|Monte Carlo (1904)|
The last of the series (the Monte Carlo (1903) event preceded it) of chess tournaments held in the quarter of Monte Carlo (1) in the principality of Monaco occurred in 1904. In this year, two events were held; a masters tournament (2) and a thematic tournament. Nine players were invited to participate, with three of them, Frank Marshall, Georg Marco, and Rudolf Swiderski, playing in both events. The masters tournament was a double round robin of six players held from February 8th until the 18th. The time control for the tournament was 16 moves every hour. Rather than distribute the prize money at the end of the event, the organizers conspired to disperse the 5000 francs to the participants upon their arrival so that they would be more likely to spend their winnings at the casinos during the tournament. Marco not only participated in both events, but he also reported on the tournament in the Wiener Schachzeitung. Trophies were awarded at the end, with Maróczy earning an additional trophy as tournament winner since it was the second time he won the tournament (the first one was Monte Carlo (1902)).
The final standings and crosstable of the masters event:
The concurrent thematic tournament was conducted using a position within the King's Gambit Accepted (C39) (including Kieseritsky's line and similar branches), called the Rice Gambit. (3, 7) After this tournament, the game Lasker / Chigorin / Marshall / Tei vs Janowski / Marco / Schlechter / La, 1904 (some of which players crossed the Atlantic to play in Cambridge Springs (1904)) popularized the Rice Gambit further due to its promotion by a New York financier named Isaac Leopold Rice. (4) It was arrived at through the following move order: 1.e4 e5 2.f4 exf4 3.♘f3 g5 4.h4 g4 5.♘e5 ♘f6 6.♗c4 d5 7.exd5 ♗d6 8.O-O:
M S M G M S
1 Maróczy ** ˝˝ ˝1 1˝ ˝1 11 7˝
2 Schlechter ˝˝ ** ˝˝ ˝˝ 11 11 7
3 Marshall ˝0 ˝˝ ** 1˝ 1˝ 11 6˝
4 Gunsberg 0˝ ˝˝ 0˝ ** 0˝ ˝1 4
5 Marco ˝0 00 0˝ 1˝ ** 0˝ 3
6 Swiderski 00 00 00 ˝0 1˝ ** 2
click for larger view
The final standings and crosstable of the thematic event:
References: (1) Wikipedia article: Monte Carlo casino, (2) Wikipedia article: Monte Carlo chess tournament, (3) Wikipedia article: Rice Gambit, (4) http://books.google.ca/books?id=zSG... is one such edition in the example of this opening book series, (5) Wiener Schachzeitung, (6) http://www.montecarlocasinos.com/, (7) http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/..., (8) Original collection: Game Collection: Monte Carlo 1904 by User: suenteus po 147.
S M M M V F
=1 Swiderski ** 11 01 01 01 01 6
=1 Marshall 00 ** 11 10 01 11 6
3 Mieses 10 00 ** ˝1 ˝1 ˝1 5˝
4 Marco 10 01 ˝0 ** 10 1˝ 5
5 von Scheve 10 10 ˝0 01 ** 10 4˝
6 Forgacs 10 00 ˝0 0˝ 01 ** 3
| page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 61
|1. Swiderski vs J Mieses
|| ||0-1||21||1904||Monte Carlo||C33 King's Gambit Accepted|
|2. Maroczy vs Gunsberg
||1-0||47||1904||Monte Carlo||C82 Ruy Lopez, Open|
|3. Schlechter vs Marshall
||½-½||37||1904||Monte Carlo||C48 Four Knights|
|4. Swiderski vs G Marco
||1-0||56||1904||Monte Carlo||C68 Ruy Lopez, Exchange|
|5. Marshall vs Gunsberg
||1-0||19||1904||Monte Carlo||D06 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|6. Schlechter vs Swiderski
||1-0||29||1904||Monte Carlo||D30 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|7. G Marco vs Maroczy
|| ||½-½||32||1904||Monte Carlo||C42 Petrov Defense|
|8. Swiderski vs Marshall
||0-1||48||1904||Monte Carlo||C01 French, Exchange|
|9. Maroczy vs Schlechter
|| ||½-½||24||1904||Monte Carlo||C68 Ruy Lopez, Exchange|
|10. Gunsberg vs G Marco
||0-1||23||1904||Monte Carlo||C55 Two Knights Defense|
|11. Schlechter vs Gunsberg
|| ||½-½||29||1904||Monte Carlo||D60 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense|
|12. Marshall vs G Marco
||1-0||76||1904||Monte Carlo||C45 Scotch Game|
|13. Swiderski vs Maroczy
||0-1||48||1904||Monte Carlo||B20 Sicilian|
|14. Gunsberg vs Swiderski
|| ||½-½||36||1904||Monte Carlo||C66 Ruy Lopez|
|15. Maroczy vs Marshall
|| ||½-½||43||1904||Monte Carlo||C48 Four Knights|
|16. G Marco vs Schlechter
||0-1||26||1904||Monte Carlo||C68 Ruy Lopez, Exchange|
|17. G Marco vs Swiderski
|| ||½-½||24||1904||Monte Carlo||C00 French Defense|
|18. Gunsberg vs Maroczy
|| ||½-½||31||1904||Monte Carlo||B20 Sicilian|
|19. Marshall vs Schlechter
||½-½||50||1904||Monte Carlo||D32 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch|
|20. Swiderski vs Schlechter
||0-1||40||1904||Monte Carlo||D63 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense|
|21. Gunsberg vs Marshall
||½-½||61||1904||Monte Carlo||C55 Two Knights Defense|
|22. Maroczy vs G Marco
||1-0||38||1904||Monte Carlo||C79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred|
|23. Marshall vs Swiderski
||1-0||32||1904||Monte Carlo||C01 French, Exchange|
|24. G Marco vs Gunsberg
||½-½||46||1904||Monte Carlo||C79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred|
|25. Schlechter vs Maroczy
|| ||½-½||32||1904||Monte Carlo||D63 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox Defense|
| page 1 of 3; games 1-25 of 61
|Nov-16-12|| ||zoren: White won the majority of the Rice Gambit themed games.|
In modern theory, it looks like after 8...Bxe5 9.Re1 Qe7 10.c3 (to prepare d4) f3 11.d4 Ne4! 12.Rxe4 Bh2+! and black is handily ahead.
|Nov-16-12|| ||Phony Benoni: <zoren> Ah, yes, the Vienna Variation of Simonson's Defense, first pointed out by Gustave Simonson, librarian of the Manhattan Chess Club. Yes, we're everywhere. It's extensively analyzed in "Twenty Years of the Rice Gambit."|
I didn't know there was modern theory.
|Nov-24-12|| ||Sneaky: This whole Rice Gambit thing is one of the most bizarre chapters in chess history. So many great minds spent analyzing what is just a silly footnote in a non-critical variation, all because some crazy rich guy became obsessed with it.|
Well, I shouldn't complain. We could use an Isaac Leopold Rice today.
|Nov-24-12|| ||Benzol: <Sneaky> Indeed it was a bit strange. There was the match at Brighton in 1903 too. See http://www.chessgames.com/perl/ches...|
|Nov-28-12|| ||gauer: Notice Steinitz' (still playing the white side of 8. d4 non-Nh5) score until 1873, when he switched sides (although Steinitz vs Chigorin, 1882 saw him win with a Salvio but Chigorin's pet lines never repaid much revenge to him), and was still doing well afterwards with 8 d4 Nh5. Unlike his previous match with Anderssen, Chigorin vs Steinitz, 1892 was the only King's gambit game in the Steinitz world championship matches against Chigorin the reply was not 2. f4 from Steinitz. Would he revive his old bread'n'butter variation with a test of 8. 0-0 again - or pick the other side in a Rice gambit match (had a note about an odds-game form of the non-h4 Showalter vs Taubenhaus, 1889 line, maybe implying that some of the other lines were still good enough for white to try)?|
Regarding the Rice line, 1902 saw Lasker try 8. 0-0 a few times, but he didn't seem to get on the 8. d4 theory much, especially after Lasker vs S T Sharp, 1904 0-1. Marshall / Allies vs Lasker, 1904 was another line of his from that year, but Pillsbury vs Chigorin, 1903 was also tested during the year prior to this thematic tournament against a player who Lasker had paraphrased: I shall have to have a match against this player someday.
Steinitz vs J Gocher, 1864, Steinitz vs F Deacon, 1863, Steinitz vs Chigorin, 1882 might be some other games to check out.
Thanks for the info about Lasker vs Chigorin 1903 being a match starting from one of the potential so-called "Rice Gambit" lines.
|Feb-06-16|| ||TheFocus: "Frank J. Marshall has been awarded the special prize of 200 francs donated by Herr Leopoldo Trebitsch of Vienna for producing the best chess in the fourth tournament at Monte Carlo. The prize provided by Baron Albert de Rothschild of Vienna - 500 francs - was distributed as follows: 200 francs to C. Schlechter for his game against Marco; 100 francs to R. Swiderski for his game against Marco; 100 francs to G. Maroczy for his game against Gunsberg; 100 francs to G. Marco for his game against Gunsberg" - <American Chess Bulletin>, September 1904, pg. 78.|
|Feb-24-16|| ||luftforlife: The Rice Gambit begins as follows:
1. e4 e5 2. f4 exf4 3. Nf3 g5 4. h4 g4 5. Ne5 Nf6 6. Bc4 d5 7. exd5 Bd6.
Here is the resulting position:
click for larger view
"Professor Rice, a New York amateur, had this position once and inadvertently left his Knight en prise; then later he won the game. He was so impressed with his success that he immediately interested a number of the prominent masters in the move, which was easy enough to do because he had a lot of money."
Reuben Fine, The Middle Game in Chess (New York: David McKay Co. 1952, Tartan softcover reprint, September 1972), at 190-91.
The Monte Carlo Tournament of 1904 "was one in which the Rice Gambit was put to a serious test; all the games opened with it." Id. at 190.
Best to all. ~ lufty
|Feb-26-18|| ||zanzibar: <Mr. D. Janowski gives the Bulletin the interesting information that the chess world need look for no tournament at Monte Carlo next spring, the Casino management having decided to transfer the scene of the annnal contests to Ostend in Belgium. The French champion positively states that the tournament at the latter place is a«sured. M. Arnous de Riviere, of Paris, the veteran manager of these tournaments will be in charge. It is understood he will conduct the event on an even larger basis than before.>|
ACB v1 N6 (Nov 1904) p124
|Feb-26-18|| ||zanzibar: Boy, the human interest aspect seems overlooked to not mention this:|
<The Monte Carlo Tourney will not begin till February 3rd, the postponement being on account of the marriage of Herr Maroczy. which was to take place on January 23rd. We heartily congratulate him on this check, as it has ended in a mate. Out of the 17 names sent in to the committee, of players wishing to compete, the following have been accepted :—Messrs. Gunsberg, Marco, Maroczy, Marshall, Schlechter, and Sviderski. This restricted entry enables the tourney to be in two rounds, so that every player will have the first move in one game with each of his opponents. Prince Dadian, of Mingrelia, the President, has offered two prizes of 300 francs. Baron A. de Rothschild and Herr Naumann give likewise each 500 francs for special prizes. After this tourney is ended there will be one at the Rice Gambit, with special prizes, in which many other masters will be invited to compete. The names of Messrs. Alapin, Mieses, Napier, Taubenhaus, Teichmann, and, in all, twelve competitors are mentioned for this, and it will certainly be equally interesting with the other.>
BCM v24 N2 (Jan 1904) p55
|Feb-26-18|| ||zanzibar: <The Strategic regrets to announce that there will be no Monte Carlo Tourney this winter, and it adds that "the sharp criticisms raised by the manner in which these tourneys were conducted must have led to this result.">|
BCM v24 (1904) p468
|May-07-18|| ||MissScarlett: <two events were held simultaneously....concurrently>|
According to the <OED>, this means 'at the same time'. Hardly likely that even Frank Marshall would contemplate that.
<The masters tournament was a double round robin of six players held from February 8th until the 18th.>
According to the respective game dates, the thematic tournament lasted February 22nd to March 3rd. I have corrected a couple of games incorrectly dated April 25th to February 25th.
|Jul-21-18|| ||MissScarlett: The (London) Daily News, January 16th 1904, p.6:|
<It is intended to play every day, except Sundays, and, furthermore, an effort will be made to finish the game in one sitting, viz., from 1.30 to 8 p.m. Though this is a long time to play at a stretch, the counter-balancing advantages are very great. The scandalous practice of analysing pending adjourned games during the dinner hour, which prevailed more or less openly, in previous tournaments, will thereby be prevented, and the afternoon is a very much better time to begin serious chess than the early hours of the morning. The time limit will be 16 moves per hour, a minimum of 56 moves will, therefore, have to be made before the time of adjournment can be reached.
Our hearty congratulations to M. Maroczy, whose marriage takes place on the 23rd inst. As there is some slight uncertainty as regards his movements, the tournament may have to be postponed up to the 8th of February, at the latest, but all the six competitors are requested to be at Monte Carlo on the 1st prox. If Maroczy is able to be present, too, play will begin once. In the Rice Gambit tournament, which will follow the first tournament, the entries are expected to be more numerous.>
As the tournament was indeed delayed until the 8th, I contend that Maroczy's movements were, in fact, quite predictable - he was busy doing the Hokey-Cokey.
|Jul-21-18|| ||zanzibar: Normally it's hard to distinguish British singers from American, but not when the British Council gets involved:|
I swear that Hokey-Pokey sounds like Hokey-Cokey.
Here's the original version for reference:
Why the British edit? (Must be some sexual connotation of some kind).
|Jul-21-18|| ||zanzibar: Why are some of these British clips involving children so disturbing?|
|Jul-21-18|| ||MissScarlett: The Germanic version:
You put your left boot in
You take your left boot out
You do a lot of shouting
And you shake your fist about
You light a little smokey
And you burn down the town
That's what it's all about
Aah, Himmler Himmler Himmler—>
|Jul-21-18|| ||zanzibar: A little bit disappointed that <missy> didn't write that bit of doggerel herself.... a little bit later I hope to post a bit more about the song's origins, but being a bit off-topic here, I think it a bit better if we pokey over to the Cafe for follow-ups. Bitte.|
|Jul-21-18|| ||MissScarlett: Well, one needs to be careful with the WWII-themed humour, as this random example attests: Robert James Fischer (kibitz #38874)|
|Jul-21-18|| ||zanzibar: <Missy> with usual delicacy, goose-steps around such sensitive issues.|
|Jul-21-18|| ||PhilFeeley: There have been very few tournaments in Monte Carlo recently. A Small Nations Team Championship in 2013 and a Women's Grand Prix in 2015. Very little else. I wonder why.|
|Oct-31-18|| ||MissScarlett: Eastern Daily Press, December 29th 1903, p.3:
<The Brighton Open Tournament bids fair to eclipse the Monte Carlo Tournament, which takes place at the same time in February next. Two masters, Dr. Lasker and Mr. Blackburne, have already announced their intention to compete at Brighton, and have declined the invitation to Monte Carlo.>
The Sussex Congress did indeed take place, and with Lasker and Blackburne in attendance, but they didn't compete in the Open tournament, giving only simul displays.
|Nov-01-18|| ||HeMateMe: <Being secret, the work of von Neumann and Ulam required a code name. A colleague of von Neumann and Ulam, Nicholas Metropolis, suggested using the name Monte Carlo, which refers to the Monte Carlo Casino in Monaco where Ulam's uncle would borrow money from relatives to gamble. Using lists of "truly random" random numbers was extremely slow, but von Neumann developed a way to calculate pseudorandom numbers, using the middle-square method. Though this method has been criticized as crude, von Neumann was aware of this: he justified it as being faster than any other method at his disposal, and also noted that when it went awry it did so obviously, unlike methods that could be subtly incorrect. >|
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: Create an account today
to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users.
Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username,
then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
- No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
- No trolling.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic.
This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general,
visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members
do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.
Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC