Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Robert James Fischer vs Samuel Reshevsky
"Right, Mr. Thomas!" (game of the day Dec-02-2011)
Fischer - Reshevsky (1961), New York, NY USA, rd 2, Jul-18
Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian. Open (B32)  ·  1-0



Click Here to play Guess-the-Move
Given 48 times; par: 49 [what's this?]

Annotations by Stockfish (Computer).      [20914 more games annotated by Stockfish]

explore this opening
find similar games 28 more Fischer/Reshevsky games
sac: 28.Rxg7 PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: The tournament is found above the game. For the newest chess events, this information may be a link which takes you to the tournament page which includes other games, a crosstable, discussion, etc.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
Premium Chessgames Member
  andrewjsacks: No one should forget that the match was tied when suddenly aborted: the old fighter was holding off the young lion...
Jan-13-13  RookFile: Sure. I have the greatest respect for the strength Reshevsky showed in this match. You can argue that the change in schedule actually would have hurt the older man more. Yet the old warrior just showed up, ready to do battle.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Joshka: Bobby's notes in 2007, he says, "In MSMG I gave 21.Nxd5 a question mark, and furthermore said: "This gives Black a little breathing room. Nowadays I would have played 21. Bd4! without giving it a second thought."

"My initial instinct was correct and 21. Nxd5 is the best move. After 21. Bd4 Qf4+ gums up the works a bit for White. Continue 22. Kb1 Bf5! (if 22...Bxd4? 23. Nxd4 Nc5 24. Qb5 Ne4 25. Nxe4 Qxe4 26. Rxg3+ Kh8 and 27. Qc5 is winning) 23. Rxg3!! Bxd3 24. Rxg7+ Kh8 25. Rxf7+ Qxd4 26. Rxf8+ Rxf8 27. Nxd4 Be4 and White is still better, but Black has put forth a much more challenging gauntlet."

Jan-14-13  Shams: <Joshka> Your citation for that is "61 Memorable Games" I suppose? Enough with that bunk already!
Jan-14-13  PaulLovric: <FSR: <Marmot PFL> As I recall, Frank Brady relates in "Profile of a Prodigy" that Allan Kaufman of the American Chess Foundation discussed with some others circa 1960 that Fischer had some psychological problems and that they should consider getting help for him. Then someone asked a question along the lines of "What if he gets better and gives up chess?" The room went very quiet and they never discussed that idea again.> Also imagine what we would have lost if lithium had been invented in Van Gogh's time
Feb-03-13  thomascrown: <howard> Regards Art of Positional Play and the F word: F word is in the text of game 48 Korchnoi-Spassky, in the opening, a Nimzo Indian. When Sammy was no longer regarded as a rival to Fischer they were on speaking terms! I have always admired Sammy's play and this book, but one should separate the chess playing qualities from the personality.
Mar-11-13  HAPERSAUD: First of all you don't cure, aspergers, you mentor it and second of all it seems that once again the game isn't being discussed.

<chessgames> what is it with random commentary on the Fischer pages?

Premium Chessgames Member
  thegoodanarchist: <FSR: ...Allan Kaufman of the American Chess Foundation discussed with some others circa 1960 that Fischer had some psychological problems and that they should consider getting help for him. Then someone asked a question along the lines of "What if he gets better and gives up chess?" The room went very quiet and they never discussed that idea again.>

Right, Mr. FSR!

Premium Chessgames Member
  perfidious: <thomascrown....I have always admired Sammy's play and this book, but one should separate the chess playing qualities from the personality.>

As with greats in any endeavour, but people everywhere wish to deify their heroes while simultaneously looking for their clay feet.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Reshevsky on Fischer.

Sammy's book on the 1972 Fischer - Spassky match is a tad cold towards Fischer. But of course that is possibly me comparing all the other books I have on this historic match.

In the forward he list all the reasons why Spassky lost rather than why Fischer won.

Fischer does get the credit for playing some good moves, especially good defensive moves (the chief reason why Fischer won according to Sammy was his opening prep and his defensive play.)

"He [Fischer] lacked brilliance, but his defensive play was good."

As always Sammy's notes are crystal clear but you do get the impression he wants the reader to think Spassky lost the title rather than Fischer winning it.

"The blunders comitted by Spassky were incredible."

"Fischer was also not in his best form, he made errors in a number of games."

On the whole Sammy says he was disapointed with the match. (Maybe he was disapointed with the result.)

A good book though with Sammy's usual clear analysis and thoughts. It's does the job.

Premium Chessgames Member
  HeMateMe: Reshevsky's books seem to have disappeared. I never see any of them in used book stores, though I see many books by other chess authors.
Feb-17-14  SChesshevsky: The Fischer-Reshevsky match might offer some of the best "fighting" chess games out there. I don't know if there's another match between two players who absolutely hated to lose, especially to each other.

I always thought that was a major reason why they didn't get along that well. They were a lot alike. Both were rocks when they thought they were right. Fischer's attitude is well known but Sam could've been equally stubborn when he thought he was right. That Benko deal back in 1975 is a good example.

Maybe what made the situation worse with Fischer is that I believed Sam, though he respected his play, didn't feel Fischer's take on the game was correct. Resigning yourself to sitting in a room with a chessboard for hours, memorizing variations and games just didn't make sense and wasn't "real" chess.

Yes, an old fashion view but from a guy who would often rather listen to good music or cook his obligatory kosher meal rather than think about chess and still played a great game.

Premium Chessgames Member
  morfishine: <HeMateMe> I just purchased a copy of Reshevsky's book (Ebay) on the 1972 WC match for less than $10 [incl shipping]
Premium Chessgames Member
  Sally Simpson: Hi.

I mentioned Sammy's book on the '72 match because the lads were thinking Sammy's postional primer without a Fischer game was a bit odd.

I'm not sure at all it was pettiness.
Pettiness would have been including some of Fischer's losses and only his losses.

When selecting games of this nature the author will be looking for games he knows he can use and note up well.

He may have felt that Bobby's games were too well known so decided to give the readers something fresh or came in from the angle you do not have to be a World Champion genious to play positional chess.

One could go through any book and look at games used and left out and start to make a case.

Chernev has ('only') two Fischer games in his 'Most Instructive Games'. (published 1966) One Fischer win, one Fischer loss. Only one Alekhine game and yet six Capablanca wins.
He also includes 3 Marshall games...all losses.

May-23-15  Johnnysaysthankyou: Believe it or not, 28. Nd2 actually LOSES to the astonishingly brilliant 28...Bxb2+!! Which leads to checkmate. (When I get home I'll post the line). This - ironically - means Fischer's instinct to take the bishop was correct.
May-23-15  Howard: Hold it !!!! I can't believe that that "checkmating" line has been overlooked all these years/decades.

Let me take a look at that, though someone else will no doubt beat me to it.

Sorry, but that's gotta be a mistake !

Premium Chessgames Member
  OhioChessFan: A checkmate after 28. Nd2 Bxb2+? Maybe for White.
May-23-15  Howard: Actually, you're probably right !
May-24-15  Johnnysaysthankyou: No, it doesn't work, but there is still one more try after 28. Nd2 and you are going to scoff at first but give me a chance.

Are you ready?


At first you might be confused and wonder why white has given up his queen for a rook, but this is honestly the only way to keep fighting, and its not so clear. After 29...Qxd1+ black should activate the knight with 29..Nf5 and try to bear down on white's position with the two bishops and rooks.

Premium Chessgames Member
  keypusher: <johnnysaysthankyou>

The queen is lost after 28.Nd2, so 28....Qxh1+ is as good as there is. But assuming after 29.Qxh1 you are recommending 29....Nc5, 30.Rxg7 wins immediately (30....Kxg7 31. Qg2+ Kf8 32.Bd6+ Re7 33.Bxc5) .

Premium Chessgames Member
  stoy: In the USA psychiatrists are first MDs before they study psychiatry. Psychologists are not MDs.
Apr-27-19  N.O.F. NAJDORF: After 28 Nd2,

28 ... Qxd1+

is not even a legal move.

Fischer did accept ARB Thomas' point that 28 Nd2 would have left black with a lost position.

Premium Chessgames Member
  diceman: <Sally Simpson: Reshevsky on Fischer.

Sammy's book on the 1972 Fischer - Spassky match is a tad cold towards Fischer.>

Sounds like Sammy had some sour grapes.

Premium Chessgames Member
  Jonathan Sarfati: Thomas' suggestion of 28. ♘d2 probably would have induced resignation. But the Stockfish 8 calculates that Fischer's move 28. ♖xg7+ was as strong if it had been followed more strongly: 28. ♖xg7 ♔xg7 29.♖g1+! ♔f8 30.♕h4! Δ a deadly discovered attack with the ♗f4.
Mar-31-20  ewan14: Korchnoi and Petrosian did not get on post 1974
Jump to page #    (enter # from 1 to 5)
search thread:   
< Earlier Kibitzing  · PAGE 5 OF 5 ·  Later Kibitzing>
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any gratuitous name-calling of any members—including Admin and Owners—or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

<This page contains Editor Notes. Click here to read them.>

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
December 2: Right, Mr. Thomas!
from Game of the Day 2011 by Phony Benoni
Game 22
from Bobby Fischer Rediscovered (Andy Soltis) by nakul1964
2nd Match Game
from Fischer 101 by rea
Time will tell
from My 60 Memorable Games/Fischer by Patca63
from The Complete Dragon (Gufeld & Stetsko) by AdolfoAugusto
Game 41
from Veliki majstori saha 29 FISCHER (I) -Marovic by Chessdreamer
maxash's favorite games
by maxash
Advanced tactics
by obrit
Robert Fischer's Best Games
by Jaredfchess
Game 26
from My Sixty Memorable Games (Fischer) by Qindarka
Game 26: Time will tell
from Bobby Fischer: My 60 Memorable Games by araodin
My Great Predecessors by Garry Kasparov
by LionHeart40
Advanced tactics
by Jaredfchess
newbie inspiration's favorite games
by newbie inspiration
Sicilian Defense: Old Sicilian. Open
from MKD's Sicilian Defense White Compiled by MKD by fredthebear
26. Time will tell
from Bobby Fischer's "60 Memorable Games" by Ewen
Art of War's favorite games 4
by Art of War
7.Be2 O-O 8.f4 d6 9.Nb3 Be6 10.g4 d5 11.f5 Bc8 12.exd5 Nb4
from zz98_B35-B39(+B27/B32)_(Hyper-)Accelerated Drago by whiteshark
New York Match 1961 Rd.2
from Fischer vs Reshevsky Match by wanabe2000
Game 26: Time will tell
from Bobby Fischer: My 60 Memorable Games by howardb86
plus 83 more collections (not shown)

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2020, Chessgames Services LLC