chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Howard Staunton vs Elijah Williams
London (1851), London ENG, rd 4, Jul-??
French Defense: Exchange. Monte Carlo Variation (C01)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 21 more Staunton/E Williams games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You should register a free account to activate some of Chessgames.com's coolest and most powerful features.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-30-04  Knight13: Well played, Staunton.
May-06-05  schnarre: Well played indeed!
May-06-05  Milo: I must concur with your lengthy analysis: well played ;).
Jun-03-05  schnarre: 6. Bg5 looks playable here as well.
Jun-03-05  aw1988: Well played. White played well, and black did too. White won. Good game.
Jun-06-05  schnarre: White's coordination of the Bishops & Rooks was decisive (in my opinion)!
Aug-23-06  sneaky pete: "In this and the next two games Black (= White; Staunton played all games against Williams with the black pieces, having the first move in the even games) appears to have roused himself into something like action; the stimulus, however, was evidently insufficient to sustain him long against the insupportable tedium of his adversary's play. There are positions, every one knows, occurring occasionaly in a game, where even the clearest and farthest-seeing head requires a long time to unravel all the intricacies of the maze. In such cases deliberation is a duty, and none, except a very unreasonable opponent, would object to it; but when a player, upon sysyem, consumes hours over moves when minutes might suffice, and depends, not upon out-manoeuvring, but out-sitting his antagonist, patience ceases to be a virtue, and one cannot help expressing deep regret that there is not some legal or moral force which may be brought to bear upon the offender, so that, in default of accelerating his pace, he should be held disentitled to a victory gained by such unworthy strategy." Staunton in the tournament book.
Aug-23-06  Marmot PFL: They could never accuse these guys of resigning too early. i would have pushed the king over after move 22. (Or stopped the clock, which evidently they didn't have in those days.)
Apr-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: This line against the French, the Monte Carlo Variation (Exchange Var 3.exd5 exd5 with 4.c4) seems to be back in fashion -- playing the French as Black, I've faced it a couple of times recently.
Apr-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: So <that's> how chess clocks came into being--it was Staunton's screed in the tournament book which set the whole business in motion.

<Dom> Saw this form of the Exchange played a bit, even at GM level, in the 1990s.

Apr-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <perf> Yes, it's a good line for White players who don't want to face theoretical lines in the Winawer or Tarrasch ... though I don't really believe this variation is good for White, my results against it aren't promising.
Apr-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Dom> Another transpositional possibility I recall is this form of the Exchange somehow metamorphosing into a Petrov.
Apr-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <perf> It's possible, though in practice it seems to be unlikely. Of course the pawn structure in the Petrov is identical to the Exchange French - no pawns on the e-file - but actual transpositions seem to be uncommon, for whatever reason. Given the pawn structure, though, strategic ideas should transfer from one system to the other.
Apr-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Dom> One more transpositional maze comes after 1.d4 d5 2.c4 dxc4 3.e3 e5, from which I recall seeing Petrovs as well-believe it was after 4.Bxc4 exd4 5.exd4, though I am no expert on all that.
Apr-24-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Domdaniel: <perf> Indeed. I'm fascinated by the transpositional possibilities inherent in openings -- indeed, I play the openings largely with a view to transpositions. In the past I've found that most opening books tend to ignore these possibilities, but I recently found an exception. FCO - Fundamental Chess Openings, by Paul van der Sterren (originally published in Dutch) is very good on transpositions -- with sections on, eg, 1.d4 e6 and 1.d4 g6.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
French Exchange. Monte Carlo Var (C01) 1-0 Crossfire on g7
from French Rubinstein, Fort Knox and Stuff by fredthebear
French Exchange. Monte Carlo Var (C01) 1-0 Crossfire on g7
from yFredthebear's Heavy Pieces Hound the Ranks by fredthebear
Trounce the French.
by schnarre
French Exchange. Monte Carlo Var (C01) 1-0 Crossfire on g7
from French Rubinstein, Fort Knox and Stuff by Patca63
French Exchange. Monte Carlo Var (C01) 1-0 Crossfire on g7
from yFredthebear's Heavy Pieces Hound the Ranks by trh6upsz

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC