Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Buffalo Tournament

Harry Nelson Pillsbury9/10(+8 -0 =2)[games]
Eugene Delmar6.5/10(+5 -2 =3)[games]
William Ewart Napier6.5/10(+6 -3 =1)[games]
Clarence Seaman Howell4.5/10(+3 -4 =3)[games]
Frank James Marshall2.5/10(+2 -7 =1)[games]
Louis Charles Karpinski1/10(+0 -8 =2)[games]
* Chess Event Description
Buffalo (1901)

The masters' event from the New York State Chess Association Congress, this was held from August 12-17, 1901 in Buffalo as a six-player, double-round tournament and ended in a convincing victory for Harry Pillsbury.

1 Pillsbury ** 11 11 ˝1 1˝ 11 9 =2 Delmar 00 ** ˝1 1˝ 11 ˝1 6˝ =2 Napier 00 ˝0 ** 11 11 11 6˝ 4 Howell ˝0 0˝ 00 ** 11 ˝1 4˝ 5 Marshall 0˝ 00 00 00 ** 11 2˝ 6 Karpinski 00 ˝0 00 ˝0 00 ** 1

Unavailable games: Rd 4 Napier-Delmar ˝-˝, Rd 9 Marshall–Karpinski 1-0

Original collection: Game Collection: 1901 Buffalo, by User: Calli.

 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 28  PGN Download
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Marshall vs W Napier 0-1461901BuffaloC53 Giuoco Piano
2. E Delmar vs Pillsbury 0-1641901BuffaloA01 Nimzovich-Larsen Attack
3. L C Karpinski vs C S Howell ½-½521901BuffaloC67 Ruy Lopez
4. Marshall vs C S Howell 0-1661901BuffaloC54 Giuoco Piano
5. L C Karpinski vs W Napier  0-1501901BuffaloC80 Ruy Lopez, Open
6. E Delmar vs C S Howell  1-0381901BuffaloD02 Queen's Pawn Game
7. E Delmar vs L C Karpinski ½-½671901BuffaloB20 Sicilian
8. Pillsbury vs Marshall 1-0331901BuffaloD02 Queen's Pawn Game
9. W Napier vs Pillsbury 0-1351901BuffaloC78 Ruy Lopez
10. C S Howell vs Pillsbury ½-½561901BuffaloB30 Sicilian
11. L C Karpinski vs Marshall 0-1271901BuffaloC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
12. E Delmar vs Marshall  1-0391901BuffaloC26 Vienna
13. W Napier vs C S Howell  1-0361901BuffaloD00 Queen's Pawn Game
14. L C Karpinski vs E Delmar  0-1581901BuffaloC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
15. C S Howell vs L C Karpinski  1-0611901BuffaloB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
16. Pillsbury vs E Delmar 1-0571901BuffaloC00 French Defense
17. W Napier vs Marshall 1-0371901BuffaloC43 Petrov, Modern Attack
18. C S Howell vs Marshall 1-0431901BuffaloD06 Queen's Gambit Declined
19. Pillsbury vs W Napier 1-0471901BuffaloC66 Ruy Lopez
20. Pillsbury vs L C Karpinski 1-0341901BuffaloB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
21. Marshall vs Pillsbury ½-½561901BuffaloC22 Center Game
22. Pillsbury vs C S Howell 1-0421901BuffaloB58 Sicilian
23. E Delmar vs W Napier 1-0211901BuffaloC32 King's Gambit Declined, Falkbeer Counter Gambit
24. W Napier vs L C Karpinski  1-0461901BuffaloB45 Sicilian, Taimanov
25. C S Howell vs E Delmar  ½-½811901BuffaloC55 Two Knights Defense
 page 1 of 2; games 1-25 of 28  PGN Download
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Marshall had come third at Paris (1900) where he beat Lasker ( Marshall vs Lasker, 1900 ). So this was a bad result for him. Pillsbury won by a large margin, despite the strong field.
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: Marshall was not Marshall in this tournament.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC