Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Biel Chess Festival (2012)

Player: Viktor Antonovich Bologan

 page 1 of 1; 8 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Bologan vs Nakamura 0-1812012Biel Chess FestivalD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
2. Wang Hao vs Bologan 1-0472012Biel Chess FestivalA58 Benko Gambit
3. A Giri vs Bologan 1-0922012Biel Chess FestivalE60 King's Indian Defense
4. Bologan vs Carlsen 0-1402012Biel Chess FestivalB30 Sicilian
5. Bologan vs Bacrot ½-½352012Biel Chess FestivalE70 King's Indian
6. Carlsen vs Bologan 1-0402012Biel Chess FestivalA59 Benko Gambit
7. Bologan vs Wang Hao 1-0492012Biel Chess FestivalB90 Sicilian, Najdorf
8. Nakamura vs Bologan 1-0582012Biel Chess FestivalA59 Benko Gambit
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Bologan wins | Bologan loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 39 OF 39 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sokrates: <tolengoy: <That, however, doesn't diminish the greatness of Carlsen by a iota.> Magnus horrific loss and early elimination in the blitz edition of this event surely diminished his greatness....not only by an iota but by 50 mega tons of TNT..> Another hilarious post. Please stop, I can hardly breathe. "50 tons of TNT" - wow, that's a powerful metaphor - can't compete here - you win by force!
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: In the aftermath of losing to that 2700+ donk Bacrot in the blitz, Carlsen might as well fold his tent. His career is done. Winning the WC and beating all comers won't be enough to overcome the stigma.
Aug-04-12  Absentee: Great, now the filipino trolls are going to crap all over this page too.
Aug-04-12  Rolfo: <Great, now the filipino trolls are going to crap all over this page too.>

They may have their opinions, their imaginary and colored way of describing their thinking. But alas they also have distorted facts, misunderstandings and some belittling.

Aug-04-12  frogbert: <Oddly enough, here he seems to be rated 2742, But here they say that his rating is actually 2747 ...>

meta, more scary in my opinon: the ittf-ranking site says that <zhang jike> is rated <2921!> jikes ... carlsen can go home now. ;o)

Aug-04-12  tahdah: <and his achievement is highly respectable. That, however, doesn't diminish the greatness of Carlsen by a iota.>

I disagree, Carlsen is way way rated above than anybody else. Once upon a time, someone said that 50 elo points does not make any difference in playing strength. That statement is not true nor correct as evidenced in this toynament, it was a product of a wild imagination, someone who can't separate facts from fictions. It is now a fact that Carlsen was below his godly standard. He should have won Biel uncontested contrary to just landing neath Hao. In fact, Carlsen should have won 10 games. No questions asked.

That diminishes his greatness (which is yet to be attained)even with the help of the circus organizers.

Aug-04-12  frogbert: according to the rating system - which is the basis of *all* the players' ratings - carlsen scored more than half a point <above> his expected score, based on the difference between his rating and his opponents' ratings. he had a tpr of 2879, clearly above his own rating and the highest in the tournament.

relatively though, wang hao overperformed even more. carlsen only plays his own games, and he certainly delivered according to expectations. imo wang hao's win was actually *more* due to his bigger overperformance than the scoring system in effect.

we can't really be too bothered that some peanut brains don't have a clue about neither ratings nor performances. nor very much else, it seems. anyway, when one doesn't understand even the basics regarding ratings - and shows no intent of wanting to learn anything - then one disqualifies oneself from having any opinion at all wrt rating-related matters. in this case that's entirely fine.

rejoin the debate when you've educated yourself, tahdah. until then you're simply noise.

Aug-04-12  tahdah: <50 elo points does not make any difference in playing strength>

I wonder who said this?

Aug-04-12  tahdah: <imo wang hao's win was actually *more* due to his bigger overperformance than the scoring system in effect.>

A lot spinning wheels to get the cherries aligned.
What's next, underperformance or at par with his current rating? Another concocted, mumbo jumbo work of art. Good for playing tarot reading.

Aug-04-12  tahdah: Yeah, it must be the sun, the moon and the stars.
Aug-04-12  frogbert: noise protection enabled. :o)
Aug-04-12  tahdah: bye bye froggie, can't handle the truth, cover your ears. :o)
Aug-04-12  Jim Bartle: Pure ignorance.
Aug-04-12  tahdah: Pure facts I laid out. It came from the houymnmn mouth.
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: Someone has to be the first to stop.
Aug-05-12  dumbgai: <meta, more scary in my opinon: the ittf-ranking site says that <zhang jike> is rated <2921!> jikes ... carlsen can go home now. ;o)>

Forget chessboxing, let's have chess-tabletennis! The ultimate sport that combines quickness of mind with quickness of body!

Aug-06-12  Nicocobas: I understand that Leinier Dominguez was scheduled to play in the Biel Chess Tournament. Does anyone know why he didn't participate?
Aug-06-12  kia0708: do you know of any video + analysis of any of the games ?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: There are videos with the players' comments on the games throughout the tournament at
Aug-06-12  Nicocobas: Thanks kia0708 and Eyval.I went to the site but didn't see how to find the answer to my question.
Aug-08-12  zakkzheng: Magnus Carlsen should of got first place in the Biel chess festival, but the special effect with 3 points a win and 1 point a draw got Magnus 1 point behind the champion Chinese Grandmaster Wang Hao! I believe that every tournament should reward the wins with 3 points and the draws with one point because this encourages people to win instead of a draw. If someone is one point ahead of someone using the rule of the draws in the last round,if they draw, then someone else might win. This is why I like to use this ideal form of counting points. I think this is a better way of counting how many points you have. :)
Premium Chessgames Member
  lostemperor: I don't think these top boys care much about these scoring points to play much harder for a win than normal since only rating points seem to matter but it sure is nice to have these kinds of progressive scores.
Aug-11-12  Octavia: this comp shows that the scoring system is silly - Carlsen was the winner to my mind.

I once won a tournament section with this system, but its not fair. a draw is half as much as a win, not slightly more than a loss!

How's that for an erudite explanation?

Premium Chessgames Member
  SugarDom: The world's most popular sports, "football" uses this system. It's silly?

You may say it's "chess" not "football". But both have "win", "loss" and "draw".

What's the difference? - Chess is supposed to be boring?

Aug-13-12  Pedro Fernandez: 3:1 baremo indeed it is stupid.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 39)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 39 OF 39 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC