chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Jacques Mieses vs Aron Nimzowitsch
Bad Kissingen (1928), Bad Kissingen GER, rd 4, Aug-15
French Defense: Classical. Svenonius Variation (C10)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 6 more J Mieses/Nimzowitsch games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To see the raw PGN for this game, click on the PGN: view link above.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Apr-22-10  Ulhumbrus: 9...g5? disturbs the King side pawns without necessity and commits Black to castling on the Queen side.

10 Bd2 obstructs the d file, and with it, the White Queen's defence of the d4 pawn. One justification for 10 Be3 instead is that on 10...Nxe3 11 fxe3 Black's f5 square seems a greater weakness than White's backward e3 pawn. Another alternative is 10 Bc1 eg 10...Be7 11 0-0 Qd7 12 Ng3 Nxg3 13 fxg3 and Black's f5 square remains weak.

11 Qc1 neglects White's development, and although it induces Black to disturb further his King side pawns, Black is going to castle on the Queen side and the weakening effect of the move ....f6 may be insufficient to justify the loss of time for development spent on the move 11 Qc1. An alternative is 11 0-0 Qd7 12 Ng3 0-0-0 13 Nce2 and Black's game seems not have quite attained safety.

12 Nd1 is consistent in one way, occupying the aquare d1 which White's Q has vacated. However it not only neglects White's development but actually undevelops the N. 12 0-0 may be better.

14 Ne3 makes a target of the N for the advance ....f5. On 14 0-0 White may still have the better of it eg 14...Qd7 15 f4 0-0-0 16 fg fg 17 Ne3

15...f5 threatens 16...f4 followed by 17...f3. White seems to have no choice but to block Black's f pawn by 16 f4.

Instead of 17 0-0-0, 17 0-0 may be better because then White has some initiative of his own on the King side. After 17 0-0-0 Black seems to have all the play and White none. A part of the reason for that is that White is unable to find good posts for his Knight and bishop. White is unable to win Black's f pawn, and that pawn advances to f4 and becomes a weapon instead of a target, a weapon which supports Black's attack.

It does not take much to transform an advantage into a lost game. The move 9....g5? contracts a permanent disadvantage. It is such a serious mistake that it takes several errors on White's part, perhaps five errors, to transform finally White's advantage into a lost game.

May-10-10  Archswindler: <Ulhumbrus: 9...g5? disturbs the King side pawns without necessity and commits Black to castling on the Queen side.>

Is it your mission to spam up the entire database with inane prattle about disturbing pawns? I wouldn't mind the fact that your analysis is complete nonsense, if it wasn't for the fact that it's EVERYWHERE. Please, just stop.

May-10-10  Wyatt Gwyon: I laughed.
Jun-26-18
Premium Chessgames Member
  Telemus: Instead of the patzer's check given above (36.. ♕c4+), Nimzowitsch played the much better 36.. ♕b5. Why is N.'s move better? The Black queen needs only to control c3 in order to trap White's quuen next move, and 36.. ♕c4+ would allow 37.c3.

Tournament book, page 88 and Skakbladet 3/1929, pages 40-41.

NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Bad Kissingen 1928
by JoseTigranTalFischer
Queenmate
by sleepyirv
Bad Kissingen 1928
by Resignation Trap
French Def. Classical. Svenonius Var (C10) 0-1 Crowded Q trap
from FrenchD b6 or Nc6 by fredthebear
French Exchange
by Chessdreamer
French Def. Classical. Svenonius Var (C10) 0-1 Crowded Q trap
from extras enlist Fredthebear as a spare by fredthebear
97_C01_Exchange Variation - Black wins (mainly)
by whiteshark


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC