chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile

trnbg
Member since Apr-23-11 · Last seen Dec-13-18
no bio

   trnbg has kibitzed 49 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Dec-06-18 S Slipak vs T Gibson, 2008 (replies)
 
trnbg: 32...h5 was Black's decisive mistake. As >cocker< mentioned, 32...Rf8 was better, and 32...d3 should win as well.
 
   Nov-23-18 Wang Hao vs R Gerber, 2016
 
trnbg: <saturn2 <trnbg: I went with 21.Bxg6 fxg6 22.Bxf6. Now Black can't take on f6 because of 23.Rd8+!,> Seems to me you are wrong. Black can take on f6 22...exf6 23. Rd8+ Kf7 and is a piece up.> Yes, you are right. I missed 23....Kf7.
 
   Nov-14-18 D Perrett vs I Efimov, 2008 (replies)
 
trnbg: <saturn2: < trnbg 29.Rf1 (what else?)> 29 Rc3>> On 29 Rc3 (after 26...Qf3+ 27.Kg1 Re2 28.Nxe2 Qe2), Black wins nicely with 29...Bd1!, cutting off the white queen from the defense.
 
   Oct-17-18 Saemisch vs Teichmann, 1922 (replies)
 
trnbg: I don't understand why White hung on so long. He should have resigned much earlier.
 
   Aug-08-18 W So vs V Durarbayli, 2015 (replies)
 
trnbg: <saturn2: I went for 19 Nd5 a 19..hxg5 20. Nxb6 Qd8 21. Qxe6#> But Black can play 20...Qe8 (instead of Qd8). Then White may continue 21. Nx8, after ...Qxc8, he can play 22. Rae1, and Black can no longer defend the pawn on e6. But in my view this is very unclear.
 
   Jul-28-18 B Adhiban vs D Andreikin, 2017 (replies)
 
trnbg: Why not 21.Nxf5 (instead of Rxf5) Nxf5 22.Rxf5 Bxf5 23.Rxf5 Qd4+ 24.Rf2 ? So White also gets two minor pieces for a rook, right?
 
   Feb-16-18 D Yuffa vs Bologan, 2015 (replies)
 
trnbg: way too easy for Friday.
 
   Feb-02-18 Larsen vs Najdorf, 1968 (replies)
 
trnbg: Were the last moves of the game really made on the board? Then I wonder why Larsen didn't resign after 37...Rxh3, at the latest. Perhaps he was in extreme zeitnot.
 
   Jan-24-18 Vogt vs G Kuzmin, 1971 (replies)
 
trnbg: <Pasker: After 1...Rxe4! 32.dxe4 Rxc5! 33.Rxc5 and now Qa7 or Qxe4 both wins material. Qxe4 threatens Qe8 mate and Qe3 + forking the rook. There is no defense.> This is not correct. After Qxe4 White can defend with 34.Qf3. Then Black has nothing better than perpetual check ...
 
   Jan-12-18 C Van Buskirk vs D B Gurevich, 1987 (replies)
 
trnbg: why not simply 29...Nxe3? The endgame after 30.Qxe3 dxe5 31.fxe5 Qxe5+ 32.QxQ dxe5 should be an easy win for Black.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2018, Chessgames Services LLC