Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Salomon Flohr vs Jose Raul Capablanca
Nottingham (1936), Nottingham ENG, rd 3, Aug-12
Queen's Gambit Declined: Tartakower Defense. Exchange Variation (D59)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 7 times; par: 100 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [20791 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 10 more Flohr/Capablanca games
sac: 39.Nd6 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: At the top of the page we display the common English name for the opening, followed by the ECO code (e.g. "D59"). The ECO codes are links that take you to opening pages.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: <wtpy>

I didn't even notice! I only looked at Nd6: 38. Nf5 Rg6 39. Qe5 Bc4 40. Nd6, which comes down to the same pattern as in the game. But now Black has to give up their Rook for the Knight at d6.

Maybe 38. Nf5 Rg6 39. Qe5 Bc4 40. Nd6 Re6 41. Nxc8 is even better (after 41. Qg3 I figured out that Black has to play Rxd6).

Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: PS I must admit Nd6 reminded me of yesterday's puzzle. So it was not hard to find :)
Jul-20-18  landshark: <WorstPlayerEver> I agree with you about 40.Nd6 Surely this is winning - ?
Premium Chessgames Member
  WorstPlayerEver: <landshark>

Yes, I checked with Stockfish. The 24. Bd3 line I gave also comes from Stockfish, btw.

That said, the way Capa handled this pos is worth a study. They tried to activate their pieces, but isolani d5 does not live up to this plan; it need to be defended. So the Black Rook is useless at the king side. Black's pieces don't coordinate well.

Jul-20-18  Cheapo by the Dozen: I went with 38 Bf5, with the plan of following up with e4 and threatening to win the exchange at the expense of either Black rook. The engine says that Black has so much counterplay as to give him an advantage.

However, the engine also says that White erred by not following my plan a couple of moves earlier, specifically via 37 e4.

Premium Chessgames Member
  agb2002: The black queen is tied to the defense of the rook on c7. The knight is well placed to create threats. These details suggest 38.Nf5:

A) 38... Rxf5 39.Bxf5 wins an exchange (39... Qxf5 40.Qxc7 Nd3 41.Rc2 + - [2R vs b+n]).

B) 38... Rg6 39.Nd6

B.1) 39... Rxg3 40.Nxc8

B.1.a) 40... Rg4(5) 41.Nxb6, followed by Nxa4 or Nxd5, wins two pawns.

B.1.b) 40... Rg6 41.Bxg6 wins an exchange at least.

B.1.c) 40... Rxg2+ 41.Kxg2 Rxc8 42.Bf5 followed by Bg4-f3 with probably a won ending.

B.1.d) 40... B(R)xc8 41.hxg3 + - [R vs n].

B.2) 39... Qd7 40.Bxg6 fxg6 41.Qxg6 Rc6 42.Qe8+ Qxe8 43.Nxe8 Kf7 44.Nxg7 Kxg7 45.Rxd5 + - [R+3P vs b+n].

B.3) 39... Qd8 40.Bxg6 as above.

B.4) 39... Ne4 40.Nxc8

B.4.a) 40... Nxg3 41.Rxc7 wins an exchange at least.

B.4.b) 40... Rxc1 41.Rxc1 Nxg3 42.hxg3 wins a piece (42... Re6 43.Rc6 Rxc6 44.Ne7+ Kf8 45.Nxc6, etc.).

C) 38... g6 39.Nxh6+ wins a pawn at least.

D) 38... Qf8 39.Qxc7, etc.

Premium Chessgames Member
  patzer2: Black's decisive mistake was 37...Qc8?, allowing today's Friday puzzle solution 38. Nf5! +- (+2.15 @ 40 ply, Stockfish 9 analysis of move 38...?).

Instead, 37...Rd7 = to ⩲ (+0.20 @ 40 ply, Stockfish 9 analysis of move 37...?) keeps the game nearly level.

Earlier in the opening, the computer prefers 12...c5 = as in Lisitsin vs A Vasiljev, 1947.

After the game continuation 12...a6 13. Rd1 ⩲, it becomes difficult for Black to avoid a weak isolated pawn -- a difficulty avoided with 12...c5 =. Perhaps it's also worth noting that this is the only game recorded with 12...a6 in our Opening Explorer.

Premium Chessgames Member
  malt: Had 38.Nf5 Rg6 39.Qe5
Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: <"This interference on the part of Euwe was absolutely inadmissable; but the tournament director was at that time busy with his own correspondence...">

I'll take BS for 800, Alex. Riiiiight, Capablanca, for crying out loud, Capa in time trouble, a crowd gathers, and the TD is busy somewhere else.

Premium Chessgames Member
  malt: 38.Nf5 Rg6 39.Qe5 Rd7
(39...Bb7 40.Ne7+ )
40.R:d5 R:d5 41.Ne7+ Kf8
(41...Kh7 42.B:g6+ )
(41...Kh8 42.N:g6+ )

42.N:g6+ fg6 43.Q:d5

Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: Not really sure what went wrong here for Capa. Its rare to see him outcombined and edged out in the endgame, all in the same game!
Jul-20-18  Mayankk: Same as a few others, I had Nf5 threatening mate on g7, necessitating a Rg6 response followed by Qe5 which had the threat of Ne6 fork and Rxd5. But more importantly it didnít seem that Black had any counter-threats and so White could slowly build on its position.

Too complex me after that, given the variety of side-lines it could branch into.

Jul-20-18  saturn2: I went with 39 Qe5 threatening Ne7 and Rxd5
Jul-20-18  ClassZPlaya: Found the main line and solved the puzzle, but I was impressed by how much play Black had left in the position. Flohr needed to continually play accurately to bring home the win.
Premium Chessgames Member
  NM JRousselle: I can't take credit for solving this one. I saw this game many years ago. It's interesting that the tournament report on this game has Euwe kibitzing and causing Capa to err.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Jimfromprovidence: I liked the simple 49 f3, below, preventing 49...Be4+ which would be winning for black.

click for larger view

It also forces 49...Bxc2 because of the threat 50 Rc3 or 50 Rcd2.

As an aside, 49 f3 and 49 Rc8+ look like the only clearly winning moves for white at that point.

Premium Chessgames Member
  swclark25: I eventually found 38.Nf5 but assumed Black chose 38...Rxf5 (rather than the slightly better game move of 38...Rg6). Then that left 39.Bxf5 Qxf5 40.Qxc7 which wins the exchange per <agb2002's> line A)
Jul-20-18  popnstart: hmmm...Nd6 sac and win against Capa not in Flohr's "Notable Games" section?
Premium Chessgames Member
  Penguincw: Was hoping it was Capablanca to move. Mid-late week Capablanca puzzles are the only one I have a chance to solve. Just love the simplicity of his play.

I got 39.Nf5, but no idea what black would reply with.

What a short line.

Feb-19-20  erony: Euwe was not only "kibitzing" !
I read this in the tournament book :
"Max Euwe, who stood close to the table, spoke several times to Flohr, telling him the number of moves remaining to be made. [...] As I requested him to keep quiet, he started to argue with me, and tried to persuade me that he was entitled to speak. This interference on the part of Euwe was absolutely inadmissible ; but the tournament director was at that time busy with his own correspondence, and as a result of this interference, I made a grave error, losing the exchange"(J. R. Capablanca).
Premium Chessgames Member
  Count Wedgemore: So Capablanca engaged in that time-honoured tradition used by many a chess player: inventing an excuse for his loss. I find it hard to believe that Euwe, a man with a reputation of being an absolute gentleman both on and off the board, was disturbing the players and therefore was to be blamed for Capa's loss. I don't buy it for a second.
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <Count Wedgemore> Winter covers the incident in "Chess Notes" 5292. A. J. Mackenzie writes, <Capablanca's complaint is undoubtedly justified. Euwe (alone) apologizes for his small part in the affair and takes a mild "wigging" in good part.>
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: Maybe Euwe thought it was a good deed to tell the players, who had lost count of their moves, that they had passed the time control on move 36 and could reset their clocks. Unfortunately, Capablanca still believed he was in time pressure, told Euwe to be quiet, and played his blunder on the 37th move.
Feb-19-20  1d410: I consider this an attack on one of my favorite payers: Flohr
Premium Chessgames Member
  beatgiant: <1d410>
<an attack... on Flohr>

What do you mean? We are talking about eyewitness accounts from the time that could be factual or not, but either way, I don't see any claim that Flohr did anything wrong.

Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 3)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 3 OF 3 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
P-Q4 Attax
by fredthebear
Round 3
from Nottingham 1936 by JoseTigranTalFischer
38.? (Friday, July 20)
from Puzzle of the Day 2018 by Phony Benoni
Game 100
from World Champion - Alekhine (I.Linder/V.Linder) by Qindarka
On the shoulders of giants
by ughaibu
Round 3
from Nottingham 1936 by Hesam7
12 August 1936, Nottingham, Rd 3
from Capablanca loses with the Black pieces by Calli
d4 : QGD : Tartakower Variation
by ISeth
38.? (July 20, 2018)
from Friday Puzzles, 2018-2020 by Phony Benoni
by whiteshark
QGD: Tartakower Def. Exchange Var (D59) 1-0 Stockfish; 38.?
from QGD TMB Compiled by Xmas Elf by fredthebear
by whiteshark
Round 3
from Nottingham 1936 - Alekhine by vantheanh

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC