Members · Prefs · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

K Rogoff 
Photograph courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.  
Kenneth Rogoff
Number of games in database: 132
Years covered: 1968 to 2012
Last FIDE rating: 2505
Overall record: +38 -29 =64 (53.4%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      1 exhibition game, odds game, etc. is excluded from this statistic.

With the White pieces:
 English (10) 
    A15 A13 A18 A16 A19
 Sicilian (8) 
    B21 B23 B30 B38 B85
 Ruy Lopez (7) 
    C88 C68 C97 C65 C91
 English, 1 c4 e5 (5) 
    A29 A20 A22
 King's Indian (5) 
    E62 E74 E63 E60
 English, 1 c4 c5 (5) 
    A34 A30 A36
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (12) 
    B93 B30 B52 B50 B81
 Caro-Kann (11) 
    B17 B10 B13 B12
 English, 1 c4 c5 (9) 
    A30 A34 A33
 Sicilian Najdorf (5) 
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   K Rogoff vs R Blumenfeld, 1976 1-0
   Huebner vs K Rogoff, 1972 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs A H Williams, 1969 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs Smejkal, 1976 1-0
   K Rogoff vs Larsen, 1976 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs O Castro, 1976 1-0
   K Rogoff vs Timman, 1971 1-0
   K Rogoff vs Bisguier, 1974 1/2-1/2
   Huebner vs K Rogoff, 1976 1/2-1/2
   A Matanovic vs K Rogoff, 1976 1/2-1/2

NOTABLE TOURNAMENTS: [what is this?]
   US Championship (1974)
   Lone Pine (1978)
   Lone Pine (1976)
   Biel Interzonal (1976)

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   Ken Rogoff Chess Highlights by GumboGambit
   US Championship 1974 by Phony Benoni
   US Championship 1975 by suenteus po 147

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Kenneth Rogoff
Search Google for Kenneth Rogoff
FIDE player card for Kenneth Rogoff

(born Mar-22-1953, 62 years old) United States of America

[what is this?]
Kenneth Saul Rogoff learned chess from his father at age six, but only took up the game in earnest when he received a chess set for his 13th birthday. He was soon recognised as a chess prodigy. By age 14, he was a USCF master and New York State Open Champion, and shortly thereafter became a senior master, the highest US national title. At sixteen Rogoff dropped out of high school to concentrate on chess, and spent the next several years living primarily in Europe and playing in tournaments there. However, at eighteen he made the decision to go to college and pursue a career in economics rather than to become a professional player, although he continued to play and improve for several years afterward.

Rogoff was awarded the IM title in 1974 and the GM title in 1978. He came third in the World Junior Championship of 1971 and finished second in the US Championship of 1975, which doubled as a Zonal competition, one-half point behind Walter Shawn Browne; this result qualified him for the 1976 Interzonal at Biel, where he finished 13-15th. In other tournaments he finished equal first at Norristown 1973 and Orense 1976.

Early in his economics career, Rogoff served as chief economist at the International Monetary Fund and also at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. He is currently the Thomas D. Cabot Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Economics at Harvard University.

Rogoff's biography in his own words:; Rogoff's game against Magnus Carlsen in August 2012 in New York:; Article by Rogoff in Chessbase titled <Rogoff on innovation, unemployment, inequality and dislocation> with particular reference to professional chess:

Wikipedia article: Kenneth Rogoff

 page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 132  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Larsen vs K Rogoff ½-½35 1968 Canadian OpenA02 Bird's Opening
2. K Rogoff vs S Spencer 1-020 1969 US Jnr ChpB15 Caro-Kann
3. K Rogoff vs A H Williams ½-½106 1969 World Junior Championship, B FinalA56 Benoni Defense
4. E M Green vs K Rogoff ½-½37 1969 World Junior ChB12 Caro-Kann Defense
5. J Durao vs K Rogoff 0-130 1970 MalagaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
6. H Pfleger vs K Rogoff  1-059 1970 WchT U26 17thA58 Benko Gambit
7. K Rogoff vs Z Vranesic  0-148 1970 Ontario opB83 Sicilian
8. Karpov vs K Rogoff 1-026 1971 06, Mayaguez tt-studA22 English
9. Ljubojevic vs K Rogoff 1-029 1971 MalagaB50 Sicilian
10. K Rogoff vs L Day ½-½21 1971 World Student OlympiadA15 English
11. K Rogoff vs Timman 1-048 1971 Malaga 11/138B08 Pirc, Classical
12. Ulf Andersson vs K Rogoff 1-036 1971 OlotB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
13. E Paoli vs K Rogoff 1-026 1971 Liberation tournB06 Robatsch
14. V Tukmakov vs K Rogoff  1-042 1971 Liberation tournD93 Grunfeld, with Bf4 & e3
15. J Durao vs K Rogoff  0-165 1971 MalagaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
16. K Rogoff vs V Tukmakov 1-041 1972 WchT U26 19th fin-AB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
17. K Rogoff vs Adorjan 1-030 1972 Graz Stu ttB30 Sicilian
18. Huebner vs K Rogoff ½-½12 1972 WchT U26 19th fin-AA15 English
19. K Rogoff vs Suttles 0-147 1973 Ottawa op-CANB06 Robatsch
20. E Paoli vs K Rogoff 0-139 1973 NorristownB06 Robatsch
21. Pilnik vs K Rogoff  0-156 1973 NorristownB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
22. L Day vs K Rogoff  ½-½23 1973 CAN-opA07 King's Indian Attack
23. K Rogoff vs Reshevsky 0-128 1974 US ChampionshipC68 Ruy Lopez, Exchange
24. K Rogoff vs K Commons  1-042 1974 US ChampionshipD47 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
25. Benko vs K Rogoff ½-½30 1974 US ChampionshipB30 Sicilian
 page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 132  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Rogoff wins | Rogoff loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7211 OF 7211 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <kellmano: Seems obvious to me 'choice' is not a straight-forward binary situation. Can you choose not to cry at a funeral? I guess you could feel very much like crying but and supress it as much as possible, but surely there is a point at which the feeling is so strong there is not a choice.>

Right. Here's another example: can you choose to be a poached egg? No!

Therefore, homosexuality is not a choice.

I'd dump the feelings-first workdview in favor of a worldview based on reasons and logic. People that commit suicide let their feelings talk them into it. Feelings need to be in check.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <The pro-gray side says:

All genetic behavior is okay
All Homosexuality is genetic behavior
Therefore All homosexual>

A decent and rare attempt to actually form an actual argument here at the Rogoff page. Glad to see some clear thinking. This argument is valid, but I think genetic behavior is an unclear term. For instance:

<The other side says:

All genetic behavior is okay
No Homosexuality is okay
Therefore No Homosexuality is genetic behavior.>

What is meant by "all genetic behavior"?


I inherit alcoholic genes. I drink too much and get drunk all the time like an alcoholic.

This is not okay just because I inherited bad genes.

I don't think that anyone can say that their actions were not preceded by choices (unless there is a gun to your head, or if you are swirling around in a tornado etc...)

I think it's true that we might not always choose to feel certain ways, but we do choose what to act on. This idea that homosexuals are somehow not in control of their lives, like they are unthinking robots that have no choice but to robotically carry out pre programmed acts of sodomy is ridiculous and not worthy of real argument.

I can just imagine all of these homosexuals walking around like zombies with their arms stretched out in front of them, plodding along slowly one step at a time, glazed over looks on their faces, mindlessly creeping around the earth while constantly and compulsively looking for an anus to poke saying, "it's not my choice, it's not my choice"

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <Jun-29-15
Premium Chessgames Member kellmano: <big pawn> 'forcing' isn't a straight binary either. On your basis if someone had a gun to your head, for example, you could still choose not to obey them. In my homosexuality example I was referring the misery of the spouse and family, not the closet homosexual.>

Kellmano, your binary force comment is a distiction that makes no difference.

Yes, gun to head or not, both are choices.

The difference that actually matters is this:

In the case of homosexuals and their sexual preference, they willingly choose to engage in sodomy or whatever. Preference is the key word.

In the case of the man with a gun to his head, he doesn't want to do what the man with the gun says, but only does so because of force; he doesn't want to die.

Let's look at another example of force:

Say I see you at the store and I go up to you and knock your groceries out of your hands. I'm to blame.

Now suppose that I have no such intentions whatsoever but someone pushes me into you, knocking the groceries out of your hand. I'm not to blame, even though I could have chosen to not be at the store.

On another note, although I refer to "homosexuals", I only do so because those are the words you people are using to talk about this.

My thoughts are that there is no need to label someone a homosexual. Instead, they are just people. We should be talking about homosexuality the act, the behavior, and not use that to brand a certain identity to a person.

Some confused feeling-first people think that saying "homosexuality is wrong" is the same thing as saying "if you participate in homo behavior then YOU are no good". This makes the feelings-first people feel like meanness is being spread around for no reason.

If we say stealing is wrong, that doesn't mean that if you've ever stolen you are forever a bad person. We can't easily judge people including ourselves, but we can judge behavior and that's what we do when we condemn homosexuality.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <they live a crushed life now because she committed suicide. I'm sure they would have given up the attempts to "cure" her if that meant she would still be alive today.>

Lots of homosexuals commit suicide. It's a dangerous lifestyle. That's probably one of the things her parents worried about.

Homos commit suicide because they have an inner moral experience that tells them they are living wrong, and the shame is unbearable.

The shame is unbearable because these people are judging themselves. They shouldn't. They kill themselves because they are feelings-first and vulnerable to their feelings. They ought to avoid that.

Instead, they should allow their intellect to take the lead and hold their feelings in check. The intellect should not be a slave to ones feelings.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <HeMateMe: <The "Sex and the City" star recently clarified remarks she made during a speech to a gay audience in which she declared, "I've been straight and I've been gay, and gay is better."> Um....Big Pawn, maybe a) she's bisexual and is still sorting out her own desires>

No, you're just wrong. How dare you speak for her. She said GAY and not bi-sexual. I know she's a woman and we are men, but I think she is fully capable of expressing herself as a mature adult.

or b) she feels that it is empowering to tell the world that whe wasn't hatched gay, but simply found her way in that world, after lengthy experimentation. celebs do go off on ego trips, to get more attentio>

You've got a vivid imagination. But why refuse to take in her words at face value? There are no good reasons to doubt what she says - except that it totally contradicts your liberal narrative.

Amazing how you immediately invent your own alternate reality to keep your emotional convictions intact.

<Many gay people say that they were confused as teenagers, because they didn't know what they were supposed to be, and they experimented with sex with both girls and boys. They ultimately followed their deepest and earliest impulses, which were for same sex relationships.>

You're right, many say that. You know why? Because they can express themselves as adults just like sex in the city woman. I noticed you don't invent ad hoc theories about the "many" homos that you mentioned; only for this lady that contradicted your narrative.

Just saying.

<It is possible that there is a mix of hereditary and environment in the makeup of a gay person.>

Not with our girl above. She was quite candid. You just refuse to hear her at all. After our conversation here, you'll pretend that you've never heard of any gays saying its a choice.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Big Pawn: <Richard Taylor> For the most "boring man in the world" your post was very interesting - and well written. I guess, being in philosophy, I love reading boring work! (did you study philosophy?)

Indeed, the current situation is lamentable and I second your lamentations.

I guess you live in NZ? I didn't know the sodomites had invaded your neck of the woods too.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Abdel Irada: <Big Pawn: Homosexuality not a choice so it's not immoral?

I wonder if <Abdel> really believes that Allah knows what is in his heart. I wonder if <Abdel> thinks that Allah will believe his lies just because he lies to himself?

Life is very short.

Will Allah ask Abdel, "why, when given the chance, did you not love your fellow man by guiding him in the right way when he is lost?">

First, I will point out that *you* do not know what is in my heart, so don't accuse me of lying. My opinion may be wrong, but every mistaken opinion is not a lie.

Then I will turn the question around and ask: "[W]hy, when given the chance, did you not love your fellow man by guiding him in the right way when he is lost?"

<OCF> says it is better to kill homosexuals than to tolerate them. Surely killing is worse than almost anything else one can do; surely to kill someone for sexual "deviance" is a terrible sin.

You have even said you rejected <OCF>'s reasoning. Why, then, do you not correct him?

Jun-30-15  epistle: Homosexuality is God's solution to the problem of population explosion.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Abdel Irada: <epistle>: I said something rather like that earlier. :-)

Jun-30-15  epistle: I was just echoing your wisdom.
Jun-30-15  cormier:
Jun-30-15  cormier: Israel is set to start building a 16-foot-high wall along its eastern border with Jordan. The 19-mile segment will stretch from the southern port city of Eilat to Timna, where a new airport will be built.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Abdel Irada: Maybe I echoed yours retroactively. :-D

Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <john b: That is why leading a life in accordance with moral principles is very hard. Moral puts an obligation on us whether we like it or not.>

I think that's the primary driving force of unbelief. An admission that God exists implies a moral obligation to live according to that God's dictates. A lot of people can't/won't do that.

Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <CIO: they live a crushed life now because she committed suicide. I'm sure they would have given up the attempts to "cure" her if that meant she would still be alive today.>

I realize it's impossible to get into specifics, but there's no question suicide rates are high among those who identify as homosexual. Does that suggest a problem with the identification?

Jun-30-15  Jim Bartle: <I realize it's impossible to get into specifics, but there's no question suicide rates are high among those who identify as homosexual. Does that suggest a problem with the identification?>

No. It suggests a problem with rehection and condemnation from others.

Jun-30-15  ljfyffe: Driving someone to suicide rather than killing them directly is so much more "Christian", I suppose.
Jun-30-15  diceman: <Jim Bartle: <I realize it's impossible to get into specifics, but there's no question suicide rates are high among those who identify as homosexual. Does that suggest a problem with the identification?>

No. It suggests a problem with rehection and condemnation from others.>

Heh, heh,

...being conservative I wouldn't know.

I only deal with the "most tolerant" when it comes to sexuality, religion, race, wealth, guns, freedoms, laws.

It must be awful to be "labeled."

Jun-30-15  Jim Bartle: Could someone please translate <diceman>'s reply into "coherent"?
Jun-30-15  ljfyffe: It cannot be done.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Abdel Irada: That's okay. <diceman> is a master of the art of quoting himself, so he really doesn't need an interlocutor.

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Abdel Irada: That's okay. <diceman> is a master of the art of quoting himself, so he really doesn't need an interlocutor.>

Cuts down on one's overhead, don't you know--cost of doing business is high nowadays.

Jun-30-15  diceman: <ljfyffe: Driving someone to suicide rather than killing them directly>

Wouldn't it have been cool if the cake bakers honored Mohammed?

...liberals would have lost their heads
over Christians finally building bridges, and mending fences.

...and stringing up rope.

<lost their heads>
...a second tip of the hat!

<killing them directly>

...known in the Middle East as, "cutting out the middle man."

Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <OhioChessFan: An admission that God exists implies a moral obligation to live according to that God's dictates.> Nonsense. Does an "admission" that Odin or Zeus exists imply a moral obligation? It all depends on what sort of god your imagination comes up with.

I can imagine a god creating the universe (well, I can't, but some people can) but then taking no further interest in it. Like me building a birdhouse and then not bothering to watch what the birds do or just forgetting about it.

Being all-powerful doesn't imply anything about right and wrong. Surely you can see that those characteristics are unrelated.

Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <Most Americans don't know Chris Christie like I do, so it's only natural to wonder what testimony I might offer after covering his every move for the last 14 years.

Is it his raw political talent? No, they can see that.>

<Is it his measurable failure to fix the economy, solve the budget crisis or even repair the crumbling bridges? No, his opponents will cover that if he ever gets traction.

My testimony amounts to a warning: Don't believe a word the man says.>

<Don't misunderstand me. They all lie, and I get that.> <<<But Christie does it with such audacity, and such frequency,>>> <<<that he stands out.>

<He has a silver tongue.

but if you look closely you can see that it is forked like a serpent's.

But let's start with my personal favorite. It dates back to the 2009 campaign, when the public workers unions asked him if he intended to cut their benefits.

He told them their pensions were <<<"sacred">>> to him.>

<"The notion that I would eliminate, change, or alter your pension is not only a lie, but cannot be further from the truth," he wrote them. <<<"Your pension and benefits will be protected>>> when I am elected governor."

He then proceeded to make cutting those benefits the centerpiece of his first year in office.>

<This, we know now, was vintage Christie. Other lying politicians tend to waffle, to leave themselves some escape hatch. You can almost smell it.

But Christie <<<lies with conviction.>>> His hands don't shake, and his eyes don't wander. I can hardly blame the union leaders who met with him for believing him.

"He seemed very sincere," says Bill Lavin, head of the firefighters union. "Why doubt someone who tells you this is sacred to them?">

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 7211)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7211 OF 7211 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. Don't post personal information of members.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | advertising | contact us
Copyright 2001-2015, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies