This team match was held between March 29th and April 4th, 1970. Participants for the Soviet Team were, in board order: Boris Spassky, Tigran Petrosian, Viktor Korchnoi, Lev Polugaevsky, Efim Geller, Vasily Smyslov, Mark Taimanov, Mikhail Botvinnik, Mikhail Tal, Paul Keres, and the Reserves, Leonid Stein and ... [more]
Player: Svetozar Gligoric
| page 1 of 1; 4 games
|Mar-10-13|| ||Absentee: Excellent page, very interesting article and notes.|
|Mar-10-13|| ||Marmot PFL: There were several mild upsets for the World to do as well as it did- Portisch > Korchnoi, Hort > Polugaevsky, Najdorf = Tal. |
Reshevsky was = with Smyslov but took a day off for religious reasons, and the alternate Olafsson lost (Gheorghiu might have been a better choice, if available).
Spassky also took a day off, for alleged illness, which Fischer (among others) was skeptical about. The alternate, Stein, was the best available player so Larsen deserves full credit for coming back to win the board 1 match 2.5 to 1.5
|Mar-10-13|| ||Marmot PFL: Olafsson and Gheorghiu both had bad results against Smyslov so it probably made no difference who played. (Helgi Olafsson has a plus score against a much older Smyslov.)|
|Jun-22-13|| ||optimal play: <<<<CHESS> by GEORGE STERN>|
TWO sensational occurrences marked the recently completed match between teams from the Soviet Union and the rest of the world.
The first involved a personality clash between Bobby Fischer and Bent Larsen. Fischer had been invited to play top board for the rest of the world team; but Larsen refused at the last moment to participate at all unless Fischer conceded him top board honours. In the event Fischer graciously and quite unexpectedly relinquished his rights, and in the process gained instant popularity perhaps for the first time in his life.
The second sensation was Fischer's crushing win over former world champion Tigran Petrosian by a 3-1 margin. Expert observers on the spot have commented that Petrosian was in better form than his successor, Boris Spassky, and that this win virtually confirms Fischer's status as the uncrowned king of chess.
[the Russians] defeated the rest of the world by the narrowest margin of 20 ½ - 19 ½ ; but on the top four boards, the Russians were severely trounced 10 ½ - 5 ½ .>
- The Canberra Times (ACT) issue Wednesday 15 April 1970>
|Jun-22-13|| ||harrylime: I get accused of 'fanboyism' in this place but not so ... |
it's just that Fischer was so far ahead of his time , and his play was so aesthetically beautiful I'm bound to be attracted to him and it.
|Jun-22-13|| ||Feldgrau: Which games of his struck you as particularly beautiful?|
|Aug-07-13|| ||GumboGambit: For clarification, it was the USSR that won , not "The Russians". Tal, Keres, Petrosian, Geller were not Russian. And a few others status are debatable as to how Russian they really are. And that doesnt even include Spassky and Korchnoi, who bailed from Russia later in their careers. If they had done a Russia vs rest of USSR match, that would have been quite a match in itself.|
|Aug-07-13|| ||TheFocus: In the report above, they were referred to as <Russians>, and <Russia> was used instead of <Soviet>.|
In doing the collection, I did not edit what the writers wrote.
|Aug-14-13|| ||Kinan: Even when the Soviets win against the rest of the world, they are criticized and called "catastrophe".
Are we gonna always suffer from this kind of biased points of view?|
|Aug-15-13|| ||todicav23: I'm a little disappointed that Fischer played safe in the last two games with Petrosian instead of playing for a win as usual.|
|Apr-14-14|| ||zanzibar: Here is a link to the SI article with mention of cars awarded, and of Fischer's regret at allowing Larsen first board:|
Fiat (circa 1970):
Moskvitch (circa 1970):
As Brady reports it:
Larsen -- "Money isn't an issue. I'm entitled to first place on my record."
Fischer -- "as a matter of principle" [...] "Larsen has a point."
but then, just before commencement:
"It was a big mistake. I shouldn't have of agreed to it." [...] "I must have been mad."
|Apr-14-14|| ||zanzibar: I wonder, I see the Fischer quotes in the into, which references CL&R. Was the Larsen quote(s) in there as well, or did Brady get them elsewhere?|
<todicav23> According to Brady:
<<"Fischer's last game *was* drawn, but not because of any timidity on his part. He played well with the Black pieces, and selected his special Grunfeld Defense (which Hans Kmoch says Fischer reserves for all his attempts at "Games of the Century").>>
|Aug-03-14|| ||Ke2: Lol "Computers have decided we will win by 3 points" Classic USSR|
|Aug-13-15|| ||fisayo123: That's what I call an impressive line-up.|
|Aug-14-15|| ||offramp: If you look at the top 9 of the 10 boards the Rest of World was winning by a point.|
|Mar-13-17|| ||devere: Botvinnik, Tal, and Keres played the bottom 3 boards for the USSR, and together they were +3. That was some team.|
|Mar-16-17|| ||The Kings Domain: Hopefully Chess can attain this renaissance once again soon.|
|Mar-04-18|| ||Allanur: Mikhail Tal has good memories about this match, why not add here?
Details that are not found here.
|Mar-07-18|| ||SpaceRunner: Allanur : Very interesting blog-thank you!|
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
- No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
- NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
- Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
- All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
- Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC