User Profile Chessforum
Member since Feb-27-05 · Last seen Apr-16-14
Currently I spend most of my chess time playing 3/0 and 2/0 games on as "TyroLoco". I used to be considered a "wannabe" in casual chess circles, but I can only aspire to that level now. It's still fun. When I get tired of playing I dip into Batgirl's history archives, I particularly enjoyed "Flea House Blues": .

I have now moved all my FICS information to the account User: FICS Info . I also update that page if there is a change in the status of the FICS server.

Currently experimenting with Lawrence Day's 30 year-old "clamp" against the Sicilian: .

Favorite player: whoever was really good 40 years ago, now that I've had time to figure out what he was doing. Fischer used to be my favorite, but now I am starting to enjoy Karpov's and Korchnoi's games. Not sure what to make of Kasparov yet. I also have a soft spot for Benko, since his 10-move blowout of me in a 1976 simul gave me a Morphy number of 4 (Mortimer>Tartakower>Benko).

Favorite book: Fischer's My 60 Memorable Games. I have found it more helpful to read a few books over and over than to read many books, at least when you're at my level!

< cheat sheet:>~~~~~~~

FAQ: Chessgames Help
Control-P saves a position
Kibitzing tricks page - Kibitzing Tricks To get the current standings for a tournament: replace the last number of the page link on your browser from 2 to 1. With crosstable=1 you can see the player standing. Latest kibitzing: Recent Kibitzing Page Special HTML symbols--included in Chessgames Editor Guide Chessgames statistics: Statistics Page Chessbooks forum: User: ChessBookForum Biographer Bistro: Biographer Bistro

[[Some chess links I'm currently using:]]

Most recent articles on

Online PGN player:

live ratings:

"Nuestro Circulo", Argentine chess magazine: .

PDFs of some old books (mostly in Spanish):

2008 performance ratings:

Performance versus players above 2700:

Performance against players below 2700:

Crosstables from many of history's top tournaments:

Crosstables from USA and USSR championships:

The Chess Mind:

Favorite Spanish-language chess sites: probably the best overall Spanish-language chess site, with many regular columns from GMs and excellent writers. Ajedrez Magico (abandoned in 2010, still with much interesting legacy content): Ajedrez Espectacular: http://www.mipaginapersonal.movista... Chessville's links to Spanish-language sites http://comentariosdeajedrez.blogspo... Argentine chess newsletter, through 2009 Peruvian chess news
List of Spanish chess jargon (R-rated):

Endgame tablebase:

Chess tournament results:

365chess online database:

Opening search: Nimzo-Indian, Samisch (E25)

Game Collection: Logical Chess: Move By Move (Chernev) - COMPLETE

Game Collection: GM RAM Game Selection

William Ewart Napier

Sicilian Alapin:

FIDE world and national rank for a given player: You need to replace ABCDEFG with the code from that player's FIDE player card (e.g. 5000017 for Viswanathan Anand). FIDE top rating statistics:

FIDE top player list history, including for inactive players: For example to get a list of Xie Jun's top player list rankings, I searched for her record, got the ID 8600147 from the "event=" value in the URL, and then typed in

USCF lowest rated players:

Bunch of old chess links:

Goddess chess blog:

Random stuff:

You can email me on Yahoo, username oneeyedman99.

<I never said computers can't figure out.

I said I hated them.

Although I use mine on a daily basis.

It's kind of the same as having a boyfriend that way.> JessicaFischerQueen, 12-Dec-08 in KIbitzer's Cafe.

<I have tried to adopt the philosophy that I'd rather hold a clear belief loosely than a fuzzy believe tightly. One of the reasons I feel I tend to get along pretty well with good chess players is that I've found that they tend to share this philosophy with regard to just about anything be it religion, politics, or chess positions. So I suspect this Mrs. Pogonina did not think that her comments were descended from Mount Sinai. This reminds me of a conversation I had with GM Nakamura. I asked him if he thought there was any advantage for White in the Wing Gambit Sicilian. He said, "Don't be an idiot! MAYBE White can draw." I said, "Are you sure about that?!" And he said, "No."> GoldenBear, in a 6-Oct-09 comment on Carlsen vs Wang Yue, 2009

<One of the things that appeals to me about competitive chess ... is that it is, as games go, very fair. There is quite a lot of luck in chess over the short term. But on the whole it tends to cancel out. Certainly chess compares very favourably with all the things that go under the designation 'real life', with all the stacked decks, silver spoons, nepotism, favouritism and disastrous misfortunes that attend. In comparison with the crazy unpredictability and uncontrollability of most of human existence, playing chess (even in a time-scramble!) is like a paradise of rationality.> - George Botterill.

The thing I learn best from chess is myself. I learn how I think, what I do well, what I don't do so well, and how best to structure my thinking to effectively solve problems and deal with different tasks. Of course it helps that I love the game but have very little natural ability for it--you learn more about yourself doing things that you are bad at.

I'm the one who took the name, but User: Resignation Trap is the real Caissanist Como se dice <kibitzer's cafe> en Espanol: User: NakoSonorense

>> Click here to see Caissanist's game collections. Full Member
   Current net-worth: 1,156 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   Caissanist has kibitzed 1908 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Apr-03-14 Botvinnik vs Kavalek, 1969
Caissanist: Kavalek annotates this game in the Huffington Post, incorporating many of Botvinnik's notes:
   Apr-03-14 Vasily Smyslov (replies)
Caissanist: Karpov was apparently also quite superstitious, since he was known for never washing his hair except after a loss.
   Mar-30-14 Karjakin vs Anand, 2014 (replies)
Caissanist: Tal himself did not say that he lost the Botvinnik rematch because of his health. He attributed it to Botvinnik's superior preparation, as quoted in the page for that match on this site.
   Mar-28-14 Viktor Korchnoi (replies)
Caissanist: I don't know about Keres, but it turns out that I was wrong, Smyslov was not a party member either.
   Mar-28-14 Joseph Tamargo (replies)
Caissanist: Tamargo was briefly a member of this site many years ago, and posted a few comments on his game with Bobby Fischer. User: JoeTamargo He seems to have been one of the more colorful characters of the New York Chess and Checkers Club, one of a number of sleazy chess clubs that ...
   Mar-28-14 Karpov vs Korchnoi, 2008
Caissanist: Regarding whether the K's have patched things up, Karpov had this to say in 2005: <My relations with Korchnoi depend on whether he has slept well. If he had bad dreams, he speaks a lot of rubbish.> Yep, that sounds like Korchnoi.
   Mar-26-14 Kramnik vs Aronian, 2014
Caissanist: User: KKDEREK Although John is at least a life master at trolling, that doesn't necessarily say anything about his chess ability. Conrad could probably give me rook odds, but I'm sure I could bait him just as well as John if that was the goal of my ambition.
   Mar-25-14 Anand vs Mamedyarov, 2014 (replies)
Caissanist: I can't believe I got (almost) even odds betting on this to be a draw on Chessbookie. Don't think I'll get that for any of Anand's remaining games here.
   Mar-19-14 Gary C De Fotis (replies)
Caissanist: Most of the 1970s games here are probably by Gary's younger (and much stronger) brother Greg.
   Mar-18-14 Mar del Plata (1960)
Caissanist: Argentina was one of the strongest chess countries in the world at the time, but for some reason only one of their top players (Eliskases) participated in this event. Seems strange, since they had so few opportunities to play against top foreigners.
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: From user <swissfed>, a fine excerpt of an interview with Bareev from 2003, summing up the world's top players of the time:

<Question: What happened? Kasparov usually out-prepares his opponents, and this time he was completely helpless.

Bareev: Was he? He pressed in every game. He played c4, d4, he tried everything. He could only get a slight advantage, or a big advantage. But that was not enough - look at the 15th game. He needed a completely winning, straight position, but he didn't get that.

Q: Kasparov said he sat at the board and had no openings. What did he mean?

Bareev: It means he doesn't tell the truth. If you analyse his last tournaments you will find he wins games just because of openings. He has winning positions with both colours. But there in London he wanted to have the same, the same winning positions, where he comes and has an easy win. But in London he just had better positions, not winning positions. That's the simple difference. It's very difficult to beat Kramnik. When he had a winning position it was after 30 moves. He was tired, under time pressure, and he made mistakes.

Q: So how can he perform so spectacularly in Wijk aan Zee and Linares?

Bareev: People cannot play chess at all. Look at them, look at these players. Come on. These players, Shirov, Polgar, they can beat players like me, my level. But when they play Anand, Kramnik and Kasparov what can they do? Nothing. It is very easy to beat Bareev, Topalov and Timman. That's why Shirov won five games in Wijk against weak opponents, but when he faced really strong players he lost three games. There is a very small group of grandmasters - you want names? I told you, three strong players, Kasparov, Kramnik and Anand. Then there is a big gap. Adams is sometimes close to them, Morozevich is not bad, with white Leko is incredibly strong, and of course Ivanchuk. But the three, and Ivanchuk, understand chess at a higher level and are better prepared. But Kasparov is better prepared than the others.

Q: How does he do that, how can he be so well prepared?

Bareev: Because of ChessBase, of course.

Q: The others are using ChessBase as well...

Bareev: But I think ChessBase was created to help Garry to be number one in the world. He started first, he created the camp earlier, he worked hard for the last five or seven years. For young players it is very difficult to catch up.

Q: So it is computers which are helping him?

Bareev: No, not only. He produces a lot of ideas, and then people and computers help him a lot. He also loves chess and works a lot. Everything together. And his talent is incredible. Kramnik and Anand have a different kind of talent. Calculating, calculating, that is Kasparov. If Kramnik tries to compete in messy positions he will lose. But if he finds other positions he can survive, he can compete and beat Kasparov. But this only applies to Kramnik and Anand, because they have strong points. Kasparov's talent is calculating, calculating, calculating, working, working, working. Kramnik's talent is wider. Vishy also calculate very fast and deep, and he is a very intuitive player. He is extremely talented, the only thing he lacks is "character", fighting spirit. There he is much weaker than Kasparov, that is why Kasparov will beat him all the time. Vladimir has great talent and confidence, and he is a hard worker. Maybe he is a chess maniac, he works much more than most players.>

Premium Chessgames Member
  juan31: Caissanist:

Thanks you for the support about the language, in México we have a lot of troubles and necessities, to my was very surprising to now about the “Chess festival”, organize for the UNAM ( U university , N national, A autonomous of México) is a public university, to us is the most important cultural project in our nation, and we hope that this experience bring a new opportunities to the students for the practice of chess. About the tribute to Robert James Fischer ( in this week of festival) don’t was a entire surprise, because I now a little about the concept that have the University about the majors contributors of the human knowledge.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: De nada! Felicitaciones al universitario por el torneo, disfrute mucho tus comentarios.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Bobwhoosta: <Caissanist>

Bravo with your son!!

I have a son who is almost 2, and I'm looking forward to introducing him to chess. I will have a few things I expect him to do, but a range of choices as to what he wants within that. Of course my love for chess makes it so that I must present a choice for him. I find it difficult to work through all the ramifications of "How do I best encourage him??" It is SO tough, especially since I've never liked anyone to let me win, even if I lose horribly. In fact, my first chess experience was with a player who beat me EVERY time. Save one. And that is one of my fondest chess memories.

I will keep updated as to your progress with your son!! How old it he? I look forward to more news!!!

Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: My son's 10 now, he still likes to play chess occasionally, but no more than that. I'm trying to figure out the best way to make our games real games but not have them be discouraging to him, since he doesn't want to play at odds.
Premium Chessgames Member
  moronovich: <Caissanist> One way could be, if you play more dull openings. Another(and can be combined off course) way is to hold back,just a little.And/or deliberattely making a wild sac,where you can,more or less figure out that he gets fine/better counterplay.

I have a son who is 35 and got a braindamage 4½ years ago and went from about 2000 to 14-1500.

So when I see him once every week I let him win around one third of the games to encourage him.And that works well for us.

I wish you good luck and all the best with your project !

And one last thing : Nimzowitsch had great succes in giving kids small exercises he made up himself.

Jan-27-11  laskereshevsky: Hello Cais. Just see your "answer" to my kibitz on Fischer's page...

<Jan-12-11 Caissanist: <laskereshevsky: Cause Bobby was always a straight man>.....

I understand your point, all in all the opinion U expressed about him in that kibitz its enough agreable.....

But i didnt want to say that he was ALWAYS a "straight man"... Probably, U didnt got the "humor" in MY kibitz...

( cause my poor English?! ) :-D


Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: <laskereshevsky> Oops, sorry, no I didn't get that it was a joke! Bobby was so weird that it's hard to really tell when anybody's joking about him.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: The Evans Gambit is a great way to learn tactics for a patzer wannabe like myself, here's the kind of fun you can have:

[Event "rated blitz match"]
[Site "Free Internet Chess Server"]
[Date "2011.04.09"]
[Round "?"]
[White "TyroLoco"]
[Black "kaestamos"]
[Result "*"]
[WhiteElo "1267"]
[BlackElo "1315"]
[ECO "C51"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 Bc5 4. b4 Bxb4 5. c3 Bc5 6. O-O Nf6 7. d4 exd4 8. cxd4 Bb6 9. e5 Ng4 10. Bg5 f6 11. exf6 Nxf6 12. Re1+ Ne7 13. Ne5 d6 14. Bxf6 gxf6 15. Qh5+ Ng6 16. Nxg6+ Kd7 17. Re7+ Qxe7 18. Nxe7 Kxe7 19. Qf7+ Kd8 20. Qxf6+ Kd7 21. Be6+ Kc6 22. Qxh8 Bxe6 23. Qxa8 Bxd4 24. Qe8+ Bd7 25. Qe4+ Kc5 26. Nc3 Bxc3 27. Rc1 Bc6 28. Rxc3+ Kb6 29. Rxc6+ bxc6 30. Qxh7 c5 31. Qb1+ Kc6 32. h4 d5 33. h5 d4 34. h6 c4 35. h7 d3 36. h8=Q c3 37. Qh6+ Kd5 38. Qxd3+ Kc5 39. Qxc3+ Kd5 40. Qh4 c5 41. Qd3+ Kc6 42. Qdc4 a5 43. Qh5 Kd7 44. Qcxc5 Ke6 45. Qb6+ Kd7 46. Qh7+ Ke8 47. Qb8# *

Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: My son is ten now. Last night we were talking about his Little League baseball practice (he's not doing so well there), and what's been going on in his life in general. Or, to be honest, I was asking him about these things and he was squirming. He seems to be unhappy a lot of the time, but won't or can't talk about what's happening. I try to let him know that I understand and won't judge him; sometimes I can get him to say something, not so often lately.

Then, out of the blue, he said "Dad, do you want to play chess?", which surprised me. I of course taught him to play five years ago, but we haven't played often since then. From time to time I ask him if he would like to play a board game and sometimes he chooses chess, but I haven't had as much time for him since his little sister arrived three years ago, especially during the school year when so much revolves around homework. He's still very much a beginner, he seems to like chess a lot but is a slow learner, very much like me at that age. I encourage him to take back moves and give him hints. Most of the time I have him win.

Somehow it was more fun last night than I remember before. I didn't really know how to play against him before, but now I've got the hang of it more, which helps. Basically I treat the game as a series of problems to solve, but I try to get him light with joking banter ("Aha, now I'm going to take your pawn, what are you going to do about that?" or "Oh, you saw that, that's cheating, you weren't supposed to see that!") When he makes a mistake I like to try to frame it as a lesson that applies to broader life without being too obvious ("What was I trying to do with that last move? You know you can't just think about what you're doing, the other guy is trying to do stuff too.") He was able to solve most of the problems I gave him over the chessboard, so he won. He was a better player at the end of the game than the beginning.

We didn't directly talk about whatever it was that was keeping him quiet before the game, but I felt a strong conviction that this was helping him--he came out of the game knowing that he could solve these problems, and if he could solve them, he could solve bigger problems too.

Reuben Fine said that most boys don't really take to chess until they are about ten, and I can sort of see why. He's at a preadolescent stage in his life, where he wants help in doing things better and solving the problems he has to deal with, but he doesn't want people telling him what to do, and he doesn't even want to talk directly about what's happening. Playing chess doesn't teach you about the world, but it teaches you about yourself, which at that age is probably more important. There was something like male bonding going on during the game that made me feel very good.

Apr-22-11  therealbenjinathan: very nice! I have 2 12 year old boys who have been playing fairly seriously for 3 or 4 yrs and a 10 year old daughter who seems to where your son is now.

With my daughter I try not to win too much. I give her things to spot and allow lots of take backs where I say either "that is not the best move, try another look" or "that is not a good move, can you see why?". She really is improving. In addition she has been taught how to mate with two rooks, a Queen etc.

Good luck!

If you ever want to chat about it I am normally here:

benjinathan chessforum

Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: In a somewhat related vein, here is a story in Wired UK about a man who taught his 8 year-old daughter chess, and was surprised shortly afterward to have his daughter present him with the rules for "plastic animal chess":
Jul-15-11  Albertan: <Hi Wayne - I went to your blog to> see your analysis of an old Georg Meier game, but when I went to and clicked on the 2010 archive link, Internet Explorer closed the tab with the following error message: " A malfunctioning or malicious add-on has caused Internet Explorer to close this webpage." It would appear that IE thinks you've got a virus/Trojan on your site. Just thought you'd like to know. ---

Thanks for this message! Yes I know something is wrong with my blog however I do not know what. I do not think it is a virus or spyware, but rather like you say it is something wrong with an add-on that you and I both seem to have using Internet Explorer. I have not had this problem when I use web-browsers such as Opera or Google chrome so this could not be a virus. If you have one of those browsers please use them instead.

Jul-15-11  Albertan: <Hi Wayne>

Hi thanks so much for telling me exactly what was happening when you tried to use Internet Explorer at my blog! I believe I found out what was wrong and corrected it using a solution I found at the website.

<- I went to your blog to> see your> <analysis of an old Georg Meier > <game, but when I went to > <>; < and clicked on the 2010 archive> <link, Internet Explorer closed the> <tab with the following error> <message: " A malfunctioning or> <malicious add-on has caused Internet> <Explorer to close this webpage." > <It would appear that IE thinks > <you've got a virus/Trojan on your> <site. Just thought you'd like to> <know. --- >

My friend, Thanks again! When you get time could you go to my blog at one more time and see if this time it loads for you and you can access Chessviewer Deluxe on my first page? I believe the problem was with a Java script add-on I had engaged. Could you them post a message on my forum if you now can access Chessviewer Deluxe? Thanks and have a great weekend! :)

Jul-15-11  Albertan: Hi I think you need to disregard the last messages I have posted. I believe the problem is that you have the following add-on activated in Internet explorer Java(tm) Plug-In 2 SSV Helper Publisher Sun Microsystems, Inc.
Status Activated
Load time (0.04 s)

For some reason there is a bug with th is add-on in relation to Chessviewer Deluxe. To use Chessviewer Deluxe on my blog you have to temporarily de-activate the plug in above using these commands: (1)Click on the Internet Options tab in the "Tools" menu. Then (2)click on the "programs" tab then click on the "Manage add-ons" tab, and disable: Java(tm) Plug-In 2 SSV Helper

(3)Then after you have viewed the games you will have to activate this add-on. I am sorry for this inconvenience I am going to email the designer of Chessviewer Deluxe and see if he can provide a solution to this problem. I understand if you do not want to engage in all of this behavior to see the games. Maybe if you have another internet browser you can try it.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: Thanks for the response! I decided to just use Firefox, which I use for most sites anyway.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: <FICS>: TyroLoco
Premium Chessgames Member
  ketchuplover: BOO!!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: A recent game of mine that my patzer self enjoyed:

[Event "rated blitz match"]
[Site "Free Internet Chess Server"]
[Date "2014.01.30"]
[Round "?"]
[White "TyroLoco"]
[Black "cdecde"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1287"]
[BlackElo "1238"]
[ECO "C50"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bc4 f6 4. d4 exd4 5. Nxd4 Ne5 6. Bb3 Bc5 7. Nf5 Bf8 8. f4 Ng6 9. Qd5 cdecde resigns 1-0

Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: Another fun one:

[Event "rated blitz match"]
[Site "Free Internet Chess Server"]
[Date "2014.02.13"]
[Round "?"]
[White "TyroLoco"]
[Black "luisguillermo"]
[Result "*"]
[WhiteElo "1326"]
[BlackElo "1387"]
[ECO "B12"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 c6 2. d4 d6 3. c4 Bd7 4. Nc3 e5 5. Be3 exd4 6. Bxd4 Nf6 7. f4 Qa5 8. Nf3 Nxe4 9. Qe2 d5 10. O-O-O Be7 11. cxd5 Nxc3 12. Bxc3 Qxa2 13. dxc6 Bxc6 14. Qc4 Qxc4 15. Bxc4 O-O 16. Rhg1 Bxf3 17. gxf3 g6 18. f5 Bc5 19. fxg6 Bxg1 20. gxf7+ Rxf7 21. Rd8# *

Feb-14-14  alan517: Hello, I see that you play on FICS, but I wonder if you have an opinion about the ICC and What is the best site for 1300 rated player? I understand that playing blitz helps you think faster, but every time I play I just go crazy :-) I really enjoy playing slower chess, and I think that I should jump in and play blitz (5 min is fast enough). Thanks for your help!!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: Hi Alan,

For a player at our level who just wants to go online on his PC and play, say two or three quick games a day, I don't know of anything that ICC or has to offer that makes them worth paying for. Those sites have a lot of extra capabilities that make them worthwhile for stronger players (notably safeguards against cheating) and/or players who want more features (e.g. opening theory). But nobody bothers to cheat at the 1300-1400 level, so FICS with the Babaschess interface on Windows works fine for me. I've never played a game on a smartphone or a tablet, though.

Feb-18-14  alan517: Hi Caissanist, thanks for your info. I started playing on FICS with Babaschess a few days ago.I like it very much. I won my first blitz game yesterday! It was a back rank mate!! My Handle is BrooklynTN. I was active in the 80s and 90s until 1995, playing in USCF tournys.I decided to start playing again, found the online sites. I might play in monthly USCF rated tourneys. Thanks again!!
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: Glad that you're back and having fun! Send me a challenge sometime--it'd be fun to play somebody from Chessgames.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: Another game I played on FICS. I'm sure it doesn't stand up to analysis, but it's an example of what I'm trying to do. As age and health problems continue to reduce my ability to calculate, I am increasingly relying on pattern recognition (aka "understanding of the game") to make decisions that I used to calculate out:

[Event "rated blitz match"]
[Site "Free Internet Chess Server"]
[Date "2014.02.22"]
[Round "?"]
[White "TyroLoco"]
[Black "raouf"]
[Result "1-0"]
[WhiteElo "1327"]
[BlackElo "1279"]
[ECO "B00"]
[TimeControl "180"]

1. e4 d6 2. d4 Nf6 3. f3 g6 4. Bd3 Bg7 5. c4 O-O 6. Be3 h6 7. Ne2 Kh7 8. Nbc3 b6 9. Qd2 c5 10. d5 e5 11. O-O-O a5 12. g4 a4 13. a3 Bd7 14. g5 Ng8 15. gxh6 Nxh6 16. h4 f6 17. Ng3 Qe8 18. h5 g5 19. Rdg1 Na6 20. Nf5 Nxf5 21. exf5 Rb8 22. Bxg5 fxg5 23. f6+ Kg8 24. fxg7 Rf7 25. Qxg5 Qd8 26. Qg6 Bf5 27. Qh6 raouf forfeits on time 1-0

I did not calculate out the consequences of 20. Nf5, although I did plan 22.Bxg5. Instead I trusted that the greater mobility of my pieces, and the open lines against black's king, would at some point enable me to at least recover the sacrificed material. That seems to have been the case here; even against the best defense (probably 21.. Bh6), one more sacrifice should do the trick: 22. Bxg5 Bxg5 23. Rxg5 fxg5 24. Qxg5 and now f6+ will lead to mate unless black plays 24.. Kh8 25. Qh6+ Kg8 26. Rg1+ Kf7 27. Rg7++.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>

from the Chessgames Store
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific user and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.

You are not logged in to
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2014, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies