KEG: A sloppy and flippant win by Janowski redeemed by a cute closing combination. Janowski--always mercurial--plays as if he knows he is going to win. Sterling at this stage of the tournament had a record of one win and 10 loses and was to end up tied for last place at 1-15. Janowski, in a strange cycle, repeatedly obtained winning positions after errors by Sterling, appeared to lose interest in the game and threw away his advantage, and then got a winning position again, and so on. It is always hard to know what to make of Janowski. 1. e4 c5
2. Nc3 e6
3. Nf3 Nc6
4. d4 cxd4
5. Nxd4 Bc5
5...Nf6, 5...Qc7, and 5...a6 are more popular choices, but the text is definitely playable. Sterling's problems don't begin until his next move. 6. Nbd5 a6
He should either deal with the "hole" on d6 by playing 6...d6 or just damn the torpedoes and develop with 6...Nf6. The text only speeds up the invasion of the White Knight on d6. Morphy in his match with Paulsen in 1858 obtained the same sort of advantage Janowski gets here when allowed to get his Knight to d6 against an e6 Sicilian. 7. Nd6+ BxN
Letting White's Queen post on d6 is so bad for Black that Sterling should probably have played the noxious 7... Kf8. Bad as that would have been for Black, the text leads to something even worse. 8. QxB Nge7
After this poor move, Sterling has what looks like a strategically lost position to me:  click for larger viewIt is remarkable how quickly Janowski--trying for haymakers--manages to ruin his overwhelmingly superior position. 9. h4?!
Also inferior is 9. Bd3?! as proposed by Rosenthal in the Tournament Book (it blocks the d-file White should want to have at his disposal). By contrast, the Karpovian 9. Be3 would allow Janowski to strangle Sterling at his leisure. 9... b5
10. h5 h6
11. Bd2
Not a blunder, but why on earth would Janowski want to put his dark-square Bishop here. Instead of misplacing his Bishop, Janowski might have hindered Nb4 with 11. a3. 11... Bb7
Janowski has done nothing to hinder this quasi-freeing move by Sterling. 12. Qg3 Rg8
13. Bd3
Janowski seems to be playing by rote. 13. 0-0-0 is the most obvious move on the board. 13... Nb4
14. Ne2
Another move by Janowski I am unable to fathom. 14. a4 was one of a number of viable plans for White here. 14... NxB+
15. cxN
Janowski still has somewhat the better of the position,but compare his position now with what he had after move 8:  click for larger view15... Rc8
16. Bc3
Since he obviously didn't intend to capture on g7, the point of this move escapes me. 16. Rc1 or 16. Nd4 seemed reasonable alternatives. 16... Qc7
17. Qe3
As Rosenthal pointed out in the Tournament Book, 17. Be5 would lead to nothing more than equality for Janowski, i.e., 17...Qa4+ 18. Bc3 [not 18. Nc3? f6 19. Bd4?? (White is already in trouble here, but needed throw away the game. 19. Bf4 keeps White afloat for a while,but Rosenthal's move loses immediately to the simple forking 19...Qb4)] 18...Qc7 (but not Rosenthal's alternative move 18...b4 which leaves Black in an inferior position after 19. Bd2). 17... Qc5
18. Qd2 Qg5
19. QxQ hxQ
Janowski now has an endgame with at most a tiny advantage:  click for larger viewThe ups and downs were to continue, as I will show in my next post on this game. |