Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Borislav Kostic vs Heinrich Wolf
Teplitz-Schönau (1922), Teplice-Sanov CSR, rd 4, Oct-05
Queen's Gambit Declined: Vienna. Quiet Variation (D44)  ·  1-0



Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [20030 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 472 more games of B Kostic
sac: 21.Bxg7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If we are missing an important game, you can submit it (in PGN format) at our PGN Upload Utility.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Oct-30-07  RandomVisitor: 24...h6 seems to stop white's attack.

<al wazir>I agree, 32.Rac1 is the best plan, simplifying and solidifying the win.

Oct-30-07  DrGridlock: After black's 32'nd move, the knight has been saved and White has a pretty solid advantage (+2.19 according to Fritz). White's next 2 moves (f3 and Rf1) gives balck first a pawn, and then the exchange. Black has come back to +1.25 according to Fritz. Now it's black's turn for inaccurate play, and by move 44, White has a rook and 5 pawns vs a rook. By move 58, black has whittled that down to a rook and 2 pawns vs a rook, and by move 80, it's the same 2 pawns, each of which have advanced 1 square.

The puzzle is in moves 25 through 31, and cover your eyes for the rest of the game.

Oct-30-07  beenthere240: I thought 33. f3 followed by 34. Rf1 was pretty good, since it led to white getting a rook on the 7th rank and a simplification into what should have been an easy endgame.
Oct-30-07  micartouse: Wow, this wasn't so easy. It's not too hard to find the idea of Qxh7+ and the knight-fork. That's true. But it's a very complex position otherwise.

I fell for playing 25. Bxg6? first because I couldn't find a clean followup to 25. Qxh7+ Kf8. A very nice exercise (I like these tricky ones with many variations).

Oct-30-07  Alphastar: White to play, Easy difficulty. We are down a piece for a pawn, though we can immediately gain the exchange back with Nxe8+. However, that's not what we're looking for. If we could remove the defender of the e8-rook, the h8-rook, we would pick up a rook and a queen (Nxe8+ followed by Nxc7). Hence: 25. Qxh7+! In case of 25. ..Rxh7, 26. Nxe8+ Kf8 27. Nxc7 easily wins. The only thing we have to check here is that the combination does not fail after 25. ..Kf8!? It doesn't, we have 26. Nxe8! Kxe8 27. Qg7 saving our queen, while we are threatening 28. Bxg6 removing the defender of the h8-rook; If Rf8, Bxg6 fxg6 Qxc7 picks up black's queen. That's the solution I think.
Oct-30-07  logo: Didn't find it (didn't look too hard too) but if it was monday today, i would have found in 1 second (Queen sac)
Oct-30-07  chessmoron: Please check out an "insane" puzzle in my forum: Click here and scroll down: chessmoron chessforum
Oct-30-07  YouRang: I spotted the knight fork potential right away, and so 25. Qxh7+ was easy to see, since the queen is immune (25...Rxh7 26. Nxe8+ getting the queen back and scooping up a rook along the way).

The trickier part was seeing what to do if 25...Kf8. At first glance, it looked like my queen might be trapped.

Funny that it took me a while to see that 25...Nxe8 still does the job of picking up a rook and keeping me out of trouble -- one way or another, either we swap queens or my queen finds refuge on g7. Good puzzle.

Premium Chessgames Member
  kevin86: To answer this one correct,do I have to get all 55 moves right? lol

Actually,I saw 25 ♕xh7+ but I feared that the queen would be trapped after ...♔f8. White did follow up with ♘xe8 anyway-attacking the queen and gaining the exchange.

Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <38.Rf8+!! Kd7 39.Na6> and ♙d6 is unstoppable!!

click for larger view

Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: Last week I became enamored with the rook lift concept. I tried it with today’s puzzle and the line that develops looks pretty strong.

I played 25 Nxe8+ Rxe8 then 26 Ra3?! (threatening Rh3 then Qh6+,etc.) 26… Rh8 27 Rh3 Qe5 28 Qh6+ Kg8 29 exf7+ Kxf7 30 Bxg6+ hxg6 31 Qxh8 Qxh8 32 Rxh8 bxa4 and white gains two rooks for a bishop and knight.

click for larger view

I'd appreciate any critique or comments on this variation, if there are any.

Premium Chessgames Member
  cu8sfan: The theme of the week must be forks.
Oct-30-07  dzechiel: <Last week I became enamored with the rook lift concept. I tried it with today’s puzzle and the line that develops looks pretty strong.

I played 25 Nxe8+ Rxe8 then 26 Ra3?! (threatening Rh3 then Qh6+,etc.) 26… Rh8>


Can't black simply play 26...bxa3? You may have black moving up the board by mistake.

I also spent a great deal of time trying to make a rook lift work, but on each occasion, the rook was immediately snapped off of the board by one of the black pawns.

Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: For today's puzzle solution, White wins with the threat of a decisive Knight Fork after 25. Qxh7+ Kxh7 26. Nxe8+ or the game continuation.

White's nifty looking demolition of pawn structure tactic with 21. Bxg7!? is apparently refuted by 24...h6, as noted by <Random Visitor>.

Premium Chessgames Member
  al wazir: <KingG: If 19...gxf6 20. Bxh7+ Kxh7>, then 21. Qh5+ Kg8 22. Qg4+ Kh7 23. Nh5 Rg8 24. Qh4 Rg6 25. Nxf6+ Kg7 26. Qh7+ Kf8 27. Qh8+ Rg8 28. Qxg8+ Ke7 29. Qxe8#.

But if instead black plays 24...Kg6!, I don't see how white can win.

Oct-30-07  nimzo knight: Can any one explain we what possible motivation can black have while playing the move 18..Rae8.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: Please disregard this earlier post. I had set up the board incorrectly. Sigh!

<Last week I became enamored with the rook lift concept. I tried it with today’s puzzle and the line that develops looks pretty strong. I played 25 Nxe8+ Rxe8 then 26 Ra3?! (threatening Rh3 then Qh6+,etc.) 26… Rh8 27 Rh3 Qe5 28 Qh6+ Kg8 29 exf7+ Kxf7 30 Bxg6+ hxg6 31 Qxh8 Qxh8 32 Rxh8 bxa4 and white gains two rooks for a bishop and knight.

click for larger view

I'd appreciate any critique or comments on this variation, if there are any.>

Oct-30-07  pawnofdoom: Great tactic. Didn't see it. I saw Qxh7 and Nxh7 but couldn't get a winning line out of either. This sacrifice really didn't win the game, though. All it did was regain material, but bring a positional advantage good enough for white to pull off a win.
Oct-30-07  gmgomes: My engine indicates that game was pretty even until black played 24... Rh8 (h6 was the move). 25. Qxh7 was found instantly with evaluations around +4. The suggested line is 25.Qxh7+ Rxh7 26.Nxe8+ Kf8 27.Nxc7 Rg7 28.g3 Nf4 29.Kf1 f6 30.gxf4 Rxc7 31.exf6 Rf7 32.f5 b3 33.Bb1 Rxf6 34.fxe6 Rxe6
Oct-30-07  newton296: that was A great attacking game by kostic. He goes after the g pawn ( kinda rare) and just keeps landing blows.

I bet wolf was thinking after Bxg7!? "what the is going on here"

then kostic follows all the kingside blows with a a great endgame to boot.

loved playing through the entire game

Oct-30-07  chessmoron: No one can solve my puzzle. :-(
Oct-30-07  TheaN: Waah! Tuesday failure! I went with the seemingly comforting 25.Bxg6 to regain the piece and allow a fatal tactic, but 25....fxg6 26.Qxh7+? Rxh7 27.Nxe8+ Kf8 28.Nxc7 Rxc7 and White has some defending to do against two pieces for a Rook.

With the idea of d5 White can safe his exchange up in the immediate sac, but I got stumped by 25....Kf8 and went for 25.Bxg6.

Oct-30-07  BipolarChessorder: I can't believe white should need another 32 moves to force resignation after being three pawns up by move 48 (or having a huge advantage even earlier). He could probably have won even by giving up his rook for black's lone pawn given that he has pairs of connected passed pawns on both sides of the board!
Jan-09-09  WhiteRook48: amazing. However he was 2 pawns up anyway so there wasn't much Wolf could do.
Nov-16-09  psmith: As pointed out above, 24...h6 equalizes at least. Also, I don't see a win for White after 19...gxf6. The best seems to be a perpetual beginning 20. Bxh7+. There just aren't enough White attacking pieces.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
25.? (Tuesday, October 30)
from POTD Queen Gambit Declined + Accepted by takchess
25. Qxh7+! wins with the threat of a Knight Fork
from Knight Forks by patzer2
25 Qxh7+! Black h8-rook defends e8-forking, h7-checking squares
from OVERLOADED! by notyetagm
25 Qh5xh7+! deflects defender of White f6-knight e8-forking sq
from Knights need forking squares! by notyetagm
25 blancas
from Puzzle 3 by ALEXIN
25.? (October 30, 2007)
from Tuesday Puzzles, 2004-2010 by Phony Benoni
Teplitz-Schönau 1922
by suenteus po 147
25.? (Tuesday, October 30)
from Puzzle of the Day 2007 by Phony Benoni
start at move 40
from Game collection: znd by willyfly
Teplitz-Schönau 1922
by Tabanus
strange tuesday
from Selected games from daily puzzles by aroyni
Borislav Kostic (1887-1963)
from Player of the day: notable game IV by nikolaas

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC