Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Youth - Experience (2006)

  PARTICIPANTS (sorted by highest achieved rating; click on name to see player's games)
Magnus Carlsen, Sergey Karjakin, Wang Hao, Alexander Beliavsky, Artur Yusupov, Jan Smeets, Ljubomir Ljubojevic, Ulf Andersson, Daniel Stellwagen, John Nunn

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 50  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Stellwagen vs Yusupov 0-1372006Youth - ExperienceC18 French, Winawer
2. Karjakin vs Ulf Andersson ½-½392006Youth - ExperienceC10 French
3. Carlsen vs Ljubojevic ½-½352006Youth - ExperienceC11 French
4. Wang Hao vs Nunn  ½-½382006Youth - ExperienceB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
5. J Smeets vs Beliavsky 0-1352006Youth - ExperienceC91 Ruy Lopez, Closed
6. Ulf Andersson vs J Smeets ½-½702006Youth - ExperienceD14 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Exchange Variation
7. Beliavsky vs Stellwagen 0-1542006Youth - ExperienceE97 King's Indian
8. Yusupov vs Wang Hao  ½-½192006Youth - ExperienceD15 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
9. Nunn vs Carlsen 0-1782006Youth - ExperienceB30 Sicilian
10. Ljubojevic vs Karjakin  ½-½332006Youth - ExperienceD43 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
11. J Smeets vs Ljubojevic 1-0612006Youth - ExperienceC84 Ruy Lopez, Closed
12. Stellwagen vs Ulf Andersson  ½-½332006Youth - ExperienceC10 French
13. Karjakin vs Nunn  ½-½382006Youth - ExperienceB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
14. Wang Hao vs Beliavsky 0-1392006Youth - ExperienceC45 Scotch Game
15. Carlsen vs Yusupov ½-½692006Youth - ExperienceC09 French, Tarrasch, Open Variation, Main line
16. Yusupov vs Karjakin 0-1792006Youth - ExperienceD45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
17. Beliavsky vs Carlsen ½-½182006Youth - ExperienceE55 Nimzo-Indian, 4.e3, Gligoric System, Bronstein Variation
18. Ulf Andersson vs Wang Hao  ½-½202006Youth - ExperienceD14 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Exchange Variation
19. Nunn vs J Smeets 1-0322006Youth - ExperienceC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
20. Ljubojevic vs Stellwagen  ½-½202006Youth - ExperienceD47 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
21. Stellwagen vs Nunn  ½-½302006Youth - ExperienceB93 Sicilian, Najdorf, 6.f4
22. J Smeets vs Yusupov ½-½562006Youth - ExperienceC18 French, Winawer
23. Wang Hao vs Ljubojevic  1-0492006Youth - ExperienceB83 Sicilian
24. Carlsen vs Ulf Andersson 1-0222006Youth - ExperienceC10 French
25. Karjakin vs Beliavsky  ½-½372006Youth - ExperienceC92 Ruy Lopez, Closed
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 50  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 24 OF 25 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-29-06  jamesmaskell: [wails] NOOOOOOO! Carlsen cost me 50...I hope he cries himself to sleep for this...
Aug-29-06  Xaurus: <jamesmaskell>I doubt he'll cry, after all he got the ticket for Amber 2007... :)
Aug-29-06  doremi: My comp crashes often at recently. Anyone has the same experience? I suspect a recent update did it, either from or from MS on my own comp
Aug-29-06  jamesmaskell: I will!
Premium Chessgames Member
  virginmind: doremi: i don't get crashes. and this live video feed is just awesome! very good quality on full screen, i can perfectly see where they put the pieces when moving so i don't even need to watch the moves being posted on the site. great job,!!
Premium Chessgames Member
  virginmind: they don't even interrupt the live feed between rounds. and the camera well positioned so you can also see the audience. so nice!
Premium Chessgames Member
  virginmind: this kind of video transmition must be the refference from now on. if they can do it, why anybody elsewhere at great tournaments won't?
Aug-29-06  jamesmaskell: Yep, the video quality is expected next month. The upcoming Topalov-Kramnik match must be top notch on everything. San Luis was pretty good internet wise. This must be perfect as theres only two people.

With the internet so frequently used this match should be followed at every single turn. Theres no excuse if quality falls.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Albertan: Jussupow - Smeets,Analysis by Hiarcs:

41.Kd2 Rg3 42.Bf5 h4 43.Rd4 Rf8 44.Rd6 Rg5 45.Bh3 Rxe5 46.Rh6 Rf2+ 47.Kd1 Rd5+ 48.Ke1 Rxa2 49.Rh7+ Kd8 50.Rh8+ Kc7 51.Rxh4 (-3.27) Depth: 14/41

Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: I often find the video to be jerky and sometimes freezes. It also is ahead of the pgn or lags behind it. Both are annoying.
Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: Full screen doesn't always work either.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Albertan: Yusupov resigned
Aug-29-06  Rawprawn: They only had 5-600 people logged in at any one time. Will a world match have the band width or whatever to handle it? I hope so. Great if they do, but I don't want to be shut out of all the key moments again like I was with Kramnik Leko.
Aug-29-06  doremi: copied from the official site <The members of the winning team won 2000 each, the members of the losing team won 1000 each> I am shocked at the low monetary prizes, that's for 10 days of work excluding travel time, opening ceremony, rest day, closing ceremony, and travel time back home. I assume that travel and hotel expenses are paid for by the organizers, but without any appearance fees and perhaps other fees that are not made public, the 'youth' could not even pay for their seconds from their prize money. Perhaps that's the reason why the 'experienced' did not bring any seconds with them in the first place.

Anyway, Steinitz died a pauper, Kasparov is a millionaire, and I like to believe against the quoted facts of this NH tournament that the conditions for top players have improved. Awarding such little money to a Ljubojevic or any of the 'experienced' for their efforts is an insult.

Aug-29-06  notyetagm: Wow, what a disaster for Karjakin. Didn't this exact same thing happen to Topalov at Linares, getting a drawing line when needing a win?

From the NH chess site:

<'Unbelievable. There's just one forced draw in the Queen's Gambit Accepted and that's what we got on the board.' Sergey Karjakin was visibly unhappy after his game against Alexander Beliavsky had ended in a draw after a mere 10 moves. Obviously the Ukrainian had hoped to play a fighting game to put pressure on Carlsen, who he was trailing by half a point at the start of this last round. Now he knew that only a loss of the Norwegian would keep his hopes alive. Beliavsky described their brief skirmish as a 'psychological game'. He had expected Karjakin to play the Slav Defence and concentrated on that opening in his preparation. When his opponent chose the QGA he decided to deviate from his normal 6.Bd3 and went for 6.Bb3. 'I knew exactly what sharp line he was hoping for, but as I had not checked my notes on the 6.Bd3 lines I decided not to take that risk.' Karjakin made his 'decisive mistake' on move 7. Here he could have played 7Bf5 followed by e6 and the game continues. After 7Bg4, Beliavsky forced the draw with the well-known 8.Ng5. 'The alternative would be 8.Be3, but then in my opinion Black may already be slightly better.'>

Aug-29-06  sitzkrieg: <doremi> i think the 2000 comes extra upon the ordinary payment. If conditions would have been bad the players wouldnt have come. I think the organization and sponsors did a very good job.

Aug-29-06  sitzkrieg: "The Tournament Rules (Extract)

2. Prize-fund: each player of the winning team receives 2000, the players of the losing team receive 1000 each. In case of a 25 25 tie, each player receives 1500. In addition each player receives 500 for each point he scores." I think we can assume that travelling costs, stay in the hotel and seconds will have been payed by the organizers.

Aug-29-06  doremi: I disagree completely with sitzkrieg. Only the top 5 players or so can make a comfortable living from chess. The rest of the top 100 and beyond cannot. This has been stated in public by players from Morozevic to Nakamura and many others. Grischuk, for example, earns more from his poker these days then from his chess.

Not that NH did not do a good job, but the sad fact is that NH could sponsor chess very cheaply because of the general market conditions. It would cost perhaps a hundred times more to sponsor a corresponding tennis tournament, if not more.

I am appalled to see how bad the conditions for top chess players really are, NH is a case in point.

Aug-29-06  sapfy: <doremi: I disagree completely with sitzkrieg. Only the top 5 players or so can make a comfortable living from chess. The rest of the top 100 and beyond cannot.>

There are certainly select people outside of the top 10 who probably do ok, like Van Wely and Vallejo.

<Grischuk, for example, earns more from his poker these days then from his chess.>

Not that I doubt it, but how do you know?

<Not that NH did not do a good job, but the sad fact is that NH could sponsor chess very cheaply>

I wouldn't call 40k euro in cash prizes and travel and lodging for all participants, including a second for all members of the Rising Stars team, cheap.

Overall, this event must have cost quite a bit of money to put on.

<It would cost perhaps a hundred times more to sponsor a corresponding tennis tournament, if not more.>

So what? Tennis is one of the most popular non-team spectator sports in the world. Chess is not and never will be. I'm just happy that there are people who can and do make a decent living from it.

Aug-29-06  doremi: I don't think you ever had to support a family, and you don't have your facts straight either. Chess players earn 10 times to 100 times less than in other professional sports, if not worse, even in the top 5, where it does not really matter. It gets appalling not much further down.

All of this have been discussed ad nauseum elsewhere, I just want to vent my disgust here. (I am not a professional chess player, BTW, I am just disgusted at their lot)

Aug-29-06  Mameluk: Everyone means something else with making good living, but I know many professionals outside top 100, and they dont seem to starve. Of course, they dont buy new cars or complexes of houses. I think top 100-200 players can make a living from playing chess. But there are 2400+ professionals writing articles, books, training pupils and trying to persuade rich parents that their kid has talent. With high unemployment, there are more and more such profis.

Nakamura is American and believes, that who is not millionaire is a bad loser. Moro on the other hand once said, that top 20 earns unbeliavable money, considering low popularity of chess. That he would play even for less:)

Aug-29-06  percyblakeney: Rating changes according to

Beliavsky +12
Smeets +8
Ljubojevic +4
Carlsen +3
Stellwagen +2
Wang +2
Andersson 0
Karjakin -2
Jussupow -15
Nunn -15

Aug-29-06  L13: <Mameluk> Moro is a bit like Kasparov in consistency; one day he says that chess has no future and all chessplayers should re-qualify and become real estate agents, and the next day he says he'd play chess for free, living on women's smiles and photosynthesis. Never believe him :)
Aug-29-06  percyblakeney: Should be +13 for Beliavsky, that should send him almost 20 places higher on the FIDE list, into the top 70. As recently as July 2004 he was top 30, ahead of for example Aronian.
Aug-29-06  jamesmaskell: Hmmm, interesting rating changes. Steady increase for Carlsen, though of course it could have been higher. He got what he needed in this tournament and good for him. Itll be interesting to see how he does against the World Elite in rapid/blind chess next year.

<L13> are you sure you really meant photosynthesis? Id be rather impressed if Moro did live on photosynthesis...

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 25)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 24 OF 25 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC