chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Howard Staunton vs Elijah Williams
London (1851), London ENG, rd 4, Jul-??
Tarrasch Defense: Symmetrical Variation (D32)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 20 more Staunton/E Williams games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some games have annotation. These are denoted in the game list with the icon.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Aug-23-06  sneaky pete: "Contrary to all expectation, Black (=White; Staunton played with the black pieces in all match games against Williams, in this 4th game he had the first move) was enabled to bear up against the intolerable tedium of his adversary to the end of this trying game, but the effect of his exertions was painfully evident in the after parties." Staunton in the tournament book.

On 38... Qe4 he writes "The sacrifice of the Knight for the purpose of gaining so fine an attack, although it turned out unsuccesful, was a highly creditable conception." There seems nothing wrong with 38... dxc3 when Williams will have, in effect, two bishops for a rook, not counting the sad figure on h5.

Apr-22-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: A fascinating game. It is from the days of no-time-limits. I hope to provide a really good analysis of this superb game, which Williams really should have won, fairly soon.
Apr-23-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  offramp: Staunton has just played 34.Ne5.


click for larger view

Williams plays the most obvious move of all time, 34...Rxe5, and he gets a pretty stonking attack out of it. After 37.Qd1...


click for larger view

...Williams is clever enough to realise that his superbly-placed knight at e4, which radiates power, is actually in the way - so he gets rid of it.

But, tragically, after 39.Bb2, and despite having all the time in the world, he misses the winning move.


click for larger view

The winning move is by no means obvious, even with unlimited time: 39...d3.

Apr-23-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Would have liked to see Elijah Williams win this one; his concept deserved a better fate.

Did he move quickly at the critical moment because of Staunton's appending him with the appellation of the "Bristol Sloth"? http://www.chesscafe.com/text/spinr...

Apr-23-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  Pawn and Two: This was game four from the final series of matches at the London 1851 tournament. Williams lost this game, but eventually he won the match, and 3rd place in the tournament, with a match victory over Staunton, by a score of +4 -3 =1.

In the tournament book, Staunton noted in his loss to Anderssen, <"....he had succumbed to an acknowledged master of the art">, while in his later loss to Williams, he stated, <"....he lost by the odd game to Mr. Williams, a player to whom, in ordinary play and under other circumstances, he has been in the habit of giving, with success, the odds of the Pawn and two moves!">

After the tournament, a series of matches were arranged. Staunton challenged Anderssen, but Anderssen was unable to remain in England. It was hoped that this contest could take place in Germany at a later date.

One of the after tournament matches that did occur was between Staunton and Williams. Victory in this match would go to the player to first win seven games. Staunton stated that Williams requested modification to the normal match terms, and therefore he granted Williams, a start of three games, before the beginning of the match.

The terms then for this match made for an exciting contest. How would you have bet on the outcome?

Staunton won the first, third and fifth games, Williams won games two and four, and games six and seven were drawn. Williams therefore, was leading the match by a score of 5 to 3.

Staunton won the next three games, and the match odds then were clearly in his favor.

However, Williams was not finished, he won game eleven, and after a draw, he also won the next game, and the match by a score of +7 -6 =3!

The last game of the match lasted 79 moves! It would have been great to have watched this match, especially so the concluding games, and to have listened in on the post-mortem discussions.

Jun-19-15  Gottschalk: Beforw Zukertort and Rubinstein, Staunton the original creator of the Rubinstein scheme. Brilliant win.
Jun-04-16  zanzibar: As <sneaky pete> has noted, this game belongs to the <London (1851)> international tournament, being the missing R4.4 game.

Somehow it was orphaned.

(Z-base followed <CG> very closely for this tournament, and didn't crosscheck with other sources. Therefore it needs patching as well).

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Staunton & Kolisch best games
by Gottschalk
Gottschalk's favorite games
by Gottschalk
I soon realised he wasn't an accountant
from Bouncy Castle, Tombola, Face Paint... by offramp
Tarrasch Defense
from Queen's Gambit Declined by dcruggeroli

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC