Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Geza Maroczy vs Akiba Rubinstein
Karlsbad (1907), Karlsbad (Karlovy Vary) AUH, rd 17, Sep-12
French Defense: Rubinstein Variation. Blackburne Defense (C10)  ·  1/2-1/2



Annotations by Emanuel Lasker.      [80 more games annotated by Lasker]

explore this opening
find similar games 14 more Maroczy/Rubinstein games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Premium Chessgames Member
  An Englishman: Good Evening: We often read of the Exchange sacrifice for an attack, but how often do we read of an Exchange sacrifice for the defense? This game is exceptional, and deserves to be rescued from oblivion. Although Rubinstein sets up a formidable blockade on the light squares, Maroczy almost finds a breakthrough with an Exchange counter-sacrifice. Rubinstein's zweischenzug <sp?> ...Qe3+! (preventing Qe6+ forking King & Rook) saves the day.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Chessical: If Rubinstein had played: <24...Qxa2> 25.Rd8 Rxd8 26.Rxd8 f6 27.Bxf6 Qb1+ 28.Rd1 Qc2, it appears that he would not have gained any greater advantage than in the game continuation.

If Maroczy had not returned the exchange, the position would have continued on a knife-edge, <27.Rd3> Bc5+ 28.Kh1 Rc7

The quality of play (especially Rubinstein's positional insight) in this game is impressive. Later Tigran Vartanovich Petrosian would make positional sacrifices for the "quality of the position" a key note of his chess, see: Reshevsky vs Petrosian, 1953

Oct-24-04  Kean: Bc8-d7-e8, quite interesting the way Rubinstein places his bishop there after the KR reaches d8. And later the QB goes to f8. Seems he understood perfectly when and how to defend.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Phony Benoni: The tournament situation may have been a factor here. With five games to play, Maroczy led with 11½ points, while Rubinstein was second with 11 and a clear point ahead of Vidmar in third.

Maroczy would have liked to win and just about clinch first, but had no need to take huge risks; a draw still kept him in the lead. Rubinstein also had no reason to risk everything; in 1907 he would have been a big underdog against Maroczy and a draw with Black would be creditable.

As it happened, the tournament schedule worked out in Rubinstein's favor. In the next three rounds he beat tail-enders Chigorin, Olland and Cohn, while Maroczy played three draws against tougher opposition in Vidmar, Nimzowitsch, and Dus-Chotimirsky. That left Rubinstein a full point up in the last round, and he was able to clinch first by drawing against Wolf when he wanted to.

Dec-28-07  Karpova: Emanuel Lasker: <The most important game in the tournament, and in many respects the most exciting, was the encounter between the two leaders toward the close. Maroczy, the hero of many hard fights, was half a point better off than the young Rubinstein, but the latter had to meet weaker opponents subsequently.

With the instinct and judgement of a veteran, with confidence in his ability to succeed in his remaining games, Rubinstein set out with a determination to draw with Maroczy. The state of the score would have impelled most players to take exceptional risks in order to depose his antagonist and take his place. Rubinstein is evidently au fait in all the arts of winning tournaments besides games. An eyewitness thus describes the attitude of the players at the conclusion of the game: "That Rubinstein was perfectly satisfied with his partial success was apparent from his beaming countenance; Maroczy looked depressed in proportion.">

Lasker's Chess Magazine 1907
"Akiba Rubinstein: Uncrowned King" by Donaldson/Minev

Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: The opening is remarkably modern. 13 c4 has never been repeated though it seems perfectly reasonable. 16 Ne5 would be more typical of the line; as Black could have tried the promising 16..b5 in response to Maroczy's 16 Qc2 (though perhaps Black had no need to play that sharply). 23 Rg3..Qxc4 24 Bxg7?..Bf5 25 Qh5..Bxg7 would have been winning for Black. 35 Bxg7?..Qf4+ would have given Black a winning attack.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.
  8. Do not degrade Chessgames or any of it's staff/volunteers.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Rubinstein French
by CrusadingBishop
French Defense: Rubinstein Variation. Blackburne Defense
from RUBINSTEIN VARIATION by gambitfan
French Defense: Rubinstein Variation. Blackburne Defense
from ANNOTATED HUMAN GAMES by gambitfan
Tremendous defence using the exchange sac.
from Unknowns of tremendous entertainment. by themadhair
Round 17 (Thursday, September 12)
from Karlsbad 1907 by Phony Benoni
Exchange sac as defence
from Rubinstein's exciting draws by Anyi
Notes by Dr. Emanuel Lasker in "Lasker's Chess Magazine" 1907
from Annotations e4 through Dead-Ball Era for FTB by fredthebear
fenix29's favorite games
by fenix29
from 53a_Middlegames: Positional Exchange Sacrifices by whiteshark
from Learn from Rubinstein by chessbuzz
Instructive Rubinstein French Games
from Fight or Flight: Let's Test Their Metal by fredthebear
kayleff's favorite games
by kayleff
joe1137's favorite Rubenstien French games
by joe1137
from 53a_Middlegames: Positional Exchange Sacrifices by Jaredfchess

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2023, Chessgames Services LLC