International chess was severely disrupted by World War II, beginning with the 1939 Olympiad at Buenos Aires. Political tensions had already affected some matches and this became more pronounced when war officially broke out during the Olympiad. Some teams and players withdrew and others remained in South America for the duration of the war. (1) The death of Alexander Alekhine in the spring of 1946 further clouded the situation. After the war ended, the FIDE conference at Winterthur, Switzerland in the summer of 1946 had to not only try to re-establish FIDE itself but also deal with the question of the world championship title. FIDE proposed a world championship tournament including five participants from the AVRO (1938) tournament: Mikhail Botvinnik, Paul Keres, Max Euwe, Samuel Reshevsky and Reuben Fine, along with Vasily Smyslov. Additionally, the winner of either Groningen (1946) or Prague 1946 (this page) would be included should they not be one of the six already seeded. (2)
Prague 1946 was conceived as a memorial to Karel Treybal and Vera Menchik who both died during the war. The possibility of advancing a player to a world championship tournament was only part of what the Prague organizers envisioned as a prestigious tournament. They had invited Botvinnik, Smyslov, Keres, Salomon Flohr, David Bronstein, Euwe, Reshevsky, and Fine. None participated, although there were expectations that they would play. The Soviets were a particular disappointment, as they declined at the last moment - citing conflict with the semifinals of their national championship. This occurred the day prior to the opening ceremony, necessitating a delayed start to the tournament. (3) Savielly Tartakower had accepted his invitation, but was delayed due to travel difficulties. He never arrived, and Karel Opocensky was chosen to replace him. (4)
All of this would weaken the prospects of the winner at Prague, Miguel Najdorf, who had remained in South America during the war, to be included in the FIDE World Championship Tournament (1948). Botvinnik won at Groningen, presumably leaving a spot open for the winner. However, politics since Winterthur had complicated the issue. Some argued that upon the death of a world champion the title should revert to the last living champion, which would be Euwe. Others held that, because a Botvinnik - Alekhine match had been agreed in principle, Botvinnik should be named champion. Others supported the idea of a championship tournament, but opposed the inclusion of additional players beyond the six named at Winterthur. Lack of consensus, the political realities of trying to bring the USSR into FIDE, and the reduced strength of the Prague event all played a part in dooming Najdorf's chances to participate in a world championship tournament (those interested in a fuller account may consult Winter's article http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...). The FIDE World Championship Tournament (1948) was finally held with the "Winterthur six" minus Fine, who had withdrawn to focus on his graduate studies.
Despite pre-tournament problems, Prague was an interesting race for first. Jan Foltys had a fast start by winning his first four games, including a win over Petar Trifunovic, one of the other contenders for the top places. But his pace slowed with two draws followed by two losses. Three draws in the final five rounds were only good enough for equal fourth with Svetozar Gligoric. Gligoric also started quite well, scoring five wins and a draw in the first six rounds, including a potentially important win against Najdorf. His hopes faded as he only won one more game, but lost two and drew four in the second half of the tournament. His blunder in Gligoric vs Stoltz, 1946 in Round 10 must have been especially painful. Trifunovic started poorly with losses to Gösta Stoltz and Foltys in the first two rounds. He lost no further games, scoring seven wins and four draws, catching up enough to finish equal second with Stoltz. Stoltz also began slowly, winning only two games while losing two and drawing three in the first seven rounds. He finished strongly, winning five and drawing one. Najdorf started well, losing only one game (Gligoric vs Najdorf, 1946) while winning six in the first seven rounds. Najdorf's draw in Round 12 (Stoltz vs Najdorf, 1946) clinched sole first place with one round left to play. He won convincingly, but in the political climate of postwar Europe his hopes of inclusion in a world championship tournament were disappointed.
Prague, Czechoslovakia, 3-21 October 1946
There were seven prizes of 40, 30, 20, 12, 8, 6 and 5 thousand korunas, which were paid in dollars (50 kr = 1 $). (5)
N S T G F G P S K K Z G O R
1 Najdorf X = = 0 = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 10.5
=2 Stoltz = X 1 1 = 1 0 1 = 0 1 1 1 = 9
=2 Trifunovic = 0 X = 0 = = 1 1 1 1 1 1 1 9
=4 Gligoric 1 0 = X = 1 1 1 = 1 0 1 = = 8.5
=4 Foltys = = 1 = X 1 0 1 1 = 0 = 1 1 8.5
6 Golombek 0 0 = 0 0 X = = 0 1 1 1 1 1 6.5
=7 Pachman 0 1 = 0 1 = X 1 = = 0 0 0 1 6
=7 Sajtar 0 0 0 0 0 = 0 X = 1 1 1 1 1 6
=9 Katetov 0 = 0 = 0 1 = = X = 1 0 0 1 5.5
=9 Kottnauer 0 1 0 0 = 0 = 0 = X 1 = = 1 5.5
=11 Zita 0 0 0 1 1 0 1 0 0 0 X = 1 0 4.5
=11 Guimard 0 0 0 0 = 0 1 0 1 = = X 1 0 4.5
=13 Opocensky 0 0 0 = 0 0 1 0 1 = 0 0 X = 3.5
=13 Rohacek 0 = 0 = 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 = X 3.5
2) Winter, "Interregnum", http://www.chesshistory.com/winter/...
3) Lissowski, Mikhalchishin, & Najdorf (2005), Najdorf: Life and games.
4) New York Times, 7 October 1946, p. S8.
5) Hans Kmoch in Nieuwsblad van het Noorden, 26 October 1946, p. 2.
Original collection: Game Collection: Prague 1946, by User: crawfb5.
| page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91
|1. Gligoric vs Guimard
||1-0||60||1946||Prague||C14 French, Classical|
|2. Sajtar vs F Zita
|| ||1-0||35||1946||Prague||D51 Queen's Gambit Declined|
|3. P Trifunovic vs Stoltz
|| ||0-1||42||1946||Prague||B39 Sicilian, Accelerated Fianchetto, Breyer Variation|
|4. Golombek vs Foltys
|| ||0-1||53||1946||Prague||A22 English|
|5. M Katetov vs I V Rohacek
|| ||1-0||40||1946||Prague||E19 Queen's Indian, Old Main line, 9.Qxc3|
|6. Najdorf vs Pachman
||1-0||47||1946||Prague||E32 Nimzo-Indian, Classical|
|7. Stoltz vs M Katetov
|| ||½-½||31||1946||Prague||D38 Queen's Gambit Declined, Ragozin Variation|
|8. F Zita vs Golombek
|| ||0-1||41||1946||Prague||B14 Caro-Kann, Panov-Botvinnik Attack|
|9. C Kottnauer vs I V Rohacek
|| ||1-0||57||1946||Prague||A13 English|
|10. Guimard vs Najdorf
||0-1||41||1946||Prague||D29 Queen's Gambit Accepted, Classical|
|11. Foltys vs P Trifunovic
|| ||1-0||40||1946||Prague||D48 Queen's Gambit Declined Semi-Slav, Meran|
|12. Pachman vs Sajtar
||1-0||40||1946||Prague||B25 Sicilian, Closed|
|13. M Katetov vs Foltys
|| ||0-1||40||1946||Prague||E21 Nimzo-Indian, Three Knights|
|14. Gligoric vs C Kottnauer
|| ||1-0||46||1946||Prague||E29 Nimzo-Indian, Samisch|
|15. Sajtar vs Guimard
|| ||1-0||50||1946||Prague||A95 Dutch, Stonewall|
|16. Golombek vs Pachman
|| ||½-½||37||1946||Prague||A30 English, Symmetrical|
|17. I V Rohacek vs Stoltz
|| ||½-½||68||1946||Prague||A07 King's Indian Attack|
|18. P Trifunovic vs F Zita
|| ||1-0||29||1946||Prague||A46 Queen's Pawn Game|
|19. Najdorf vs Opocensky
||1-0||41||1946||Prague||E17 Queen's Indian|
|20. Opocensky vs Gligoric
|| ||½-½||40||1946||Prague||E10 Queen's Pawn Game|
|21. Pachman vs P Trifunovic
|| ||½-½||62||1946||Prague||C82 Ruy Lopez, Open|
|22. Guimard vs Golombek
|| ||0-1||58||1946||Prague||E16 Queen's Indian|
|23. Foltys vs I V Rohacek
|| ||1-0||50||1946||Prague||E33 Nimzo-Indian, Classical|
|24. Opocensky vs Sajtar
|| ||0-1||60||1946||Prague||D94 Grunfeld|
|25. C Kottnauer vs Stoltz
|| ||1-0||35||1946||Prague||E06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3|
| page 1 of 4; games 1-25 of 91
|Dec-23-15|| ||Tabanus: As per 23 Dec 2015, the games are correctly dated, but the original game collection header dates are off by one day.|
TfS at http://www.schack.se/tfsarkiv/histo... gives dates for rounds 1, 8 and 13. Comparing with the Dutch newspapers and with The Times, the dates are:
01 - Oct 3
02 - Oct 4
03 - Oct 5
04 - Oct 8
05 - Oct 9
06 - Oct 10
07 - Oct 11
08 - Oct 12
09 - Oct 15
10 - Oct 16
11 - Oct 17
12 - Oct 18
13 - Oct 21
with Opocensky - Kottnauer (rd. 1) played Oct. 14, and Opocensky - Gligoric (rd. 2) played Oct. 7.
|Jul-14-21|| ||syracrophy: What a tournament by Najdorf: the conqueror that left due WWII and came back to his continent to continue achieving successes. This must have been an emotionally hard event for Mr. Miguel: after losing all his previous life when staying in Argentina, then returning, playing again after war ended, where little of what he had known remained -- heartbreaking but touching.|
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!
NOTE: Create an account today
to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users.
Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username,
then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
- No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
- No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
- No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
- Nothing in violation of United States law.
- No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
- No trolling.
- The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic.
This forum is for this specific tournament only. To discuss chess or this site in general,
visit the Kibitzer's Café.
Messages posted by Chessgames members
do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.
Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC