Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 US Chess Championship (2013) Chess Event Description
Previous edition: ... [more]

Player: Benjamin Finegold

 page 1 of 1; 9 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. R Hess vs B Finegold ½-½362013US Chess ChampionshipB07 Pirc
2. B Finegold vs V Akobian ½-½792013US Chess ChampionshipE32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical
3. Onischuk vs B Finegold 1-0402013US Chess ChampionshipD11 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
4. B Finegold vs Y Norowitz  0-1472013US Chess ChampionshipD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
5. A Ivanov vs B Finegold ½-½822013US Chess ChampionshipB12 Caro-Kann Defense
6. B Finegold vs Khachiyan 1-0362013US Chess ChampionshipA00 Uncommon Opening
7. Shulman vs B Finegold 0-1342013US Chess ChampionshipE70 King's Indian
8. Kaidanov vs B Finegold  ½-½402013US Chess ChampionshipD27 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical
9. B Finegold vs Shabalov 0-1222013US Chess ChampionshipB06 Robatsch
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Finegold wins | Finegold loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 8 ·  Later Kibitzing>
May-11-13  Everett: <pawn to QB4: <have the mighty Botvinnik, Tal or Kasparov ever come close to going 11-0> believe it or not, they haven't. But here's a decent score by Botvinnik in the USSR Championship: 15 - 2, the field a mite stronger than RJF had to face.>...

+13 =4

May-11-13  parmetd: Look other problem with swiss bears its head again Kamsky who is 6/8 will have to play Ray Robson 4.5/8 so a +4 vs +1
May-11-13  Everett: Christiansen has eight decisive games, no draws.
Premium Chessgames Member
  WannaBe: I see, that Finegold isn't doing that well...
May-11-13  dx9293: <parmetd> Kamsky has played everyone else with 4.5 points or more, except Robson! Plus Shabalov (one of the players with 4/8) in Round 1. There's no one else for Kamsky to play, and this highlights the reason I don't mind the small swiss, because the top finishers will basically be playing a RR against each other anyway.
May-11-13  parmetd: No dx9293 you are wrong. The leader of the field sets the pairings and thus the leader of the field will play all the best while the other players will consistently get easier pairings as a result. This tournament is a ddisastrous abuse of swiss pairings. It is a major problem.c
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <parmetd:....the leader of the field will play all the best while the other players will consistently get easier pairings as a result...>

Jack Peters mentioned this inequity in a CL&R interview long ago, noting moreover that the higher-rated players will (other things being equal) play stronger opposition than those lower rated.

May-12-13  dx9293: <parmetd> It's true that Kamsky has had the toughest pairings (well, he hasn't had to face himself), but that is the price of leading the tournament.

Looking at the other players' pairings over the course of the event, I don't see anything egregiously bad (and I've directed hundreds of tournaments). I don't think any of the players can really complain about bad pairings.

An RR is the "purest" type of tournament one could have, but I maintain that a small swiss is a good compromise in order to get more players into the tournament. HOW the players qualify, that's another question (I don't like wildcards).

May-12-13  Shams: "So Kayden made 'luft', a German word that means 'air'..." -- Yasser Seirawan, a couple minutes ago. I sure wish he would stop talking to the .01% of his audience that is rated <1000.
May-12-13  Shams: Kamsky has just allowed a huge exchange sacrifice.
May-12-13  waustad: They are going to rapid tiebreak tomorrow!
May-12-13  Petrosianic: Rapid Tiebreak? No Most Losses, Sonnenborn, or One Potato Two Potato like in a Candidates Tournament?
May-12-13  schweigzwang: Imagine.
May-12-13  dx9293: <Petrosianic> :-))
May-12-13  Everett: < Petrosianic: Rapid Tiebreak? No Most Losses, Sonnenborn, or One Potato Two Potato like in a Candidates Tournament?>

Perhaps they should choose by deciding who makes the most bitter and sarcastic posts.

May-12-13  Marmot PFL: With a national title at stake there has to be a playoff.
May-12-13  parmetd: Well and look at Ramirez's easy schedule... he didn't even have to play Gareev.
May-12-13  RookFile: Whatever. Kamsky wins the tiebreak. No worries.
May-12-13  dx9293: 2614 TPR for Troff in the US Championship. That should equal a GM norm (no federation requirements for National Championships or National Team Championships).
May-13-13  Ezzy: Top 6 get a World Cup place.
May-13-13  schweigzwang: Whoa, look at that huge tie for 6th place!
May-13-13  Strongest Force: Looks like 1 blitz game will decide after both rapid games were drawn.
May-13-13  Edeltalent: <StrongestForce> From what I understood, it won't be a Blitz game. White gets 45min and has to win, so both players will (secretly) bid how few time they are willing to accept to get Black and draw odds.
May-13-13  Edeltalent: In fact Ramirez "won" the bid and got Black, offering 19:40min (Kamsky bid 20min). There's an increment of 5sec per move.
May-13-13  Strongest Force: That's better than blitz. Thx Edeltalent.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 8)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 7 OF 8 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC