chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

 
Chessgames.com User Profile Chessforum

OhioChessFan
Member since Apr-09-05 · Last seen Jun-26-17
Norway 2017 Moves Prediction Contest

<Main Focus>: Predicting how many moves in a game for each pairing.

Chessgames.com tournament page:
Gashimov Memorial (2017)

Official site: http://

Live games:
http://www.nrk.no/sport/sjakk/

Alternative live games: http://worldchess.com/broadcasts/eu...

***Hall of Fame***
chessmoron chessforum

<Format>:

[player]-[player] [result] [# of MOVES]

==4 Different Scoring Methods==

Standard Moves Ranker (1st place-Over[3pts], 1st place-Under [7pts], Exact [10pts])

Bonus Ranker (3rd place-Over[1pts],2nd place-Over[2pts],3rd place-Under [5pts], 2nd place-Under [6pts]

Standard Moves/Bonus Ranker [Add all to together]

1st place Ranker [how many 1st place you have in Standard Moves Ranker]

For example:

<Note: Participants 3, 4, and 5 are predicated on nobody scoring an exact as Participant 2 did. If someone hits an exact, the closest score under and over will score the points for second place.>

Actual Game: [player]-[player] 0-1 45

Participant 1: [player]-[player] 1/2 45
Participant 2: [player]-[player] 0-1 45
Participant 3: [player]-[player] 0-1 44
Participant 4: [player]-[player] 0-1 43
Participant 5: [player]-[player] 0-1 46

Participant 1: No points even though 45 is correct. Results must be correct. If Result is wrong and moves # is correct...you get no points whatsoever

Participant 2: 10 pts rewarded for correct Result/moves #

Participant 3: 7 pts rewarded for closest under (1st-Under) to 45 moves

Participant 4: 6 pts rewarded for the 2nd closest under (2nd-Under) to 45 moves.

Participant 5: 3 pts rewarded closest OVER(1st-OVER) to 45 moves.

Again, the description of Participant 3, 4, and 5 are based on there being no exact prediction as made by Participant 2.

<IF> there is an exact or an under closest, the highest scoring over participant will be 2nd over. The second closest over will be 3rd over. The <ONLY> time there will be a first over is if there is no exact or under winner.

http://mrwgifs.com/wp-content/uploa... Bold strategy

>> Click here to see ohiochessfan's game collections.

Chessgames.com Full Member
   Current net-worth: 1,292 chessbucks
[what is this?]

   OhioChessFan has kibitzed 35785 times to chessgames   [more...]
   Jun-26-17 Kenneth S Rogoff (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: <GSM: What I can tell you is that I've had white non-hispanics confide all sorts of interesting things to me over the years about their secret racist beliefs, thinking that they were speaking to a member of their tribe, things along the lines of "I don't want *my money* ...
 
   Jun-25-17 chessgames.com chessforum (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: 1. What has been your most pleasant surprise in running Chessgames.com? 2. What has been your most unpleasant surprise?
 
   Jun-25-17 C R G Krishna vs G Pap, 2016 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: "Hurry, Krishna"
 
   Jun-25-17 Trygve Dahl vs F Urkedal, 2017 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: "Frode Book At Him"
 
   Jun-24-17 Kibitzer's Café (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: <Scazza: you and I ought to put our b̶e̶d̶s̶ heads together for the purposes of commerial exploitation.> I am afraid to ask what commerial refers to.
 
   Jun-24-17 K Commons vs A Lein, 1978
 
OhioChessFan: "Hold Your Commons Until the End"
 
   Jun-20-17 D Indjic vs R Sertic, 2011
 
OhioChessFan: White to play his 38th move would be a decent Monday or Tuesday puzzle. [DIAGRAM]
 
   Jun-19-17 Mariano Sana (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Whew, I just looked again at my last post. Very sloppy language, but the trapping of the White King while Black can shuffle Kc7/c8 is an important endgame tactic.
 
   Jun-19-17 Van der Wiel vs J van Baarle, 1983 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: Kind of a tough Monday. I apparently am the only person who had a bit of chess blindness in that I was looking for Qe8+ as a followup to Rf8+. That is, my first thought was "If I could only get the Queen past that Rook, the Queen would mate on e8." It took a little longer than ...
 
   Jun-18-17 Wei Yi vs A Aleksandrov, 2017 (replies)
 
OhioChessFan: <drieper> we apparently cross posted. I didn't look for the line you suggested, but both should be pretty straight forward wins.
 
(replies) indicates a reply to the comment.

Moves Prediction Contest

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 604 OF 604 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Golden Executive: Round 9:

Kramnik - Giri 1/2 40
Karjakin - Vachier-Lagrave 1/2 40
Caruana - Nakamura 1/2 40
So - Aronian 1/2 40
Anand - Carlsen 1/2 40

Jun-16-17  sea otter: Karjakin - Vachier-Lagrave 1/2 105
Caruana - Nakamura 0-1 56
So - Aronian 0-1 51
Anand - Carlsen 1/2 84
Kramnik - Giri 1-0 37
Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  alfamikewhiskey: Round 9:

Kramnik - Giri 1/2 34
Karjakin - Vachier-Lagrave 1/2 34
Caruana - Nakamura 1/2 36
So - Aronian 1/2 34
Anand - Carlsen 0-1 38

Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp:
Round 9:
Kramnik - Giri 1/2 33
Karjakin - Vachier-Lagrave 1/2 38
Caruana - Nakamura 1/2 35
So - Aronian 1/2 36
Anand - Carlsen 1/2 40
Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: ** Round 8 Recap **

The Chess World is watching closely, as <WinKing> continues his run for a Quadruple Crown. He leads 3 Rankers and is second in the other. <Switch> leads that Ranker, and is also within shouting distance of a Quadruple Crown. <chessmoron> and <GE> still haven't hit a #1 and continue to ugly up our scoreboard with the associated 0's.

Can <WinKing> hit for the cycle? Will <Switch> hang on to the lead in Bonus Ranker? Can <Switch> have a big round to hit his own 4 banger? Can someone <please> help <chessmoron> and <GE> hit a #1? Stay tuned for the answers to these and many other exciting questions. Last round, for all the marbles, and the crowd rises....

Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Kramnik - Giri 1-0 30
Karjakin - Vachier-Lagrave 1/2 42
Caruana - Nakamura 1/2 42
So - Aronian 1/2 42
Anand - Carlsen 0-1 36
Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  lostemperor: Round 9:
Kramnik - Giri 1/2 40
Karjakin - Vachier-Lagrave 1-0 45
Caruana - Nakamura 1/2 50
So - Aronian 1/2 40
Anand - Carlsen 1/2 40
Jun-16-17  chessmoron: Kramnik - Giri 1-0 45
Karjakin - Vachier-Lagrave 1/2 43
Caruana - Nakamura 1-0 44
So - Aronian 1/2 42
Anand - Carlsen 1/2 45
Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WinKing: Round 9

Kramnik - Giri 1/2 40
Karjakin - Vachier-Lagrave 1/2 43
Caruana - Nakamura 1/2 42
So - Aronian 1/2 42
Anand - Carlsen 1/2 40

Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: Round 9:

Kramnik - Giri 1/2 42
Karjakin - Vachier-Lagrave 1/2 43
Caruana - Nakamura 1/2 42
So - Aronian 1/2 42
Anand - Carlsen 1/2 40

Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: Round 9 games have started.
Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Golden Executive: ♔ Norway 2017: <FINAL Round> Result ♔

<Kramnik-Giri 1-0 in 20 moves>

Score, User ID, Exact, Moves Under, Moves Over

3, OhioChessFan, -, -, 10
2, juan31, -, -, 19
1, chessmoron, -, -, 25

===

<Karjakin-Vachier-Lagrave 1/2 in 30 moves>

Score, User ID, Exact, Moves Under, Moves Over

3, alfamikewhiskey, -, -, 4
2, Penguincw, -, -, 6
1, Robin01, -, -, 7

===

<Caruana-Nakamura 1-0 in 59 moves>

Score, User ID, Exact, Moves Under, Moves Over

7, chessmoron, -, 15, -

===

<So-Aronian 1/2 in 59 moves>

Score, User ID, Exact, Moves Under, Moves Over

7, wordfunph, -, 9, -
6, chessmoron, -, 17, -
6, OhioChessFan, -, 17, -
6, SwitchingQuylthulg, -, 17, -
6, WinKing, -, 17, -
5, Golden Executive, -, 19, -
5, lostemperor, -, 19, -
2, sea otter, -, -, 25

===

<Anand-Carlsen 1/2 in 34 moves>

Score, User ID, Exact, Moves Under, Moves Over

3, Golden Executive, -, -, 6
3, juan31, -, -, 6
3, lostemperor, -, -, 6
3, offramp, -, -, 6
3, SwitchingQuylthulg, -, -, 6
3, WinKing, -, -, 6
2, chessmoron, -, -, 11
1, wordfunph, -, -, 16

===

Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Golden Executive: ♔ Norway 2017: <FINAL Round> Summary ♔

Perfect # moves predictions for this round goes to:

None

Moves Ranker - Through <FINAL Round>

Highest score: 7 points: <chessmoron>, <wordfunph>

Score, User ID, Over, Under, Exact

♔ 48, WinKing, 1, 5, 1
♘ 38, offramp, 1, 5, 0
♗ 34, Penguincw, 1, 3, 1
♗ 34, SwitchingQuylthulg, 2, 4, 0
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
30, wordfunph, 2, 2, 1
27, sea otter, 2, 3, 0
24, Robin01, 1, 3, 0
23, juan31, 2, 1, 1
17, lostemperor, 1, 2, 0
17, OhioChessFan, 1, 2, 0
7, chessmoron, 0, 1, 0
6, alfamikewhiskey, 2, 0, 0
3, Golden Executive, 1, 0, 0

===

Bonus Ranker - Through <FINAL Round>

Highest score: 9 points: <chessmoron>

Score, UserID, 3-Over, 2-Over, 3-Under, 2-Under

♔ 79, SwitchingQuylthulg, 0, 1, 7, 7
♘ 73, WinKing, 1, 2, 4, 8
♗ 43, sea otter, 1, 4, 2, 4
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
38, lostemperor, 1, 2, 3, 3
33, chessmoron, 2, 1, 1, 4
27, Golden Executive, 0, 0, 3, 2
26, juan31, 1, 2, 3, 1
24, OhioChessFan, 4, 2, 2, 1
24, Robin01, 2, 3, 2, 1
23, wordfunph, 3, 2, 2, 1
16, Penguincw, 1, 2, 1, 1
9, alfamikewhiskey, 1, 4, 0, 0
4, offramp, 4, 0, 0, 0

===

Moves+Bonus Ranker - Through <FINAL Round>

Highest score: 16 points: <chessmoron>

Score, UserID

♔ 121, WinKing
♘ 113, SwitchingQuylthulg
♗ 70, sea otter
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~
55, lostemperor
53, wordfunph
50, Penguincw
49, juan31
48, Robin01
42, offramp
41, OhioChessFan
40, chessmoron
30, Golden Executive
15, alfamikewhiskey

===

Moves Ranker (# of 1st place Under/Over) - Through <FINAL Round>

Highest score: 1 points: <alfamikewhiskey>, <chessmoron>, <Golden Executive>, <juan31>, <lostemperor>, <offramp>, <OhioChessFan>, <SwitchingQuylthulg>, <WinKing>, <wordfunph>

Score, UserID

♔ 7, WinKing
♘ 6, offramp
♘ 6, SwitchingQuylthulg
♗ 5, Penguincw
♗ 5, sea otter
♗ 5, wordfunph
~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*~*
4, juan31
4, Robin01
3, lostemperor
3, OhioChessFan
2, alfamikewhiskey
1, chessmoron
1, Golden Executive

===

Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Golden Executive: <OCF> Please delete my post with the wrong format. Thanks
Jun-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  juan31: Thanks < OhioChessFan and GE> for the contest, congratulations for the medalist.
Jun-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: <OCF> and <GE> thanks thanks!

congratulations to all winners!

Jun-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  wordfunph: triple King for <WinKing>, gratz bro!
Jun-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: ** Final Update **

<OhioChessFan> managed to escape the evil clutches of his employer at 4AM and discover that <WinKing> has won a Triple Crown. He took a silver in the other ranker, won by <Switch>, who added 2 silvers and a bronze. <offramp> had 2 silvers, <Penguincw> had a silver and a bronze, <sea otter> had 3 bronze, and <wordfunph> had a bronze.

<chessmoron> and <GE> waited until the last round to hit a #1, so they got rid of the remaining 0's on our scoreboard, which had become a bit of an embarrassment.

Thanks to <GE> for scoring and all the contestants for participating.

Jun-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  SwitchingQuylthulg: Thanks to <OhioChessFan> and <Golden Executive>, and congratulations to <WinKing> and the other medalists!
Jun-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Woo, I got 2 medals. Anyway, thanks to all for making this contest possible, and hope to see you soon (Dortmund, Biel or Sinquefield I guess).
Jun-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WinKing: Thanks for a well run contest <Golden Executive> & thanks to <OhioChessFan> for hosting this prestigious event.

Congratulations to all of those fortunate enough to win a medal! I had the opportunity, once again, to duel it out with <SwitchingQuylthulg> one of the best players in this 'moves prediction' contest. This time I was the one lucky enough to get the better of it. Next time, if there is one, it may have a different ending. I salute you <Switch> on a great contest!

Look forward to seeing you all at the next event!

Jun-17-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WinKing: <chessmoron> if you can find the time it would be great if you could update the Hall of Fame stats. I'm trying to keep up with everything in my forum but the stats I have are pretty outdated - thanks.
Jun-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  lostemperor: Thanks <chessmoron> and <OhioChessFan>
Jun-19-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: <OCF> You may enjoy this article:

http://www.espn.com/college-footbal...

Jun-20-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Fusilli: Another useful endgame concept, which shows up in actual play more than most people think, is that you can't win with king, a bishop and rook pawn versus king if the bishop does not run on squares of the same color as the pawn's promotion square and the defending king manages to reach the promotion square.

I benefited from that fact in this game (not in this database):

Benedict Smail v Mariano Sana, US Open 2009


click for larger view

White has winning chances with 52.Bd8 or even something like 52.Bb1 or 52.Bc2, but exchanging bishops was too tempting and he played 52.Bd3:


click for larger view

Black has no choice but trading, which fortunately suffices to draw:

52...Bxd3 53. Kxd3 Kxf5 54. Kc4 Ke6 55. Kb5 Nb8 56. Bc7


click for larger view

56... Kd7, just in time! 57. Bxb8 Kc8 58. Bf4 Kb7


click for larger view

1/2-1/2

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 604)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 604 OF 604 ·  Later Kibitzing>

Daily puzzles, news, and more!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No posting personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific user and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Participating Grandmasters are Not Allowed Here!

You are not logged in to chessgames.com.
If you need an account, register now;
it's quick, anonymous, and free!
If you already have an account, click here to sign-in.

View another user profile:
  


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2017, Chessgames Services LLC