chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

🏆 US Championship (Women) (2017)

Chessgames.com Chess Event Description
A 12 player round-robin with Krush, Zatonskih, Paikidze, Abrahamyan, Nemcova, Foisor, Sharevich, Yu, Virkud, Feng, Nguyen, and Yip. ... [more]

Player: Anna Vitalyevna Zatonskih

 page 1 of 1; 11 games  PGN Download 
Game  ResultMoves YearEvent/LocaleOpening
1. Jennifer Yu vs A Zatonskih 1-0582017US Championship (Women)D35 Queen's Gambit Declined
2. A Zatonskih vs Emily Nguyen  1-0232017US Championship (Women)B40 Sicilian
3. N Paikidze vs A Zatonskih 0-11292017US Championship (Women)D78 Neo-Grunfeld, 6.O-O c6
4. K Nemcova vs A Zatonskih  ½-½222017US Championship (Women)A40 Queen's Pawn Game
5. A Zatonskih vs A Virkud  1-0292017US Championship (Women)D37 Queen's Gambit Declined
6. C Yip vs A Zatonskih  1-0492017US Championship (Women)C10 French
7. A Zatonskih vs I Krush  ½-½312017US Championship (Women)B22 Sicilian, Alapin
8. A Sharevich vs A Zatonskih  ½-½422017US Championship (Women)D02 Queen's Pawn Game
9. A Zatonskih vs Maggie Feng  1-0382017US Championship (Women)D20 Queen's Gambit Accepted
10. S Foisor vs A Zatonskih 1-0412017US Championship (Women)D37 Queen's Gambit Declined
11. A Zatonskih vs T Abrahamyan ½-½542017US Championship (Women)C01 French, Exchange
  REFINE SEARCH:   White wins (1-0) | Black wins (0-1) | Draws (1/2-1/2) | Zatonskih wins | Zatonskih loses  

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Apr-08-17  Jambow: Not sure about budget cuts, but for as much as we spend on education we certainly don't get a good return. I'm not opposed to our students learning a second language in public schools but the inabillity to be effective in the first one is a bigger concern.

I would like to see classical logic taught too, now our kids know how to shout loud, protest, tear things down and crap in public when they don't get their way. More money isn't going to fix that...

Chickens are coming home to roost from our children raised on television by an inept lying corrupt media... Give me give me give me I'm a victim of something I'm sure. Work I don't like that give me ... sadly we gave them debt that they aren't even aware of yet.

Great tournament so far no?

Apr-08-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  wtpy: Jambow,So your kids watch the news and read the newspaper? If not how are they affected by the lies of the mainstream media? In addition to logic,perhaps a little English grammar should be taught as well. I am still puzzling over, "Work I don't like that give me..."
Apr-08-17  nok: <Give me give me give me I'm a victim of something> A man after midnight?
Apr-09-17  botvinnik64: Chess, anyone? Nazi looks to be two-time champ here. Well, she has shown the steadiest of all the competitors. Great, heroic performance by Sabina. Eye opening (at times) play by Maggie Feng. A very exciting tournament!
Apr-09-17  sho16: How come Yip and Virkud have played 11 games?
Apr-09-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Their individual game registered twice.
Apr-09-17  devere: Sabina Foisor wins again in brilliant style.
Apr-09-17  Boomie: Foisor has the best performance of her life in memory of her Mother, who died a couple of months ago. Cristina-Adela Foisor
Apr-09-17  devere: Sabina Foisor is the new US Woman's champion, and she didn't win the title with a last round draw. Congratulations to Sabina! 8-3 is a great winning score for everyone but a Fischer.
Apr-09-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: Great finish by Sabina Foisor! I saw it "live" so to speak. It was dramatic to actually see on the camera...When you make those sacs it is very emotional. You are winning but a part of you cant believe it. [Because you know how easy it is to lose a won game and also of course the stakes here were so high]. You check and recheck but then away you go!

Good to be able to see live coverage via I think it was the St. Louis Chess Club with Seirawan and Jennifer Sharade (?) commenting and also Maurice.

Interesting also about that "showman" master of whom there is a book. He reminds me of this hard case Maori bloke I used to work with: he was a kind of showman and a character, such people make the world go round!

But the women's chess had a lot of interesting games. Jennifer Yu has a good positional sense and did well for sure.

Apr-09-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: I see, Foisor played a Nimzo-Indian, a great opening adopted a few years ago when I decided it was about time I actually studied an opening. It took me a long time to understand it. I used to just play games without preparation and from what I felt like right up until I was 60 and then I reached my highest rating in NZ when I was 62. I had said to once that I would "never go over 2000" and an answer came "if you think that you never will" so it stayed in my mind. Of course that was NZ rating only. But an achievement if not anything very "fantastic".

But as one of the women said, she has children, if she is to continue chess, she will have to do a lot of work on chess and that is the dilemma, there are so many other things of importance and interest in the world.

Apr-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  FSR: It's not fair that Virkud and Yip got to play a game more than everyone else.
Apr-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <FSR: It's not fair that Virkud and Yip got to play a game more than everyone else.>

Yet it availed them naught.

Apr-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  virginmind: Bravo Sabina!
Apr-10-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Some 'up and at em' chess played here. Both tournaments had 66 games.

Women's = 41 decisive games with 25 draws,

Mens = 28 decisive games and 38 draws

Overall the decisive games out score the draws 69 - 63

Apr-10-17  stst: Nazi to Yu: "Hey!? Why you confiscate my cup??"
Apr-11-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  TheFocus: No one went undefeated!!
Apr-11-17  Jambow: <Jambow,So your kids watch the news and read the newspaper?> I took the cable and antenna out years ago, I also haven't purchaced a paper in years. That is rather untypical and using a single home to represent the whole is the kind of failure in basic reasononing I'm speaking of, and an example is always helpful. However they do watch the news sometimes in school.

The point is that the educational system gets alot of money to teach and they do a very poor job of it. The focus has shifted to indoctrination and away from critical thinking. Money isn't the problem and my poor grammer really exemplifies that point.

Second languages are valuable imho, but our failure to teach the primary one adaquately might need addressed first? I would like to see chess offered or promoted more as well, helps in logical decision making.

Even if I concur with the poster that not having second languages taught is a negative we have bigger fish to fry.

Interesting womens tournament, definately lacking some quality at certain points but always unclear who would stand as queen of the hill keeping it interesting. Sabina-Francesca Foisor congrats !!!

Apr-11-17  Strelets: <Jambow> Tell teachers that have to purchase classroom supplies with funds out of their own pockets that money isn't a problem. Tell people denied better education by virtue of their ZIP codes that money isn't a problem.
Apr-11-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: I am glad I was able to go to school and learn how to read and much else. It is possible to use Television wisely. I don't watch it (here in NZ) but I listen to the news reports. Education can be done by "homeschooling". This suits some.

In other cases the education or schools system is good for many (probably most) and will vary in quality throughout the world and throughout a country.

Apr-11-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: The women's games were as interesting and sometimes more so than those in the Open.
Apr-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sokrates: <Richard Taylor: The women's games were as interesting and sometimes more so than those in the Open.>

Agreed, and I would add: more entertaining. Some epic battles there, like Foisor-Sharevich. My late congrats to Foisor - what a superb result with so many winning games.

Apr-13-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Richard Taylor: <Sokrates: <Richard Taylor: The women's games were as interesting and sometimes more so than those in the Open.> Agreed, and I would add: more entertaining. Some epic battles there, like Foisor-Sharevich. My late congrats to Foisor - what a superb result with so many winning games.>

Yes I also thought the coverage by Chess 24 was great as I was able to see Foisor's Q sac finish to win live. Good for her. The other women played well.

Apr-15-17  Jambow: T<ell teachers that have to purchase classroom supplies with funds out of their own pockets that money isn't a problem. Tell people denied better education by virtue of their ZIP codes that money isn't a problem.>

Sure that is a problem where did the money go is the next question. In Indiana my home state they receive $10,500.00 per student x 25 students in the average class. That is $262,500 for the mathematically challenged. The teacher probably earns about $100,000 with benefits on maybe a bit more. Now these funds have nothing to do with buses, building, utilities etc. those come from other taxes, So where is the money?

Apr-15-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Gregor Samsa Mendel: <Jambow--The teacher probably earns about $100,000 with benefits on maybe a bit more.>

What orifice did you pull this figure from?

http://www.teachingdegree.org/india...

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 4)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 4 OF 4 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific tournament and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.
Spot an error? Please suggest your correction and help us eliminate database mistakes!


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC