chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆
MATCH STANDINGS
Marshall - Showalter US Championship Match

Frank James Marshall8.5/12(+7 -2 =3)[games]
Jackson Whipps Showalter3.5/12(+2 -7 =3)[games]

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
Marshall - Showalter US Championship (1909)
For links to other US championship matches, see Game Collection: US Championship matches (meta).

After the death of Harry Nelson Pillsbury in 1906, the US championship was vacant. Marshall had a strong win at Cambridge Springs (1904), finishing ahead of current world champion, Emanuel Lasker, Pillsbury, as well as the title holder prior to Pillsbury, Jackson Whipps Showalter. He also easily won the 7th American Chess Congress (1904) in St. Louis. As arguably the strongest active US player of the day, he could be considered the natural successor to Pillsbury's title. However, the days of assuming the championship by "acclaim" were long gone. Arguments about lineage and qualification similar to the objections raised by Walter Penn Shipley in response to the proposal to name the winner of the 7th American Chess Congress as US champion were revisited.

The New York Chess Association planned to host a match for the US championship between Marshall and former champion Albert Hodges during their July 1909 meeting at Bath Beach. Of course Hodges probably had less of a claim on the title than Showalter, but this match would be derailed before that became a critical issue.

The situation was complicated by the fact that Marshall had been beaten badly in a match by Jose Raul Capablanca (+8 -1 =14) earlier in 1909. Capablanca had lived in the US for almost five years, and objected to a US title match being arranged without his input. There was some debate as to whether he had a claim on the title. Shipley again weighed in, maintaining that citizenship, not mere residency, was a prerequisite:

"If there is any chess champion of the United States, Jackson W. Showalter, of Kentucky, is the holder of the title. Since he won it, he has never declined a challenge, and until he does so, neither Marshall, nor Capablanca, nor any other player has a valid claim to the title. It is self-evident that no one who is neither a native or naturalized citizen of the United States can be considered." - Chess Weekly, 1909.

Prior to leaving for Havana for a six week trip, Capablanca was reported as intending to apply for US citizenship once he became eligible (Brooklyn Daily Eagle, 11 Jul 1909, page 6). After his return to the US, Capablanca made a public statement with a somewhat modified position (quoted here from the American Chess Bulletin):

"Since my return to this country, a few days ago, I have been asked several times concerning my attitude with respect to the United States championship and my citizenship. In reply I wish to make known my attitude in this respect. I am the undisputed champion of Cuba, and last spring I beat Marshall by the score of 8 to 1. Mr. Marshall has the greatest reputation and the best score in tournaments of any living chess player in the U. S. A., and is therefore considered everywhere as the strongest representative of the United States.

By my victory over Marshall, I have taken his position as the strongest representative on this side of the Atlantic. Therefore, I consider myself the 'champion of America,' and stand ready to defend my title within a year against any American of the U. S. A. or anywhere else, for a side bet of at least $1000, United States currency. Under these circumstances the question whether I am a citizen of the U. S. A. or not has nothing to do with the matter under consideration."

While there have been those who have alleged this is evidence that Capablanca tried to pronounce himself US champion, American Chess Bulletin's interpretation of this statement was that Capablanca was claiming to be the strongest player in the Western Hemisphere, not US champion. In any event, Capablanca was clearly more interested in trying to arrange a challenge for the world championship than any claim of a US title.

Marshall made arrangements to challenge Showalter before anything else could complicate the situation further. Marshall was eager to arrange and start the match, so was willing to travel to Kentucky. Showalter had never been particularly difficult in regard to match conditions, so details were settled without prolonged negotiations. A friend of Showalter wrote to the American Chess Bulletin in October 1909, saying:

"We discussed the conditions of his match with Marshall and he was willing to agree to all of the conditions proposed, with the exception of having draws count a half point. He says that, in view of the fact that he has not played any serious chess for a year or so, he is likely to lose several games in the earlier stage of the match and would be seriously handicapped in that case to have draws count a half point. He says, however, that you need have no fear of there being any large proportion of draws, as he intends to play the games to a finish. Concerning the number of games, he suggests eight up as suitable, but, if Marshall prefers, will change it one game either way.

In regard to the number of games per week and the number of off days, he is willing to leave this entirely to Mr. Marshall. As to the time of day for playing, he prefers afternoons. His home is ten miles from Lexington and it takes an hour to get here. If the proposed conditions are satisfactory, we would suggest that you draw up a contract and forward a copy here."

Phoenix Hotel, Lexington, KY, 9-26 Nov 1909

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 1 2 Pts 1 Marshall 1 = 1 1 0 = = 1 1 1 0 1 8.5 2 Showalter 0 = 0 0 1 = = 0 0 0 1 0 3.5

Marshall +1 +1 +2 +3 +2 +2 +2 +3 +4 +5 +4 +5 (+7 -2 =3)

Showalter at this point was past his prime, and not that serious an obstacle to Marshall. Marshall would hold the title for many years, but only defend it once.

Original collection: Game Collection: Marshall -- Showalter 1909 match by User: crawfb5..

 page 1 of 1; 12 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Showalter vs Marshall 0-1511909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipC42 Petrov Defense
2. Marshall vs Showalter ½-½311909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipC01 French, Exchange
3. Showalter vs Marshall 0-1551909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipC11 French
4. Marshall vs Showalter 1-0341909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipC21 Center Game
5. Showalter vs Marshall 1-0241909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipC63 Ruy Lopez, Schliemann Defense
6. Marshall vs Showalter ½-½391909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipC30 King's Gambit Declined
7. Showalter vs Marshall  ½-½601909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipC11 French
8. Marshall vs Showalter 1-0621909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipD08 Queen's Gambit Declined, Albin Counter Gambit
9. Showalter vs Marshall 0-1411909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipC62 Ruy Lopez, Old Steinitz Defense
10. Marshall vs Showalter 1-0281909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipD00 Queen's Pawn Game
11. Showalter vs Marshall 1-0441909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipC77 Ruy Lopez
12. Marshall vs Showalter 1-0291909Marshall - Showalter US ChampionshipD08 Queen's Gambit Declined, Albin Counter Gambit
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2)  

Kibitzer's Corner
Jan-17-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: There were quite a few objecting to this match for the vacant title taking place stating that the title died with Pillsbury. (see above)

Not least was the publication 'Chess Weekly' edited by Magnus Smith who after criticising the whole affair added:

"According to press despatches, a match is being arranged between messrs. Duffer and Pawnpusher, the Punkinsville experts, for a purse of ten cents and the championship of the United States.

The Match will be played on a pocket-board in the Corner Grocery, and in view of the importance of the contest the promoters anticipate no difficulty in raising the purse by popular subscription.

Later (by wireless) - Match Off. or indefinitely postponed owing to Mr. Pawnpusher having contracted a sore thumb from over-practice."

Chess Weekly, September 25th 1909. (page 138)

Apr-13-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  MissScarlett: Louis Uedemann in <The Chicago Sunday Tribune>, December 12th, 1909, reports Marshall's surprise announcement that he was permanently retiring from the game for family and business reasons.

<Now where is the American championship title? Showalter lost it to Pillsbury and claims he reinherited it by the latter's untimely demise. This view Marshall shared, because in their recent match the title was played for and won by Marshall. With Marshall's retirement Showalter again becomes the owner by inheritance.>

Marshall's next major outing was the Anglo-American Cable Match in March 1910, so a couple of months away from the game was evidently enough to bring him to his senses.

Aug-19-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <Sally Simpson> Using Walter Shipley's logic, when Alekhine died in 1948 the WCC title should have reverted to Euwe. After all, he was the last living WCC and had never refused a challenge. FIDE would not have been in the picture. Then again, 1948 was a far different world than 1909.

I don't know the circumstances or the reasons how FIDE gained control to administer the ACC title. Do you or someone else know?

Aug-19-18  Howard: You mean WCC, not ACC---correct ?

As far as how FIDE wrested control of the WC title, it's explained in that blue paperback that Gligoric helped write giving all the WC games from 1948-1985. I don't recall the name of it, though.

Botvinnik and Kasparov are on the cover.

Aug-19-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  AylerKupp: <Howard> Well, I got 2 out of 3 right. :-)
Aug-20-18  Howard: As far as any tidbits from that aforementioned book that I still faintly recall, it was stated that there were still some disappointed feelings about the Capablanca-Alekhine 1927 "rematch" which never took place, and FIDE was determined not to let something like that happen again.

There was also something about the fact that FIDE was having some important meeting, but they postponed it by one day so that the people involved could go on some sightseeing tour. The Soviets arrived...one day late. If not for the sightseeing expedition, "all of chess history may have turned out differently".

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC