chessgames.com
Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing
Jose Raul Capablanca vs Alexander Alekhine
Nottingham (1936), Nottingham ENG, rd 2, Aug-11
Dutch Defense: Alekhine Variation (A92)  ·  1-0

ANALYSIS [x]

FEN COPIED

Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 20 times; par: 74 [what's this?]

Get this game explained with Decode Chess
explore this opening
find similar games 48 more Capablanca/Alekhine games
sac: 26.Qd2 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: If you do not want to read posts by a certain member, put them on your ignore list.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.
PREMIUM MEMBERS CAN REQUEST COMPUTER ANALYSIS [more info]

A COMPUTER ANNOTATED SCORE OF THIS GAME IS AVAILABLE.  [CLICK HERE]

Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Mar-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  Arturo2nd: Alekhine remarked immediately after winning the title, "Somehow the rematch will never take place." He had pretended to be Capablanca's friend beforehand and was only able to play the match because Capablanca had persuaded wealthy Argentine friends to sponsor the match. Capablanca was rewarded by not only being refused a rematch, but by being trashed repeatedly in print and barred from appearing in any tournament in which Alekhine would appear. Effectively, this kept Capablanca from participating in almost all the major events with big purses and earning appearance fees. This was their first game against each other since the title match. It must have been a particularly sweet day in the Capablanca household.
Mar-07-13
Premium Chessgames Member
  jessicafischerqueen: <Alekhine remarked immediately after winning the title, "Somehow the rematch will never take place.">

What is your source for this?

<Capablanca had persuaded wealthy Argentine friends to sponsor the match>.

What is your source for this?

Dec-11-13  YvccChamp: Many of us have friends like the great Alekhine. We give to them a carrot;they reward us with a snake. The world lost a chance to see what would have been a match for the ages, because a return match in 1929 would have been won by the 41 year old Capablanca. Alekhine knew Capa was aging so he gave us the 2 Bogoloubov Matches instead. Alexander A Alekine is truly a great master, but lacked in in important character traits. I enjoy many of his games;however, the Cuban's talent was superior. Alekhine knew this!
Feb-05-14  maxi: I am attracted to <RookFile>'s comment of two years ago: "I think this game is way over our heads."
Feb-06-14  SChesshevsky: <"I think this game is way over our heads.">

Certainly a great game. Maybe the best way to view is open lines and mobility.

I'm not sure what Alekhine's plan was but it looks likes Capablanca's plan was something like...

Around 7. Qb3 he wants to control the White squares while Black's QB is stuck, especially eying the a2 diagonal with a tempo check on the King.

Around 16. Nfd4, maybe he's attempting d4 control which might be important to Black especially the KB. It also opens the h1 white diagonal if needed.

19. Be3, now the fights definitely on for d4, thinking if he can get rid of Black's KB that weaken's Black on the dark squares as well.

24. Rd3, it appears Capablanca has already seen the following combinations and saw that getting rid of the two B's without open files for the Rooks to work on is better for him.

35. the exchange of Q's pretty much defuses any Black chances. Then it's just close up the Qside and open lines for the B's and make sure the open files are well covered.

For a good example of Capablanca's positional feel, at the final position count the number of useful squares each side has in enemy territory within a couple of moves.

Feb-06-14  morfishine: Whats interesting is what the players were thinking and how they assessed the position as the game progressed. As born out in the notes, Capablanca was unhappy with his opening play. Alekhine, though not admitting outright that his play was too passive, gives Black a slight edge on or about move 23. Fair enough

But Alekhine ventures into a line that is in effect, too transparent, which in turn, plays into Capablanca's greatest strengths: calculating and positional play. This miscalculation is somewhat odd since its not terribly deep or complex, the net effect being that Capablanca's task is eased and simplified.

One sees that both players were not thrilled about the opening. A draw was most likely when Alekhine decided to play for a win.

An excellent example of successful positional play emanating from a dry and inaccurate opening.

*****

Mar-02-14  Everett: I've come too a loose conclusion based on the stories and results of Lasker, Capablanca, and Alekhine, and they are this: Lasker was the most professional, Capablanca the most talented, and Alekhine the most chess-obsessed.

Discuss ;-)

Mar-02-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <Everett> In support of your view on Alekhine, while he and Capablanca were at London (1922), a patron took them to a show.

The way the account went, Capa never took his eyes off the girls, while Alekhine never removed his from his pocket set!

Mar-02-14  Sally Simpson: Hi perfidious:

I'm thinking as Everett mentions all three we have to take Lasker to the theatre as well.

So... Alekhine's eyes never his pocket chess set, Capablanca's eyes never leaves the dancing girls what would Lasker be doing if he was there?

Taking an occasional peep at what opening variations Alekhine was looking at and then studying the dancing girls to see if a mathematical formulae could be applied to dance choreography.

This is fun. Let's take them to the beach.

Capablanca randomly kicks some sand about and suddenly this beautiful sandcastle appears.

Lasker builds one of the most intricate and complex sandcastles ever seen complete with a moving drawbridge powered by a waterwheel that also supplies the electricity for the rampart search lights.

Alekhine builds a sand chess set.

:)

Mar-07-14  Whitehat1963: What's the finish?
Mar-08-14
Premium Chessgames Member
  Benzol: <Whitehat1963> See Capablanca vs Alekhine, 1936 and have a look at <Calli>'s comments.
Nov-02-14  erniecohen: Where is the win after 27...♘a4? (Lasker and Capablanca seem to agree that Black's mistake was in winning the exchange.)
Jan-28-15
Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: A very strange game - neither player played up to their usual standards.

Capablanca's opening was very unsuccessful and he did not play the early part of the middle game well either. Had Alekhine played 24..Ba4 25 Qd2..Ne4 26 Qe1..g5 he would have had a large advantage. After 24..f4? his advantage was gone and after 27..c5? he was lost.

The game was adjourned and winning plan is described in several places here (ie. near the top of page 2).

May-24-15  Hesam7: 22 b4 was the losing move but Alekhine did not find the win which would have followed after 22...g5!


click for larger view

The following line is now more or less forced: 23 Nf3 f4 24 gf4 gf4 25 Bf4 Qg7 25 Bg3 Bf5 26 Qb3 Nc3 27 Rc3 Bc3


click for larger view

White is an exchange down but Black's threats are not over yet. e2 needs to be defended: 28 e3 Kh8 and now White has to deal with ...Bg4 & ...Be4.

Aug-16-16  sudoplatov: One reason that three Minor Pieces generally have an advantage over two Rooks is that the side with two Rooks cannot usually sacrifice the Exchange. This would yield a two Minor Piece vs Rook material. Of course BBN vs RR is more advantages (in general) than BNN vs RR; the RR side could sacrifice for the Bishop and perhaps do well.

Three Minor Pieces do not fight so well against the Queen as the Queen can mount her own mating attack or multiple attack on various points. The three Minors need anchors.

Similarly with RR vs Q, the Rooks generally have to guard against the Queen's possibility of multiple attacks or mating attacks. Again the Queens side cannot sacrifice a piece (at least not if these are the only pieces left.)

Many years ago, I had to go through a bunch of these analyses to write the evaluation function for a chess program. (LACHEX, we ran out of money and had to quit.)

Aug-16-16
Premium Chessgames Member
  whiteshark: <sudoplatov: <(LACHEX, we ran out of money and had to quit.)>> --> Lachex
Oct-25-17  Toribio3: The 2 rooks of Alekhine are useless, they have no room to maneuver.
Oct-25-17
Premium Chessgames Member
  tamar: Obvious to Capa and Alekhine, but how the three pieces dominate 2 rooks is worth study

1) +3.00 (28 ply) 38...Kf6 39.Bc3+ Kg6 40.h4 Rc7 41.Kg1 Re7 42.Kg2 Kh6 43.Nf1 Rg8+ 44.Kh2 Rge8 45.Bc6 Rb8 46.Ne3 Kg6 47.Kg2 Rf7 48.Bd5 Rff8 49.h5+ Kxh5 50.Bg7 Kg6 51.Bxf8 Rxf8 52.Be6 h5 53.Nd5 Rb8 54.Kg3 Re8 55.Bd7 Re2 56.Nxb6

May-17-20  pepechuy: The position after black's 30th move appears in Fine's "Basic chess endings", but with white's pawn on a3 (instead of a2). It seems there is diagram typo there, but after 31. Nd2 he provides the variation 31... cb4 42. ab4, so he really has the pawn on a3. This appears in the revised edition by Pal Benko (I would expect such a mistake to have been corrected). I do not find any full game score that supports Fine's diagram (I checked the books on Capablanca by Panov, and by Caparros).
Aug-05-20  Chesgambit: Capblanca beats Alekhine again
Aug-06-20
Premium Chessgames Member
  harrylime: Was Alekhine drunk when he played this ?
Feb-27-21  Gaito: The position after 27.exd3 seems worthy of some post-mortem analysis (see diagram below):


click for larger view

In the comments above many kibitzers have already had a lot to say about this position, so it would be pointless to add more commentary; but what about the chess engines? What do they have to say about this critical position? Alekhine played 27...c5? but the engines don't seem to like that move at all. SF13 in depth 44 suggests 27...Na4 with equality (computer evaluation: 0.00). LcZero in depth 28 also plays 27...Na4 and gives an evaluation of +0.03. Ethereal 12.75 in depth 38 plays also 27...Na4 with an evaluation of -0.37. So we may take it for granted that 27...Na4 was Black's correct move in the diagrammed position. A sample variation (White: SF13, Black: LcZero, 30 seconds per move): 27...Na4 28.Ng5 h6 29.Bc6 hxg5 30.fxg5 Bb2 31.Rc2 (depth 52) b5 32.Bd5+ Kh8 33.Qe2 (depth 40). See diagram below:


click for larger view

The evaluation of the computer (SF13) is +0.62, which means a very tiny advantage to White.

Apr-10-21
Premium Chessgames Member
  kbob: Alekhine wrote a book on this tournament. From childhood I seem to recall him annotating that he started a combination, and then persisted in it, under the "hallucination" that he was winning two exchanges, but instead gave up three pieces for two rooks.
Jun-03-21  N.O.F. NAJDORF: Please allow me to clear up the matter of Alekhine's antisemitism.

Although he denied - after the war -
writing the anti-Semitic articles that had appeared under his name, and claimed that the Nazis had deceitfully attributed them to him, Alekhine had admitted their authorship in an interview with a Spanish newspaper during the war.

The fact that Alekhine was a personal friend of Hans Frank, who was hanged at Nuremberg for crimes against humanity, tends to support the claims that there was indeed something deeply unpleasant about him.

The curious thing is that, in order to diminish Capablanca's abilities, he had years before compared him unfavourably with a number of Jewish grandmasters.

Euwe reported that following his win over Lasker at Zurich 1934, Alekhine exclaimed: 'The Jew has been taught another lesson.'

It was in fact the only time Lasker lost to Alekhine.

Jun-03-21  sudoplatov: The local Stockfish computes that 24...f4 is Black's best chance.
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 6)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 6 OF 6 ·  Later Kibitzing>

NOTE: Create an account today to post replies and access other powerful features which are available only to registered users. Becoming a member is free, anonymous, and takes less than 1 minute! If you already have a username, then simply login login under your username now to join the discussion.

Please observe our posting guidelines:

  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, or profane language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate, or gibberish posts.
  3. No vitriolic or systematic personal attacks against other members.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No cyberstalking or malicious posting of negative or private information (doxing/doxxing) of members.
  6. No trolling.
  7. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by moderators, create a false impression of consensus or support, or stage conversations, is prohibited.

Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.

Blow the Whistle

See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a moderator.


NOTE: Please keep all discussion on-topic. This forum is for this specific game only. To discuss chess or this site in general, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of Chessgames.com, its employees, or sponsors.
All moderator actions taken are ultimately at the sole discretion of the administration.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
mneuwirth toReview
by mneuwirth
(A92) Dutch, 38 moves, 1-0 3 Minors vs 2 Rooks
from Alex Alek Alex Alek Fredthebear Alex Alek Alex by fredthebear
Strategic battles
by TheDestruktor
Positional Motifs
by Del ToRo
Round 2
from Nottingham 1936 by JoseTigranTalFischer
Capablanca!
by chocobonbon
The Chess Machine: Jose Raul Capablanca CD by Tim Sawyer
from Publications by Year and Uncomfirmed Source 8 by fredthebear
Dutch A92 example
from patguy54's favorite games by patguy54
What I think are "classic" games
by boneheadcharles
!!!
from capablanca best games by brager
RR:BBN (wins)
from 47w_RR:3minor by whiteshark
The Dutch Defense (and Anglo-dutch)
by Jersey Joe
Out of touch
from bitko's collection by bitko
2B VS RR
from Exchange sacs - 4 by obrit
?
from Balar's favorite games of Pure EVIL!!! by Balar
Capablanca vs the World Champions Decisive Games
by visayanbraindoctor

Home | About | Login | Logout | F.A.Q. | Profile | Preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | New Kibitzing | Chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | Privacy Notice | Contact Us

Copyright 2001-2021, Chessgames Services LLC