Mar-28-13 Carlsen vs Ivanchuk, 2013 
| |
|
Landman: 1.e3 ... 2.a3 ...3.h3 ... 4.g3 ... 5.b3 ... 6.c3 ... 7.d3 ... 8.f3 ...
[Ivanchuk loses on time]
|
|
| | Mar-15-13 Ivanchuk vs Grischuk, 2013 
| |
|
Landman: I don't see a way for either side to play for a win. If anyone had chances to be better it was Black with the outside pawns, but he must not have seen anything better than a draw when he forced the Q exchange.
|
|
| | Feb-24-13 Anand vs Gelfand, 2013 
| |
|
Landman: Why was seven afraid of six?
|
|
| | Feb-24-13 M Molner vs A Jayakumar, 2011
| |
|
Landman: <perfidious> I recall 23...Re8-e7 from the final game of the 1985 WC match. There the idea was even weirder than protecting f7 - the next move was 24...Rde8 doubling rooks and leaving the e7R with no legal moves. Karpov vs Kasparov, 1985
|
|
| | Jan-26-13 Carlsen vs Nakamura, 2013 
| |
|
Landman: <Eyal> <kellmano> I agree, "computer-lost" is a useful term. Nakamura's comment after his KID win over Anand: "I don't really have to find the difficult moves here. I attack, it if works, it works; if it doesn't, I lose horribly and look like an idiot." This is part of ...
|
|
| | Jan-26-13 Louis F Stumpers 
| |
|
Landman: Sneaky - How about "Pairs of independently famous games"? Nothing subjective about that. ;P Actually, one could make this somewhat objective: famous = published in Informat.
|
|
| | Jan-24-13 Magnus Carlsen 
| |
|
Landman: Equivalent stats for Rapid+Blitz+Blindfold only. Fewer games means more variance. 2007
Carlsen 2.5/10 = 25%
Kramnik 10.5/18 = 58%
Aronian 8.5/16 = 53%
Anand 8.5/16 = 53%
2008
Carlsen 2.5/8 = 31%
Kramnik 4.5/8 = 56%
Aronian 4/6 = 67%
Anand 3/6 = 50%
2009
Carlsen ...
|
|
| | Jan-23-13 Carlsen vs E L'Ami, 2013 
| |
|
Landman: It has to be a mistake to allow Carlsen to get opposite-colored bishops. Look how many games he wins with those things.
|
|
| | Jan-20-13 Carlsen vs Karjakin, 2013 
| |
|
Landman: With this game, Carlsen climbs up a notch or two on the list of all-time greats.
|
|
| | Jan-19-13 Tata Steel (2013) 
| |
|
Landman: Anand's +3 from seven games is all the more remarkable because he's faced 4 of his top 5 competitors by rating (Carlsen, Aronian, Caruana, Nakamura). Anand has the "easiest" opponents remaining, with avg rating 2693. The other leaders face 2709 (Carlsen), 2735 (Karjakin) and 2757 ...
|
|
| | indicates a reply to the comment. | |