Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

17th DSB Congress, Hamburg (1910) 17th DSB Kongress Hamburg, German Empire, 18 July - 6 August 1910 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Pts 1 Schlechter * 0 1 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ 1 1 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 11½ 2 Duras 1 * 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 ½ 0 ½ 1 1 1 0 ½ 1 11 3 Nimzowitsch 0 0 * 1 ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 1 1 ½ 0 ½ 1 1 1 10½ 4 Spielmann ½ ½ 0 * ½ 0 ½ ½ 1 1 0 1 1 ½ 1 1 1 10 =5 Teichmann ½ 0 ½ ½ * 1 1 ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 1 ½ ½ 1 1 9½ =5 Marshall ½ ½ 0 1 0 * 0 ½ 1 ½ ½ 0 1 1 1 1 1 9½ =7 Dus Chotimirsky 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 1 * ½ 0 1 1 0 ½ 0 1 1 1 8½ =7 Alekhine 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ ½ * 0 0 1 1 ½ ½ 1 1 1 8½ =9 Tarrasch ½ ½ 0 0 1 0 1 1 * ½ 0 ½ ½ ½ 1 1 0 8 =9 Forgacs 0 1 0 0 ½ ½ 0 1 ½ * ½ ½ ½ 1 1 ½ ½ 8 =11 Leonhardt 0 ½ 0 1 ½ ½ 0 0 1 ½ * 1 1 0 0 0 1 7 =11 Tartakower 0 0 ½ 0 ½ 1 1 0 ½ ½ 0 * 0 1 1 ½ ½ 7 =11 Salwe ½ 0 1 0 0 0 ½ ½ ½ ½ 0 1 * ½ 0 1 1 7 =11 Koehnlein 0 0 ½ ½ ½ 0 1 ½ ½ 0 1 0 ½ * 1 0 1 7 15 Speijer ½ 1 0 0 ½ 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 * 1 ½ 5½ 16 John ½ ½ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 ½ 1 ½ 0 1 0 * 1 5 17 Yates 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 ½ 0 ½ 0 0 ½ 0 * 2½ Wikipedia article: Hamburg 1910 chess tournament. Carl Schlechter after a win in Hamburg 1910: http://www.endgame.nl/HAMBURG.JPG. <Aug-05-08 whiteshark: It looks as if Franz G Jacob played only six rounds in Hamburg 1910 (+0 =3 -3) and abondoned the tournament afterwards. Why? Any background information? <Aug-05-08 sneaky pete: Not in the 1911 tournament book. It only states that Jacob, Mülhausen i. Els. (with <Alechin>, Moskau and Dus Chotimirski, Moskau last minute replacement for the invited trio Capablanca, Janowski and Rubinstein) withdrew after round 6. "Eine unangenehme Störung erlitt das Meisterturnier leider dadurch, daß Herr Jacob nach der 6. Runde zurücktrat.">> --> Franz G Jacob. ♙ = ♙ = ♙ = ♙ = ♙ = ♙ = ♙ Phony Benoni: Puzzled by the pun? <"Pride and Prejudice"> This was Yates' first important international tournament. Tarrasch had objected to his inclusion, feeling he wasn't strong enough for the event. Objectively, Tarrasch was probably right. Yates finished dead last by 2.5 points and won only one game, Tarrasch vs Yates, 1910. Tournament book: Rudolf Gebhardt (Hrsg.): XVII. Kongreß des Deutschen Schachbundes, Hamburg 1910, Coburg 1911. Here's a gem from Haupturnier B, Group 3: Roesch vs W Schlage, 1910 Wikipedia article: Roesch %E2%80%93 Schlage, Hamburg 1910. 0 = 0 = 0 = 0 = = 0 = 0 = 0 = = Although no additional biographical information comes to mind at this stage, our correspondent’s contribution is an opportunity to raise a point regarding Jose Raul Capablanca non-participation in Hamburg, 1910. In chapter IV of My Chess Career (page numbers vary, according to the edition) he wrote: ‘In the summer of 1910 I was invited to take part in the International Tournament at Hamburg. I accepted the invitation, and was ready to start when my physical condition prevented my making the voyage to enter such a strenuous contest. Many comments were made at the time with respect to my withdrawal at the last hour, some of the masters making the silly remark that I had simply been scared away by the strong entry of the tournament. The real reason was, as I have already stated, that I was not in condition to stand such a strain. That I was not afraid, and had no reason to be, I soon proved to the satisfaction of all, when the following year I won the first prize in the strongest tournament that has ever been held: the first San Sebastian tournament.’ Magazines of the time referred to Capablanca’s intended participation in Hamburg, 1910 and to his withdrawal through illness. <But what critical comments were made, and which masters accused him of being ‘scared away’?> That's a serious question, asked in CN 4067: http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/.... Based on an original game collection by User: whiteshark.  page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 136  Game   Result Moves Year Event/Locale Opening 1. Schlechter vs Alekhine 1-0 34 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C41 Philidor Defense 2. F Duz-Khotimirsky vs Duras ½-½ 30 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg D31 Queen's Gambit Declined 3. Marshall vs L Forgacs   ½-½ 32 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg D32 Queen's Gambit Declined, Tarrasch 4. P S Leonhardt vs Spielmann 1-0 31 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C14 French, Classical 5. A Speijer vs Teichmann   ½-½ 39 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C68 Ruy Lopez, Exchange 6. Tartakower vs Tarrasch   ½-½ 37 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C01 French, Exchange 7. Salwe vs Yates   1-0 46 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg D05 Queen's Pawn Game 8. Koehnlein vs Nimzowitsch   ½-½ 30 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg B16 Caro-Kann, Bronstein-Larsen Variation 9. Duras vs P S Leonhardt   ½-½ 52 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C77 Ruy Lopez 10. Tartakower vs Marshall 1-0 51 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C00 French Defense 11. Tarrasch vs Spielmann 0-1 32 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C49 Four Knights 12. Teichmann vs Koehnlein   ½-½ 39 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C79 Ruy Lopez, Steinitz Defense Deferred 13. W John vs A Speijer 0-1 69 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg D02 Queen's Pawn Game 14. Nimzowitsch vs F Duz-Khotimirsky   ½-½ 30 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C45 Scotch Game 15. L Forgacs vs Salwe   ½-½ 31 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C49 Four Knights 16. Yates vs Schlechter 0-1 61 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C48 Four Knights 17. A Speijer vs Alekhine 0-1 48 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C15 French, Winawer 18. Spielmann vs Duras ½-½ 49 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C84 Ruy Lopez, Closed 19. Marshall vs Tarrasch 1-0 29 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C55 Two Knights Defense 20. Schlechter vs L Forgacs 1-0 46 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C42 Petrov Defense 21. F Duz-Khotimirsky vs Teichmann 0-1 26 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg D62 Queen's Gambit Declined, Orthodox, Rubinstein Attack 22. Koehnlein vs W John 0-1 32 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C01 French, Exchange 23. Salwe vs Tartakower 1-0 61 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg A53 Old Indian 24. P S Leonhardt vs Nimzowitsch 0-1 53 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg B16 Caro-Kann, Bronstein-Larsen Variation 25. Alekhine vs Koehnlein ½-½ 57 1910 17th DSB Congress, Hamburg C26 Vienna  page 1 of 6; games 1-25 of 136    REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)   Jun-22-13    Karpova: From pages 254-255 of the 1910 'Wiener Schachzeitung' 'Im "Berliner Lokalanzeiger" macht sich Dr. Tarrasch darüber lustig, daß im Hamburger Meisterturnier als Vertreter Englands <nur ein in weitesten Kreisen unbekannter Mr. Yates mitspielt, der zwar vielleicht ein ausgezeichneter Schachspieler ist, vorläufig aber noch nicht die geringste Berechtigung besitzt, zu einem Meisterturnier zugelassen zu werden.> <Für homines novi,> fügt er hinzu, <sind die Turniere zweiten Ranges, die fälschlich sogenannten Hauptturniere da, unter deren Kämpen sich immer einige befinden, die Meisterstärke besitzen.> Translation of what Dr. Tarrasch wrote: ... only a in widest circles unknown Mr. Yates participates, who indeed may be an excellent chessplayer, for the time being he does not possess in the slightest the qualification to be allowed to a Master Tournament. For homines novi, there are the 2nd rank tournaments, wrongly called Main Tournaments, among whose competitors always a few of Master strength can be found. Dr. Tarrasch famously lost the game between the two and this was Yates' sole win: Tarrasch vs Yates, 1910 It should be noted though that players of much greater talent than Yates had to prove their worth in Main Tournaments before being allowed to compete in Master Tournaments and start their impressive careers. Apr-10-14    Karpova: Prizes (in <Mark>): Schlechter 2,000; Duras 1,500; Niemzowitsch 1,000; Spielmann 700; Marshall and Teichmann shared 600+500; Dus Chotimirsky and Alekhine shared 400+300; Forgacs and Tarrasch shared 200. Source: 'Wiener Schachzeitung', October-November 1910, p. 336 Apr-10-14    Karpova: Regarding Jakob of Straßburg: <Unähnlich dem Straßburger Meister Jakob, der dem Komitee einen unangenehmen Strich durch die Rechnung machte, indem er, weil er sich wegen angeblicher Schlaflosigkeit "indisponiert fühle", unversehens zurücktrat, [...].> (Unlike Master Jakob of Strasbourg, who displeasingly upset the committee's plans, by withdrawing unawares as he "felt indisposed" due to alleged insomnia, [...].) Source: 'Wiener Schachzeitung', October-November 1910, p. 349 Feb-07-16    TheFocus: Leonhardt was awarded the Brilliancy Prize of 300 marks donated by Baron Albert de Rothschild for his game against Tarrasch. See <American Chess Bulletin>, February 1911, pg. 31. Apr-17-21    Nosnibor: Was it this tournament that an argument broke out between Nimzovitch and John whereby John challenged Nimzovitch to a duel? I read somewhere that Nimzovitch rolled up his sleeve and flexed his muscle and offered to fight instead which apparently John declined. [ Maybe written by Ed.Lasker from his book "Secrets I have learned from Chess Masters".] Jan-14-23    spektrowski: @Nosnibor: yes, this was this tournament. What's funnier, the story had a continuation, recounted (as an unrelated incident) in Baudet and Strick van Linschoten's chess column in Het Vaderland: on the next day after the game against John, after meeting John's second in the morning and threatening them with his muscles, Nimzowitsch played Alekhine (the latter was 17 at the time and suffered from a leg infection, barely able to walk). Nimzo got a good advantage in the opening, but squandered it and only managed to draw. After the game, he suddenly became very angry, shouting at Alekhine that "he was blatantly playing for a draw, even though he was a clearly inferior player and should have lost", and that "he would be lucky if he reached his room in one piece". And then Nimzowitsch came to Alekhine's room and threatened him again. Thankfully, they didn't come to blows, but despised each other for years. NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion. Please observe our posting guidelines: No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members. Nothing in violation of United States law. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members. No trolling. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times. See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator. NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café. Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration. Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes! Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC