< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 49 OF 49 ·
Later Kibitzing> 
Jul1214
  Tabanus: <WCCEP> Thanks ;) Does this mean I can have a little fun now on the World team? Oh wait, Evian next. 

Jul1214
  WCC Editing Project:
<Tab Evian Water>
If you have time, might you take a preliminary look at this? Game Collection: Sukhumi 1972 This is the first tournament I ever found and collected all of the games for with round order and dates, so I want it to be proper before submitting it for promotion. I couldn't find any access to or even mention of a tournament book, so I made do mainly with Tal's autobiography to write the intro. 

Jul1314
  Tabanus: <WCCEP> Looks great. Perhaps write the round date on the first game each round, and on the games deviating from that? Plus I can help with "Hübner" on my keyboard, if you can't! 

Jul1314
  WCC Editing Project:
Thanks <Tab>.
I can change the name to <Robert Hübble Space Telescope> by copy and pasting the "oomlaut letter." You are talking about writing the round date on the first game from each round in the game description box in my games collection, right? I already added in all the correct round dates to the uploaded games on the chessgames.com pages. I will do all of this tomorrow as I'm too tired to do any work right now. QUESTION: Maybe tomorrow , or the next day after I do your suggestions, would you be willing to nominate this collection for me, so that all of the "fields" are sure to be filled in correctly? I want the "fields" to be Tabanized if possible.
Whatever standard you are following on filling out these fields is what I want too. 

Jul1314
  Tabanus: Three duplicates of Spassky games from 1977 requested removed (the first two slips sent ca. 5 July 2014, the third today) http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches... 

Jul1314
  Tabanus: <You are talking about writing the round date on the first game from each round in the game description box in my games collection, right?> Right! It gives a good impression. I could nominate, but Site: Sukhumi GEO or Sukhumi URS? Some people in the Bistro earlier wanted an exception for the Baltic states, i. e. Tallinn EST instead of Tallinn URS (during the Soviet period). So perhaps they want an exception for Georgia as well. I think you will have to ask them there what system they want :( Event: Sukhumi (and "(1972)" will be added) 

Jul1314
  Tabanus: 7.Nbd2 Ne7 8.d4 exd4 9.cxd4 Bb6 10.Re1 Bg4 11.h3 Bh5 12.Qb3 d5 13.e5 Nd7 14.a4 <A. 14...a6> 15.Bd3 c5 <A1. 16.g4 Bg6>
[16...c4 17.Bxc4 dxc4 18.Nxc4 Bg6 19.Bg5 Ba7 20.a5! h6 21.Bh4 Rc8 22.Nd6 Rc7 23.Rac1 Nb8 24.d5 Qd7 25.Kg2! Rxc1 26.Rxc1 f6 27.exf6 gxf6 28.Bg3 h5 29.Nh4 hxg4 30.hxg4 Qxg4 31.Re1 Bc5 32.Nxb7 Nd7 33.f3 ] 17.Bxg6 hxg6
[17...Nxg6 18.Qxd5 cxd4 19.Nc4 Nc5 20.Qxd8 Bxf8 21.Nxd4] 18.Ng5 Nc6 19.e6 fxe6 20.Nxe6 Qe7 21.Nf3 Qf7 22.Bf4 c4 23.Qd1 Qf6 24.Nfg5 Bxd4 [24...Nxd4 25.Nxf8 Rxf8 26.Be3 Nb8 27.f4 Nbc6 28.Qd2 Qxg5 29.fxg5 Nf3+ 30.Kg2 Nxd2 31.Bxb6] 25.Ra3 Bxf2+ =
<A2. 16.Qc2 Bg6> 17.Ng5 cxd4 18.e6 fxe6 [18...f6 19.exd7 fxg5 20.Bxg6 hxg6 21.Nf3 Rxf3 22.gxf3 Qxd7 23.Qe2 Nc6 24.Qe6+ Qxe6 25.Rxe6] 19.Nxe6 Bxd3 20.Qxd3 Nc5 21.Nxc5 Bxc5 22.Nb3 Bb4
[22...Qd6 23.Nxc5 Qxc5 24.b4 Qd6 25.Ba3 Qf6 26.b5 Qxf2+ 27.Kh2] 23.Bd2 Bxd2 24.Qxd2
<B. 14...a5> 

Jul1414
  Nickster: <Tabanus: 7.Nbd2 Ne7 8.d4 exd4 9.cxd4 Bb6 10.Re1 Bg4 11.h3 Bh5 12.Qb3 d5 13.e5 Nd7 14.a4> <A. 14...a6 15.Bd3 c5 > <A1. 16.g4 Bg6 17.Bxg6> click for larger view Three ways to capture:
A11. 17...hxg6 <18.Ng5 Nc6 19.e6 fxe6 20.Nxe6 Qe7 21.Nf3 Qf7 22.Bf4 c4 23.Qd1 Qf6 24.Nfg5 Bxd4 [24...Nxd4 25.Nxf8 Rxf8 26.Be3 Nb8 27.f4 Nbc6 28.Qd2 Qxg5 29.fxg5 Nf3+ 30.Kg2 Nxd2 31.Bxb6] 25.Ra3 Bxf2+ = >
This is in line with what I was getting.
A12. 17...Nxg6 <18.Qxd5 cxd4 19.Nc4 Nc5 20.Qxd8 Bxf8 21.Nxd4> This is exactly what I got.
A13. 17...fxg6 I think this is Black's best line. I have been unable to equalize with white. The whole 16.g4 line is interesting but it looks like a dead end. 

Jul1414
  Nickster: 7.Nbd2 Ne7 8.d4 exd4 9.cxd4 Bb6 10.Re1 Bg4 11.h3 Bh5 12.Qb3 d5 13.e5 Nd7 14.a4 14...a6 15.Bd3 c5 <16.Qc2> click for larger view 16...Bg6 17.Ng5 cxd4 18.e6
Here instead of your <18...fxe6> black can play <18...Nc6> click for larger viewWild complications: 19.exf7+ (19.Ndf3 Nb4 is another big mess which is hard to work out) Kh8 20.Bxg6 Qxg5 21.Bxh7 d3 22.Bxd3 Nde5 23.Rxe5 Nxe5 24.Nc4 Nf3+ 25.Kh1 Qe7 26.gxf3 dxc4 27.Bg6 click for larger viewEngines say = but I'm not so sure. 

Jul1514
  Tabanus: <Nickster> Dead end it seems :( 

Jul1614
  WCC Editing Project:
<Doctor Tab>
I'm going to nominate Game Collection: Sukhumi 1972 today, and I'd like to do it without making a mistake. Might you confirm how to fill out the fields?
##################
<Field a Name of tournament> Sukhumi <Field b Site> Sukhumi, URS <Field c Year> 1972 is already in the box by default, so I just leave that as it is, right? <Field d Scoreboard Style> Leaderboard <Field e Include introduction> Yes ###################
If there are any corrections please let me know. 

Jul1714
  Tabanus: <WCCEP> Great stuff! Site should be Sukhumi URS without a comma, else OK. I wonder in the crosstable, the total scores starting with 9,5 etc. should be placed one space to the right? So that 9 is beneath the 0 in 10. 

Jul1714
  WCC Editing Project:
Thanks <Tab>.
I changed the crosstable like you said, and I nominated it now. 

Jul1714
  Tabanus: Ok. 10<.0> on Taimanov, and big P perhaps in pts :) 

Jul1714
  WCC Editing Project:
Aha! Thanks <CrossTABle>. I fixed those two points on the crossTABle now. 

Jul1814
  Hugin: 7.Nbd2 Ne7 8.d4 exd4 9.cxd4 Bb6 10.b3** Ng6 11.Qc2* Likes this one. [11.Bb2* c6 12.Bd3 Nf4 13.Bc2 Re8 14.h3 (14.Kh1 Bg4 15.Rc1 Bh5 16.Ra1 Qd7 (16...Bg4 17.Rc1 Bh5 18.Ra1 Bg4 19.Rc1 Bh5 20.Ra1) 17.a3 Qg4 18.Rg1 Bg6 19.Qb1 Qh5 20.Re1) 14...d5 15.e5 N6h5 16.Rc1 f6 17.Kh1 g6; 11.h3* c6 12.Bd3 d5 13.Qc2 Nf4 14.e5 Nxd3 15.Qxd3 Ne4 16.Nxe4 Bf5 17.Nf6+ Qxf6 18.Qc3 (18.Qe3 Qe7 19.a4 Qd8 20.Ba3 Re8) 18...Qe6; 11.Ba3* c6 12.e5 cxb5 13.exf6 Bf5 (13...gxf6 14.Ne4 a5 15.Nxd6 b4 16.Nxc8 Rxc8 17.Bc1 Re8 18.Bh6 Ne7 19.Re1 Nf5 20.Rxe8+ Qxe8 21.Qd2 Rd8) 14.fxg7 Re8 15.Re1 Qf6 16.Re3 Rxe3 17.fxe3 Re8 18.Nf1 Bg4 19.h3 Bxf3 20.Qxf3 Bxd4 21.Qxf6 Bxf6 22.Rd1 Be5; 11.Re1* c6 12.Bf1 Re8 13.Qc2 h6 14.h3 Be6 15.Ba3 Nf4 16.e5 dxe5 17.dxe5 N6d5 18.Nc4 Ba5 19.Red1 Bc7 20.Nd6 Likes this one.
click for larger view] 11...c6 12.Bd3 Nf4 13.Bb2 Re8 14.Rfe1 Ba5
[14...Bg4 15.Bf1 Ba5 16.Re3 Qd7 17.Nh4 Bxd2 18.Qxd2 Nxe4 19.Rxe4 Rxe4 20.f3 Bxf3 21.gxf3 Ne2+ 22.Bxe2 Rxh4 23.d5] 15.Bf1 Bg4 16.Re3 Qd7 [16...Rc8 17.a3 h6 18.b4 Bb6 19.h3 Be6]
17.Nh4 Bxd2 18.Qxd2 Nxe4 19.Rxe4 Rxe4 20.f3 Bxf3 21.gxf3 Ne2+ 22.Bxe2 Rxh4 23.d5 * click for larger viewSo temporary conclusion 10.b3 seems to work and it creates a range of diffrent tension filled/complicated postions where our hardware superiority should cause the GM serious problems... 

Jul1914
  Tabanus: <Hugin> Thanks for this! :) Interesting lines, but unfortunately I think <kwid> is correct about 10...d5 = 

Jul2014
  Tabanus: 10.Re1 Bg4 11.h3 Bh5 12.Qb3 d5 13.e5 Nd7 14.a4 a6 15.Bd3 c5 16.Qc2 Bg6 17.Bxg6 Nxg6 18.Qf5 cxd4 19.Nb3 Rc8 20.a5 Nc5 (20...Ba7 21.e6) 21.Bg5 Qe8 (21...Ne7 22.Qg4 Nxb3 23.Bf6 g6 24.Qg5) 22.Nbxd4 Ba7 23.Be3 Ne6 24.Rad1 

Jul2414
  Tabanus: 10.Re1 Bg4 11.h3 Bh5 12.Qb3 d5 13.e5 Nd7 14.Qd1 f6 15.e6 Nb8 16.Nb3 Qd6 17.Bd2 Nbc6 18.Bc3 a5 (18...a6 19.Bd3 Nd8 20.Re3 Re8 21.Qc2 Nxe6 22.Bh7+ Kh8 23.Bf5 is OK?) 19.Rc1 a4 20.Nc5 Bxc5 21.dxc5 Qxc5 22.Bxc6 Nxc6 23.g4 Bg6 24.Bxf6 Qb6 25.Bh4 d4 26.e7 Rfe8 27.Qd2 

Jul2514
  Tabanus: 10.Re1 Bg4 11.h3 Bh5 12.a3 a6 13.Bf1
a) 13...Nc6 14.g4 Bg6 15.d5 Ne5 16.Nxe5 dxe5 17.Bg2 Re8 18.Nc4 Bd4 19.g5 Nd7 20.h4 f6 21.Qg4 Nc5 22.Be3 fxg5 23.hxg5 b) 13..Re8 

Jul2714
  Tabanus: DcGentle: Ok, here there is my winning line with <12. Ba4>:
1. e4 e5 2. Nf3 Nc6 3. Bb5 Nf6 4. d3 Bc5 5. c3 OO 6. OO d6 7. Nbd2 Ne7 8. d4 exd4 9. cxd4 Bb6 10. Re1 Bg4 11. h3 Bh5 12. Ba4 Nc6 13. e5 dxe5 14. dxe5 Nd5 15. Bxc6 bxc6 16. Qa4 Rb8 17. a3 h6 18. Qc4 Re8 19. b3 Re6 20. Bb2 Qe7 21. Rac1 Rd8 22. g4 Bg6 23. Rcd1 c5 24. Ne4 c6 25. Ng3 Ba5 26. Rf1 Bb6 27. Nf5 Qd7 28. N3h4 h5 29. Rfe1 hxg4 30. hxg4 Bh7 31. Nf3 Bc7 32. Ng5 Rg6 33. Bc1 Re8 34. Qe4 Rxe5 35. Qf3 f6 36. Rxe5 Bxe5 37. Nxh7 Kxh7 38. Qh1+ Kg8 39. Qh5 Kf7 40. f4 Bd4+ 41. Kf1 a6 42. Nxd4 Qxg4 43. Qxg4 Rxg4 44. Nxc6 Nxf4 45. Be3 Ne6 46. Rd7+ Kf8 47. Rb7 Re4 48. Bf2 c4 49. Rb4 Rf4 50. bxc4 Rf3 51. a4 Rc3 52. Nd4 Nc5 53. Ne2 Rf3 54. Rb8+ Kf7 55. Kg2 Rb3 56. Rxb3 Nxb3 57. c5 Ke6 58. Nf4+ Kd7 59. Kf3 g5 60. Nd3 Ke6 61. Kg4 a5 62. Be3 Na1 63. Nc1 Nc2 64. Bd2 Nd4 65. Bxa5 

Jul2814
  Tabanus: <imag: <YouRang> Stockfish agrees with your line but insists that Black has small advantage there: 10. Re1 Bg4 11. h3 Bh5 12. Qb3 d5 13. e5 Nd7 14. Qd1 f6 15. e6 Nb8 16. Nb3 Qd6 17. Bd2 Nbc6 18. Bc3 a5 19. Rc1 Nb4 20. a3 Na2 21. Rc2 Nxc3 22. Rxc3 c6 23. Bd3 Qf4 24. Qb1 a4 25. Nc5 Ba5 26. Re3 Bxc3 27. bxc3 Bg6 [0.21] d=42 28.Qxb7 Rfe8 29.Bxg6 hxg6 30.Qb1 Reb8> 

Jul2814
  Tabanus: 10.Re1 Bg4 11.h3 Bh5 12.Ba4 Nc6 13.e5 dxe5 14.dxe5 Nd7 15.Bxc6 bxc6 16.g4 Bg6 17.Nb3 Qe7 18.Bg5 Qe6 19.Rc1 c5 20.a4 0.10/29 20...a5 21.Rc3 h6 22.Bh4 Rfe8 23.Qe2 Bh7
0.04/29 20...a6 21.Rc3 Rfe8 22.Be3 Nxe5 23.Nxe5 Qxe5 

Jul2814
  Tabanus: 10.Re1 Bg4 11.h3 Bh5 12.Ba4 Nc6 13.e5 dxe5 14.dxe5 Nd7 15.Bxc6 bxc6 16.g4 Bg6 17.Nb3 Qe7 18.Bg5 Qe6 19.Rc1 c5 20.Be3! 0.00 

Jul2814
  Tabanus: 11.h3 Bh5 12.Ba4 c6 13.Bb3 h6 14.Nc4 Bxf3 15.gxf3 (15.Qxf3 Bxd4 16.Bf4 d5) 15...Qd7 (15...d5 16.Nxb6 axb6 17.Kh2 Ng6 18.Rg1 Nh5 19.Rg4 Nf6 and draw by repetition?) 16.Nxb6 Qxh3 17.Nc4/Nxa8 Ng6 and draw by repetition? 


< Earlier Kibitzing · PAGE 49 OF 49 ·
Later Kibitzing> 