chessgames.com

  
Stuart Rachels
Number of games in database: 55
Years covered: 1986 to 1992
Current FIDE rating: 2485
Overall record: +12 -18 =25 (44.5%)*
   * Overall winning percentage = (wins+draws/2) / total games
      Based on games in the database; may be incomplete.

MOST PLAYED OPENINGS
With the White pieces:
 Sicilian (12) 
    B90 B32 B63 B68 B45
 Pirc (4) 
    B08 B09 B07
With the Black pieces:
 Sicilian (13) 
    B57 B58 B65 B56 B73
 Queen's Gambit Accepted (5) 
    D20 D27 D29
Repertoire Explorer

NOTABLE GAMES: [what is this?]
   Miles vs Rachels, 1989 1/2-1/2

Search Sacrifice Explorer for Stuart Rachels
Search Google® for Stuart Rachels


STUART RACHELS
(born Sep-26-1969) United States of America

[what is this?]
IM Stuart Rachels was born September 26, 1969 in Alabama. He started playing chess when he was nine years old and, in 1981, he became the first American to become a master before the age of 12. He tied for first in the 1989 U.S. Championship with Roman Dzindzichashvili and Yasser Seirawan. After retiring from serious chess in 1993, he became a university professor.

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 55  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves Year Event/LocaleOpening
1. Christiansen vs Rachels  1-040 1986 Somerset 42/770A56 Benoni Defense
2. Rachels vs Sherzer  1-040 1987 USA-ch U18B42 Sicilian, Kan
3. Rachels vs O Rodriguez  0-143 1987 It (open)C55 Two Knights Defense
4. DeFirmian vs Rachels  1-038 1987 It (open)E90 King's Indian
5. Rachels vs Miles  0-144 1987 PhiladelphiaB14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack
6. D Gurevich vs Rachels  ½-½33 1987 Midwest Masters InvA15 English
7. K Burger vs Rachels  ½-½49 1987 It (open)A33 English, Symmetrical
8. Rachels vs Zsuzsa Polgar  ½-½56 1987 New York opC53 Giuoco Piano
9. Illescas-Cordoba vs Rachels  1-027 1987 New York opB73 Sicilian, Dragon, Classical
10. Alburt vs Rachels ½-½14 1987 12, USA opA46 Queen's Pawn Game
11. Rachels vs Ivkov  0-143 1987 New York opC50 Giuoco Piano
12. Gelfand vs Rachels  1-061 1988 AdelaideA32 English, Symmetrical Variation
13. Rachels vs D Gurevich ½-½19 1988 Boston 46/B63 Sicilian, Richter-Rauzer Attack
14. Adams vs Rachels  1-037 1988 WchJ U20 AdelaideB58 Sicilian
15. Adams vs Rachels  1-037 1988 Adelaide Wch jrB56 Sicilian
16. Kasparov vs Rachels 1-042 1988 New YorkA56 Benoni Defense
17. Rachels vs D Norwood 1-063 1988 Ch World (juniors) (under 20)B09 Pirc, Austrian Attack
18. Rachels vs Blatny  1-031 1988 WchJM-U20 AdelaideC84 Ruy Lopez, Closed
19. Rachels vs D Gurevich 1-0100 1989 Long BeachB07 Pirc
20. DeFirmian vs Rachels  ½-½41 1989 Ch USAB57 Sicilian
21. Miles vs Rachels ½-½78 1989 Long BeachD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
22. Kudrin vs Rachels 0-129 1989 LongB56 Sicilian
23. Rachels vs Igor Ivanov  1-061 1989 Long Beach ch-USAC71 Ruy Lopez
24. Rachels vs J Benjamin  ½-½15 1989 9, Long Beach USA chB32 Sicilian
25. Rachels vs Dzindzichashvili  ½-½15 1989 US ChampionshipB08 Pirc, Classical
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 55  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Rachels wins | Rachels loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing >
Apr-25-05   Poisonpawns: Was this another promising american player at one time?
Apr-25-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  iron maiden: Not all that promising, although he did tie for first at the U.S. Championship one year.
Apr-25-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Rachels wrote a letter to New in Chess 7/2004 commenting on Bobby Fischer. He is a professor now at the University of Alabama.
Apr-25-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Caissanist: Iron Maiden--why doesn't he seem to you to have been that promising? He was apparently only 19 when he tied for the championship. So far as I know, Fischer, Evans and now Nakamura are the only others to have won it that young.
Apr-25-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  iron maiden: I meant that he never really appeared to be world championship caliber. But for a fleeting instant in the early 1990's he did look to have some international potential. Unfortunately he turned out to be a John Grefe rather than a Bobby Fischer.
Nov-05-05   Koster: <john Grefe> you mean Rachels ended up joining some wacko cult and worshipping his guru? I thought he was a professor...
Nov-05-05   WMD: <Rachels wrote a letter to New in Chess 7/2004 commenting on Bobby Fischer.>

And what did he say?

His hair was thinning as a young man, so now he must be as bald as a coot.

Nov-05-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Resignation Trap: <WMD> So, who wants fat hair? See: http://www.bradpriddy.com/rachels

His last serious tournament seems to have been the 1992 US Championship, where he finished -2: http://members.aol.com/graemecree/c... .

Nov-05-05   WMD: My best advice to anyone with thinning hair is to wear a cap or hat if you're out in the sun. Alternatively, try a wig.
Nov-05-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: <And what did he say> NIC 2004/7 Stuart Rachels letter

<In a recent Wall Street Journal editorial, Kasparov attributed Ficher's mental decline to the fact that he left chess. This is wrong. It's like saying John Nash went downhill because he left mathematics. The mental decline makes the genius abandon his trade, not the other way around.

Many articles about Fischer don't make the obvious point: he is a paranoid schizophrenic. The onset of schizophrenia is typically in one's late 20's. Bobby's long Nash-like hiatus began in 1972 when he was 29. WHile we cannot know whether Fischer hears voices the main symptom of schizophrenia, we can observe signs of psychosis in his behavior: Fischer's tirade against the dirty Jews, the fixed world championship matches and the thieving storage facility in California are typical of paranoid schizophrenia. And as Hans Ree said, even someone who doesn't know English can sense that something is wrong by hearing Fischer's tone of voice-he is too angry.>

cont.

Nov-05-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Rachels letter cont.

<There are different types of schizophrenia. Paranoids are the highest functioning. Fischer is a paranoid, but Nash is not. This is why Fischer, unlike Nash, never thought he was going to become the Emperor of Antarctica. And this is why Fischer's tirades usually have some basis in reality, however tenuous.

I am reluctant to send you this letter because I do not want Fischer to read it and hate me. I began playing chess in the 1970's. Fischer was my chess hero then, and he still is. To my knowledge, Bobby Fischer has never hurt a fly, and his shortcomings have a clinical cause. Kasparov has many faults but lacks that excuse.

Professor Stuart Rachels
Birmingham,AL,USA>

Nov-05-05
Premium Chessgames Member
  Ron: http://www.as.ua.edu/philos/faculty...
Apr-18-06
Premium Chessgames Member
  LIFE Master AJ: Did you know Stuart and I played. I played him in two or three AL State Championship Tournaments.

I think at least two of the game scores were published in the "Antics," which used to be the official newsletter/magazine for Alabama.

Sep-26-06   BIDMONFA: Stuart Rachels

RACHELS, Stuart
http://www.bidmonfa.com/rachels_stu...
_

Sep-04-07   rozumim: Okay <BIDMONFA>, I give: who, or what, are you? I've been to your website, and I'm scratching my head as to how and why you've collected all of this player information...?
Dec-25-07   Ziggurat: http://www.bradpriddy.com/rachels/C...

A new essay about chess by Stuart Rachels

Dec-25-07   Tomlinsky: Thank you <Ziggurat> for the enjoyable read.
Dec-25-07   Jim Bartle: Thanks for that; very interesting.
Dec-25-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: Yes, very interesting, bookmarked his homepage for further readings.

My guess is that his sentence (p.5):

<By 1989, the world could see that Kasparov was an even better player than Fischer had been in his prime.>

won't find an undivided acceptance on the Fischer page.. :D

Dec-25-07   Tomlinsky: <won't find an undivided acceptance on the Fischer page>

Or the Kramnik page, or the Topalov page, or the Capablanca page, etc.

Dec-25-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <Tomlinsky> But of course. Seen one, seen 'em all.
Dec-26-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  micartouse: I really enjoyed <Ziggurat>'s link. This Rachels guy has a really down to earth view of the game and he does a good job painting a picture of chess culture. I don't agree with him about <Searching for Bobby Fischer> though. I don't think it was a really good movie from a chess perspective - it doesn't show what chess life is really like at all. Interesting comments about problemists. My favorite remark:

<When chess players call chess a sport, this strikes me not only as false, but as pathetic. It’s pathetic in the same way it’s pathetic to ask someone out on a date who said no the last three times you asked. American culture has rejected chess. For the chess player to insist that chess is a sport is a way of not taking the hint.>

Dec-27-07   Helios727: Doesn't a "sport" also have to have a physical athletic element to it as well?
Dec-27-07   Petrosianic: <When chess players call chess a sport, this strikes me not only as false, but as pathetic. It’s pathetic in the same way it’s pathetic to ask someone out on a date who said no the last three times you asked. American culture has rejected chess. For the chess player to insist that chess is a sport is a way of not taking the hint.>

Yeah, good observation. But still, it's <American> culture that's rejected chess. As Rachels himself popints out, GM's are more highly thought of in Europe.

So he's explained why Americans want chess to be a sport (so that America will "go out" with us).

But is it a sport or not? If it's not here, it's not in Europe either, where GM's are appreciated. Rachels says that physical activity is a necessary condition of sport. And I tend to agree with that. My first reaction was to say that chess is a pastime, not a sport (the difference being the lack of physical activity).

However, thefreedictionary.com's definition of sport muddles this a bit:

1.
a. Physical activity that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often engaged in competitively.

2. An activity involving physical exertion and skill that is governed by a set of rules or customs and often undertaken competitively.

<3. An active pastime; recreation.>

D'oh oh Number 3.

Dec-27-07   apple pi: The other "snagging point" in the argument against chess as a sport is the technical classification of chess as "physical" because, although it doesn't involve the contraction of muscles as widely accepted sports do, it still involves impulses of neurons in the brain.
< Earlier kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing >
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, totally anonymous, and 100% free--plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, or duplicating posts.
  3. No personal attacks against other users.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
Blow the Whistle See something which violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform an administrator.


NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific player and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, you might try the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | new kibitzing | chessforums | new games | Player Directory | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Little ChessPartner | privacy notice | contact us
Copyright 2001-2009, Chessgames.com
Web design & database development by 20/20 Technologies