Members · Prefs · Laboratory · Collections · Openings · Endgames · Sacrifices · History · Search Kibitzing · Kibitzer's Café · Chessforums · Tournament Index · Players · Kibitzing

Peter Svidler vs Viswanathan Anand
Dos Hermanas (1999), Dos Hermanas ESP, rd 5, Apr-11
Spanish Game: Open Variations. Karpov Gambit (C80)  ·  1/2-1/2



explore this opening
find similar games 63 more Svidler/Anand games
PGN: download | view | print Help: general | java-troubleshooting

TIP: To flip the board (so black is on the bottom) press the "I" key on your keyboard.

PGN Viewer:  What is this?
For help with this chess viewer, please see the Olga Chess Viewer Quickstart Guide.


Kibitzer's Corner
Nov-06-03  Open Defence: This variation seriously challenges Sokolov's 11..Bd5?! but so far I don't see anything to say that Black cannot hold the game as the center is way open...did you guys see any analysis showing a win for Svidler?
Jan-15-04  aulero: Svidler agreed a draw in a winning position!!

After 70.♔xd4!! ♘b5+ 71.♔c5 ♘xa7 72.♔b6 ♘c8+ 73.♔c7 Black is lost!

73... ♘e7 74.h7 ♔g7 75.f6+

73... ♘a7 74.♔d7 followed by h7 and f6

See also Kramnik vs Svidler, 2004 for another Svidler's very bizarre decision!

Jan-27-04  Dick Brain: <aulero> Hey! give credit. That's all from Fundamental Chess Endings exercise E3.11. They way you say it might lead someone to think it was your own work ;).
Jan-27-04  aulero: <Dick Brain>, I surely did not discover this Svidler's error. I did not know this game, I was only curious because in a chessbase's page about the Kramnik vs Svidler game and the Svidler's bizarre resignation there was a reference to another Svidler's sensational decision: the offer of a draw in a winning position. I retrieved the game, then I analyzed the final position and I worked out the variants: they are not difficult especially knowing that they exist!

I cannot give the credit to a book that I don't know, but citing this book you raised an interesting question: was this ending already known? Was the book published before the present game?

If not, then we must give the credit to the first person that showed the winning move, perhaps Anand just after the game!

Jun-06-04  AdrianP: Svidler is incredibly strong with the White pieces in the Ruy Lopez. I have 84 such games in my database, with Svidler scoring +44 =33 -7. Svidler's novelty 14 Qg4+! should have won.
Oct-28-05  iron maiden: <suenteus po 147> Never resign!
Oct-29-05  suenteus po 147: <iron maiden> Thanks for spotting this! It's amazing how Anand through complete dedication to playing out the endgame is able to win the draw. Psychologically, he probably had some help from having the intense complexity in the middlegame. By the end, Svidler was probably happy to wash his hands of the game without a loss :)
Feb-03-07  positionalgenius: Everyone should look at this one-brilliance from svidler.
Dec-30-08  soberknight: Yes, I remember seeing some years ago that Svidler drew a won endgame. This is the first time I'm seeing the whole game.
Premium Chessgames Member
  Peligroso Patzer: <aulero: Svidler agreed a draw in a winning position!! *** > Here is the complete analysis of this ending from "Fundamental Chess Endings" by Muller and Lamprecht (Gambit (c)2001), E3.10 at pages 75 and 369 (with move numbers conformed to the actual game):

Svidler,P. - Anand,V.
Dos Hermanas, 1999

70.Kxd4 Nb5+ 71.Kc5! Nxa7 72.Kb6! (Nunn Convention is used throughout these notes.) Nc8+ 73.Kc7! 73...Na7 [73...Ne7 74.h7! Kg7 (74...Nd5+ 75.Kd6 Kg7 76.Kxd5 ) 75.f6+! ] 74.Kd7!! [74.h7? Kg7!=] 74...Nb5 [74...Kf6 75.h7! Kg7 76.f6+! Kxh7 77.f7! Kg7 78.Ke8! ] 75.h7! Kg7 76.f6+! Kxh7 77.f7! Kg7 78.Ke7!

Considering the number of far-from-obvious "only" moves in this analysis, even if Svidler had been motivated to play for the win, my guess is the most likely outcome still would have been a split point (i.e., Svidler would have missed 71. Kc5! or 72.Kb6! or 73.Kc7! or 74.Kd7! and the great defender Anand would not have allowed him another chance to win).

Oct-20-10  sevenseaman: The decisions OTB are ruled by what one can see there.
May-23-12  sheltone: GM Campora was the one who spotted the win before Svidler resigned.
Jun-14-12  dumbgai: <Yes, I remember seeing some years ago that Svidler drew a won endgame.>

This is not the only time Svidler has drawn a won endgame. Here's another:

Gelfand vs Svidler, 2001

Premium Chessgames Member
  plang: 11..Bd5 was an idea first played by I.Sokolov against Anand at Lyon 1994 (Black won). The piece sacrifice 12 Nxf7 was first played in Dominguez - Rios Cuba 1996. Svidler's 14 Qg4 was an improvement over Dominguez's 14 Ne4. The alternative defense 18..h6 could have been answered by 19 Nh4..Rg8 20 Ng6+..Kd6 21 cxd..Ncxd4 22 Be3 with a powerful attack. Flear felt that Black could have improved with 20..Qd5 (intending ..Kd7) 21 Nxe6..Nxe6 22 Rxe6..Qxe6 23 Re1..Qxe1 24 Rxe1..dxc 25 Bxc3..Kd8 and Black is out of danger. Anand, down three pawns, put up a dogged defense. He won material with 43..Rxc3 but an alternative suggested by his second Ubilava may have been even stronger: 43..Rxc2 44 Kd1..Rxf2 (threatening ..Kd3). As Seirawan pointed out 68..Kg7! would have maintained the fortress and drawn; Marin gave the drawing line as 68..Kg7! 69 Kd3..Kg8! 70 h6..Kh7 71 Kxd4..Nb5+ 72 Kd5..Nxa7 73 f6..Kxh6 74 Kd6..Kg6 (followed by ..Nc6). Instead, after 68..Kf6? Anand was theoretically lost. This fortunate escape was the highlight of a poor tournament who finished tied for last (with Svidler and J Polgar) with a winless -2 (Adams won the tournament).
Premium Chessgames Member
  sfm: Instead of accepting the draw White had of course no risk in trying 70.KxP. But he he didn't even imagine that there could be a win after 71.-,Nxa7.
Jun-16-16  Keshav Murali: Not sure if Ruy Lopez or Fried Liver Attack, :D
Jun-08-19  Christoforus Polacco: Swidler couldn't lose that endgame. So...For him it was any risk to play a some longer :)) Draw was the obvious plan minimum without any danger .... Shade.
Jun-08-19  SChesshevsky: Clocks are involved, so there is a way Svidler could lose the endgame. Walking into the fork and then chasing the N by diverting the K away from the pawns probably isn't going to be near the first lines calculated. Without knowing the clock situation, it's hard to tell whether Svidler blew it or just made a practical decision.
Jun-14-19  Christoforus Polacco: At 1999 year there were used electronic clocks or not ? With 30 seconds extra per one móve ? :) Probably not.....:))
NOTE: You need to pick a username and password to post a reply. Getting your account takes less than a minute, is totally anonymous, and 100% free—plus, it entitles you to features otherwise unavailable. Pick your username now and join the chessgames community!
If you already have an account, you should login now.
Please observe our posting guidelines:
  1. No obscene, racist, sexist, profane, raunchy, or disgusting language.
  2. No spamming, advertising, duplicate or nonsense posts.
  3. No malicious personal attacks, including cyber stalking, systematic antagonism, or gratuitous name-calling of any member Iincludinfgall Admin and Owners or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. If you think someone is an idiot, then provide evidence that their reasoning is invalid and/or idiotic, instead of just calling them an idiot. It's a subtle but important distinction, even in political discussions.
  4. Nothing in violation of United States law.
  5. No malicious posting of or linking to personal, private, and/or negative information (aka "doxing" or "doxxing") about any member, (including all Admin and Owners) or any of their family, friends, associates, or business interests. This includes all media: text, images, video, audio, or otherwise. Such actions will result in severe sanctions for any violators.
  6. NO TROLLING. Admin and Owners know it when they see it, and sanctions for any trolls will be significant.
  7. Any off-topic posts which distract from the primary topic of discussion are subject to removal.
  8. The use of "sock puppet" accounts to circumvent disciplinary action taken by Moderators is expressly prohibited.
  9. The use of "sock puppet" accounts in an attempt to undermine any side of a debate—or to create a false impression of consensus or support—is prohibited.
  10. All decisions with respect to deleting posts, and any subsequent discipline, are final, and occur at the sole discretion of the Moderators, Admin, and Owners.
  11. Please try to maintain a semblance of civility at all times.
Blow the Whistle See something that violates our rules? Blow the whistle and inform a Moderator.

NOTE: Keep all discussion on the topic of this page. This forum is for this specific game and nothing else. If you want to discuss chess in general, or this site, visit the Kibitzer's Café.

Messages posted by Chessgames members do not necessarily represent the views of, its employees, or sponsors. All Moderator actions taken are at the sole discretion of the Admin and Owners—who will strive to act fairly and consistently at all times.

This game is type: CLASSICAL. Please report incorrect or missing information by submitting a correction slip to help us improve the quality of our content.

Featured in the Following Game Collections[what is this?]
Spanish, Open. Karpov Gambit (C80) 1/2-1/2 Spanish Fried Liver
from 1999 Party Like Its 1999 by fredthebear
by Gottschalk
Chapter 2: Winning, Drawing and Losing (Game 28)
from John Emms: Survival Guide to Competitive Chess by cu8sfan
Agreeing to a draw in a won position!
from Masters blunder too! by parmetd
by Bobak Zahmat
Karpov Gambit
by Cannon Fodder
Game 28 in The Survival Guide to Competitive Chess by John Emms
from Spaniards Sailin' Abroad by fredthebear
Svidler's novelty
from The Open Defence by Open Defence
Chapter 2: Winning, Drawing and Losing (Game 28)
from John Emms: Survival Guide to Competitive Chess by nakul1964
Game 28
from Survival Guide to Competitive Chess (Emms) by Qindarka
VaselineTopLove's favorite games - part 2
by VaselineTopLove
0ZeR0's Favorite Games Volume 5
by 0ZeR0
Svidler - Anand 1/2
from Ruy Lopez, Open v. 11.Ng5 by webbing1947
70.? [Answer in Kibitzing]
from John Emms' Ultimate Chess Puzzle Book Set 4 by The Last Straw
Move 69(W). Svidler accepts the draw in a won position.
from Tragicomedies (Dvoretsky) by Nasruddin Hodja
Move 69(W). Svidler accepts the draw in a won position.
from Tragicomedies (Dvoretsky) by mneuwirth
Chapter 2: Winning, Drawing and Losing (Game 28)
from John Emms: Survival Guide to Competitive Chess by nakul1964
Move 69(W). Svidler accepts the draw in a won position.
from Tragicomedies (Dvoretsky) by Chess4Him

home | about | login | logout | F.A.Q. | your profile | preferences | Premium Membership | Kibitzer's Café | Biographer's Bistro | new kibitzing | chessforums | Tournament Index | Player Directory | Notable Games | World Chess Championships | Opening Explorer | Guess the Move | Game Collections | ChessBookie Game | Chessgames Challenge | Store | privacy notice | contact us

Copyright 2001-2019, Chessgames Services LLC