Feb-09-05 Kasparov vs Timman, 2000 
| |
|
znosko2000: I thinks what <Gregor> is talking about is a refutation to <who> and he meant that 34. g4+ is not a valid transposition since balck can go 34.. Ke5 stopping white from getting to the pawn in time.
|
|
| | Oct-05-04 Mednis vs Timman, 1974
| |
|
znosko2000: <patzer2> it seems that Timman was able to learn how to counter 6. g4 with h6 slowing down the white pawn attack in a game against Karpov in 1982 (I am not sure how to link to it).
|
|
| | Aug-19-04 Radjabov vs Anand, 2002
| |
|
znosko2000: 20. a4 seems to be where Radjabov went wrong, allowing Anand to have an open b file and a passed flank pawn.
|
|
| | Mar-18-04 Balashov vs Bronstein, 1975
| |
|
znosko2000: Does anyone have a reply for karlzen's question why Bronstein didn't take on e4 on the 16th move? I had the same question.
|
|
| | Feb-24-04 Alekhine vs Colle, 1925
| |
|
znosko2000: patzer, what if 29...fxg6 30. Qe6+ Kf8
|
|
| | Nov-06-03 Karpov vs Shirov, 2003
| |
|
znosko2000: Isn't 29....? too easy and direct to be considered a chess puzzle?
|
|
| | Sep-25-03 J Blake vs G A Hooke, 1891
| |
|
znosko2000: Bill, that second move is a standard opening called Philidor's defense (ECO - C41) which is defnitely playable as shown by Alekhine's great record playing it. However, it does lend itself to traps such as the one above and the similar Legall's Mate if not played correctly. In ...
|
|
| | | indicates a reply to the comment. | |
