have this post from <Abdel>'s forum copied here as it might be gone soon:|
< john barleycorn: <Abdel Irada: ∞
You are a hypocrite, and not nearly as smart as you like to think. Unless you improve the standard of your posts to my forum, I will delete them without comment.
another declaration of your moral and mental bankruptcy? Delete now before your pompousness takes a serious blow.>
|Jun-19-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: <jbc>
I do not mind. I support free speech. I am a huge supporter of, and believer in, the Bill of Rights in our US Constitution.
<AI> embraced Islam because the authoritarian nature of that religion appeals to the arrogance and the control freak in him.
However, he has no accomplishments to qualify himself as an authority on anything, (other than his excellent vocabulary). Couldn't re-up in the Navy, couldn't go the full 4 years in university.
So he is willing to pay money to give himself a forum in which he can make rulings on posts at his whim.
If he can ever impose Sharia on even a tiny little section of America, he will gladly do so. (Since he believes he has the right to decide what *other people* find offensive.)
So while free speech is under threat at <AI>'s forum, for reasons stated above, your post is safe here.
|Jun-19-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: << saffuna:>|
It's clearrly incremental. There wasn't one particular point when you can say (gun violence) became a problem.>
|Jun-21-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: <unf/finny>:
For you, my friend!
Kenneth S Rogoff (kibitz #280084)
|Jun-28-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: Loose Pieces Drop Off|
|Jun-29-17|| ||jessicafischerqueen: |
*Loose pieces drop offramp*
|Jul-03-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: Mark, I am not going to have that kind of talk in my forum, so I am deleting that post.|
I denoted the objectionable part with the "XXXXXXXXXX"
< User not found: https://m.facebook.com/story.php?st...
"Here he is again... Here he is AGAIN. that's <astonishing!?> That's absolutely world clarrrssss. <only football can make you feel like this!>
Us Messlims need to pray..
"Our Lionel. Who art in heaven. Hollowed be thy goal. XXXXXXXXXX>
|Jul-04-17|| ||jessicafischerqueen: |
<TGAir> Books always say things to me nowadays because I only listen to audio books.
I didn't have time to go to the liberry when I was young, and I still don't have time to go to the liberry.
I'd say "thank goodness for audiobooks" then, except in truth I only use them as sleep aids.
<Moby Dick> is particularly good on this front.
I have yet to get past "Call me Ish..."
|Jul-04-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: <jessicaFQ> I understand completely.|
In 2012 I went in for surgery on my right ankle, with twelve weeks of temporary disability scheduled.
My intent during that time was to read <Moby Dick> cover to cover.
It turned out to be a snooze fest. All the critics love a good snooze fest.
So after a few chapters I ditched the book and started watching BPL.
|Jul-05-17|| ||jessicafischerqueen: |
Yep <Moby Dick> was ahead of its time on that front. Long, dense, incomprehensible bloat that prefigured the era of long, dense, incomprehensible postmodern fiction.
Yet the same writer produced the lean, mean, and extremely funny <Bartleby the Scriviner>.
|Jul-13-17|| ||Big Pawn: <Nizzle: <Big pawn> said if we accepted that second premise was correct we were forced to accept first premise.>|
This is not true. Provide the link.
<Nizzle: <Big pawn> cut off the conversation as he does so often with the conversation of <saffuna>>
This is not true. Here is what <Nizzle> said and here is the link.
1) if -A , -B
3) therefore A
Is this correct logic , <bureaucrat> , <johnlspouge> , <abdel irada> and other smart posters ? :)>
Kenneth S Rogoff (kibitz #277676)
This is especially delicious!
<tga>, he then goes on to show for sure that he doesn't know what he's talking about. Look,
<Nizzle: <Big pawn> says that if it is modus tollens , then if second premise is correct, we are forced to accept first premise even if first premise is wrong.>
Kenneth S Rogoff (kibitz #277755)
He thinks that 3. "Therefore A" is saying that we must accept the first premise!
The fool doesn't know that "A" is not the first premise lol.
The first premise is 1. if not A then not B.
Still, <Nizzle> thinks he has us fooled when he says that his "seventh grade students" know logic better than big dummy meanie big pawn!
heh, heh, heh,
|Jul-13-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: <Nisjesram: <thegoodanarchist: <Big Pawn: <thegoodanarchist> (nisj) says I lied about him asking for help regarding basic logic. I didn't lie, he did ask for help, he was lost, didn't know modus tollens, now he's embarrassed. >|
Wow, he is saying that's the lie?
Well, I read that post where he asked <jls> and others for help.
<nisj>, there is your answer. I read that post of yours. You asked for help>
<Big pawn> cut off the conversation as he does so often with the conversation of <saffuna>
<Johnlspouge> and I agreed with second premise namely <omv> exist
And both <johnlspouge> and I said that first premise is wrong.
<Big pawn> said if we accepted that second premise was correct we were forced to accept first premise.
"Not if first premise is wrong to begin with " I said
And then I wrote something like
"1)Trump is not a very bad president, if omv don't exist
3) Trump is a very bad president
And so on and then asked at the end of satire '<johnlspouge> , <bureaucrat> is that correct logic"
He cut off the conversation. >
<nisj> I am not going to tolerate 2 things in my forum. The first is any kind of talk that is inappropriate for children, since children play chess.
Second thing I will not tolerate is abusive language in my forum.
In here, you will have to mind your manners if you want to post.
So I copied the appropriate part of your post, and showed it above.
The inappropriate part is not shown, and your original post is deleted.
If you cannot follow my posting guidelines I will delete everything, and put you on ignore to prevent you from posting any abusive language.
|Jul-13-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: <Still, <Nizzle> thinks he has us fooled when he says that his "seventh grade students" know logic better than big dummy meanie big pawn!>|
First of all, you are using abusive language. But since you are referring to yourself, it doesn't violate my posting guidelines.
Second of all, when you first posted the moral argument, I didn't go to google or wikipedia.
I thought it through myself, for a while, and realized it makes sense.
It seems to me that <nisj> is doing the same thing that <Bureaucrat> does - insulting or deriding that which he doesn't understand.
|Jul-16-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: Kenneth S Rogoff (kibitz #275618)|
|Jul-20-17|| ||thegoodanarchist: "Shortly, the public will be unable to reason or think for themselves. They'll only be able to parrot the information they've been given on the previous night's news."|
-- Zbigniew Brzezinski
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 13 OF 13 ·