|
< Earlier kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |
| Apr-25-05 |
| Poisonpawns: Was this another promising american player at one time? |
 |
Apr-25-05
 |
| iron maiden: Not all that promising, although he did tie for first at the U.S. Championship one year. |
 |
Apr-25-05
 |
| tamar: Rachels wrote a letter to New in Chess 7/2004 commenting on Bobby Fischer. He is a professor now at the University of Alabama. |
 |
Apr-25-05
 |
| Caissanist: Iron Maiden--why doesn't he seem to you to have been that promising? He was apparently only 19 when he tied for the championship. So far as I know, Fischer, Evans and now Nakamura are the only others to have won it that young. |
 |
Apr-25-05
 |
| iron maiden: I meant that he never really appeared to be world championship caliber. But for a fleeting instant in the early 1990's he did look to have some international potential. Unfortunately he turned out to be a John Grefe rather than a Bobby Fischer. |
 |
| Nov-05-05 |
| Koster: <john Grefe> you mean Rachels ended up joining some wacko cult and worshipping his guru? I thought he was a professor... |
 |
| Nov-05-05 |
| WMD: <Rachels wrote a letter to New in Chess 7/2004 commenting on Bobby Fischer.> And what did he say?
His hair was thinning as a young man, so now he must be as bald as a coot. |
 |
Nov-05-05
 |
| Resignation Trap: <WMD> So, who wants fat hair? See: http://www.bradpriddy.com/rachels His last serious tournament seems to have been the 1992 US Championship, where he finished -2: http://members.aol.com/graemecree/c... . |
 |
| Nov-05-05 |
| WMD: My best advice to anyone with thinning hair is to wear a cap or hat if you're out in the sun. Alternatively, try a wig. |
 |
Nov-05-05
 |
| tamar: <And what did he say> NIC 2004/7
Stuart Rachels letter
<In a recent Wall Street Journal editorial, Kasparov attributed Ficher's mental decline to the fact that he left chess. This is wrong. It's like saying John Nash went downhill because
he left mathematics. The mental decline makes the genius abandon his trade, not the other way around. Many articles about Fischer don't make the obvious point: he is a paranoid schizophrenic. The onset of schizophrenia is typically in one's late 20's. Bobby's long Nash-like hiatus began in 1972 when he was 29. WHile we cannot know whether Fischer hears voices the main symptom of schizophrenia, we can observe signs of psychosis in his behavior: Fischer's tirade against the dirty Jews, the fixed world championship matches and the thieving storage facility in California are typical of paranoid schizophrenia. And as Hans Ree said, even someone who doesn't know English can sense that something is wrong by hearing Fischer's tone of voice-he is too angry.> cont. |
 |
Nov-05-05
 |
| tamar: Rachels letter cont.
<There are different types of schizophrenia. Paranoids are the highest functioning. Fischer is a paranoid, but Nash is not. This is why Fischer, unlike Nash, never thought he was going to become the Emperor of Antarctica. And this is why Fischer's tirades usually have some basis in reality, however tenuous.I am reluctant to send you this letter because I do not want Fischer to read it and hate me. I began playing chess in the 1970's. Fischer was my chess hero then, and he still is. To my knowledge, Bobby Fischer has never hurt a fly, and his shortcomings have a clinical cause. Kasparov has many faults but lacks that excuse. Professor Stuart Rachels
Birmingham,AL,USA> |
 |
Nov-05-05
 |
| Ron: http://www.as.ua.edu/philos/faculty... |
 |
Apr-18-06
 |
| LIFE Master AJ: Did you know Stuart and I played. I played him in two or three AL State Championship Tournaments. I think at least two of the game scores were published in the "Antics," which used to be the official newsletter/magazine for Alabama. |
 |
| Sep-26-06 |
| BIDMONFA: Stuart Rachels RACHELS, Stuart
http://www.bidmonfa.com/rachels_stu...
_ |
 |
| Sep-04-07 |
| rozumim: Okay <BIDMONFA>, I give: who, or what, are you? I've been to your website, and I'm scratching my head as to how and why you've collected all of this player information...? |
 |
| Dec-25-07 |
| Ziggurat: http://www.bradpriddy.com/rachels/C...
A new essay about chess by Stuart Rachels |
 |
| Dec-25-07 |
| Tomlinsky: Thank you <Ziggurat> for the enjoyable read. |
 |
| Dec-25-07 |
| Jim Bartle: Thanks for that; very interesting. |
 |
Dec-25-07
 |
| whiteshark: Yes, very interesting, bookmarked his homepage for further readings. My guess is that his sentence (p.5):
<By 1989, the world could see that Kasparov was an even better player than Fischer had been in his prime.> won't find an undivided acceptance on the Fischer page.. :D |
 |
| Dec-25-07 |
| Tomlinsky: <won't find an undivided acceptance on the Fischer page> Or the Kramnik page, or the Topalov page, or the Capablanca page, etc. |
 |
Dec-25-07
 |
| whiteshark: <Tomlinsky> But of course. Seen one, seen 'em all. |
 |
Dec-26-07
 |
| micartouse: I really enjoyed <Ziggurat>'s link. This Rachels guy has a really down to earth view of the game and he does a good job painting a picture of chess culture. I don't agree with him about <Searching for Bobby Fischer> though. I don't think it was a really good movie from a chess perspective - it doesn't show what chess life is really like at all. Interesting comments about problemists. My favorite remark: <When chess players call chess a sport, this strikes me not only as false, but as pathetic. It’s pathetic in the same way it’s pathetic to ask someone out on a date who said no the last three times you asked. American culture has rejected chess. For the chess player to insist that chess is a sport is a way of not taking the hint.> |
 |
| Dec-27-07 |
| Helios727: Doesn't a "sport" also have to have a physical athletic element to it as well? |
 |
| Dec-27-07 |
| Petrosianic: <When chess players call chess a sport, this strikes me not only as false, but as pathetic. It’s pathetic in the same way it’s pathetic to ask someone out on a date who said no the last three times you asked. American culture has rejected chess. For the chess player to insist that chess is a sport is a way of not taking the hint.> Yeah, good observation. But still, it's <American> culture that's rejected chess. As Rachels himself popints out, GM's are more highly thought of in Europe. So he's explained why Americans want chess to be a sport (so that America will "go out" with us). But is it a sport or not? If it's not here, it's not in Europe either, where GM's are appreciated. Rachels says that physical activity is a necessary condition of sport. And I tend to agree with that. My first reaction was to say that chess is a pastime, not a sport (the difference being the lack of physical activity). However, thefreedictionary.com's definition of sport muddles this a bit: 1.
a. Physical activity that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often engaged in competitively. 2. An activity involving physical exertion and skill that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often undertaken competitively. <3. An active pastime; recreation.> D'oh oh Number 3.
|
 |
| Dec-27-07 |
| apple pi: The other "snagging point" in the argument against chess as a sport is the technical classification of chess as "physical" because, although it doesn't involve the contraction of muscles as widely accepted sports do, it still involves impulses of neurons in the brain. |
 |
|
< Earlier kibitzing · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·
Later Kibitzing > |