Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Riga Technical University Open (2014) Chess Event Description
Played in Riga, Latvia 16-24 August 2014. Crosstable: ... [more]

Player: Robert Ris

 page 1 of 1; 3 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. R Ris vs B Bok  0-1512014Riga Technical University OpenE20 Nimzo-Indian
2. V M Golod vs R Ris  0-1352014Riga Technical University OpenD20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
3. R Ris vs V Erdos  ½-½212014Riga Technical University OpenD31 Queen's Gambit Declined
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Ris wins | Ris loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessgames Bookie: Round 5 markets are now up:

Riga rd 5: PICK THREE
Riga rd 5: Argandoņa-Melkumyan
Riga rd 5: Iturrizaga-Kovalenko
Riga rd 5: Rapport-Golod
Riga rd 5: Werle-Naroditsky
Riga rd 5: Shirov-Bailet
Riga rd 5: Sirosh-Boruchovsky: BLACK WIN

Good luck!

Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: Why did Shank withdraw?
Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: He heard that Russia was about to annex Latvia.
Aug-20-14  Everett: <Aug-20-14
member Check It Out: Why did Shank withdraw?

member HeMateMe: He heard that Russia was about to annex Latvia.>

He heard that Murka was growing so stupid that his intelligence was needed back home.

Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <CIO: Why did Shank withdraw?>

Kinda <postolympic stress disorder> I'd guess: He drew a 2200 in the 1st round and lost against another 2200 in the 2nd round...

Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessgames Bookie: Betting on round 6 is now open:

Riga rd 6: Melkumyan-Iturrizaga
Riga rd 6: Kovalenko-Rapport
Riga rd 6: Kovalenko-Rapport: DRAW NO BET
Riga rd 6: Shirov-Kveinys
Riga rd 6: Shirov-Kveinys: OVER/UNDER
Riga rd 6: PICK THREE

Good luck!

Premium Chessgames Member
  Check It Out: <whiteshark> Shank shanked.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessgames Bookie: Richard Rapport has opened his first three White games with 1.Nc3, 1.f4 and 1.b3 respectively. Will he keep using unusual opening moves, or will he switch to something more normal now he's facing his strongest opponent yet in tournament leader Hrant Melkumyan? Place your bets:

Riga rd 7: Rapport-Melkumyan: FIRST MOVE
Riga rd 7: Rapport-Melkumyan
Riga rd 7: Goganov-Oparin
Riga rd 7: Molner-Shirov
Riga rd 7: Iturrizaga-Naroditsky

Good luck, and have fun!

Aug-22-14  Ed Frank: Rapport played 1.e3 against Melkumayan.

Funny guy.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessgames Bookie: Betting on round 8 is now open:

Riga rd 8: Melkumyan-Savchenko
Riga rd 8: Bok-Rapport
Riga rd 8: Bok-Rapport: DRAW NO BET
Riga rd 8: Shirov-Boruchovsky
Riga rd 8: Shirov-Boruchovsky: OVER/UNDER
Riga rd 8: PICK THREE

Good luck!

Premium Chessgames Member
  Zhbugnoimt: Ha! I won the bet with Rapport winning.
Aug-23-14  Zerebuh: Rapport played the Philidor today and mated Benjamin Bok on move 26! He shares the lead with Melkumyan at 7/8 with a round to go.
Aug-23-14  fgh: <>, these <A Aleksandrov vs A Kveinys> duplicates need to go.
Aug-23-14  Zerebuh: What does Alexey Aleksandrov do at the top of the standings?
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Somebody will have to look into his 4 15 move draws against Kveinys...
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <tamar> All prearranged, of course.....
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessgames Bookie: Betting on the last round is now open:

Riga Technical University Open: WINNING SCORE: IN-PLAY
Riga rd 9: Savchenko-Rapport
Riga rd 9: Savchenko-Rapport: OPENING MOVES
Riga rd 9: Banusz-Melkumyan
Riga rd 9: Banusz-Melkumyan: HOW MANY MOVES?
Riga rd 9: Kveinys-Iturrizaga
Riga rd 9: Aravindh-Shirov

Note that the last round will begin at 11:00 local time (04:00 US/Eastern), a full 5 hours earlier than the first eight rounds. Good luck, and have fun!

Premium Chessgames Member
  PhilFeeley: Perhaps <> should stop generating results tables for tournaments like this. For many others, all they publish is a list of competitors names. It's impossible to tell from the table above who's winning or who's even leading.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Rapport and Melkumyan both are tied with 7.5/9. Who wins? I looked at the tiebreaks below:

< Tie Break1: Buchholz Tie-Breaks (variabel with parameter) >

< Tie Break2: Buchholz Tie-Breaks (variabel with parameter) >

< Tie Break3: Performance (variable with parameter) >

I tried doing the math, and it looks like Melkumyan edged Rapport has 37.5-36.5. There is 1 game to go (Bonafede-Golod), but I don't think it matters.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Official results:

1. Melkumyan 7.5
2. Rapport 7.5
3. Iturrizaga 7
4. Naroditsky 7
5. Savchenko 7
6. Banusz 7
7. Fridman 7
8. Aravindh 7

The first tiebreaks was tied at 43.0 each, but the second one (whatever it is) was decisive, as Melkumyan edged Rapport by the narrowest of margins: 55.5-55.0.


Other 2600+ players

12. Goganov 6.5
18. Kovalenko 6
33. Erdos 6
40. Shirov 5.5
212. Shankland 0.5 (withdrew after 2 rounds)

Full standings:

Aug-24-14  Strelets: Melkumian might have one won the tournament by half of a point on the second tiebreaker but the play of Rapport seems to leave a stronger impression. Going +3 -0 =1 with White (not to mention a neat win with the black pieces in the Philidor) while using such openings as the van Geet (1.Nc3), Bird's (1.f4), the Nimzo-Larsen (1.b3), and the van 't Kruijs (1.e3) is a pretty unique feat in modern day chess.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mating Net: Does this tournament confirm that Shirov is absolutely finished as a top notch contender? He couldn't even crack the top half of this tourney with not exactly elite level competition.
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Don't really see that this event is any more confirmation that Shirov is spent as a force at top level than that Carlsen's relatively poor form is a sign of his imminent decline. Shirov's overall pattern of results in recent years do more to buttress any such belief than this, subpar though it may be.
Aug-26-14  notyetagm: B Bok vs R Rapport, 2014

<wordfunph: simply impressive.>

Yes, a 2587-rated player (Bok) completely missed the elegant <MATE IN 3> beginning with 24 ♗c5x♖f8? ♕f5-h3+!!.

click for larger view

click for larger view

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: Good of you to spam that position throughout the site and call attention to a near-2600 GM's blunder.
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC