Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Magistral Internacional Ruibal (2008)

Player: Sandro Mareco

 page 1 of 1; 9 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. R Dos Santos vs S Mareco  ½-½192008Magistral Internacional RuibalC53 Giuoco Piano
2. S Mareco vs D Valerga  ½-½412008Magistral Internacional RuibalB80 Sicilian, Scheveningen
3. S Mareco vs G Mahia  1-0472008Magistral Internacional RuibalE92 King's Indian
4. D Lemos vs S Mareco  1-0322008Magistral Internacional RuibalE36 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
5. S Mareco vs D Contin  1-0392008Magistral Internacional RuibalE11 Bogo-Indian Defense
6. L Liascovich vs S Mareco  ½-½602008Magistral Internacional RuibalE12 Queen's Indian
7. S Mareco vs A Rodriguez Vila  0-1682008Magistral Internacional RuibalE43 Nimzo-Indian, Fischer Variation
8. Larsen vs S Mareco 0-1212008Magistral Internacional RuibalA00 Uncommon Opening
9. S Mareco vs C Garcia Palermo  0-1252008Magistral Internacional RuibalD50 Queen's Gambit Declined
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Mareco wins | Mareco loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-30-08  Karpova: That's the official site:
Oct-30-08  jon01: Oh my god, look at Bent Larsen's games.
Oct-30-08  Kwesi: jejeje...Larsen's gone crazy...
Oct-30-08  waustad: I really wonder what brought out that kind of response from Larsen. Maybe somebody badgered him into playing when he didn't want to. Could it be a protest over the computer analysis going on everywhere? "I'll show 'em ones they never studied!" Maybe he just flipped out. The Polish is a least real opening, if a bit obscure. Was it Tartakower who called it the Orangutan? I seem to recall that Larsen called his 1.) b3 the Baby Orangutan years ago.
Oct-30-08  Shams: <jejeje...Larsen's gone crazy...>

"I watched a snail crawl along the edge of a straight razor. That's my dream, it's my nightmare. Crawling, slipping along the edge of a straight razor and surviving....">

Oct-31-08  shr0pshire: Larsen has been pretty darn close to the summit in chess, and I doubt these games mean much to him -- no offense to the sponsors, but I doubt he puts as much stock into this tournament as he did when he was competing for world championships.

At least Sugar, he was going down swinging. Well played Mr. Larsen, well played.

Oct-31-08  acirce: Regarding Larsen's openings, Monokroussos was very harsh on him. Completely undeservedly, in my opinion. Playing weird openings is.... weird, but it does not necessarily mean you disrespect your opponents.

Oct-31-08  Harvestman: My take on Larsen, as a fan of his, is that he has always played 'ideas', even if he knows them to be be unsound. Sort of "lets see what happens if I try this". Sometimes it works. With advancing age, it hasn't come off.

Oh, and respect to anyone who would rather keep trying things than take a quick draw just to get off a zero score, even if it means finishing 0/9. I suspect Larsen has a stubborn streak, that makes him keep trying his ideas, even when they aren't working.

Oct-31-08  acirce: However, playing things like 1.e4 a5 is hardly an 'idea'... it is not something that has a certain logic behind it even though not completely sound, it is simply something that is plain bad and that is it. Larsen knows it and plays it anyway. I don't understand it at all but surely it is his choice.
Oct-31-08  Harvestman: Oh I agree, the openings here are mostly rubbish. I'm saying that to some extent this has always been Larsen's style. It just seems to have become more extreme with age.

Out of curiosity, I'm going to look up any other recent Larsen games I can find, and see if this sort of thing is a recent trend, or just a one-off in this tournament where he decided to try some really wild moves.

Oct-31-08  Harvestman: Well that didn't take long. Chessgames has no other Larsen games in the database since 2004.
Oct-31-08  JuliusCaesar: It's tragic to see Larsen's play at this tournament. I've just gone through three of his games – horrifying stuff. Larsen was never a purist, but here he's taking brinkmanship to a ridiculous level. I 'd be interested to hear what he has to say about why he played the way he did. Because this smacks of self-destruction, not an old guy having some fun with the younger generation.
Oct-31-08  Ziggurat: I read an interesting theory about this debacle, which was that this was Larsen's homage to Sämisch. Apparently, when Larsen was young, he played in a tournament with the aging Sämisch, who went 0-15 in the tournament, losing all his games on time. (He was famous for losing on time.) Larsen was very taken with this and wrote an article about it. This tournament could be a "reenactment" of Sämisch's tournament, where Larsen's equivalent of losing on time would be weird openings, which he is known for. Don't know how much truth there is to this theory but it is interesting.
Oct-31-08  JuliusCaesar: Well, let's hope so, Ziggurat. I wouldn't put it past someone like Larsen to do that. He's always marched to the beat of his own drummer. Anyway, here's hoping it's his first and only tribute to Fritz Sämisch.
Oct-31-08  Caissanist: I don't know which games <Julius Caesar> is referring to, but only three or four of them look like blowouts to me. In the rest he seems to do OK until move 25 or so, when he apparently gets tired and starts making mistakes. Against Dos Santos he may even have had winning chances, before his blunder on move 27.
Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: That tourney where Sämisch lost all his games on time, Büsum 1969, was a very strong top class event with then present and future candidates: Polugaevsky, Gligoric, Hübner, Ivkov, Szabo - besides of Larsen himself and other strong and experienced names like Szily, Bilek, Zaitsev, Bobotsov and a few others - in comparison, the field here sounds very modest, and Sämisch anyway was never a serious candidate - Golombek called him once 'a specialist in minor events' - (or something like that - quoting by memory). And also worth mentioning en passant, Larsen held a match with Chile's number one Ivan Morovic to a worthy +0=3-1 score some months ago - so the mystery is still to be explained - why not ask himself for an explanation!? - Anyway, I hope still to a Larsen's return sooner or later
Oct-31-08  waustad: The sad thing for the other players is that nobody will remember anything about this tournament except that Larsen went in the tank. Of course, if Larsen hadn't gone in the tank nobody would have even heard of this tournament outside of Argentina.
Oct-31-08  Caissanist: Thanks to vonKrolock for mentioning that match, the website is at Morovic is stronger than any of the players in this tournament so this was quite a good result for Larsen, especially since he was never that good a match player.

I have to say, though, that Larsen's games from Magistral are a lot more fun to play over than the ones from the Morovic match. Probably Larsen thinks the same thing.

Nov-01-08  Akuni: It could be a purposeful attempt to deflate his own rating.

Abut as likely as anything else I've heard.

Except maybe that he's old and wants to do everything he couldn't do when he was a contender.

Premium Chessgames Member
  vonKrolock: <Caissanist> Thank You for the link - Returning to my previous post, it would be unfair not to mention that at least Rodriguez and Garcia Palermo are in the <strong and experienced names> category, and other younger players in this field will become, or even surpass, being still very young...

Events like this could arise also some reflexions of how the current sistem favours machinal and stereotypated play. A classification with grades, like 'dan' in some oriental sports, instead of the elo numbers, would maybe humanize Chess

Nov-03-08  amateur05: Did Larsen really go mad, as his play in this tournament suggests, or is he just pretending and teasing everybody? Something like postmodern art.
Nov-03-08  amateur05: I think I understand what this was. Psychological scars must resurface into the human mind before they can disappear. This principle lies at the heart of psychoanalysis. For Larsen, this tournament was nothing else but an attempted self treatment against his emotional trauma that was caused by the 0:6 defeat to Fischer. 35 years have passed but the whitewash still haunts him. Poor Larsen...
Jun-06-10  cjgone: Larsen is my hero by playing ridiculous openings that at some points make little sense at all. Very out of book and very inspirational for me to gain the courage to start using such openings. :d
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: Good grief. The man was 73 years old and in ill health. He knew there was no way he would do well in the tournament, that he would weaken late in the games due to lack of stamina, that very likely he'd never play in another tournament. So why not go out having some fun?

I doubt he intended to lose the games deliberately, but he wasn't going to take the pathetic way out by making a lot of short draws. That wouldn't have been Larsen.

Sep-11-10  twinlark: Yeah...just looks he was having a bit of fun at his last hurrah. This had been his first tourney in years.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 1 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC