Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Amber Tournament (Rapid) Tournament

Gata Kamsky7/11(+5 -2 =4)[games]
Viswanathan Anand7/11(+4 -1 =6)[games]
Levon Aronian7/11(+5 -2 =4)[games]
Vladimir Kramnik6.5/11(+3 -1 =7)[games]
Sergey Karjakin6/11(+4 -3 =4)[games]
Magnus Carlsen6/11(+3 -2 =6)[games]
Veselin Topalov5/11(+1 -2 =8)[games]
Vassily Ivanchuk4.5/11(+1 -3 =7)[games]
Alexander Morozevich4.5/11(+2 -4 =5)[games]
Peter Leko4.5/11(+2 -4 =5)[games]
Wang Yue4/11(+1 -4 =6)[games]
Teimour Radjabov4/11(+1 -4 =6)[games]

 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Kamsky vs Carlsen 1-0492009Amber Tournament (Rapid)B73 Sicilian, Dragon, Classical
2. Leko vs Anand 1-0682009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
3. Ivanchuk vs Aronian 0-1392009Amber Tournament (Rapid)B13 Caro-Kann, Exchange
4. Wang Yue vs Karjakin ½-½522009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
5. Morozevich vs Kramnik 1-0432009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
6. Topalov vs Radjabov  ½-½402009Amber Tournament (Rapid)B30 Sicilian
7. Karjakin vs Topalov 1-0462009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C43 Petrov, Modern Attack
8. Wang Yue vs Morozevich 0-1442009Amber Tournament (Rapid)A15 English
9. Radjabov vs Kramnik ½-½262009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C42 Petrov Defense
10. Carlsen vs Ivanchuk ½-½452009Amber Tournament (Rapid)E33 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
11. Aronian vs Leko 1-0292009Amber Tournament (Rapid)E15 Queen's Indian
12. Anand vs Kamsky 1-0492009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
13. Kamsky vs Aronian 1-0512009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D02 Queen's Pawn Game
14. Ivanchuk vs Leko 1-0592009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C53 Giuoco Piano
15. Carlsen vs Anand ½-½382009Amber Tournament (Rapid)B12 Caro-Kann Defense
16. Morozevich vs Radjabov ½-½462009Amber Tournament (Rapid)B32 Sicilian
17. Kramnik vs Karjakin ½-½302009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
18. Topalov vs Wang Yue  ½-½762009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D18 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Dutch
19. Topalov vs Morozevich 1-0432009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C93 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Smyslov Defense
20. Wang Yue vs Kramnik 0-1492009Amber Tournament (Rapid)D45 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav
21. Leko vs Carlsen ½-½582009Amber Tournament (Rapid)E60 King's Indian Defense
22. Aronian vs Anand  ½-½322009Amber Tournament (Rapid)A31 English, Symmetrical, Benoni Formation
23. Ivanchuk vs Kamsky ½-½592009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C95 Ruy Lopez, Closed, Breyer
24. Karjakin vs Radjabov 0-1742009Amber Tournament (Rapid)B31 Sicilian, Rossolimo Variation
25. Radjabov vs Wang Yue 0-1412009Amber Tournament (Rapid)C43 Petrov, Modern Attack
 page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 66  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 60 OF 60 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-26-09  Kaspablanca: vesivialvy: what blitz chess are you talking about?
Mar-26-09  KamikazeAttack: <KingG: Topalov isn't that successful at rapid, and isn't particularly good at blindfold either, so it's no surprise that he doesn't do so well here.>

Topalov is quite good in Blindfold.

He won it 3 times in the past.

Mar-26-09  Vakus: <AuN1> - no need to crush a conspiracy theory, just read the articles on that issue in ChessVibes, ChessBase, ChessPro. And even if Topalov could win that, a draw in rapid section would be well enough for Aronian's first place (check the tie-break)
Mar-26-09  karoaper: From :

Score after Round 11

1. Aronian 7
Carlsen 7
Kramnik 7
4. Anand 6
Morozevich 6
6. Leko 5
Topalov 5
8. Ivanchuk 5
Radjabov 5
10. Karjakin 4
11. Wang Yue 3
12. Kamsky 3

1. Anand 7
Aronian 7
Kamsky 7
4. Kramnik 6
5. Carlsen 6
Karjakin 6
7. Topalov 5
8. Ivanchuk 4
Leko 4
Morozevich 4
11. Radjabov 4
Wang Yue 4

1. Aronian 14
2. Anand 13
Kramnik 13
4. Carlsen 13
5. Morozevich 11
6. Karjakin 10
Topalov 10
8. Kamsky 10
Leko 10
10. Ivanchuk 9
11. Radjabov 9
12. Wang Yue 7

Mar-27-09  KamikazeAttack: Congrats to Aronian, the Houdini of our time. He is the Lord of the Manor as far as Amber is concerned now.

2 srt8 wins in all categories is very, very impressive indeed - excellent.

However, old pros Anand and Kramnik continue to prove their mettle in their specialised categories.

Anand - 5 rapid wins in 6 years.
Kramnik - 3 BF wins in 3 years (Hat-trick).

Mar-27-09  vesivialvy93: kasablanca ....sorry , you're right , it's rapid chess , not blitz ...i need a good night sleep ;-)
Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: <why do they call Morozevich a blindfold expert?, what merits does he have that seperates him from for example Kramnik(who is not referred to as an expert)>

<I think Kramnik is the ral expert>

<there were only two exceptional results by Moro in blindfold, 2004 and 2006>

I don't really agree with the comparison that is supposed to show that Kramnik is the blindfold expert of the two... Morozevich's +7 in 2002 was also a rather exceptional result considering that that was the first time he participated.

Morozevich's blindfold scores: +7 +3 +6 +1 +8 +3 +2 +2. That's an average of +4. Kramnik's scores have been very slightly worse on average as can be seen above (but of course more or less just as excellent).

I think both Kramnik and Morozevich are excellent blindfold players, but I would consider Morozevich as the expert of the two since Kramnik always has been top five in all disciplines. He has performed very strong results in classical, rapid and blitz the last decade. Morozevich hasn't been top five in anything else than blindfold and there he has for much of the time been #1, or at worst #2, so I think it would be strange not to see him as a blindfold expert.

One could just look at his scores against Anand and Topalov, he is 12-1 against these strong blindfold players that both have an even score against Kramnik. He is 2-3 against Kramnik himself though, but that isn't too bad either.

Mar-27-09  anandrulez:

Blindfold performance of players from 2000-2008

Mar-27-09  square dance: maybe someone who was into that sort of thing could calculate their updated blindfold ratings. :-)
Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: <updated blindfold ratings>

After Amber 2009 it should be

Morozevich: 2860 in 88 games

Kramnik: 2823 in 143 games

Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: The top five in rapid chess 2000-2009 should look like this (Fischl's stats plus Amber):

Anand 2816 in 406 games

Kasparov 2803 in 104 games

Aronian 2781 in 119 games

Kramnik 2767 in 209 games

Ivanchuk 2764 in 332 games

Mar-27-09  DCP23: <percyblakeney: <updated blindfold ratings>>


Mar-27-09  square dance: thanks pb.
Mar-27-09  percyblakeney: <DCP23> <square dance>

You're welcome!

Mar-27-09  KamikazeAttack: <anandrulez:

Blindfold performance of players from 2000-2008

I wonder if Bu would be invited to Amber next year.

Mar-28-09  ILikeFruits: this is...
a man's...
i said this...
is a man's...
but it...
would be...
nothing without...
women or...
Mar-28-09  cuendillar: it would....
be easier...
to read if...
wrote it...
on one line...
with ...
Mar-28-09  Jim Bartle: I don't mind the dots or the one-word lines that much. What drive me nuts are the 400-word posts written in a single paragraph!

I gave up reading "Remembrance of Things Past" just because there weren't any paragraph breaks.

Mar-28-09  khursh: - .... .- -. -.- ... / .--- .. -- / -... .- .-. - .-.. . -.-.--

Mar-28-09  Vakus: .-.. . ...- --- -. / .- .-. --- -. .. .- -. / .. ... / - .... . / -.-. .... .- -- .--. .. --- -.


Mar-28-09  ILikeFruits: so many...
Mar-28-09  I Like Fish: dots are there...
to breathe in...
Mar-28-09  ILikeFruits: indeed...
Mar-30-09  ajile: <Vakus: <AuN1> - no need to crush a conspiracy theory, just read the articles on that issue in ChessVibes, ChessBase, ChessPro. And even if Topalov could win that, a draw in rapid section would be well enough for Aronian's first place (check the tie-break)>

Yes there are a bunch of people talking about this conspiracy idea. Thing is why don't any of the chess websites (this one included) show all the prize money for all the places? I don't get it since most other sports clearly show how the prize money is divided. Why is chess different? And if we knew what the prizes were then we could better gauge how much money Topalov would lose by dropping a place in order to drop Kramnik out of the lead.

Apr-17-09  jussu: <ajile> - I have always been irritated when reading tennis news and finding that quite a proportion of the text is reserved to reports on how much money was at the stake. This is low, I want to read about the sport, not to browse in the sportsmen's wallets.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 60)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 60 OF 60 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC