The 14th Soviet Chess Championship was held in Moscow from June 1st to July 1st, 1945. Nineteen of the Soviet Union's strongest masters qualified or were invited to participate in the round robin event. Twelve players qualified from semifinal tournaments played earlier in 1945: Alexander Konstantinopolsky, Alexander Kotov, Iosif Rudakovsky, and Vitaly Chekhover qualified from Baku; David Bronstein, Ilia Kan, Vladimir Alatortsev, and Peter Romanovsky qualified from Moscow; and Isaac Boleslavsky, Alexander To ... [more]
Player: Vladimir Alatortsev
| page 1 of 1; 17 games
|1. Bondarevsky vs Alatortsev
|| ||½-½||27||1945||USSR Championship||D03 Torre Attack (Tartakower Variation)|
|2. Alatortsev vs I Rudakovsky
|| ||½-½||57||1945||USSR Championship||A53 Old Indian|
|3. Alatortsev vs P Romanovsky
|| ||0-1||33||1945||USSR Championship||E34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation|
|4. Alatortsev vs Lilienthal
|| ||1-0||78||1945||USSR Championship||E33 Nimzo-Indian, Classical|
|5. Tolush vs Alatortsev
|| ||0-1||39||1945||USSR Championship||C49 Four Knights|
|6. Boleslavsky vs Alatortsev
|| ||½-½||21||1945||USSR Championship||C43 Petrov, Modern Attack|
|7. Kotov vs Alatortsev
|| ||½-½||83||1945||USSR Championship||E26 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch|
|8. Alatortsev vs G Goldberg
|| ||½-½||59||1945||USSR Championship||E38 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, 4...c5|
|9. Botvinnik vs Alatortsev
||½-½||62||1945||USSR Championship||D13 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Exchange Variation|
|10. Alatortsev vs Kan
|| ||½-½||26||1945||USSR Championship||E34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation|
|11. Konstantinopolsky vs Alatortsev
|| ||1-0||74||1945||USSR Championship||D13 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav, Exchange Variation|
|12. Alatortsev vs Koblents
||0-1||25||1945||USSR Championship||D30 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|13. Ragozin vs Alatortsev
|| ||1-0||33||1945||USSR Championship||D46 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav|
|14. Alatortsev vs Smyslov
|| ||½-½||25||1945||USSR Championship||E34 Nimzo-Indian, Classical, Noa Variation|
|15. Chekhover vs Alatortsev
|| ||½-½||51||1945||USSR Championship||D12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav|
|16. Bronstein vs Alatortsev
||1-0||33||1945||USSR Championship||C33 King's Gambit Accepted|
|17. Alatortsev vs B Ratner
|| ||1-0||42||1945||USSR Championship||A57 Benko Gambit|
| page 1 of 1; 17 games
|Feb-01-13|| ||Benzol: "This Championship was something of a landmark for Soviet players. In gaining my fifth successive victory in difficult events, on this occasion I made the staggering score of 16 points out of 18 ( including my win over Flohr, who retired from the tournament ). My success made such an impression that Soviet masters wrote to Stalin, suggesting that a world championship match be organized between Alekhine and Botvinnik." - Mikhail Botvinnik.|
|Feb-01-13|| ||HeMateMe: Thanks chess biographers, and <phony benoni> for putting in the work to make these games available.|
1945--Makes you wonder how people had time to think about chess, with chunks of Russia and half of Europe burned to the ground.
|Feb-01-13|| ||waustad: This must be one of the most impressive wins ever over such a collection of players, +14 without a loss. At face value this is astounding, though I have to wonder if there may have been a little of: <My success made such an impression that Soviet masters wrote to Stalin, suggesting that a world championship match be organized between Alekhine and Botvinnik.> Would the powers that be have encouraged some players to improve the score? I don't know, but the way things were at that time it is possible. How could we ever know and could we believe anybody's later comments if they exist. I guess this is the essential problem for historians.|
|Feb-01-13|| ||keypusher: Here's an idea for improving discourse around here: no unsourced accusations against Botvinnik. No more "golly, I wonder..." every time he wins a match or a tournament.|
|Feb-01-13|| ||TheFocus: <keypusher> I second that motion.|
|Feb-01-13|| ||fisayo123: <Keypusher> Its interesting people say that. I read even Grischuk (in an interview) saying someone told him something along those lines.|
|Feb-02-13|| ||keypusher: <fisayo123: <Keypusher> Its interesting people say that. I read even Grischuk (in an interview) saying someone told him something along those lines.>|
Yes, that's exactly the kind of crap I have in mind. An unidentified person said an unidentified thing to someone who was born 40 years after this tournament took place. What is that worth? Zero.
|Feb-02-13|| ||TheFocus: According to some of the ignorant nay-sayers, without the help of the bureaucrats, Botvinnik would have just been another no-talent hack.|
I doubt that there is anyone living today that could not learn from Botvinnik's games. An all-around universal player, capable of stellar attacks, defensive masterpieces, strategy, positional nuances, and one of the greatest endgame players in the game.
Nuff said about one of the ten greatest players in the game.
|Feb-02-13|| ||perfidious: <TheFocus> and <keypusher>: Another piece of tripe I have seen implied, and even stated outright, is that Botvinnik was only capable of playing when in one of his systems-take him out of those and he was nothing special, or so went this risible theory.|
Turned out old Mikhail Moiseevich had a purty durned good career for a 'system player'. Somehow he managed to play at a high level till well into his fifties, despite his 'handicap'.
|Feb-21-15|| ||Fusilli: Enough about Botvinnik, folks! You are missing the truly remarkable thing that happened in this tournament... Tolush drew only one game!! :)|
|Sep-11-15|| ||keypusher: Kirillov-Botvinnik (USSR Championship 1931) after 21....Nb4:|
click for larger view
V G Kirillov vs Botvinnik, 1931
Golberg-Botvinnik (USSR Championship 1945) after 17....Nb4:
click for larger view
G Goldberg vs Botvinnik, 1945
Botvinnik-Yuriev (1927 Soviet Metalworkers Championship) after 19....Nb6
click for larger view
Botvinnik vs B Yuriev, 1927
Botvinnik-Kan (1945 USSR Championship) after 20....Nb6:
click for larger view
Botvinnik vs Kan, 1945
(Thanks to <MissScarlett> for pointing out the second pairing.)
Prearrangement? No, I don't think so. Botvinnik prepared opening systems very deeply, and if he found a plan that worked he would repeat it as often as necessary. In the Tal rematch he used analysis from 1947 to win Botvinnik vs Tal, 1961 and in Botvinnik vs Tal, 1961 he said he followed a plan from a game in the early 1950s (not one of his). But I'll bet Bobby Fischer would have been all over this.
|Sep-11-15|| ||Benzol: <But I'll bet Bobby Fischer would have been all over this.>|
<keypusher> Do you mean in a positive or negative sense?
I can recall seeing a demonstration lecture given by Brazilian IM Herman van Riemsdijk in which he pointed out that Fischer himself used similar middlegame setups that he was familiar with. I'm sorry I can't remember at the moment which of Bobby's games this applied to but I'm sure a lot of players follow this practice.
|Sep-15-15|| ||keypusher: <Benzol> Oh, negative, certainly. See here. H MacGrillen vs E Formanek, 1973|
But I see this erudite poster had given some thought to the issue:
H MacGrillen vs E Formanek, 1973
|Dec-19-17|| ||zanzibar: < Shortly after this, WW2 erupted and Kotov worked as an engineer in an armaments factory in Tula. Despite the war, the Soviets held championships in 1940, ‘44, and ’45 and Kotov finished second in all three events. ... >|
I think Tartajubow mistakenly assigns Kotov 2nd place in the USSR-ch (1945), as he place in a tie for 4th.
|Mar-07-18|| ||Marmot PFL: <Its interesting people say that. I read even Grischuk (in an interview) saying someone told him something along those lines.>|
I heard many stories like that from former Soviet residents. For instance one said Boleslavsky didn't object to losing a game for the "greater good" but rather than lose with his favorite Sicilian played the Spanish instead (which he very seldom played). Stories like this are impossible to check, all the participants having departed this world. Stories about Keres were the most common.
|Mar-31-18|| ||keypusher: < Marmot PFL: <Its interesting people say that. I read even Grischuk (in an interview) saying someone told him something along those lines.>
I heard many stories like that from former Soviet residents. For instance one said Boleslavsky didn't object to losing a game for the "greater good" but rather than lose with his favorite Sicilian played the Spanish instead (which he very seldom played). Stories like this are impossible to check, all the participants having departed this world. >|
Actually, we can check that story. Boleslavsky has ten Ruy Lopez games with Black in the database, and the only time he ever lost with it was in Round 1 of this tournament.
Botvinnik played 1.e4 against Boleslavsky five times and won each time: three French Defenses, one Sicilian and one Ruy Lopez.
So, odds are pretty good that that particular story is rubbish.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply.
Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it
entitles you to features otherwise unavailable.
Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
- No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
- NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
- Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
- All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
- Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page.
This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or
this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
your profile |
Premium Membership |
Kibitzer's Café |
Biographer's Bistro |
new kibitzing |
Tournament Index |
Player Directory |
Notable Games |
World Chess Championships |
Opening Explorer |
Guess the Move |
Game Collections |
ChessBookie Game |
Chessgames Challenge |
privacy notice |
Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC