chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 Grand Chess Tour Paris Blitz (2016)

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
The first leg of the four-tournament 2016 Grand Chess Tour was held in Paris, France, from June 9 to June 12. The tournament consisted of a two-day rapid round-robin and a two-day blitz double-round-robin; in the combined standings, the results of the rapid games counted double (2 points for a win, 1 point for a draw, 0 points for a loss) while blitz games counted normally. In case of a tie for first place, a tie-break match would decide the winner. ... [more]

Player: Hikaru Nakamura

 page 1 of 1; 18 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Nakamura vs Carlsen 0-1592016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
2. Nakamura vs Topalov 1-0422016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzE46 Nimzo-Indian
3. Fressinet vs Nakamura  0-1502016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzD56 Queen's Gambit Declined
4. W So vs Nakamura 0-1682016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
5. A Giri vs Nakamura  0-1462016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
6. Nakamura vs M Vachier-Lagrave  ½-½312016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzA29 English, Four Knights, Kingside Fianchetto
7. Caruana vs Nakamura  0-1322016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzC50 Giuoco Piano
8. Nakamura vs Kramnik  ½-½592016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzD35 Queen's Gambit Declined
9. Aronian vs Nakamura  ½-½632016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzE06 Catalan, Closed, 5.Nf3
10. Topalov vs Nakamura  ½-½322016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzA15 English
11. Nakamura vs A Giri 1-0792016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzA06 Reti Opening
12. Nakamura vs Fressinet  1-0492016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzD55 Queen's Gambit Declined
13. Carlsen vs Nakamura 1-0352016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzC65 Ruy Lopez, Berlin Defense
14. Nakamura vs W So  ½-½202016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzD12 Queen's Gambit Declined Slav
15. M Vachier-Lagrave vs Nakamura  1-0542016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzA04 Reti Opening
16. Nakamura vs Caruana  ½-½572016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzD37 Queen's Gambit Declined
17. Kramnik vs Nakamura 0-1372016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzA14 English
18. Nakamura vs Aronian  ½-½542016Grand Chess Tour Paris BlitzD56 Queen's Gambit Declined
 page 1 of 1; 18 games  PGN Download 
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Nakamura wins | Nakamura loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Jun-12-16  SirRuthless: Oh yes I almost forgot Wes, he could sneak in top 3 but he will not be able to keep up with the masters of blitz and rapid over four days. I expect a top 6 finish from him.
Jun-12-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  ChemMac: Nakamura won against Kramnik thanks to a blunder by Kramnik right before the end...Be3 instead of Qe3 I think. And that decided the Blitz result.
Jun-12-16  Pulo y Gata: Great job, Nakamura! Congratulations!
Jun-12-16  SirRuthless: <ChemMac>. Actually that game was drawish and Nakamura won a full point, but a draw would still be a half point Not enough for carlsen to close the gap. Anything else?
Jun-12-16  Jambow: <1971> Sorry I saw a flicker and thought the light was on.
Jun-13-16  Pulo y Gata: Nakamura. Carlsen. Not much surprise there.

I thought Maxime is the revelation in this dual event. In the shadow of great players, but he sure is getting there, if not already.

Jun-13-16  Atking: <Pulo y Gata> Totally agreed. I'm surprised how much publicity is done around others super talents, like Giri, Caruana, Wesley, when the French man did for the year even better and only few posts are about MVL's notable performance. I heard that MVL took few years for his graduation in Mathematics this could explain he didn't focus at 100% like the others young stars yet back to chess MVL shows himself as one of the best 5 maybe 3 in the world.
Jun-13-16  Pulo y Gata: <Atking> And his play is uncompromising and creative. He's been consistently strong recently and it can only bode well for chess.

Tradewise Gibraltar (2016)
Tata Steel (2015)
World Cup (2015)

I have read before, too, that he took some time off chess for his studies. But he's back and is now looking to be on the right track.

Jun-14-16  Atking: Yeah <Pulo y Gata> The World cup is always a bit random if my memories serve, considering Elo, Maxime has met by far a stronger opposition before he lost to Giri. Still a strong performance by MVL. Adding Maxime finished also 2nd at London Chess Classic 2015; making exception of the World champion Magnus Carlsen, only very few could have such strong year. I hope Chess media will focus a bit more on the French talent.
Jun-14-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <Maxime has met by far a stronger opposition before he lost to Giri>

Far stronger opposition than who? Giri?

Let's see. MVL (back then 2731) faced Ortiz Suarez (2577, beat 1.5-0.5), Sargissian (2673, beat 1.5-0.5), Tomashevsky (2747, the classical and the rapid part were drawn, MVL won 2:0 on quick rapids), So (2779, beat 1.5-0.5) before evetually losing to Giri (2793, lost 0.5-1.5).

Giri (2793): Ssegwanyi (2357, beat 1.5-0.5), Motylev (2658, the classical part was drawn, 2:0 on rapids), Leko (2714, beat 1.5-0.5), Wojtaszek (2733, the classical part was drawn, 2:0 on rapids), Vachier-Lagrave (2731, 1.5-0.5) before losing to Svidler (2739, 0.5-1.5).

Yes, MVL's opposition was stronger. But <much> stronger? If we don't couund the first round, I'd say the difference is miniscule.

Jun-14-16  Captain Hindsight: When Kramnik plays badly he plays very badly...
Jun-14-16  Virgil A: < alexmagnus: <Maxime has met by far a stronger opposition before he lost to Giri>

Far stronger than who? Giri? >

It ( opposition ) may also mean MLG 's previous opponents.

< Pulo y Gata: Nakamura. Carlsen. Not much surprise there. I thought Maxime is the revelation in this dual event. In the shadow of great players, but he sure is getting there, if not already. >

That's accurate.

Jun-14-16  Virgil A: We're talking about blitz/rapid.
Jun-14-16  Atking: Well, I already said it. I dislike the system of the World Cup especially as a selection to the Candidates. <alexmagnus> just gave me the argument I was searching for. 2557 to 2357 (220); 2673 to 2658 (15); 2747 to 2714 (33); 2779 to 2733 (46) If I'm not wrong 314/4 nearly an average 80 Elo difference! Not in one or two games, but in 10 games. The two players and probably not only these ones, played another category of tournament. At the end of the tournament it is not surprising that one is more exhausted than the other. This system is not fair and far to be ideal.

But lets go on. I agree with other posts this is going too far from the topic of this page. I wish Maxime will got his real place among the top.

Jun-14-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <Atking> But if you throw away the first round, the difference becomes much smaller - actually, even the maximum is lower than your average. First round was relatively easy for both. Actually, probably harder for Giri - that draw against the 2300 player was a pretty long game and surely somewhat of a psychological shock.

As for the World Cup for Candidate selection - well, so far the system works good. Tjose qho qualified to the Candidates via World Cup - Kramnik and Andreikin in 2014, Karjakin and Svidler in 2016 - did not badly in the Candidates. Svidler and Grischuk in 2013 did not bad either.

Jun-14-16  Atking: There is no reason to throw away any round <alexmagnus>.
Jun-14-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: The reason is that for a 2700 player both 2300 and 2500 should be easy opponents. Would you still count them if the ratings were as low as 1000 and 1500?
Jun-14-16  Atking: This is becoming really ridiculous <alexmagnus>. These players are qualified, of course you have to count of all them. Show more respect toward Mr. Ssegwanji.
Jun-15-16  Illogic: Kramnik lost 100 blitz rating points, that seems a little ridiculous.
Jun-15-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  alexmagnus: <Show more respect toward Mr. Ssegwanji.>

Of course he'd beat me all the time. But as for "he qualified, he must be good" - well, the zonal he qualified from is not exactly a hot spot of chess. He qualified from <zone 4.2>, which is composed of <Burundi, Egypt, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Seychelles, Somalia, Sudan, Tanzania, Uganda.>. Except for Egypt, I'n not sure any of those has GMs at all, and the tw famous Egyptian players, Amin and Adly, were already qualified through the African championship...

Jun-15-16  Absentee: You're not showing enough respect, therefore your argument is void.
Jun-15-16  frogbert: Why does the front page say that Nakamura won the blitz event with 11.5/18 points? Carlsen and Nakamura finished with the same number of points, and Carlsen had the better Sonneborn-Berger score and won 2-0 head to head.

Congratulations to Nakamura for winning the first leg of the Grand Chess Tour 2014. Both Carlsen and Nakamura saved/won several blitz games that objectively were lost or drawish, but I guess it just shows how great these two are at blitz. Overall it was very close; Carlsen avoiding the brain fart (of losing on time with 20 seconds on his clock) in his first rapid game against So could've turned the tables. It's kind of ironic that Carlsen has let his time run out twice in the past year, but never in a blitz game. :)

Jun-15-16  frogbert: <The winner overall will be Magnus or Hikaru.>

Carlsen does not participate in the classical part of the Grand Chess Tour, does he? So he will hardly win overall.

Jun-15-16  frogbert: <If I'm not wrong 314/4 nearly an average 80 Elo difference! Not in one or two games, but in 10 games.>

<Atking> That simply shows that averaging everything isn't the way to go. Except for the first round, where Giri clearly had the easier opponent (due to being seeded higher), the difference between their opponents were essentially insignificant.

The World Cup uses a strong seeding system, and in order not to be unfair to the stronger players, that's the only reasonable thing to do. Otherwise one would get much worse examples of "unfairness" than the one your pointing to now.

Jun-22-16  siamesedream: https://www.arctic.com/secno/magnus...
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC