chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Garry Kasparov vs Viswanathan Anand
Corus Group A (2000), Wijk aan Zee NED, rd 7, Jan-23
Nimzo-Indian Defense: Romanishin Variation. English Hybrid (E20)  ·  1/2-1/2

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

explore this opening
find similar games 79 more Kasparov/Anand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

Kibitzer's Corner
Oct-27-08  TommyC: How about 18.Re1 ;)
Oct-27-08  einneu: lol...yes, 18.Re1 and white wins!
Nov-25-08  VaselineTopLove: what's the joke about 18.Re1?
Nov-25-08  hitman84: Kramnik-Anand game 10.
Feb-06-11
Premium Chessgames Member
  Eyal: <Today's play on the top board reminded me of the famous chess tale from the Gothenburg tournament of 1955 when the Argentinean contingent of Najdorf, Panno and Pilnik, all playing black in the 14th round against the Soviet might of Keres, Geller and Spassky, decided that they would all play the same risky line of the Sicilian Najdorf that they had prepared before the round in an effort to collectively confuse their opponents. As the games progressed, the Soviets' quickly twigged what was happening as they watched each other's games from the demonstration boards […] The reason for telling this tale is that it's a ploy that today could have saved Vishy Anand a painful few hours of torture at the hands of Kasparov. As the opening moves were being played on the top board, at the other end of the tournament hall, it was like looking in to a mirror as Van Wely vs Short, 2000 had the same moves as the Kasparov-Anand game - even right up to Kasparov's TN at move 19!

Kasparov had found a big improvement over the Shaked-Georgiev game from Las Vegas 1999, in one of his favourite systems against the Nimzo-Indian with g3. And, every move the world number one made with White against Anand, Van Wely was faithfully reproducing in his game against Short.

"It's an instance of cloning," commentator Vlastimil Hort informed his audience. "Pretty smart, actually, since Van Wely is a few moves behind, so he can see how White's plan works out. Kasparov doesn't seem to mind but if I were Short, I'd be rather annoyed. After all, he's playing Kasparov two days running!" Luckily for the wily Short, he managed to find the correct defensive plan to easily draw. Now if only Anand had had the sense to slow down to find out how Short was going to handle the opening….

[…]

19.Rd2! Kasparov's TN. 19 Re1 Nc4 20 Qc5 Rfd8 was Shaked vs Kiril Georgiev, 1999 [with the rook on d2, 19…Nc4 fails to 20.g4! Qxg4 21.f3 – and here, 21…Bxf3 can be met by 22.Qxc4, since g2 is defended.] 19 ..Rab8 20 Bxb6 axb6 21 Qd6 Bf3?! "It seemed a good idea at that point," said Anand at the press conference after the game. "I was convinced that I'd win the pawn back soon enough." He did not, however, and had to work hard for another 35 moves to salvage a half point from the encounter.

Short, who was in exactly the same position as his Indian colleague, came up with a better idea. He played the simple 21 ..Rfc8! (later Kasparov suggested 21. ...Rbc8 as his preferred move here MC) "I'm much better than this Indian guy," he boasted after he left the tournament hall. "What's he doing, giving away a pawn like that?" Kasparov later - his game lasted three hours longer - remarked that Van Wely wasted his chances with his weak 22 h3. Short disagreed, showing he might just as easily have drawn after the stronger 22 Rb1 that Kasparov suggested. A) 22 h3 Bf3 23 g4 (23 Rb1 Bxg2 24 Kxg2 Qa5 and Van Wely and Short opted for the draw here) 23 ..Qg5! 24 Rb1 Rd8 25 Rxb6 Ra8! 26 Ra6 Rab8 Now 27 Rb6 is a draw by repetition as White's only other option is: 27 Qxd8+ Rxd8 28 Rxd8+ Qxd8 29 Bxf3; B) 22 Rb1 h6 Black has to watch the back-rank [there’s a threat of 23.Rxb6!] 23 e5 Bf3 [a few years later, Bacrot vs Leko, 2004 reached this position and quickly ended in a draw] 24 Rdb2 b5 25 c4 (25 a4 Rd8 26 Qc5 Rd5 27 Qxc6 Rd1+) 25 ..Bxg2 26 Kxg2 Ra8 holds comfortably for Black.

[…]

Afterwards at the press conference, Australia's Ian Rogers asked Anand if he at any moment he had felt jealous of Short? "Oh, yes," replied Anand. "When he left the tournament hall a good three hours before I did!"> (http://www.chess.co.uk/twic/wijk7.h...)

Feb-06-11  Hesam7: <VaselineTopLove: what's the joke about 18.Re1?>

I think it refers to Kramnik vs Anand, 2008 the position after Black's 17th move is identical in both games (but the move orders differ):


click for larger view

Here Kramnik played 18. Re1 as oppsed to Kasparov's 18. Be3 and went on to win the game. If I remember correctly in the press conference after the game Kramnik called the position arising from the opening as very difficult to understand.

May-05-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: Kasparov's original idea 20 Bc5..Nc4 21 Bxf8..Rxb4 22 Rd8..h6 23 cxb..Kh7 but he realized that Black would have strong counterplay with the idea of ..Ne5 and ..Nf3+. Had Anand played 23..Rfe8 24 Qd6..Qc5 he would have had excellent drawing chances; instead after 29..Qe5?! he was clearly worse. Kasparov with 35 Rb7? overlooked Anand's reply 35..f6!; he would have maintained good winning chances with 35 Rb3..Qc4 36 e5+..g6 37 Rf3..Qd5 38 Qb5..Rc5 39 Qe8..Rc7 40 Qf8..Ra7 41 h3.
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Rook Endings
by Nimzophile
--> R
from zz03_Heavy pieces in action: pure QRR middlegame by whiteshark
senakash's favorite games nimzo
by senakash
Kale Oyunsonlari
by tristanfermat
CoachJay's Rook & Pawn Endgames
by coachjay
why a draw?
from Tarav's favorite games by Tarav
Rook Endings
by Knight Pawn
10_R+P(4:3)|| on the same wing
by whiteshark
Nimzo Indian Three Knights Variation
by KingG
Round Seven, Game #48
from Wijk aan Zee Corus 2000 by suenteus po 147


home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us


Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC