Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Jacques Mieses vs Aron Nimzowitsch
Bad Kissingen (1928), Bad Kissingen GER, rd 4, Aug-15
French Defense: Classical. Svenonius Variation (C10)  ·  0-1



Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 6 more J Mieses/Nimzowitsch games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: Some people don't like to know the result of the game in advance. This can be done by registering a free account then visiting your preferences page, then checking "Don't show game results".

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-22-10  Ulhumbrus: 9...g5? disturbs the King side pawns without necessity and commits Black to castling on the Queen side.

10 Bd2 obstructs the d file, and with it, the White Queen's defence of the d4 pawn. One justification for 10 Be3 instead is that on 10...Nxe3 11 fxe3 Black's f5 square seems a greater weakness than White's backward e3 pawn. Another alternative is 10 Bc1 eg 10...Be7 11 0-0 Qd7 12 Ng3 Nxg3 13 fxg3 and Black's f5 square remains weak.

11 Qc1 neglects White's development, and although it induces Black to disturb further his King side pawns, Black is going to castle on the Queen side and the weakening effect of the move ....f6 may be insufficient to justify the loss of time for development spent on the move 11 Qc1. An alternative is 11 0-0 Qd7 12 Ng3 0-0-0 13 Nce2 and Black's game seems not have quite attained safety.

12 Nd1 is consistent in one way, occupying the aquare d1 which White's Q has vacated. However it not only neglects White's development but actually undevelops the N. 12 0-0 may be better.

14 Ne3 makes a target of the N for the advance ....f5. On 14 0-0 White may still have the better of it eg 14...Qd7 15 f4 0-0-0 16 fg fg 17 Ne3

15...f5 threatens 16...f4 followed by 17...f3. White seems to have no choice but to block Black's f pawn by 16 f4.

Instead of 17 0-0-0, 17 0-0 may be better because then White has some initiative of his own on the King side. After 17 0-0-0 Black seems to have all the play and White none. A part of the reason for that is that White is unable to find good posts for his Knight and bishop. White is unable to win Black's f pawn, and that pawn advances to f4 and becomes a weapon instead of a target, a weapon which supports Black's attack.

It does not take much to transform an advantage into a lost game. The move 9....g5? contracts a permanent disadvantage. It is such a serious mistake that it takes several errors on White's part, perhaps five errors, to transform finally White's advantage into a lost game.

May-10-10  Archswindler: <Ulhumbrus: 9...g5? disturbs the King side pawns without necessity and commits Black to castling on the Queen side.>

Is it your mission to spam up the entire database with inane prattle about disturbing pawns? I wouldn't mind the fact that your analysis is complete nonsense, if it wasn't for the fact that it's EVERYWHERE. Please, just stop.

May-10-10  Wyatt Gwyon: I laughed.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Telemus: Instead of the patzer's check given above (36.. ♕c4+), Nimzowitsch played the much better 36.. ♕b5. Why is N.'s move better? The Black queen needs only to control c3 in order to trap White's quuen next move, and 36.. ♕c4+ would allow 37.c3.

Tournament book, page 88 and Skakbladet 3/1929, pages 40-41.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.

NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Bad Kissingen 1928
by Resignation Trap
French Def. Classical. Svenonius Var (C10) 0-1 Crowded Q trap
from FrenchD b6 or Nc6 by fredthebear
French Exchange
by Chessdreamer
97_C01_Exchange Variation - Black wins (mainly)
by whiteshark
by sleepyirv
Bad Kissingen 1928
by JoseTigranTalFischer
French Def. Classical. Svenonius Var (C10) 0-1 Crowded Q trap
from extras enlist Fredthebear as a spare by fredthebear

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC