chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Milan Vidmar vs Max Euwe
Nottingham (1936), Nottingham ENG, rd 2, Aug-11
Slav Defense: Czech. Carlsbad Variation (D17)  ·  0-1

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 16 times; par: 24 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 4 more Vidmar/Euwe games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: You can get computer analysis by clicking the "ENGINE" button below the game.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
Feb-04-05  kostich in time: this is extremely good game..Euwes revenge for Carlsbad 1929
Feb-04-05  euripides: 23...Ba7 is a deceptive move, looking as though it simply ducks from the threatened fork, but actually unleashing a vicious queen's side attack.
Mar-24-06  Whitehat1963: Granted, it's lost by a light-year, but doesn't 30. h4 make it a more difficult finish?
Apr-23-06  Karpova: 30.h4 fg
Sep-06-06  EmperorAtahualpa: Crafty's evaluation after 30.h4:

30...gxh3 31.Kh2 fxg5 32.f3 Rfe8 33.Qc2 g4 34.Rad1 Be3 35.Rxd8 Rxd8 36.f4 Bg2 37.Bf6

(eval. -7.05; depth 14 ply; 102M nodes)

Sep-06-06  lopium: Yes, 23...Ba7 is an incredible move. You have to have balls to play such a move.
Aug-01-13  JureIvanusic: 30. Ne6 Qd5 and mate to follow.
Mar-23-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: 11..Rd8 (11..f6 is the main line) had been played for the first time the previous year in Alekhine-Euwe 1935 Match game 21 where Black won to tie the match. The year following the present game in game 1 of the 1937 rematch Euwe, this time with White, played the improvement 21 Ne4 and won. In the game from the 1935 match Alekhine had played 18 Bxe5 but had not gained any advantage but Vidmar's pawn sacrifice 18 Ra4?! (recommended by Vukovic) was not an improvement; perhaps 18 Nd3 would have been good enough for equality. 20 Re4..Bf5 would not have helped White and 20 Qe3..Bb6 21 Bxe5..fxe 22 Qxe5..Qxe5 23 Nxe5..Rxf2! 24 Kh1 would have given Black a big advantage. After 21..g5! Black was winning; both 22 Nxe5..gxf 23 Nc4..Ba7 24 Ra3..f5 25 Bg2..Be6 and 22 Bxe5..fxe 23 Nxe5..Bh3 24 Qb3+..Kh8 25 Bg2..Bxg2 26 Kxg2..Qxe5 27 Qxb6..Qxe2 28 Qxb7..Qf3+ 29 Kg1..Rd1! would have been very strong for Black.
Dec-01-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  Mateo: Beautiful game from Euwe. 29...Qf5! was very accurate. If he plays instead the 'obvious' 29...fxg5?, 30.Qxg5+ Kf7 31.Rad1!, White has strong play. After the cool-blooded 29...Qf5!, the Knight will not escape.

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Round 2
from Nottingham 1936 by Hesam7
damegambiet pak pion
by ewit evertsen
From My Games 1920 - 1937
by Benzol
Round 2
from Nottingham 1936 by JoseTigranTalFischer
Slav Def. Czech. Carlsbad Var (D17) 0-1 Impressive realignment
from Slavs more SLAVS, Semi-Slavs, the whole Sha-bang by fredthebear
Slav Def. Czech. Carlsbad Var (D17) 0-1 Impressive realignment
from yFredthebear's Diagonals Diagonals II by fredthebear
Game 64
from Max Euwe - The Biography (Munninghoff) by Qindarka
Slav Defense
by Chezter75
Game 465
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by Chessdreamer
Game 58
from My Games (Euwe) by Qindarka
456 L40
from * CT-ART by takchess
Game 465
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by demirchess
D16-17
by Chessdreamer
Game 465
from Max Euwe - From Steinitz to Fischer, Part 2 by FRoeten
September, p. 200 [Game 172 / 709]
from Chess Review 1936 by Phony Benoni
Slav Def. Czech. Carlsbad Var (D17) 0-1 Impressive realignment
from yFredthebear's Pawn Mowers & Trimmers by trh6upsz

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC