| Jul-24-07 |
| Mameluk: http://www.susanpolgar.blogspot.com/
Now that is a coincidence, Kramnik is a bad cheater. Confident boy, regular participant of Pardubice, beating Navara last year in Poland in not that much Rybka-like game. I wonder what has happened with those cases as DP Singh or young players from Phillipines. Stanislav Novikov was suspect at Aeroflot and they stopped transmission of his games, now he normally plays in Pardubice again. I think this is worse than Afromeev who only takes rating points from players who agree so. Life sentence or very serious fine cause people love money most and life sentence for the second cheating are only appropriate punishments. This is stealing money from old professionals like Malaniuk. |
 |
Jul-24-07
 |
| Karpova: <Mameluk: Now that is a coincidence, Kramnik is a bad cheater.>
Could you elaborate on this accusation? |
|
| Jul-24-07 |
| Mameluk: <Karpova> Have you read the Polgar article? |
|
Jul-24-07
 |
| keypusher: <mameluk> Do you mean Kramnik or Ejsmont? |
|
Jul-24-07
|
| Karpova: Karpova: <Mameluk>
Of course, I did read the article and (not to my surprise considering what it's about) Kramnik is not mentioned anywhere.So why do you bring him up? Did you confuse the names as <keypusher> insinuates? |
|
Jul-24-07
 |
| percyblakeney: I doubt that <Mameluk> actually means that Ejsmont's 49 moves out of 50 matching Rybka 2.3.2 is a coincidence, and that Kramnik is the cheater of the two because of Danailov's slightly less convincing calculations :-) Still a bit strange that someone should follow Rybka for 49 of 50 moves, and that for five games in a row. Something like that is bound to make everyone suspicious. Ejsmont isn't far from 2400 and should be able to make more than one move on his own in every game (maybe depending on how he got close to 2400...). |
|
Jul-24-07
|
| percyblakeney: Someone posted the games in question on the Polgar blog together with the Rybka suggestions. In several games Ejsmont is following Rybka to the end without one single deviation, and he beats much higher rated GM's in less than 30 moves. At a couple of occasions he plays something like h4 instead of Nh4, and after the 7th round he was expelled from the tournament. |
|
| Jul-24-07 |
| Mameluk: Maybe I confused words bad for bad. I mean that Kramnik cannot even cheat properly. But funny how some people have alergy seeing words Kramnik and cheater together:) But no offense <Karpova>. The games with evaluations are posted at susanpolgar, so I first wanted to replay Ivanchuk´s games from Canada to learn something, but I will try to learn from Ejsmont instead. |
|
Jul-24-07
|
| keypusher: <The games with evaluations are posted at susanpolgar, so I first wanted to replay Ivanchuk´s games from Canada to learn something, but I will try to learn from Ejsmont instead.> LOL, good plan. Sorry I misunderstood. |
|
Jul-24-07
|
| Karpova: <Mameluk: Maybe I confused words bad for bad.> Nice to see that you didn't even read my question properly or else you would have seen at once that you confused the names (and no further question if I had read the article would have been necessary). |
|
