chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Aron Nimzowitsch vs Georg Salwe
"Overprotection Racket" (game of the day Aug-04-2005)
Karlsbad (1911), Karlsbad (Karlovy Vary) AUH, rd 15, Sep-09
French Defense: Advance Variation. Milner-Barry Gambit (C02)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 30 times; par: 63 [what's this?]

Annotations by Aron Nimzowitsch.      [48 more games annotated by Nimzowitsch]

explore this opening
find similar games 5 more Nimzowitsch/Salwe games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Aug-09-07  sanyas: 18...♗xe5 was a strategic error.
Sep-19-07  euripides: This is often discussed as one of the great pioneering games of hypermodernism. But like Nimzowitsch vs Tarrasch, 1912, it is also a nice victory for the two bishops.
Sep-19-07
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: Or even Nimzowitsch vs Tarrasch, 1914?
Sep-19-07  euripides: <key> yes, but it was never any secret Siggy liked his bishops. Nimzo kept this well-hidden.
Sep-19-07  Shams: Nimzowitsch is full of it. Double exclam for 7.dxc5, right.
Apr-12-08  stupidiot21: now thats what i call a slugfest
May-27-09  shalgo: Both Nimzowitsch and Pachman suggest that 15.Qe2 is a strong move and that 15.Bd4 would have been a mistake, because of 15...Qc7 16.Qe2 Ng4! 17.h3 e5!

Yet both also pass over Salwe's 15...Rac8 in silence. Isn't this move a mistake, as it loses a tempo in the fight over the d4- and e5-squares?

Black would probably have done better to play 15...Bxe5 16.Nxe5 Be8, intending Nd7.

For example, 17.Rfe1 Nd7 18.Nxd7 Bxd7 and Black's f-file play looks as valuable as White's on the e-file. I don't think White has more than a perpetual after 19.Qh5.

If instead of exchanging on d7 White plays 18.Nf3, then 18...Bh5 19.Qxe6+ Qxe6 20.Rxe6 Bxf3 21.gxf3 Rxf3 and Black should be okay in the ending, as White has a lot of pawn weaknesses.

Oct-18-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: There is an element of overprotection in this game, but I think it vividly demonstrates swapping occupation of the center of pawns, with piece outposts instead.
Oct-18-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: Jonathan Sarfati: How do you equate Tarrasch's variation with dxc5 with the deep Nimzovich idea of giving up the center pawns for piece outposts?!

You don't think Nimzovich's My system was a key instrument used by the Hypermodern School to teach findings about useful exceptions to the theories of Steinitz and Tarrasch?! You don't believe in the Hypermodern School?! Is this really the case?

Oct-18-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <kingscrusher: Jonathan Sarfati: How do you equate Tarrasch's variation with dxc5 with the deep Nimzovich idea of giving up the center pawns for piece outposts?! >

How do you distinguish them? Why does Tarrasch suggest dxc5?

Oct-18-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: keypusher: Well cxd4 fixes White's weakness on d4, and maybe even forcibly wins a pawn in certain positions. So dxc5 might in some positions be a forced move, otherwise cxd4 would be winning material basically.

However, Tarrasch was I think not really "dogmatic" - he was trying to simplify Stienitz's concepts, and although he may have come across as dogmatic, I think systems like the Tarrasch defence where black accepts the IQP for strong counterplay are anything but dogmatic - more dynamic.

There was though I believe a fiece competitive personal rivalry between Nimzovich and Tarrasch, and I think Nimzo did really want to radically depart and challenge Tarrasch's ideas.

Oct-18-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: I have video annotated this game:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xFPk...

It will form part of the Evolution of Style video series I am working on as a long term project:

http://www.chessworld.net/chessclub...

Oct-18-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <kingscrusher>

dxc5 and exf6 by Tarrasch:

Tarrasch vs M Kuerschner, 1890

Oct-19-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  kingscrusher: keypusher: Yes, I think that in order to play against black's backward e-pawn exf6 is necessary - and maybe that was really the focus of Tarrasch's strategy. Also Black's kingside is a bit more exposed.

In this game, there was a very controlled substitution of the pawn chain by blockading pieces.

But I admit the two games do seem to have very similar events - like the Qc2 and Bh7's.

Maybe a lot of Nimzovich's "My system" is repackaging of existing example games, in such a way to make the concepts more reusable. I think for example Staunton used Overprotection and fianchettoed bishops a long time before Nimzovich. A lot of the structural weaknesses were identified a long time before by Philidor.

What "My system" represented and why it was so influencial on the evolution of chess style, is the bringing together of all the aspects of "element management" - and nice new interesting terms like:

"Rook on the 7th"
"Restrain-blockade-destroy"
"Undermining"
etc

So that players later could re-use these concepts quite easily.

Oct-19-10
Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <kingscrusher>

<In this game, there was a very controlled substitution of the pawn chain by blockading pieces. >

You're right. Presumably Nimzo would have been horrified by Tarrasch's Ng5. (Note, though, that even Nimzowitsch eventually gives up his blockade.) I certainly wouldn't say Tarrasch-Kuerschner undermines any claim this game has to originality.

But there are some Steinitz games that seem to anticipate this one more closely, e.g. Steinitz vs Max Weiss, 1882. And I suspect, if you really looked, you'd find examples of White trading off his pawns and putting pieces on blockading squares against the French that are older than this game. One critical discovery we all make very early in our chess careers is that pawns don't capture straight ahead, after all. That makes putting a piece directly in front of a pawn a very natural thing to do.

Mar-27-12  bystander: 18) Rae1? limits the space of the Rook on f1 and makes 18...Ne4! possible. My silicon monster suggests: a)19) Be4x de4x 20) Qe4x Bb5 (attacks the rook on f1) 21) c4 Bc4x 22) Nc4x Qe4x 23) Qe6x+ Qe6x 25) Re6x Bb4x b) 19) Qg4 Be5x 20)Qe6x+ Bf7 21) Qe5x Qe5x 22) Be5x Nd2. After 18) Rfe1 Ne4? 19) Be4x de4x 20) Qe4x with better play for white My computer prefers 18) f4 and I understand that white blockades e5 very firm, but I cannot see how white and black should continue after 18) f4.
May-11-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Octavia: <niklas> In my German book N omits 38 Kf1 Bc6 but in my American "Blockade" trans Joseph Platz, they're included.

In My system N talks quite clearly about where Salwe went wrong: He had to play 6...cd !

May-11-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Octavia: Hi <kingscrusher> could you remove your utube link, please? It doesn't work & made my comp crush twice.
Oct-30-12  Naniwazu: It seems that 27. Qe2 wins instantly..exd4 28. Qxe7 Qxe7 29. Rxe7 Rxc3
May-23-13  Emmykarpov: Please I am in Nigeria, how do these materials reach this axis?
Nov-06-13  davide2013: 15.Bd4 is NOT a mistake, Nimzowitsch's analysis in this case is wrong, because after 15...Qc7; white would play 16.Re1, not Qe2. If Pachman just copied and paste Nimzowitsch's analysis, then there is a case for understanding Petrosian's words when he said that Nimzowitsch went often too far to demonstrate his point, but his analysis were not correct. However it would be interesting to know the year in which Nimzowitsch wrote the analysis, because Nimzowitsch vs Tarrasch 1912, one year after this game still has Nimzowitsch playing 6.Bd3, instead of Be2 which should protect more the Pd4 in his words.
Mar-22-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  tpstar: Planning In Segments:

https://youtu.be/vJQiOnLCou0

Apr-11-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: Actually, the overrated "My System" scared a lot of people away from allowing 7.dxc5. But this Captain Kennedy had shown the correct course for Black way back in 1849! E Lowe vs H Kennedy, 1849 He had a clearly won game but threw it away. The important thing is to prevent 9.b4 with 8... a5. The first World Junior Champion Borislav Ivkov revived it to good effect over a century later in J Pokojowczyk vs Ivkov, 1971.
Apr-11-16  RookFile: If Nimzo was alive today I'd hire him as director of marketing for my company.
May-16-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Zephyr10: "RookFile: If Nimzo was alive today I'd hire him as director of marketing for my company." Indeed, I don't know if a greater proclamation of chess genius has ever been made on account of the win of a SINGLE PAWN. ;-)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 2 OF 2 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Annotated by Nimzowitsch
from Fluxcapacitor's favorite games by Fluxcapacitor
getting a feel for openings (C) Compiled fourier
by fredthebear
Game 45
from Masters of the Chessboard (Reti) by Qindarka
Pachman's Modern Chess Strategy
from Published Games by Year and Unconfirmed Source 1 by fredthebear
8 La barrera de una cadena de peones, p. 64.
from Ajedrez de entrenamiento by agb2002
Karlsbad 1911
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Game 42
from Modern Chess Strategy (Pachman) by isfsam
Karlsbad 1911
by suenteus po 147
Pachman's Modern Chess Strategy
by maoam
Modern Chess Strategy
by Del ToRo
c02
from favorite games according to opening c00-c99 by mirage
Karlsbad 1911 "Overprotection Racket" (GOTD)
from Favorite Games from (1515-1916) by wanabe2000
Game 46
from My System: all 50 games (nearly!) by xela
French Defense: Advance Variation. Milner-Barry Gambit
from GrandMasters of Chess by HCS by RayDelColle
Game 19
from Secrets of Modern Chess Strategy (Watson) by isfsam
Game 42
from Modern Chess Strategy (Pachman) by Qindarka
The Blockade of the Center Pieces
from The Center A Modern Strategy Guide Mikhalchishin by opus
French Advance Milner-Barry Gambit (C02) 1-0 Blockade Isolani
from Annotations e4 Various Authorities & Fredthebear by Patca63

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC