chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Louis Paulsen vs Adolf Schwarz
Vienna (1882), Vienna AUH, rd 18, Jun-01
French Defense: Advance Variation. Paulsen Attack (C02)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [22201 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 15 more Paulsen/A Schwarz games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: All games have a Kibitzer's Corner provided for community discussion. If you have a question or comment about this game, register a free account so you can post there.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

THIS IS A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE.   [CLICK HERE] FOR ORIGINAL.

Kibitzer's Corner
Mar-02-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: An excellent effort by Paulsen.

This game ended a theoretical discussion in those days about the <7... g6> line.

Note some conceptual ideas:

23. a3 (prophylaxis!)
24. g4 (restriction!)
25. Ncd4 (blockade!)

Mar-02-12  thomastonk: <whiteshark> You write about a <7.. g6 > line in those days, but I could find only one more game with this position played by the same players and three games played 1966 and later. So I would very much appreciate a source or further information.

Maybe you are interested in my view of the game. After 17.Rh7 the main theme of the game is this dominating rook. White has thereby a slight, but enduring edge. 17.. b5 is a minor mistake, because it increases the rook's effect; 20.. Kb7 is a serious mistake, loosing two moves.

23.a3 is a double-edged move, because it weakens b3 seriously, and makes White's queen's side pawns immobile, but I don't see a prophylactic effect. 23.g4 would have been a fine example of restriction.

23.. Nf5 is another serious mistake, and now White should be winning. The reply 24.g4 is quite naturally here, but 24.Nb4 is a pretty alternative, inceasing the rook's power.

25.Ncd4 is a blockade, but a self-blockade! 25.Qe3 and 25.Ng5 are much better. Beginning with this mistake, Paulsen looses almost all of his advantage until move 32, and - though I generally like his play very much - I have to say, that he is playing badly here. Imagine Black would have played 32.. Nb3 -- yes, this little square that has been weakened in move 23rd! Suddenly, d4 becomes a threat. After, say 33.Qf4, Black has 33.. a5 with the new threat of b4. White still has this rook on h7, but Black is closer to equality than White to winning, I believe.

Mar-02-12
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <thomastonk> Nicht schuldig, Euer Ehren! I just translated Svesnikov's light annotations from his manual <Französisch Vorstossvariante, Band 1>. Probably a bit casual from my side not to validate it beforehand. :D
Mar-03-12  thomastonk: <whiteshark> Geguttenbergt! :-)

If all your comments are taken from Svesnikov's book, then he had a really bad day, when he made them. Nevertheless, he is one of my favorite players, too.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Complete French Advance
by neontheorist
french study
by jake1
Game 4
from French Defense, Advance Variation by kenilworthian
Vienna 1882
by suenteus po 147

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC