chessgames.com

K Rogoff 
Photograph courtesy of Wikimedia Commons.  
Kenneth Rogoff
Number of games in database: 113
Years covered: 1968 to 2012
Last FIDE rating: 2505
Overall record: +32 -27 =53 (52.2%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.
      1 exhibition game, odds game, etc. is excluded from this statistic.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 English (9) 
    A15 A13 A18 A16 A19
 Sicilian (7) 
    B21 B30 B38 B85 B83
 Ruy Lopez (6) 
    C88 C68 C97 C65 C95
 English, 1 c4 e5 (5) 
    A29 A20 A22
 King's Indian (5) 
    E62 E74 E63 E60
 English, 1 c4 c5 (4) 
    A30 A34 A36
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (10) 
    B93 B52 B30 B50 B81
 Caro-Kann (8) 
    B17 B10 B12
 English, 1 c4 c5 (8) 
    A34 A30 A33
 Sicilian Najdorf (4) 
    B93
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   K Rogoff vs R Blumenfeld, 1976 1-0
   Huebner vs K Rogoff, 1976 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs Timman, 1971 1-0
   Huebner vs K Rogoff, 1972 1/2-1/2
   K Rogoff vs Bisguier, 1974 1/2-1/2

GAME COLLECTIONS: [what is this?]
   US Championship 1974 by Phony Benoni

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Kenneth Rogoff
Search Google for Kenneth Rogoff
FIDE player card for Kenneth Rogoff


KENNETH ROGOFF
(born Mar-22-1953) United States of America

[what is this?]
Kenneth Saul Rogoff learned chess from his father at age 6, but took up the game in earnest when he got a chess set for his 13th birthday. He was soon recognised as a chess prodigy. By age 14, he was a USCF master and New York State Open Champion, and shortly thereafter became a senior master, the highest US national title. At sixteen Rogoff dropped out of high school to concentrate on chess, and spent the next several years living primarily in Europe and playing in tournaments there. However, at eighteen he made the decision to go to college and pursue a career in economics rather than to become a professional player, although he continued to play and improve for several years afterward.

Rogoff was awarded the IM title in 1974, and the GM title in 1978. He was 3rd in the World Junior Championship of 1971 and finished 2nd in the US Championship of 1975, which doubled as a Zonal competition, a half point behind Walter Shawn Browne; this result qualified him for the 1976 Interzonal at Biel where he finished 13-15th. In other tournaments he was 1st= at Norristown 1973 and 1st= at Orense in 1976.

Early in his economics career, Rogoff served as chief economist at the International Monetary Fund and also at the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. He is currently the Thomas D. Cabot Professor of Public Policy and Professor of Economics at Harvard University.

Rogoff's biography in his own words: http://www.economics.harvard.edu/fa...; Rogoff's game against Magnus Carlsen in August 2012 in New York: http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...; Article by Rogoff in Chessbase titled <Rogoff on innovation, unemployment, inequality and dislocation> with particular reference to professional chess: http://chessbase.com/newsdetail.asp...

Wikipedia article: Kenneth Rogoff


 page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 113  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Larsen vs K Rogoff ½-½35 1968 Canadian OpenA02 Bird's Opening
2. K Rogoff vs S Spencer 1-020 1969 US Jnr ChpB15 Caro-Kann
3. K Rogoff vs A H Williams ½-½106 1969 World Junior Championship, B FinalA56 Benoni Defense
4. E M Green vs K Rogoff ½-½37 1969 World Junior ChB12 Caro-Kann Defense
5. J Durao vs K Rogoff 0-130 1970 MalagaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
6. H Pfleger vs K Rogoff  1-059 1970 WchT U26 17thA58 Benko Gambit
7. K Rogoff vs Z Vranesic  0-148 1970 Ontario opB83 Sicilian
8. Karpov vs K Rogoff 1-026 1971 06, Mayaguez tt-studA22 English
9. K Rogoff vs L Day ½-½21 1971 World Student OlympiadA15 English
10. Ulf Andersson vs K Rogoff 1-036 1971 OlotB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
11. Ljubojevic vs K Rogoff 1-029 1971 MalagaB50 Sicilian
12. E Paoli vs K Rogoff 1-026 1971 Liberation tournB06 Robatsch
13. V Tukmakov vs K Rogoff  1-042 1971 Liberation tournD93 Grunfeld, with Bf4 & e3
14. K Rogoff vs Timman 1-048 1971 Malaga 11/138B08 Pirc, Classical
15. J Durao vs K Rogoff  0-165 1971 MalagaB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
16. K Rogoff vs V Tukmakov 1-041 1972 WchT U26 19th fin-AB21 Sicilian, 2.f4 and 2.d4
17. K Rogoff vs Adorjan 1-030 1972 Graz Stu ttB30 Sicilian
18. Huebner vs K Rogoff ½-½12 1972 WchT U26 19th fin-AA15 English
19. L Day vs K Rogoff  ½-½23 1973 CAN-opA07 King's Indian Attack
20. E Paoli vs K Rogoff 0-139 1973 NorristownB06 Robatsch
21. Pilnik vs K Rogoff  0-156 1973 NorristownB81 Sicilian, Scheveningen, Keres Attack
22. K Rogoff vs Suttles 0-147 1973 Ottawa op-CANB06 Robatsch
23. K Rogoff vs Bisguier  ½-½77 1974 US ChampionshipE08 Catalan, Closed
24. K Rogoff vs Zuckerman  1-044 1974 US ChampionshipA15 English
25. N Weinstein vs K Rogoff  ½-½11 1974 US ChampionshipC42 Petrov Defense
 page 1 of 5; games 1-25 of 113  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Rogoff wins | Rogoff loses  
 

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4453 OF 4453 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  chancho: <Our technology may be getting smarter, but a provocative new study suggests human intelligence is on the decline. In fact, it indicates that Westerners have lost 14 I.Q. points on average since the Victorian Era.>

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/...

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  johnlspouge: < <cormier> wrote: However, that leaves 14 North American retailers that are shirking responsibility for any future workplace deaths by refusing to sign the accord. >

Quite correct: I should have excerpted from the link. Thanks.

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  hedgeh0g: <<OCF: Is saying someone is "dishonest" the same as saying they are a "liar"?> <Abdel: Is outright lying the only way to be dishonest? >

I asked first. Do you practice being smarmy or does it come naturally?>

As though it weren't obvious enough already, the answer to your question would be "No".

Now enjoy your three-month vacation where you'll conveniently return when everyone has forgotten you were tasked with answering a question of your own.

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Abdel Irada: <OhioChessFan: <OCF: Is saying someone is "dishonest" the same as saying they are a "liar"?>

<Abdel: Is outright lying the only way to be dishonest? >

I asked first.>

Thank you for demonstrating exactly the distinction I had in mind.

To make it plain: To my knowledge, you have never actually *lied* on this forum. But I have often seen you use fallacious arguments, strategic silences and casuistry, techniques many might consider dishonest.

Whether you agree with that last judgment or not, I think the example serves to show why my question answers yours.

<Do you practice being smarmy or does it come naturally?>

I am but your humble apprentice. ;-)

May-22-13  Colonel Mortimer: <OCF: Is saying someone is "dishonest" the same as saying they are a "liar"?>

There are questions, and then there are rhetorical questions.

As a footnote: <OCF> you seem to have a hang up about 'lying'. You've accused many people of 'lying' on this forum. What's it all about? Did you mean 'dishonest' instead?

Don't confuse the two, they ARE different. Words mean things remember!

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  OneArmedScissor: Why is <Abdel> obsessed with the jews?
May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  hedgeh0g: <Why is <Abdel> obsessed with the jews?>

Because you were adopted. Now go away.

May-22-13  diceman: <OneArmedScissor: Why is <Abdel> obsessed with the jews?>

Read PAGE 9 of the Terrorteer Handbook.

May-22-13  Colonel Mortimer: <OCF> <I asked first.> Such entitlement.
May-22-13  diceman: <cormier: noting is imposible to God ... lol ....>

Lets see him make a man out of Abdel.

May-22-13  Colonel Mortimer: <OCF> Were you the kid in the playground that others shunned?

Note the example of a rhetorical question:)

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  benjinathan: <Were you the kid in the playground that others shunned?>

I suspect that goes for many around here - this is a chess website after all ;0

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <OCF> <I asked first.>

<CM: Such entitlement.>

If <you> are entitled to call someone else a moron, AJ is entitled to call someone else a megalomaniac.

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <Were you the kid in the playground that others shunned?>

<benji: I suspect that goes for many around here - this is a chess website after all ;0 >

Yeah, cause I kept winning their lunch money in blitz.

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Travis Bickle: <diceman: Lets see him make a man out of Abdel.> Let's see him make a man out of Cu^& Mortimer. ; P
May-22-13  diceman: <Abdel Irada:
<HeMateMe:>
I would characterize you as the most dishonest and unscrupulous poster in this forum.>

No, you are.
(Wow, diceman has entered the hallowed halls of our most deeply intellectual posters, it can only be down from here)

<the hallowed halls of our most deeply intellectual posters> …and remember,
they are definitely, absolutely, and positively, not Anti-Semitic.

…they will tell you that many, many, many, many, times during the day.

Why?
…because they aren’t.
Absolutely positively and most definitely.

Just ask them they will tell you.
(actually, if you wait, Abdel will probably tell you many, many, many, many, more times without even asking)

…it’s a little known fact, but that’s how folks who aren’t Anti-Semitic spend most of their day.

Absolutely, positively, and most definitely.

If confused just ask, they’re here to help.

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <king sac> Call it what you will. Places like australia, the United States and Brazil had immigrant white populations that were more successful at populating these lands than were the indigenous peoples. The land was sparsely settled, and the people there must have seemed primitive to the immigrants who came.

I think this is quite a bit different than Japan attacking modern nations like the Phillippines and South Korea, to kill and conquor lands already settled. In the case of Japan and Nazi Germany much of it wasn't just trying to take territory, there was also an element of killing just for the sake of killing--the Holocaust, and Japan's active slaughter of unarmed chinese civillians.

It you want to beat yourself up over American westward expansion, fine. Turkey is a remnant of the Ottoman empire, and your ancestors have as much blood on their hands as anyone else.

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: I heard <HeMateMe> might be in the midst of a credibility death spiral (not that there was much to lose), so much like looking at a traffic accident, I had to take a look:

<HeMateMe: The growing north american population of white colonists pushing the native americans off of their lands bears no resemblance to Nazi germany or the Roman empire.>

That's right. They weren't slaughtered and imprisoned in concentration camps. They just sort of…got bumped in to another area, sort of like a friendly heavy metal mosh pit.

   <HeMateMe: <Mortsie> The United States has never been an "empire". We didn't colonize the world…>

No, those hundreds of military bases scattered throughout the world http://socioecohistory.files.wordpr..., along with the McDonalds and Starbucks to keep the troops well fed, don't constitute an "empire", more like a peace-keeping brigade.

In the 50's and 60's on Guam the locals were punished if they spoke anything but English in school and at their government jobs. Now their mother tongue, Chamorro, is all but dead.

That's modern colonialism. You don't have to massacre everybody. Just kill the culture.

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <Check It Out:> Way too righteous, get off of your high horse, boy. You probably have an IRA or pension plan that invests in these same multinationals you are bad mouthing. They are making money for you. And you are going to spend it.

Foreign military bases? Maybe they are there to use high end eqipment which detects the building and testing of nuclear weapons. Maybe knowing such things about the rest of the world will save YOUR dumb butt, one fine day.

I don't think anyone here is defending someone who drives another ethnic group off of their land. I'm just saying that the disparity in advancement was much greater in the 18th and 19th centuries, setters vis a vis native americans, than in the 20th century when Germany and Japan went on massive killing and conquest sprees. The Americans in the old west took farmlands from indians. They didn't bomb cities and troop formations with an airforce. If you can't see any difference, fine. your ancestors are the same as mine, and wallow in guilt if you want to. I'm going to have a beer and watch the Heat/Pacers game.

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: <HeMateMe> <I don't think anyone here is defending someone who drives another ethnic group off of their land.>

Aren't any of those bottles you stare at reflective?

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  King Sacrificer: <HeMateMe: It you want to beat yourself up over American westward expansion, fine. Turkey is a remnant of the Ottoman empire, and your ancestors have as much blood on their hands as anyone else.>

Every time you answer me with a reference to Turkey, i remember something and feel good. I'm able to question and criticize my ancestors/country but you are not. If i was born and raised in New York, i would probably do the same thing and criticize both USA and Ottoman Empire. But if you were born in Turkey, you would bad mouth USA and tell how lovely Ottoman Empire was. Believe me, we have millions of such people here. You would be one of them.

May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Shams: <King Sacrificer> Spot on.
May-22-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: <king sac> I just said "I'm not defending anyone...." That includes the USA. How more clear can I be? I don't know what you are arguing here, anyway. As a descendant of the Ottoman empire, do you feel guilty over the killing of your muslim ancestors, as they pushed westward, over the past five hundred years? Probably not. Do I feel guilty over the plight of the American indian, 200 years ago? I wasn't there.

If you can find someting more interesting to discuss, I'd love to take part.

May-22-13  diceman: <Shams: <King Sacrificer> Spot on.>

Anti-Semites of a feather, flock together.

May-22-13  diceman: <King Sacrificer: Ottoman Empire.>

Wow, I guess they didn’t have enough lazy-boy recliners?

Jump to page #   (enter # from 1 to 4453)
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4453 OF 4453 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2013, Chessgames Services LLC
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies