Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Harrwitz - Williams Match

Daniel Harrwitz4/5(+3 -0 =2)[games]
Elijah Williams1/5(+0 -3 =2)[games] Chess Event Description
Harrwitz - Williams (1846)

Played in London, England.

Harrwitz = 1 1 = 1 4 Williams = 0 0 = 0 1

Missing information: No game dates.

Based on an original collection by User: TheFocus.

 page 1 of 1; 5 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. E Williams vs Harrwitz ½-½841846Harrwitz - WilliamsD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
2. E Williams vs Harrwitz 0-1301846Harrwitz - WilliamsD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
3. Harrwitz vs E Williams 1-0431846Harrwitz - WilliamsC38 King's Gambit Accepted
4. E Williams vs Harrwitz ½-½521846Harrwitz - WilliamsD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
5. E Williams vs Harrwitz 0-1471846Harrwitz - WilliamsC50 Giuoco Piano
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Sep-08-13  Alpinemaster: For students of Open Games who prefer to avoid slow positional structures at all cost in a Romantic viewpoint, will do well to study this match in conjunction with the famous 1830's Alexander McDonnell v Louis Charles Mahi de La Bourdonnais match.

The study material in question here are all 3 Queen's Gambit Accepted: Old Variation games of this match and all games of the same opening in the earlier match between two self-proclaimed World Champions.

The objective relates in no way to the Queen's Gambit or even 1.d4 openings, however! After 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3 e5!(=)4. Bxc4 exd4 5.exd4... we have reached the French Defense - Monte Carlo Variation by transposition from the Queen's Gambit Accepted: Old Variation, which is, in my opinion, the most reliable way to deal with the French Defense (the most closed defense to 1.e4) while forcing an open and Romantic position. It was favored by many early 19th century masters; the most notable practitioner of course being Louis Charles Mahi de La Bourdonnais, who was arguably the most powerful Chess player in the World due to his superior Opening Theory knowledge and ability to quickly seize advantages through initiative granted to his middle game position through Opening superiority.

For further study, the standard French Defense - Monte Carlo Variation arises after 1.e4 e6 2.d4 d5 3.exd5 exd5 (the Exchange Variation, favored by Morphy and modern players of Old Romantic preference) 4.c4! dxc4 5. Bxc4...

I would leave you with this thought in closing:

"He is who is afraid of an Isolated Pawn, should not play Chess." -Dr. Siegbert Tarrasch, MD and Chess Master

Good studies,


Nov-30-17  yureesystem: The games are a big disappointment, too many blunders but good for the average amateurs to study. The opening is played so poorly but the first game seem to be the best for advance player to learn something.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC