|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·
Later Kibitzing> |
May-15-13
 | | truefriends: I kind of expect <Kd6> after both <Bd1> or <Kg2> cause his bishops are ideally placed on d7 and b4 to stop our intended setup. |
 |
| May-15-13 | | Ceri: I ran a Houdini check on his options.
At 40 ply, the top 4 were all +0.81 for White. Perhaps the equality is delaying a response. I would rather expect Bb4 on the grounds that the Bishop has been there before and because of the Be1 option. Cheers,
Ceri |
 |
May-15-13
 | | DcGentle: Let's say Black moves <Bb4> then we can enforce our setup by <1. Bd1 Kd6 2. Bc1> click for larger viewNow Black is forced to make a bad move.
After that either <Kg3> or even <g5> can follow. |
 |
May-15-13
 | | truefriends: Seems like white cant play <3.Kg3> if the black DSB stays on b4, cause <3... Be1+> |
 |
May-15-13
 | | DcGentle: If Black doesn't play <1... Kd6> but <1... Bd6>, it's more precise to follow up with <2. Bd2> in order to prevent a reappearance of this bishop on b4 after an immediate Kg3, which would be annoying. click for larger viewBlack to move cannot prevent the next white move <Kg3>, and if the black bishop leaves the diagonal c8 - h3 even <g5> instead of Kg3 can follow, because White can deal with f5 and fxg5. |
 |
May-15-13
 | | DcGentle: <<truefriends>: Seems like white cant play <3.Kg3> if the black DSB stays on b4, cause <3... Be1+>> *hmmm* Black has to move something. But we can also try to move <Kg2> after <Bb4>. Lemme see. |
 |
May-15-13
 | | truefriends: < DcGentle: If Black doesn't play <1... Kd6> but <1... Bd6>, it's more precise to follow up with <2. Bd2> in order to prevent a reappearance of this bishop on b4 after an immediate Kg3, which would be annoying.> Yes this was my plan exactly... |
 |
May-15-13
 | | DcGentle: Not easy, maybe a bishop move to h6 is necessary, but anyways, if Bb4 will stay there, maybe you still need luck. It's only black king moves that will enable this, maybe it's not so likely. I dunno.... And the black bishop on b4 could have been avoided too, but this is past. |
 |
May-16-13
 | | truefriends: And ofcourse the best move was played <55... Bb4> click for larger viewWHITE TO MOVE... |
 |
May-16-13
 | | DcGentle: I am up to something new. Perhaps we can still enforce the win. Give me an hour. |
 |
May-16-13
 | | DcGentle:  click for larger view[Event "Endgame"]
[Site "cg.com"]
[Date "2013.04.14"]
[Round "?"]
[White "truefriends"]
[Black "N.N."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "DcGentle"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "8/3bk3/5pp1/3Pp2p/1b2P1PP/4BP2/4BK2/8 w - - 0 1"] 1. Bd1 Kd6 2. Ba7 Be8 3. Bb8+ Ke7 4. Bc7 Bb5 5. gxh5 gxh5 6.
f4 Bc5+ 7. Kg3 Kd7 8. Ba5 Bd3 9. fxe5 fxe5 10. Ba4+ Kd6 11.
Kf3 Bc4 12. Be8 Bb3 13. Ke2 Bc2 14. Bg6 Bb1 15. Kd2 Bf2 16.
Bb4+ Kc7 17. Be7 Kd7 18. Bf6 Kd6 19. Ke2 Bd4 20. Bg5 Bc2 21.
Bd2 Bc5 22. Bh6 Ke7 23. Bg5+ Kd6 24. Kd2 Bb1 25. Bh6 Ke7 26.
Kc3 Kf6 27. Bf5 Ba2 28. Bg5+ Kf7 29. Bd8 Bd6 30. Ba5 Kf6 31.
Bh3 Kf7 32. Bg2 Be7 33. Bc7 Bf6 34. Bh3 Bxh4 35. Be6+ Ke8
36. Bxe5 Bf2 37. Kd3 Bb6 38. Ke2 Bd8 39. Kf3 Bb3 40. Kf4 h4
41. Kf5 Bb6 42. d6 1-0
Ok, many of these moves are forced, but I haven't checked all subvariants, but apparently it's possible to take the h-pawn when it's actually <good>! I wouldn't have thought that. In any case, your next move should be <Bd1>.
This will keep all your options alive. |
 |
May-16-13
 | | truefriends: How bout <2... Bc5+> exchanging off DSB... Think white should avoid this |
 |
May-16-13
 | | DcGentle: <truefriends>: I guess I checked this. It's not good for Black. I'll check it again. |
 |
May-16-13
 | | DcGentle:  click for larger viewWhite to move.
1. Bxc5+ Kxc5 2. Ke3 Be8 3. gxh5 gxh5 4. f4 Kd6 5. f5 Kc5 6. Kd2 Kb6 7. Kc3 Kc5 8. Bf3 Kb5 9. Be2+ Kc5 10. Bd1 Kb5 11. d6 White wins. |
 |
May-16-13
 | | DcGentle: Well, here there is another line for a black move that worried me, this occurs after 4... Bc5+ click for larger view[Event "Endgame"]
[Site "MyTown"]
[Date "2013.04.14"]
[Round "?"]
[White "truefriends"]
[Black "N.N."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "DcGentle"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "4b3/2B1k3/5pp1/2bPp2p/4P1PP/5P2/5K2/3B4 w - - 0 1"] 1. Kg3 Bb4 2. Kg2 Bb5 3. Bb8 Kd7 4. gxh5 gxh5 5. f4 Bd3 6.
Kf3 Kc8 7. Ba7 Kc7 8. fxe5 fxe5 9. Ba4 Be1 10. Ke3 Bc4 11.
Be8 Bxh4 12. Bxh5 Be7 13. Kf3 Bb3 14. Bg4 Bd1+ 15. Kg3 Bc2
16. Bf3 Ba4 17. Be3 Be8 18. Bd2 Bg6 19. Bc3 Bf6 20. Kf2 Bh7
21. Ba5+ Kb7 22. Bb4 Kc7 23. Ke3 Bg6 24. Bg4 Be8 25. Bf5
Bg5+ 26. Kf3 Bh4 27. Kg4 Bf6 28. Kg3 Bg5 29. Kh3 Bh5 30. Kg3
Be8 31. Kg4 Bf6 32. Bc5 Bd8 33. Ba3 Bf6 34. Bb4 Kb7 35. Bh7
Bd7+ 36. Kh5 Kc7 37. Kg6 Bh4 38. Bg8 Kd8 39. Bc3 Bg3 40. Kf6
Bb5 41. d6 Ke8 42. Be6 Bc6 43. Bxe5 1-0 |
 |
May-16-13
 | | DcGentle: There is a problem with 2... Kc7. So 2. Rb6 is more precise. I'll think about it. 2... Ke7 seems to be forced due to the threat 3. Bd8. |
 |
May-16-13
 | | DcGentle: Ok, I solved this problem:
The new mainline looks like this:
<1. Bd1 Kd6 2. Bb6 Ke7 3. Ba7 Be8 4. Be3 Bd7 5. Bb6 Be8 6. Bc7>  click for larger viewIt has reached the same position as the above line after move 4, but it offers more chances for Black to miss the correct move. And <6. Bc7> will be a bit of a surprise, most likely. |
 |
May-17-13
 | | DcGentle: Unfortuately in this position,
 click for larger view<10... Kd6> is a mistake, and <10... Ke7> will hold the draw. :-( (See first mainline)
grrrrr. |
 |
May-17-13
 | | DcGentle: Wait a moment, before you move Bd1.
Maybe there are alternatives. |
 |
May-17-13
 | | truefriends: Yes <Kg2> as i mentioned before... |
 |
May-17-13
 | | DcGentle: There actually is a variant providing something
positive, Black can force the black bishops away!
Look here:
 click for larger view[Event "Endgame"]
[Site "MyTown"]
[Date "2013.04.14"]
[Round "?"]
[White "truefriends"]
[Black "N.N."]
[Result "1-0"]
[Annotator "DcGentle"]
[SetUp "1"]
[FEN "8/3bk3/5pp1/3Pp2p/1b2P1PP/4BP2/4BK2/8 w - - 0 1"] 1. Kg2 Kd6 2. Bc1 Ke7 3. Kf2 Kd6 4. Bd1 Bc5+ 5. Ke1 Bb5 6.
Bd2 Bd3 7. Be2 Bc2 8. Bh6 Ke7 9. Bf1 Bb4+ 10. Bd2 Bc5 11.
Bc3 Bd6 12. Kd2 Ba4 13. Bd3 Bd7 14. Be2 Be8 15. Ke1 Bc5 16.
Bd2 Bd7 17. Kf1 Ba4 18. g5
 click for larger viewBlack has lost. |
 |
May-17-13
 | | DcGentle: Again I have not looked at all subvariants, but the positive point is, that White needs not move any pawn. I'll check some more variants.
But <Kg2> can be moved.
:-) |
 |
May-17-13
 | | truefriends: Ok <Kg2> played!
 click for larger view |
 |
May-17-13
 | | DcGentle: <truefriends>: Still it's tempting for Black to check the king, should there be a possibility, but what worries me a bit, what happens, if Black doesn't do this. I am looking for a solution. |
 |
May-18-13
 | | truefriends: <56... Be8> played
 click for larger view |
 |
 |
|
< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 15 OF 15 ·
Later Kibitzing> |